People always shit on gen 5 for the worst pokemon concepts...

I love gen 5 mons but I'm gonna have to tell you to fuck off

>>25082626
Anon, you know that there's no point in saying that a gen is shit just because someone said that hates one that you like, Gen 4 is great to me, just as Gen 5 is too.

>>25082626
Abysmal taste

File: 1407699648860.jpg (34KB, 680x510px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 680x510px

>>25082626
What are you smoking? Those are some top notch 'mons anon.

File: beauty grace.png (39KB, 200x174px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 200x174px

>>25082649
truly top notch

is just ripoff of gen 1 pokemon
torterra = venusaur
infernape = charizard
empoleon = blastoise
staraptor = pidgeot
bibarel = raticate
kricketune = venomoth
luxray = raichu
roserade = vileplume
rampardos = kabutops
bastiodon = omastar
wormadam/mothim = parasect/butterfree
vespiquen = beedrill
pachirisu = pikachu
floatzel = floatzel
cherrim = tangle
gastrodon = kingler
ambipom = tauros
dirfblim = gengar
lopunny = wigglytuff
mismagius = gengar
honchkrow = fearow
purugly = persian
skuntank = arbok
bronzong = slowbro
chatot = farfetch'd
spiritomb = gengar
garchomp = dragonite
lucario = primeape
hippowdon = sandslash
drapion = muk
toxicroak = poliwrath
carnivine = tangle
lumineon = seaking
abomasnow = jynx
rotom = gengar
fairy pixie things = mew
arceus = mewtwo

File: 1446362131734.jpg (1MB, 986x1229px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 986x1229px

>>25082683

>>25082683
>floatzel = floatzel
Me too anon

File: 69e.png (121KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 625x626px

>>25082683

File: 1440867842966.png (106KB, 404x382px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 404x382px

>>25082683
>floatzel = floatzel

File: 17184012.png (60KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 500x500px

>>25082683
>every ghost-type is a ripoff of gengar

>>25082626
i love sinnoh mons
so cozy compared to hoenn

>>25082626
Dunno man
I see no gear, ice cream or trash bag in Gen 4...

File: bad.png (322KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

322KB, 800x600px

>>25082759
but what about a magnet, a cherry and rotom?

File: Rotom_parts.png (490KB, 780x612px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 780x612px

>>25082788
Cherubi is just a grass mon like any other.
And while Rotom forms are silly, they're not literally part of Rotom's body or permanent "evolutions", at least.

File: hni_0050_by_lordofthefuzzys-d85y8oh.jpg (119KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1024x768px

>>25082847
How is Vanillite not an ice mon like any other?

>>25082702
>>25082716
>>25082720
>>25082725
>>25082744
is nutjobber clovre boogeyman

>>25082863
Are you too dumb to understand why pokemon based on man-made food incoherent while those based on fruits arent?

File: 44157152_p0.jpg (98KB, 777x721px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 777x721px

>>25082903
Explain why you're triggered by pokemon based on man-made food?

unless you can't

>>25082683
Uncannily similar.

Nah, Gen III was the worst gen and the first massive decline in popularity. Which caused gen IV to be shitty as they pandered to genwunners with cross gen evolutions and when that failed they tried a reboot in gen V which failed even harder. Gen III was the worst gen objectively speaking.

File: HHH.png (213KB, 2236x413px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 2236x413px

Idk for me most of gen4 is at least decent, and i really like some designs.

>>25082942
go back to clovre chemicalman

>>25082954
>Ambipom good
>Abomasnow crap

wut?

>>25082930
Because pokemon are natural creatures that arrived before or at the same time as humans
It makes no sense for them to be based on stuff humans recently invented

>>25082954
>disliking delelelelewhooop and carnivine designs
baka senpai

>>25082974
so magnemite is disgusting?

File: 38171276_p0.png (41KB, 325x439px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 325x439px

>>25082974
The pokemon world is different than our world.
What if the Vanillite line inspired ice cream? I'm sure there was a throwaway line about Casteliacones being based on them.

Not to mention with that logic pokemon like Jynx and Pangoro based on certain groups of people would also make no sense, do you hate them too?

>>25082663
It's a castle-faced dinosaur that goes well with it's name.
It's pretty damn creative compared to some shit we have now.

>>25082995
what's wrong with a aurora based sail sauropod?

File: 1450915094262.png (195KB, 542x477px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 542x477px

>>25082683
>floatzel = floatzel

>>25082994
With Pangoro they were subtle. It's a panda with a unusually long fur some places.
The problem with the Vanilluxe is how painfully in-your-face the design is, it's literally an ice cream made out of ice with a face, even with a straw in case you didn't already get that it is supposed to look like an ice cream.

