[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Home]
4Archive logo
Survey time
If images are not shown try to refresh the page. If you like this website, please disable any AdBlock software!

You are currently reading a thread in /vp/ - Pokemon

Thread replies: 170
Thread images: 14
1. In which year were you born?

2. What was the first main-series pokemon game you played?

3. Rank the generations from best to worst.

Thank you for your participation, your invaluable contributions will be utilized to further scientific progress!
>>
1. 1991
2. Red
3. II>V>I>III>VI>IV
>>
>>25101307
1. 1994
2. Pokemon Red. Yes, I was playing Pokemon at this early in my life.
3. 2>5>4>1>3>>>>>>>>6

Keep in mind I hate 4 but it redeemed itself because of HG/SS.

I'm a Johtoddler through and through.
>>
>>25101307
1992
Red
V>IV>III>VI>II>I
>>
>>25101307
1.1990
2.Red
3.V>IV>III>VI>II>I
>>
>1995
>Blue
>3>5>1=2>6>4 (ranked by pkmn design)
>>
1993
Yellow
IV > V > II > VI > III > I
>>
>>25101307
1. 1991
2. Red
3. GSC > XY > BW > RSE > RBY
I haven't played DPP.
>>
>>25101353
Diamond and Pearl are trash, Platinum is fantastic.
>>
>>25101307
1. 1992
2. Blue Version
3. Unova > Sinnoh > Johto > Kanto = Kalos > Hoenn
>>
>>25101307
1. 1995
2. Red or Blue I had both but can't remember
3. 2>4>1>3>5>6
>>
File: lugia.gif (207 KB, 500x234) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
lugia.gif
207 KB, 500x234
>95
>Silver
>II>III>I>IV>V>VI
>>
1992

Blue

V > III > IV > II > I > VI

>All these Redfags
>>
>>25101307
1. 1996
2. Yellow
3. 5>3>6>4>2>1
>>
>>25101307
>1993
>Sapphire
>IV > VI > II > III > V > I
>>
>>25101375
It's my favorite color, sue me
>>
'93

Blue

V > III >= VI > IV > II > I
>>
1. 1996
2. Blue
3. 5 > 4 > 6 = 3 > 2 > 1
>>
>94
>Blue
>III - IV - I - II - VI - V
>>
1. 1992
2. Silver
3. 5 > 2 > 3 > 1 > 4 > 6
>>
File: 1444539846809.jpg (31 KB, 555x644) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1444539846809.jpg
31 KB, 555x644
1991
Blue
5 = 3 > 1 >>>>>>>>>>>> 2 > 6 > 4
>>
File: 1.png (642 KB, 1280x622) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1.png
642 KB, 1280x622
>>25101307
1994
Blue
4>5>3>2>1>6
>>
>>25101307
1. 1996
2. I think that was Emerald
3. V>IV>I>III>VI>II
>>
>1995
>Blue
5>2>6>1>3>>>>>>>>>>>4
>>
>>25101307
1. 1992
2. Sapphire
3. 3>4>5>6>2>1
>>
1. In which year were you born?
October 1990
2. What was the first main-series pokemon game you played?
Pokemon Gold
3. Rank the generations from best to worst.
I'll rank the games that I played instead
HeartGold=Gold=Crystal>FireRed=LeafGreen>Emerald>Sapphire>>>Diamond, didn't touch anything after HG
>>
95
Red
VI>V>Iv>III>II>I
>>
1. 1995
2. Red
3. 4>3>6>5>2>1
>>
>>25101307
1. 1995
2. Pokemon Blue
3. 3>2>4>1>6>>>>>>>5
>>
File: 6576475.png (118 KB, 480x640) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
6576475.png
118 KB, 480x640
1. 1990
2. blue version
3. 1, 2 ,3, 6, 5, 4
>>
1993
Red
V > IV = III > I = VI = II
>>
>>25101307
1996
Yellow
I/II > VI > III > IV >>>>>>>>>>>> V
>>
1993
Red
2>5>1>6>3>4

