[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

WarGamesGeneral - /wgg/

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 750
Thread images: 235

File: against all odds.png (177KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]
against all odds.png
177KB, 480x360px
>What the fuck is this?
A general for all the realistic wargames out there that don't generate enough traffic to sustain their own generals.

>Old thread
http://boards.4chan.org/vg/thread/127439403/

>Attention grabbing search terms go here:
/wgg/, /fsg/, /mowg/, /mowassg/, /rtsg/, /ctag/, /dcsg/

>Example welcome games:
Wargame: Red Dragon
Combat Mission
Call to Arms
Flashpoint Campaigns: Red Storm
Graviteam Tactics
DCS: World
Theatre of War
Men of War
Falcon BMS
Command: Modern Air Naval Operations
Armored Brigade
Close Combat
Steel Beasts
Steel Panthers MBT

>Graviteam DLC:
http://pastebin.com/TwMLZQ6h

>Planefag pastebin:
http://pastebin.com/Zb0U61in

>Interesting history links:
Cold War military technology ads:
http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/military-ads-1980s
/wgg/ misc Cold War literature:
http://www.mediafire.com/download/zfm69f0k91pmf0y/wgg-lit-v1.3.rar
The Soviet Army: troops, organization & equipment
http://fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm100-2-3.pdf
USMC intelligence North Korea handbook:
http://fas.org/nuke/guide/dprk/nkor.pdf

>Steamgroups:
/wgg/ old group
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/VG-Wargamers
/wgg/ new group
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/dedgamededthread
Uralmod official group
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/Uralgraznomod
/wgg/ Men of War / Call to Arms Group
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/ReReaGa
/fsg/ group
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/flightsimgeneral

>Teamspeak server
uralmod.typefrag.com:7495

>Legacy Wargame General pasta and game-info repository:
http://pastebin.com/70Nwcb5m
https://www.dropbox.com/s/lon0cgmjfqwq1oi/WargameRD_Hidden_Knowledge_Spreadsheet.xlsx?dl=0
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UvBiH3lrCFzLYnRzNzF49yVtaNHYLfi7dgMpNE517RM/
>>
File: фласчпоинт.png (3MB, 1343x789px) Image search: [Google]
фласчпоинт.png
3MB, 1343x789px
first for hexshit
>>
2nd for a3g fuck off
>>
3rd for make us ;)
>>
File: Joseph_Stalin.jpg (213KB, 640x400px) Image search: [Google]
Joseph_Stalin.jpg
213KB, 640x400px
Fourth for best red alert.
>>
File: image.jpg (292KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
292KB, 1024x576px
FO
>>
File: image.jpg (391KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
391KB, 1920x1080px
btr80a
>>
Remember fellow /wgg/

you let arma in the thread will turn to absolute cancer.
>>
File: 1386970417880.jpg (303KB, 600x1437px) Image search: [Google]
1386970417880.jpg
303KB, 600x1437px
>/a3g/ still trying to shit this place up
>>
>>127828601
>coming from a neo-wgg plane/hex fag

k
>>
File: image.jpg (166KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
166KB, 1920x1080px
>>127828601
arma is a wargame pal
>>
>>127828760
yeah, but it has its own general, son
>>
File: 1449750398532.jpg (114KB, 443x443px) Image search: [Google]
1449750398532.jpg
114KB, 443x443px
>>127828993
everything in this thread had its own general at some point, friend
>>
>>127828760
shit game
autistic fancore
gtfo
>>
File: image.jpg (487KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
487KB, 1920x1080px
>>127828993
and that general is dead and consists of people who do not understand what a FEBA or LD is.
>>
>>127829150
Yeah but they all died because they are ded games.

arma isn't a ded game and the general died because of pure unadulterated faggotry
>>
File: 6980846536748.webm (2MB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]
6980846536748.webm
2MB, 720x480px
Post satisfying webms
>>
>>127829150
rip wargame general
>>
File: Even in death i am swag.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
Even in death i am swag.webm
3MB, 1280x720px
>>127829323
>>
File: bt7.webm (3MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]
bt7.webm
3MB, 640x360px
>>127829323
>>
>>127829510
Kind of boring, to be honest.

