>>55563 If you use the pictures shown (I can't tell if they are really similar) then AC:EG = 11/35 (answer C).
If you use the order of the vertices for the correspondence and disregard the pics except for the measurements then the sides AB, BC, AC correspond to the sides EF, FG, EG, so the ratio AC:EG correspond to the scaling factor, which can only be determined by EF and the corresponding side AB. Therefore AC:EG = AB:EF = 5/35 = 1/7 (answer A).
>>55603 Yeah, I'm pretty sure it has to do with the order of the vertices. Although the diagram is really shitty and misleading, the definition of similarity is that corresponding sides are in proportion and corresponding angles are congruent.
Although the diagram seems to imply BC corresponds to EF, since similarity is defined in the above way, we have to conclude BC actually corresponds to FG (based on the order).
In this case, since we know AC:EG = AB:EF (by the aforementioned definition of similarity), we find that AB:EF = 5:35 = AC:EG = 1:7.
Thread replies: 4 Thread images: 1
Thread DB ID: 508331
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at email@example.com with the post's information.