Some bloke reduce the amount of Pokemon from 721 to 290 based on how good they are.
Person preference it seems. He dropped the machop line and I think a few others because they were too close to humans. Yet he kept the
inferiorhitmons. I think pokemon like them have their place since monsters can be anything. Just as long as they don't become a majority.
I don't know, I think he maybe kept Hitmonchan because of its association with with Hitmonlee which he liked. Still, somehow by his standards Hitmonchan is less 'human-like' so it makes the cut and more interesting than the four armed Machamp. He also kept the machamp clones Hariyama and Conkeldurr.
Others anons here in /vp/ already made threads like that, with lists of their own pokédex, but holy fucking shit why this dude made a video with 1 hour and 30 minutes JUST about it? Extremely autistic.
Is that how it's pronunced? For the Stadium game?
>cutting out middle evolutions
>disproportionate amount of starters
>all starters are two stages except the few that aren't
>cutting out parts of trios without all of them
>only has Nidorina, Nidoking, and Nidoqueen
>Ninjask without Shedinja
>Bagon and Salamence without Shelgon (did you even think of the theme of the evolutionary line?)
>Slakoth and Slaking without Vigoroth (missing the point)
>has Mantine despite cutting out Remoraid
>high powered evolutions like Weavile now basic Pokémon
>cuts out final evolutions but keeps their Megaevolution in the case of Abomasnow and Sceptile
>cuts out some Eeveelutions
>all those fucking fossils
I watched the Crobat part. While most of it is personal preference he said that cross-gen evolutions are a poor way to rebalance the game and so decided to cut either the original evo or the cross-gen evo. He chose golbat.
Except that the purpose of cross evos is not "rebalance the game", they just do that because is cool (and marketable) to see a old pokémon evolve even further, simple as that.
I would like to play a game where there are only the first 150 new Pokémon and not these shitty things like the trash bag, the white cock dragon or Mew.
Bulbasaur - Mewtwo.
001 - 150
That's it. I only want that.
>a Blaziken linefag and a Samurott linefag
RBGY include that shitty no-official cat called "Mew". And they are broken, slow and shit-looking games.
FRLG look and play better, but they include that shit from Johto and Hoenn.
Eh, it'd be decent if you put in the missing evolutionary lines, I don't see why Goodra wouldn't appear unless it's a desert region or why Glaceon wouldn't appear when there are areas icy enough to have those other Ice-types. That Dragonite is also weird but I'll let it slide since it's subjective.
How cool Sir Genwunner, so just don't play Pokémon at all and tip your fedora a bit more.
Does this guy not know that Nintendo doesn't name the pokemon during the design proccess? He does know most of these names are English Localizations and not made as the pokemon is made right? He keeps blaming nintendo for that and not just the localization team.
There are 386 fully grown Pokemon, and that's counting Legendarys, all ends of branches, Pokemon that should be gender differences(Nidoking/Nidoqueen, Tauros/Miltank), and Pokemon that should be branched(Plusle/Minun, Tauros/Bouffalant).
Different stages of Pokemon should not be called their own Pokemon, as we do not call a baby or a tadpole its own species. This guy is a piece of shit.
I'm not criticizing the names. I'm saying he complains about it like it was part of the actual development proccess and there's actually parts when he brings that up as reasons why he doesn't like a pokemon.
What's so special about this garbage? We do this shit on /vp/ all the time. Here. crack open your MSpaint or PS, or Gimp or whatever. Narrow it down to 300, not counting Megas: 30 rows down, 10 row accross. Your objective is to be less shit than the guy in the video.
>I don't get the idea behind the bug/fire type
>creating this abomination as if it was better than based Magnezone
>He didn't drop Empoleon
>He didn't get rid of Staraptor
>He didn't get rid of Dusknoir
>He didn't get rid of Dialga
>Getting rid of Empoleon, Staraptor and Dusknoir
This alone shows that his taste is far better than yours.
Hey he kept Braviary, cool
Don't like how dismissive he is of some of them or how he kept saying "Nintendo is literally out of ideas at this point!!!" but whatever. I just skipped around anyways
I said I didn't want them to drop them you mongoloid.
Oh, I could've gotten into detail over shit that didn't make it in, but I wanted to focus on shit that got cut while other stuff got in, like splitting up trios and removing tons of middle evolutions and having Megas without the Pokémon they Megaevolve from.
I still want to fucking know why you have Nidorina, Nidoking, and Nidoqueen with nobody else. Can someone skim the video to tell me why, I don't want to have to sit through it but fuck, my mind is wrapping around itself trying to figure out the logic behind this. Is Nidorina genderfluid in his video or something?
>video where some egocentric faggot shares his shitty opinions with the world and thinks removing Pokemon is actually a good idea
Jesus Christ, this is more cancerous than Top 10 videos. I seriously hope he's just doing this for views.
>keeps Shaymin and drops Victini
>shit taste confirmed
I'd rather watch a shitty Watch Mojo video. At least you can laugh at how pandering those are, and don't take more than a fucking hour.
This is also the first thing I noticed. I like hitmonlee but come on. If he was gunning for function, Machamp has much more utility over the hitmons and even Hariyama. I mean he kept Conkeldurr for that same reason.
And you objectively decide what's a turd and what isn't, how exactly?
>just some dude expressing his opinion on every pokemon
And why are you fuckers so mad about it?
Make a long series of polls. We would end up with whatever triggers /vp/ the least while still performing its intended purpose. Intended purpose as in, we still need a 3 early game stage bug bug shitmon, but the best one according to the community.
That's a lot of implications you've got there and it sounds like you just want to be above it all.
Some are annoyed he is shilling it here. Others just don't find his changes agreeable. That's the point of an hour long+ video you shit out on the web. Feedback and discussion.
>That's the point of an hour long+ video you shit out on the web. Feedback and discussion.
I know, I'm just wondering why anyone on /vp/ cares, as usually this place could give less of a shit about poketubers.
Except he isn't simply expressing his opinion on every Pokemon. It's a video about some clown who thinks removing 400+ Pokemon is somehow a good idea when the main attraction of the series is the creatures themselves. I bet he still thinks Pokemon is about catching them all.