Pretty much why I've stopped playing DCS.

Especially right now, its seems that all they've made actually viable in PvP is slinging BVR missiles at each other and watching the mechanics for them wig the fuck out or going full X-Wing mode. The latter of which you die 99% of the time seconds after you even knew someone was there.
>>
>>127829323
>>
File: Billy.png (170KB, 800x455px) Image search: [Google]
Billy.png
170KB, 800x455px
>>127829843
Git gud
>>
File: thosedamnturtles.gif (608KB, 300x225px) Image search: [Google]
thosedamnturtles.gif
608KB, 300x225px
>>127830003
I didn't say I was losing the engagements, kiddo
>>
>>127830328
Maybe, maybe not

but it is pretty boring, i haven't played in forever because only 104th is populated
>>
Remember to report A3G shitposting as off topic.
>>
File: end.png (394KB, 819x559px) Image search: [Google]
end.png
394KB, 819x559px
For those who are interested (I am guessing 0 people) here is the end of the AAR of the game of Squad Leader I started last night.

I got caught up in work and had to leave, so couldn't finish it yesterday.

Germans assault was spread to thin, looping around the hill to enter from the north with 1 squad+leader cost them, as they got gunned down. Meanwhile in the south an extra leader to direct the main attack would have given the needed edge.

The Russians had an excellent layered defense utilizing cover and their 9-2 leader to make up for inferior range and numbers.

Overall a close game that didn't get decided until the very last round.

(I h ave the 4th editions rules scanned, I could upload the pages here if anyone wants me to, the rules required to play the scenario here are about ~4 pages of text and ~2 pages of example diagrams)
>>
>>127831103
Keep going, it's good to have content
>>
>>127831103
>>127831276
+1
>>
File: BS13.jpg (283KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
BS13.jpg
283KB, 1920x1080px
>>127829150
There was never a Combat Mission general

I like having a place where me and the literal one other CM player can post about it.
>>
>>127829323
https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1451448952436.webm
>>
>>127832058
When will 4chan fags allow sounds on vg?
>>
>>127832330
never, and for good reason.
>>
>>127832330
literally never
>>
IMO Arma is not welcome for now simply because they have enough of a player/poster base to generate and keep a general going without needing to aggregate with /wgg/ solely because it lacks traffic.

If this changes in the future (arma generals dying because they lack traffic) then I'd call for it to be included in this general too, but for now, that's definitely not needed.
>>
>>127832330
Hopefully never. Terrible idea.
>>
File: Setup.png (595KB, 1365x728px) Image search: [Google]
Setup.png
595KB, 1365x728px
>>127831276
>>127831103
Well, as "promised" a more complex scenario (only slightly).

TO&E shown on the right.

This scenario has the Germans assault the large complex in the middle. They have assault engineers with flamethrowers, smoke, and demochargesat their disposal.

Whoever owns 6 hexes of the complex in the middle at game end wins.
>>
File: Pieces set up.png (613KB, 1365x728px) Image search: [Google]
Pieces set up.png
613KB, 1365x728px
>>127832872
All pieces are on the board and play can commence.

Russia vastly outnumbers the Germans, but only have 4 leaders over ~40 units and barely any equipment. The Germans on the other hand have 6 leaders over ~20 units and have a lot of (heavy) equipment to work with.
>>
>>127835184
This is going to go slow, not a lot of time, neither does my buddy.

Will probably update at the end of every half turn. Detailing all the intermediary steps is rather pointless anyway if you don't understand the rules, far more interesting to see the grander picture of troop movements etc.
>>
Bmp
>>
File: German Turn 1.png (623KB, 1125x571px) Image search: [Google]
German Turn 1.png
623KB, 1125x571px
>>127836921
>>127835184
Germans attempted an assault on the east side of the complex.
The Germans are too impatient and despite heavy prep fire and smoking up the street they lose an engine squad and their 10-2 leader, the flamethrower lying on the ground after the failed assault.