Not including remakes for gen 3+.
>>
>>25101307
1. 1996
2. Red
3. 3>5=4>6=2=1
>>
1994
Blue
4>5>6>2>1>3
>>
>>25101307
>1991
>RBY
>5>4>2=3>1>6

(i started the last two threads of the same content and gen 5 almost always wins best gen. Sorry, unova haters)
>>
1. 1993
2. Blue
3. 4 > 2 > 3 > 6 > 1 >>>>>>>>>> 5
>>
File: 1449107097973.png (782 KB, 799x931) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1449107097973.png
782 KB, 799x931
>>25101307
>1992
>Blue
>4>2>3>6>1>5
>>
>>25102192
>>25102214
Well fuck. Great taste, brother.
>>
1994
Emerald
5>4>3>6>1>2
>>
>>25101307
1996
HeartGold
V>IV>III=VI>II>I
Not shitting on Gen I, but I just could never get into it with all the glitches and retarded movesets. I mean, seriously, a fast Pokemon with Bind can make them unable to do anything ever? Gyarados can't use one of its STABs? Alakazam can instantly rape anything? There's just too many things wrong with it.
>>
1. 1996

2. Yellow (Technically I had borrowed a friend's Crystal cart when I was super young. Why is my alligator a caveman now?)

3. Gen4>Gen5>Gen3>Gen6>Gen2>Gen1
While I enjoy the regional Dex and quality of life upgrades Gen 6 had, something just feels off about it for some reason.

I haven't played the GB games in ages, and I don't really see why I should again, unless it's for nostalgia.
>>
>In which year were you born?
1990

>What was the first main-series pokemon game you played?
Red

>Rank the generations from best to worst.
5 > 4 > 3 > 6 > 1 > 2
>>
>>25101307
1. 1989, what a year

2. Yellow version

3. 4>3>1>5>2>6
>>
>>25101307
>1. In which year were you born?
1993
>2. What was the first main-series pokemon game you played?
Red, and I had no idea what the fuck I was doing.
>3. Rank the generations from best to worst.
2=6>3>1
Only recently bought a DS, so I haven't gotten a chance to play Gens 4&5.
>>
1990
2-1-3-4-5-6
>>
File: 1453477497307.jpg (3 KB, 126x126) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1453477497307.jpg
3 KB, 126x126
>>25101307
1.1992

2. Red

3. 2>3>1>6>5>4
>>
>1995

>Yellow

>3 > 2 > 4 > 6 > 5 > 1
>>
1997
Ruby
3<4<1<6<5<2

Fuck johto man.
>>
>all these 90s kids

I feel old as fuck now...
>>
89
Yellow
3>2/4/5/6>1

I find it hard to rank the games, in all honesty, because they are all decent, but 1 was a glitchy mess (not that I didn't enjoy most of them) and Fire Red and Leaf Green were... Uninspired, not doing much to improve my opinion of it. 3 has been my favourite since it first came out, and I love ORAS - I still can't express enough how much R/S/E engaged me with all the awesome locations, and the neat legendary hunt.
>>
1993
Red
IV > III > V > II > I > VI
>>
>>25101307
1993
Gold
5 > 2 > 6 = 1 > 3 > 4
I think gen 5 is very nicely polished and I liked having an all new dex. Some of the designs are a little weak but I think people forget how great some of the designs are too (Chandelure, Darmanitan, Scolipede...). I also liked the story well enough and the rivals/friends were likable.

Gen 2 is kind of purely for nostalgia, but you can't deny how awesome it was as a kid to step into Kanto and eventually fight Red. (Gold was my first game but I started playing Blue before I got to Kanto in Gold and I was so hype when I realized I could travel there.)

Gen 6 has great graphics and the first half of the game is great but then it just...tapers off and the pacing starts getting weird. Also after gen 5, the story and rivals/friends were a real let down. Gen 1 was great since it's the start, but it's got some wonky mechanics that have since been fixed well.

