Archived threads in /x/ - Paranormal - 451. page

>>19358866
Don't know the name.
The official story is that it was a test of a degaussing system that was later blown out of proportion by one guy claiming to have watched it.
The other theory is that the ship being tested was nearly identical to the Philadelphia simply re-labelled, so if passers-by saw something weird, they'd say "I saw the Philadelphia doing X", when the actual Philadelphia was nowhere nearby.

Beyond that, despite the resources widely-available to the public, no one has legitimately demonstrated any of the effects described, and anyone claiming to do so has been blackballed as a scam artist.

Give it time, and they'll say some bs like it's photoshopped. But then they'll link to some shitty youtube vid as their proof.

>>19358803
You can't refute a belief that rejects physics using a simple image. Physics is what gives the image meaning, makes us able to interpret it. Don't think this shit is easily proven just because society has built up the knowledge over centuries. All you'll do is add fuel to the shitfire and make everyone try to debunk something that don't understand.

>>19358765
you were born

>>19358765
>>19359778
include me in the screencap

>>19358765
There is a race of super-intelligent Jellyfish at the bottom of Mariana's Trench who are secretly manipulating world events through their psychic powers

Duh.

>>19358562
Your narrative isn't one size fits all. I'm on here to learn more about chakras, consciousness, maybe ayylmaos, and higher vibrations. The realest spoopy thing on here is information about the "jews" controlling literally the majority of the world.

>>19358494

>> Do you have a proper hook?
>> Are you wearing long sleeves?

If the answer to either or both is no, what sort of pleb spoopy campfire teller are you anon without having even the most basic tools needed for the job?

Look up old green texts from early /x/. There's nothing really spooky here anymore.

>>19358494
Tell them all about that time I fucked your mom

Have you ever noticed every fantastic daily thread on /x/, nobody ever replies?

nigger

för i helvete!

>>19357836
Naming something gives it power. It makes it more discrete in the mind, easier to talk about. The fact that things end up with names doesn't say anything about those things.

>>19357836
I think people in general just love buzzwords. There is real power in language. It goes beyond the explicit meaning or words. The implicit meaning of the words have a very real subconscious effect on the reciever. If you use the word "incestuous" to discribe relationship between business and government, the reciever gets a far nastier impression than saying "a revolving door."

A good buzzword will make people remember, and lend the idea credibility, and a bad one will discredit the contents.

Just take "pizzagate" for example. Its a horible buzzword that almost seems designed to make people roll their eyes. "human-trafficking" on the other hand actually discribes the topic.

Another example: "illuminati" gets the eye-roll (thanks to decades of fictional media), whereas "deep-state" discribes the topic and has a certain ring to it.

>>19357782
bump

>>19357782
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00788R001700210016-5.pdf

A document from the CIA detailing such things.

You can thank me later.

Read Astral Dynamics. Personally I've only reached the vibrational stage though.

>>19357748
>Is it dangerous to look?
It's dangerous to look for a lot of things, OP.

File: 1483999239962.png (24KB, 500x400px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 500x400px

>>19357444
Only because of those trips, yes.

Help Please,

Can anyone recommend a "neuro-psychopharmacist- MD.- in the greater
Portland, Or. area?
I would appreciate "new in-put", and am willing to satisfy his/her
financial requirements.
Please respond directly.

Thank-you,


David

>>19357444
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cr7DHm94Gp4