The second flamethrower malfunctioned and had to be abandoned. The norther engineers move further north and manage to gun out the northeastern corner of the complex.

In the west the Germans decide to hold cover, but some overwhelming Russian fire forces the units on the perimeter to break away from their cover. The Russian gear proved below subar, all their LMG's malfunction in the process of trying to clear out the Germans in their way of the middle complex.

Overall a overly hasty German first turn, balanced out by an overly clumsy Russian defensive response.
>>
File: 1452013898157.png (38KB, 853x543px) Image search: [Google]
1452013898157.png
38KB, 853x543px
ASSAULT SQUAD 2 TIME
>>
>AS2 on the same day the new season starts
I CANT MAKE MY DECISION

0-4 - Finish this show and play AS2
5-9 - Ignore steam group and keep watching anime
>>
>>127841350
what show?

Also what's the steamgroup again, I wouldn't mind playing this time.
>>
>>127841728
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/ReReaGa
>>
>>127841875
Cheers, I'll be playing Shogun 2 until a round opens.
>>
>>127841350
Ok I changed my mind I am just going to keep watching anime

Sorry steamgroup
>>
dont play mowas when you're supposed to be studying for an exam, you just get mad and play badly
>>
File: Russian Turn 1.png (602KB, 1130x585px) Image search: [Google]
Russian Turn 1.png
602KB, 1130x585px
>>127840394
Russians, wanting to link up their western forces with the forces in the complex, decide to break cover and open up with 2 MMG's from the middle. They manage to make some Germans reveal themselves as they break their cover.

The bulk force in the west can not do much but fire at Germans abd push back the German western forces for now. Crossing open ground with so many known (and unknown) German MG positions would be suicide.

German player manages to keep the east side of the complex open during the defensive phases. The northern engineer squads even manage to reveal the northern section of the building (as it turns out, no Russian troops were actually there).
>>
File: German Turn 2.png (624KB, 1125x571px) Image search: [Google]
German Turn 2.png
624KB, 1125x571px
>>127843658
>>
File: 1395773295404.jpg (748KB, 1280x1311px) Image search: [Google]
1395773295404.jpg
748KB, 1280x1311px
vintage bump
>>
>>127849309
TOW infantry when
>>
File: 1432491168800.jpg (230KB, 780x533px) Image search: [Google]
1432491168800.jpg
230KB, 780x533px
>>127849309
Eugen this is completely unacceptable
>>
File: SPACE HIND.jpg (228KB, 1191x887px) Image search: [Google]
SPACE HIND.jpg
228KB, 1191x887px
>>127849309
fuck off mosque
>>
File: f4nip.jpg (121KB, 750x1152px) Image search: [Google]
f4nip.jpg
121KB, 750x1152px
Is anyone else in love with fast amphibious auto cannon recon units?

Brdm3 and Lav-25 are so good for flank attack cv/aa hunting.
>>
File: 1409840734096.jpg (63KB, 560x631px) Image search: [Google]
1409840734096.jpg
63KB, 560x631px
>>127854965
Pretty much all the top 10 players.
Welcome to the club, enjoy your stay.
>>
File: National Socialism.jpg (158KB, 816x960px) Image search: [Google]
National Socialism.jpg
158KB, 816x960px
>>127858970
I love maps with little or no rivers so I can call in coyote recon lavs with delicious 2 av and better cannons/eyes
>>
Not sure if I want to get this game as my first John Tiller game or not:

http://www.matrixgames.com/products/318/details/John.Tiller%27s.Campaign.Series

Thoughts, /wgg/ hexshit folks?
>>
>>127829843
>>127830464
Get a more challenging module to fly instead of FC3 aircraft?
>>
File: 14509461777120.png (2MB, 1954x1188px) Image search: [Google]
14509461777120.png
2MB, 1954x1188px
>>127831103
I like those AAR's. Keep going.
>>
File: hms.webm (3MB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]
hms.webm
3MB, 800x450px
>>127829510
>>
File: 1410078462192.jpg (28KB, 698x563px) Image search: [Google]
1410078462192.jpg
28KB, 698x563px
>>127861060
>>
>>
>>127863497
>Germany are Bootlickers