Gen 3 was kind of underwhelming and yeah, too much water. Gen 4 was slow, awkward, and had awkward pokemon designs, and made me worry I was outgrowing pokemon (until gen 5 reignited my passion). Best spin off games were gen 4 though.
>>
File: 1453682917132.jpg (248 KB, 1048x689) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1453682917132.jpg
248 KB, 1048x689
>>25101307
>1997
>Leaf Green
>5 > 2 > 3 > 4 > 1 > 6
>>
1989
Red/Blue
6> 3> 1>2> 5> 4

Im interested to hear stories/opinions from anons older then me. Im pretty chill and dont completely hate any gen. I think the move to 3d, full party xp option, character customization and petting minigame were huge improvements to the series
>>
>>25101307
1992
Blue
IV>III>V>6>1>2
>>
>1988
>Red

Am I actually too old to be playing Pokémon? Feels bad.

Also I'm a bit skeptical of all these two year olds who played RBY first.

Sure you did.
>>
>1997
>Fire Red
> 2 - 5 - 4 - 1 - 3
>>
>>25101307
1994
Red
V > III > VI > IV > II > I
>>
>>25102789
Honestly, I saw some guy that had to be in his 60s playing gbc with silver and I thought it was pretty cool. More interesting then everyone else just pretending to be busy with thier cellphones.
>>
>>25101323
>I played Red when I was four!
>>25101341
>I played Blue when I was three!
>>25101365
>I played Red and Blue when I was three!
>B-but I can't remember!
>>25101397
>I played Blue when I was two!
>>25101644
>I played Blue when I was four!
>>25101705
>I played Blue when I was three!
>>25101784
>>25101822
>We played Red when we were three!
>>25101852
>And I played Blue at three!
>>25102131
>Well I was only two, gramps!
>>25102158
>Four!
>>25102311
>I was five... but I had no idea what I was doing lel. Please believe me!
>>25102617
>Five here

Damn. People are thirsty for that Gen I street cred.
>>
1990
Red/Blue
3, 2, 1, 6, 4, 5
>>
>>25102830
You know you can play a game after the release year, right?
>>
>>25102830
>>25101644 here, nobody said I played Blue when it came out, I'm pretty sure my copy of Blue was a hand-me-down when my rich cousins got Gen 2, like how I got a lot of games as a kid (when my cousins got rid of their N64 I got like thirty games and most of the worthwhile ones among them).
>>
>>25102836
Yeah. But by 1999 Yellow was available. And by 2000 they'd be playing GS.

Just calling bullshit that we had all of these three-year-old hipsters playing the previous gen Pokémon games first.
>>
>>25102830
Oh yeah man, gotta get that respect on an anonymous image board where my post won't matter after this thread is pruned. Better delete my post now that you've found me out.
>>
>>25101307
1995
Ruby
456312
>>
>>25102854
To be fair, my sister was 4 years younger than me and still played Red around the time Yellow released. Just because someone is a little younger doesn't mean they can't play, and not everyone got these games on release day.
>>
>>25101307
1. 1991
2. Crystal since I didn't have any handhelds until I was 10
3. Johto>Sinnoh>Kalos>Unova>Kanto>Hoenn
I still hold the disappointment of R/S as a kid.
>No day/night system
>Nothing to do after the Pokemon League
>Had few new mons that I liked
The remakes are the only games so far that I haven't bought, and now I'm mad they took away having a customizable avatar.
>>
'89
Red
VI>V>IV>III>II>I
>>
1993
Blue
2>1>5>3>4>6
>>
>>25101307
1990
Red
IV>V>II>III>VI>I
>>
>>25101375
It is what she bought me
>>
>>25102854
>yellow

Their parents might have bought them Red even though Yellow was released.

>G/S

They might have had a GBC. Sure, G/S can be played on a GB/GBP but the box says Gameboy Colour and a smart parent wouldn't buy an incompatible game.

This is ignoring the possibility that the first game they played was a hand-me-down from an older sibling, like me.

