Is Pokemon the game that you're best at, or are you better at other games than Pokemon?
Nah, I stink at Pokemon.
Civilization V, on the other hand, I mastered.
>mfw i actually completed a domination victory on deity
I'm pretty good at singles
I'd look into other formats if:
>more people were willing to play rotation
>I had any interest in triples or doubles
>You could play Inverse singles, doubles, multis, etc with friends
But oh well, what can you do?
I like to play side scrollers and action rpgs but i'm not particularly good at them
Funny, I'm great at Pokemon but stink at Civ V and I've clocked 600 hours into it
THIS! Meleefags are the Genwuners of Smash. Have fun playing Fox V Falco on Final Destination for the next 15 years
It's one of my best games, yeah.
I'm also pretty good at sm4sh. Use charizard, jiggs, and pikachu for my "mains."
I enjoy a good FPS from time to time. And also get sucked into MMOs occasionally when I feel like I need more self-loathing.
I'm decent at Pokemon, but I can't get into running specific EV spreads to handle specific Pokemon and all that shit. It's just not for me. I'm not going to spend hours soft resetting for a legendary, and I'm not going to hack in teams either.
I've gotten ice cold at Sm4sh though. Some of my friends are hardcore tourneyfags and I can consistently win against them with Captain Falcon, and more recently, Peach.
Pokémon is like an old friend. Every generation goes attached to a different point of my life so I mostly play it for nostalgia and because I like the overworld.
I caught them all, living dex, 100% legal.
I don't care about competitive, but I still IV breed and EV train. Despite all of that I consider myself terrible at battling because I am shit at team building.
If I have to be autistic, I'd rather picka more satisfying game.
Pic related. I'm much more competitive in managing games, Paradox games, Real Time Strategy and City Builders. They remind me of why I'm studying Economics and Politics.
Oh, also at Smash Bros.