kek
>>
File: 4 horsemen.png (3MB, 1425x747px) Image search: [Google]
4 horsemen.png
3MB, 1425x747px
>>
Anyone here play Project Reality?
>>
>>127875780
That poll seems to be rigged to me, I'm a filthy eyetie and most of the people I talk with HATE muslims and other trash with a deep passion, and that seems to be the general consensus too.
>>
File: honecker in the house.jpg (38KB, 533x300px) Image search: [Google]
honecker in the house.jpg
38KB, 533x300px
>>
>>127875015
Oh the good days of AL battle.
>beating NATO pubs with cheap shit polish decks
>dat polish spec ops raping everything
>flanking undeadable abrams with cheap ww1 veichles and killing them
Is red dragon worth it?
>>
>>127877959
Someone repost Ramsay and Reagan.
>>
>>127878289
Yes, because it's alive
>>
>>127878930
Sometimes life is worse than death. At least death is forever.
>>
>>127878930
>Red Dragon
>Alive
Well... I'd say it is in a coma with the life support still attached.
>>
>>127866785
Once again work got the better of me. Will See how far we can get now.

Image here >>127846154 is still the current situation.
>>
File: 14496733463250.png (1MB, 1000x715px) Image search: [Google]
14496733463250.png
1MB, 1000x715px
>>127882483
I never played board wargames and with AAR's much simple understand how it's going.
And thank you for Vassal
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gqdWTyuX9o

>tfw watching your plane fly itself toward the stratosphere
>>
PSV-14
>>
>>127885849
Fuck off armafag
>>
File: Russian Turn 2.png (631KB, 1062x564px) Image search: [Google]
Russian Turn 2.png
631KB, 1062x564px
>>127882483
Russians manage to punch a hole down the middle in the west. The northwest also find the opportunity to advance. The southwest advance is halted by the Germans coming out of their concealment and opening up.

The middle complex is seeing a lot of action with fire going back and forth. A gnasty ambush with a 8 firepower HMG set up in the middle cuts down some Germans squads forcing them back over the street to their leader in the east. Despite this the German player currently seems to have the upper hand in the building, the 83-8 assault engineers with their specialist equipment and the MG position in the south eastern building are making it hard for the Russians to hold on. The complex is in dire need of reinforcements from the west if the Russian player wishes to hold on.
>>
>>127861060
>le red pill maymay
>>
>>127886007
T-90A
>>
>>127886007
Report as offtopic
>>
>>127886007
PASGT
>>
In DCS when? I want the kawaii little sister of the A-10.
>>
>>127875015
THESE SYMBOLS
WHAT DO THEY MEAN
SO OBSCURE AND HARD TO UNDERSTAND
>>
>>127886607
FGM-148 Javelin
>>
The fuck, are we being raided by /a3g/ now?
>>
>>127886657
Why the fuck are you here, faggot? I guess you are too illiterate to read the OP or too dumb to understand that Arma isn't a wargame, just a game about war.
>>
>>127886736
Nobody cares about your HATO shit.
>Hind when?
>>
>>127886861
I'm reporting all that shit, don't worry
>>
File: MiG-29-3.jpg (47KB, 720x180px) Image search: [Google]
MiG-29-3.jpg
47KB, 720x180px
noice
>>
>>127886997
Take it back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
File: 1444495754165.png (2MB, 1000x858px) Image search: [Google]
1444495754165.png
2MB, 1000x858px
>>127887129
We slavaboos here.
>>
>>127886773
Actually, that was my question. Half these are ambiguous, desu.
>>
L110A2
>>
>>127887251
exactly.
Like, are those infantrymen or waiters crouching with their platters?
Discerning it is costing me valuable reaction time.
>>
>>127887363
What if i call in arty on those infantry only to find out the symbols are actually for miniature dodo birds?
I would feel awful. This is why I need NATO's symbols.
>>
GPMG
>>
>>127887363
>>127887574
I dunno about NATO symbols, not really that great with them desu, but some of those symbols are a little perplexing, yeah.
>>
oporder
>>
File: Gp9BPVC.jpg (787KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Gp9BPVC.jpg
787KB, 1920x1080px
operator
>>
What DCS modules are coming out this year?
>>
File: gaDMTai.jpg (377KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
gaDMTai.jpg
377KB, 1920x1080px
mi24d
>>
>>127888301
Pray daily for F/A-18C
>>
>>127888347
Is it looking so bad for 2016?
>>
File: German Turn 3.png (637KB, 1105x573px) Image search: [Google]
German Turn 3.png
637KB, 1105x573px
>>127886050
Germans manage to push further into the middle building. They smoke entry and demo charge the 2 Russian MG positions. In the end they end up killing 2 Russian squads while only having to retreat one of their own.