>>25101375
>not being first half master race

Red, Gold, Ruby, Diamond, Black, X.
>>
>>25102854
>playing later games before you play the previous games
I am the one calling bullshit
>>
1. 1997
2. Yellow version
3. Everything> gen 3
>>
>>25102895
>no one lies on the Internet
Sure, bro.

I guess every 4chan user really is 6'6" with a 9" penis and IQ >150.
>>
>>25101307
1. 1996
2. Silver
3. Gen IV, Gen II, Gen I, Gen III, Gen V and I don't know how I feel about VI
>>
1. 1994

2. Blue

3. 4 > 3 > 5 > 6 > 1 > 2

I don't dislike any of the gens, I just like some more than others.
>>
1994

Red/Blue can't remember, me and my brother probably shared between them

4>3/5>2>6>1

Didn't start to truly get into pokemon till Gen 3 since I was a no nothing Kid.
>>
>>25103156
>I guess every 4chan user really is 6'6" with a 9" penis and IQ >150.
Actually I've seen many posts that did not assert any of those. And many that also directly contradict that as well.

But if you're just going to assume that everyone lies on the Internet, because no one could ever possibly tell the truth, why are you even here? Why would any of this matter to you? Why waste your time pointing out that people are lying, if you already know that everyone is lying?

Since I can't possibly tell the truth on the Internet, why don't you post when you started playing. Then I can lie and tell you that I was a year older. Then not only can you rest assured that you have the most "cred" as the youngest person to ever play a Pokémon game, but also know, with 100% certainty, that I would be lying about it.
>>
>>25102830
I bought lots of GB games from used game stores as a kid in the 2000s, they were pretty cheap. Too bad Gamestop bought all of the good stores.
>>
>>25101307
1. 1997
2. Diamond
3. IV>V>III>VI>II>I
>>
>>25101371
>lugia surfs on its own feces.gif
>>
1991
Red
3>5>6>2>1>4
excluding gen remakes of course
>>
>>25102830
I actually did play blue when I was 3 though because I'm not a fucking retard and actually understood how video games worked.
>>
>>25102276
>1989
I thought I was the oldest person in /vp/ for a second. I'm not coming here anymore. I'm literally too old to be here.
>>
>>25103966

I hear you. '89 fag here, sometimes I wonder what I'm doing with my life and why I haven't applied to grad school yet.
>>
1991
Red
5, 3, 2, 1, 6, 4
>>
1982

Red

1-5-2-6-4-3
>>
>>25101307
1993
Red, possibly Blue when I played a cousin's Game Boy
4 > 5 > 2 > 1 > 6 > 3

>>25102830
Good thing I was a literate child.
>>
>>25104849

>2000

MODS!
>>
1997
Sapphire
1>3>2>5>6>4
>>
>>25101307
1. 1987
2. Pokémon Blue Version
3. Tricky question. Pokémon wise: 1>5>3=4=6>2 Gameplay wise: 6>5>3>2>1>4
>>
>>25104949
awful, try again
>>
>>25104951
Ok, let's settle this:
3. 1>6>2>3=4>5
Mostly because of muh nostalgia and how great was Pokémon back then.
>>
>>25104958
even worse, try again.
>>
>>25104962
Sorry, that's just, my opinion, man.
Though, not considering remakes, it'll be like this: 1>6>5>3>2>4
>>
1. 1993
2. Crystal
3. 2 >5>4>1>6>3
>>
>>25104971
put 3 between 4 and 1 and you're golden
>>
>>25101307
>1. In which year were you born?
1990

>2. What was the first main-series pokemon game you played?
Blue

>3. Rank the generations from best to worst.
Gen2>Gen6>FR/LF>Gen1>Gen4
I haven't played gen 5 and only FR/LF in gen 3 but if RS is similar to ORAS is the last one.
>>
1997
Pokemon Crystal
5>2>6>3=4>1