Jynx is pretty shit too yeah.

>>25082954
>Prinplup and Luxray good
>Tangrowth and Hippowdon bad

Shit taste anon, shit taste.

>>25083057
what about stuff like magnemite and machoke?

>>25083066
>implying prinlup is bad
you're the shitter here

>>25082984
Yes, it's Gen 5 tier
A good thing it's an exception in Gen 1

>>25083090
what about koffing and voltorb?

>>25083100
those are both artificial tho
magnemite was around 3000 before the games according to some dex entries

File: Snowless_Vanillite.png (166KB, 310x219px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 310x219px

>>25083057
I'll agree that Vanilluxe is very in-your-face, but it isn't literally an ice cream made out of ice with a face. It's literally some... two-headed diamond-studded floating ice crystal monster that exhausts cold air (hence the straw) with snow on top. The design's obviously based on ice cream, but I think it's creative enough to get a pass.

>>25083069
Magnemite might have been scrap metal brought to life by electromagnetic fields, as with Voltorb.
I don't have a problem with objects brought to life like that, same reason I don't mind Grimer and Trubbish since they're shit brought to life by radiation and what not.
Vanilluxe on the other hand is just an Ice pokémon that "coincidentally" happens to look exactly like ice cream on the other hand.

I fail to see why you would think I have a problem with humanoid pokémon.

>>25083113
>Because pokemon are natural creatures that arrived before or at the same time as humans
>It makes no sense for them to be based on stuff humans recently invented
you're the one who said this
also magnemite was around 3000 years ago
http://archives.bulbagarden.net/media/upload/2/2d/Neo_Premium_File_2.jpg

>>25083127
Except I'm not.
>>25083057 and >>25083113 are my only two posts in the thread.

>>25082974
Voltorb came after poke balls were invented, idiot

File: Worst.jpg (640KB, 2236x413px) Image search: [Google]

640KB, 2236x413px

Worst generation for sure.

>>25083107
Keep moving those goal posts

Gen 4 has the worst designs (more than a few good ones though)
Gen 2 has the most bland (same here, and even more so, with really great ones)

I don't get why so many people such the dick of either of those Gens.

>>25083142
oh ok sorry m8

>>25083163
i thought i was responding to >>25082974
so i just followed his logic m8

>>25083175
I can agree with this.

I don't think many people are sucking Gen IV's dick, it's mostly backlash to how hated it is.

>>25083127
I wouldn't take promotional art for the TCG too seriously. The same scan also accurately describes some of the fossils far better than what they could have done even with their hands on a full skeleton.

>>25083159
>disliking qts and babymons
>disliking roserade, togekiss and rotom
>liking eeveelutions
gay

File: COCAINE.png (78KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 500x500px

How much crack have you been smoking OP?

>>25083208
Some babymons are pretty damn shit, like Happiny and Mantyke that just look like smaller forms of their evolutions.
Bonsly is top tier though.

>>25083255
mantyke has a smile on its back
how can anyone seriously hate it

>>25083261
If they actually had followed through and given it different markings depending on region like the dex states I probably would have liked it.

>>25083276
>implying they did the same with anything else
arbok looks pretty much the same desu

File: 1450145822066.gif (12KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 500x500px

>>25082626
>gen 5 was the ugliest!
>no gen 4 was the ugliest!
I don't know how people can consistently make this mistake when gen 2's Pokemon were objectively the worst by a huge margin.

>>25083292
That's only from gen IV and on, before that they actually gave a fuck about Arbok's patterns.

>>25083337
so in gen II and in rse it looks one way but exactly the same way in other games and that's not lazy, lol

>>25083318
Gen II was based
As a matter of fact, most were just delayed Gen I pokemon that werent put in the first games.

But of course you digimon lovers would prefer overdesigned Gen V shits

>>25083358
It had one belly pattern for gen I/remake, one for gen II and one for III. That wasnt lazy as all.
It's only from gen IV on that they have been lazy and used the same design in every game.

File: Untitled.png (2MB, 1362x1490px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1362x1490px

>shitting on pokemon designs.
A reminder to get a load of this

File: 1453664455693.png (64KB, 777x922px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 777x922px

>>25083797

>>25083385
It's not Gen 4's fault they stopped giving a shit in Gen 5.

I mean, they only added two gender differences in Gen 5 and they were really fucking obvious.

>>25084366
BW had no native arboks so there shouldnt be a new pattern for them

>>25084231
>not even enough arguments to complete a bingo card
>>>/trash/