>there will never be another pokemon with parental bond
>there will never be a non-mega pokemon with parental bond period
Not to imply it isn't broken as hell, but it's just so depressing that it will forever be locked to one single pokemon.
Marowak's dead mother will appear and it'll be a ground/ghost with parental bond.
>>24965258
>252+ Atk Thick Club Parental Bond Marowak Thunder Punch vs. 252 HP / 252+ Def Skarmory: 222-264 (66.4 - 79%) -- guaranteed 2HKO after Leftovers recovery
>banned to ubers
>>24965258
I'm all for this "marowak gets a stand" concept
too bad it will never, EVER happen
>>24965242
they said it about wobbuffet
they said it about slaking
>>24965510
Honestly, if Marowak got an evo it wouldnt have garbage stats and wouldnt need the Thick Club. Increase defense a little, add a fuckton (like 30 or more) of attack and increase speed to 95 or higher, preferrably close to 110 and then dump whatever into Sp. Def/Attack to bring the BST up to ~540 and Marowak's evolution would be viable on her own.
>>24965510
Really wish you people would stop assuming everybody cares about the rules in your fan community
>>24965522
I don't tell you this often, Brett, but you have a point this time.
>>24965548
I swear some of you people are becoming like vegans.
>Doesnt play by smogon rules
>Realizes he hasn't mentioned it in 8 seconds
>>24965517
Bumping this thread from death just to point out somebody once again claimed to know the future
Everyone, point and laugh
>>24965510
>Mega Marowak gets Parental Bond
>But only after Parental Bond has been nerfed into uselessness
>>24965674
but YOU are the vegans
>lets talk about dinner
>btw I'm vegan so please make those considerations for me
>lets talk about pokemon
>btw I play by smogon rules so please make those considerations for me
I don't care if you want to use their site and stuff, but that's the thing, there is already a whole site dedicated to discussion their rules and tiers. You don't need to talk about them on other sites and assume anyone else even cares about them.
>>24968639
agreed