5th gen games are massively better than most other pokemon game
>>
>>25101307
1994
red
>4>2>5>6>1>>>>>>>3
>>
>>25104975
True enough, actually.
>>
File: MarioRPG.gif (773 KB, 403x227) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
MarioRPG.gif
773 KB, 403x227
>>25101307
1989
Pokémon Red Version
4=5>6>3=2>1

I feel my opinions on which generation is better will get me murdered here, but if it doesn't have Physical/Special split, it's shit.
>>
out of a supposed 82 posters, we have this many /tr/ainers born before the 90's

>>25102276
>>25102599
>>25102771
>>25102933
>>25103966
>>25104007

and these super oldfags here, in comparison to the general age range, these freaks are anomalies

>>25102789
>>25104949
>>25104821

wtf /vp/, it's not even summer


1989
blue
4>5>2>1>3>6
>>
>>25105337
shit i meant 5>4
>>
>>25101307
>1997
>__Blue_
>4 > 5 = 2 > 3 > 6 > 1
>>
1. 1994
2. Blue
3. 6 > 3 > 1 > 2
4 and 5 are excluded as i havent played them yet.
>>
>>25101307
1. 1988
2. Blue
3. 4>6>1>5>3>2
>>
>>25105449
MODS
>>
>this thread
>all these 88-93 babies who played gen 1 first and rank it and gen 2 dead last.
>either babies/fetuses false flagging or proper genwunners letting their opinions be cucked by highschoolers
>>
1. 1989
2. Pokémon Red and Yellow, almost at the same time. Yet, only on a DOS Emulator that I carried almost everywhere on a Disquette. I played both in School and the Library. We weren't able to afford things like a GB back then.
3. I don't think that there are worst gen per se. Of course all of them have flaws, some more noticeable than others, but all of them have their pros too. This said, I don't know why I like Pokémon that much, I think that the games are pretty mediocre, and wasted potential overall. Maybe it's the concept in itself. This said, the Gen I like the most to the less.
II>III>V>VI>IV>I
>>
1991
Silver
5 > 2 = 3 > 6 = 4 > 1

I love playing RBY but I could never get over the back sprites; I was spoiled by GSC
>>
>>25101307
1993
Yellow
2>3>4>1>6>>>5
>>
1994
Gold
2>3>1>4>6>5
>>
File: 1397044994457.jpg (88 KB, 500x500) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1397044994457.jpg
88 KB, 500x500
The number of amerishits who put Gen V number 1 out of blind patriotism itt
>>
1998 my birthday was 2 weeks ago
red
2=4>3>1>6>5
>>
>>25105557
You just don't get the story, is it too much READING for your simple CASUAL mind
BW's story is such a failure for such a good concept.
>>
I am sure at least half of this board are underage, but they won't post here cause they'll be banned of course.
>>
>>25105337
>calls me a super oldfag
>he's only 2 years younger than me
>>
>>25101307
1. 1996
2. Crystal
3. 3 > 4 > 5 = 2 > 1 = 6
>>
>>25105464
i know this is b8, but fuck you — my opinions are my own, and I include remakes and third versions in making my judgement.

Yellow? fucking trash. Crystal? Absolutely incredible, at the time it was as if this was as good as it could get. Gen 3 was subpar, the remakes were incredible, but looking back Emerald couldn't surpass Crystal, it wasn't an improvement — overall this whole gen was a rehash. Gen 4 had incredible remakes, HGSS are some of my favourite titles, and a 10/10 third version when we go back in time with Celebi and see Giovanni in the mountains, Giratina and the distortion world —this gen raised the bar. Gen 5 was incredibly fresh, it felt great to explore a new region with ONLY new pokemon, even if they were all silly nods and winks to existing mons. On top of this, the games actually got sequels — this made a big difference, for the first time it was as if they'd actually released two sets of finished games instead two rushed clones, and a third improvement. The issue with gen 5 was the hints of what was to come in gen 6. Gen 6, there is no defending you — the hand holding — the dialogue — the awful remakes — the everything you are made of — it is a sad day for this franchise, gen 6, and you are the shaman who summoned its dawn.
>>
>>25105779
>in comparison to the majority of posters
dats it mane

keep away from me tho, ur old germs will crinkle my youthful skin
>>
>>25105810
Yeah, in comparison to the majority I might be a little old. But hey, it's not my fault if I was born in the best era and my skin is silky as baby's buttocks
>>
>>25102925
Holy shit are you me?
>>
>>25105831
post pics or you're a lying old fag with prune flesh
>>
1996
Yellow
IV = V > II > III > I > VI
>>
>>25105841
I prefer being considered and oldfag with prune flesh than posting private pics on this site. You know, "those suspicious caryatids" and so on.
>>
>>25102854
What if they dont live in america, grey matter?
>>
1994

Red, on my Gameboy Color (got it for my 5th birthday along with Pokemon Red). Granted, it took me a while to pass Viridian City as I got the English version of Red and English wasn't my native tongue, so I didn't know how to save nor how to get the old man out of the way. Essentially I learned English with Pokemon (as well as a few other games).

IV > II > V > I > VI > III
>>
>>25105905
>it took me a while to pass Viridian City as I got the English version of Red and English wasn't my native tongue, so I didn't know how to save nor how to get the old man out of the way.

Almost same here, except it was Yellow and the game was in my native tongue (which isnt English, but I dont live in a gay ass Scandinavian country that dont translate media like you).
But the thing with me is that it was my first video game ever so I didnt understand the concept of saving the game
>>
1. 1993
2. Pokémon Red on my friends gameboy. Us not speaking English we didn't manage to get past the drunk guy in Viridian but once we did my friend already had a Charizard. Got a Gameboy of my own AND Pokémon Blue AND Crystal my next birthday.
3.
IV > V > II > III > I > VI
>>
>>25101307
1. 1991
2. Blue Version
3. 4>2>3>1>5>6

favorite game is platinum
>>
1. 1992
2. Pokémon Red on a bitching limegreen gameboy color
3. IV > II > I > III

Favourite game is Soulsilver, haven't played any of the gen 5 and 6 games
>>
>>25101307
1. 1996
2. Pokémon Yellow
3. 4>2>3=1=5>6
>>
>>25101307
1. 1993
2. Red
3. 4>6>5>2>1>3
I didn't like D/P or R/S/E, but I fucking loved HG/SS and Pt was okay. 3 gets my lowest score because I didn't like any of the mainline games that gen despite FR/LG being pretty good. And 5 and 6 rank highly because of their overall polish and introduction of features I can't live without.
>>
1. 30

2. Blue

3. 5>4-6>3-2>1

Gen 5 was awesome... bw2 has the best postgame ever. Gen 4 was the first time we battled online. Gen 6 made the online stuff ever better. Gen 3 was the gen i have played the most. Gen 2 was awesome too but lacked content. Gen 1 has no replay value...and im not a nostalgiafag.

Favorite games?

Bw2>cristal> hgss>xy (oras sucks)> emerald- blue

I love johto. But bw2 is far the best game in the series... hgss was awesome but wasnt like cristal to me. Yes. Thats called nostalgia.
>>
1. 1992
2. Red
3. 2 > 4> 3> 1> 6> 5
>>
>>25101307
>1988
>silver
>4>2>1>3>6>5
>>
File: 1432962249784.gif (3 MB, 419x610) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1432962249784.gif
3 MB, 419x610
>1995
>Sapphire/Emerald on emulator in 2007
>5>2>4=3>1>6
>>
1) 1997
2) Emerald
3) 5 > 3 > 4 > 2 > 6 > 1
>>
>>25101307
>1990
>Yellow
>2 > 4 > 3 & 1 > 5 > 6
Gen6 would probably higher if it had more quantity
>>
>>25101307
1. 1997
2. Pokemon Yellow
3. III>II>IV>I>VI>V
>>
1996
Silver
2>6>4>1>5=3
>>
>>25101307
>1. In which year were you born?

1980, yes suck it up.

>2. What was the first main-series pokemon game you played?

Blue. But bought Blue and Red on the same day

>3. Rank the generations from best to worst.

Gens overall.
3 - 1 - 5 - 6 - 2 - 4
>>
>>25112058
My fucking nig. This guy knows what the fuck is up.
>>
>>25112094
>>
>>25101307
1988
Red
4>3>2>5>1

No 3DS.
>>
>>25101307
1. 1994
2. Red
3. 4(HGSS)>1>2>3>4(DPP).
Diamond was too big of a disappointment so I never tried the newer games.
>>
>1. In which year were you born?
1987

>2. What was the first main-series pokemon game you played?
Red

>3. Rank the generations from best to worst.
2 - 3 - 1 - 5 - 6 - 4
>>
>1989
>red
II>I>III>V>IV

Never played VI, I assume the handholding got even worse.
>>
Around 100 participants or more so far and only 3 people that I found said that gen 1 was the best.

it looks like about 80% or maybe more played gen 1 first, even those who were infants or not even born yet when it was released.

Despite all this gen 1 is one of the most popular choices for last place in the rankings.

Someone should make some interesting graphs and charts with the data when this archives.
>>
>>25101307
1993

Gold

BW/B2W2 > GSC > R/S/E > R/B >>> D/P >>>>>> X/Y

The saving grace of gen 4 are gen 2 remakes.

Ranking the remakes

HG/SS = FR/LG >>>>>> ORAS

Each third version

Emerald > Crystal > Yellow haven't played platinum.
>>
File: 1451882915139.png (252 KB, 395x513) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1451882915139.png
252 KB, 395x513
>>25101307
>1997
>silver
>4 > 2 > 3 > 5 > 1 > 6

platinum will always be my favorite poke game
>>
1995
Red. I didn't play Pokemon until I was 6.
5 > 4 = 3 > 6 > 2 (not counting HGSS, which is second to 5) > 1
>>
1994
Crystal
IV>II>I>VI>V>III
>>
>>25101307
1995
Yellow
II>I=III>IV>VI>V
>>
>>25101307
-89
-red
- 2 > 3 >> 1 > 6 > 5 >>>> 4 (based on my impressions when I first played them, not my current)
>>
>>25101307
92
Yellow
4 2 3 5 1
6 not rated because no 3ds.
>>
1996
Red
5 > Platinum > HGSS > 3 > 2 > XY > 1 > ORAS
>>
>>25102472
>fuck johto
>ranks gen 2 as best
ok man
>>
>>25112689
To be fair, it's not exactly clear on what basis the generations are judged. In that case, I would hope that gen1 doesn't win over other generations that are essentially gen1 + more stuff. Having gen1 first is probably a result of nostalgia, a particular liking for the dex or a general liking for simplicity.
>>
>>25101307
1.1991
2. Red
3.1>2>5>6>3>4

Genwunner fag since day 1.
>>
1. 1995

2. Gold version. I didn't play gen 1 first because I wasn't allowed to have electronics

3. gen1, gen 2, gen 4, gen 3, gen 5, gen 6
>>
>>25101307
1. 1994
2. Yellow
3. 6>3>5>1>2>4
>>
1995

First game played was Yellow but first game bought was Gold

The third piece will count as that whole gen IE Crystal, Yellow EEmerald, Plat

4=3>5>2>>6>>1
>>
1. 1997
2. Fire Red :^)
3. 4 > 3 > 2 >>>>>>>>> 1 = 5 = 6
>>
>>25101307

1. 1989
2. Blue. Then to now - Blue, Red, Yellow, Silver, Crystal (Large break in time) Emerald, Platinum (Another large break in time) White / White2.
3. Best to Worst = 2, 4, 3, 1, 5. I can't opinion 6 until the Gen is officially over.
>>
1.1979
2. Diamond
3.3>4>2>5>1>6
Thread replies: 170
Thread images: 14
Thread DB ID: 478918



[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at [email protected] with the post's information.