The leader in the north west managed to come to his senses and fire the MG at the Russians on the street on his own. It forces 2 of them to retreat (not shown here, but they had to retreat to the woods directly to their north). Later during the round the leader was forced to retreat, the MG's being to heavy to carry on his own, he decides to disable them, permanently. The south western German position falls back slightly as well, so as not to come under too much fire.

In the south eastern building the HMG with the 9-1 leader moves up one hex to the north in preparation of a possible (and likely) Russian assault from the east.

The Russians did not manage to do a lot of defensive damage this round, largely due to the smoke in the building (it doesn't affect demo charges, but it does affect all small arms fire).

Main German concern is holding of all the Russian units coming from the west, especially now that they have broken through the middle and only need to cross one more street to link up with their forces in the large complex.

The Russian main concern is that the Germans clear out the complex and get their MG's set up on the west side of the complex before the relief arrives.
>>
File: WD48061a-800x600.jpg (267KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]
WD48061a-800x600.jpg
267KB, 800x600px
Any hope of a buff next patch?
>>
File: 1434730302583.png (106KB, 399x382px) Image search: [Google]
1434730302583.png
106KB, 399x382px
>>127888326
>arma babbies don't even recognize Mi-24V when it's staring them in the face.

Even dumber than I thought desu
>>
Both the Su-33 and MiG-29 are getting some love! We are working on the Professional Flight Model (PFM) for the Su-33. This will be based on the Su-27 PFM, but will be adapted for weights, the tail hook, and its distinctive aerodynamic features. Once we complete the flight model of the Spitfire IX, we will begin work on a new flight model for the MiG-29. Speaking of the MiG-29, we are also completing work on an all-new external model!
>>
>>127888301
Likely:
F-5E Tiger II
AJS-37 Viggen
F-4U Corsair
SA-342M Gazelle

Unlikely:
F/A-18C
F-14A & B
Bo-105 PAH1A1
Spitfire IX

No-Chance:
All the others.
>>
>>127888583
>ED
>Actually fixing Russian shit

i don't think so.
>>
>>127888583
>redfor buffs

LoL no, enjoy more nk nerfs and some "bug fixes" that make china weaker
>>
>>127888583
What game are you talking about
>>
A glimpse at the main armament of the mig-9-12b of the KPAF on QRA duty. A pair of R-27R and 4 m-60mk.
>>
File: arm.jpg (52KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]
arm.jpg
52KB, 600x450px
>>127889754
Forgot pic
>>
>>127889754
>slav armament
>doesn't actually exist

accurate post
>>
>>127889754
>R-60km

ayyyy peashooter.
>>
>>
File: losses after German turn 3.png (222KB, 660x441px) Image search: [Google]
losses after German turn 3.png
222KB, 660x441px
>>127888521
Losses for both sides as it stands right now.

After this, would there e a specific sort of scenario you guys would like to see. The game has a plethora of scenarios around platoon levels (some are smaller, others reach battalion scale).
>>
>>127890757
D-day scenario?
>>
>DMS actually believes Brandenburgers are balanced.
>>
>>127892281
watched my teamate pound a sherman croc with like 4 panzershreks and didnt even get a disable.
>>
>>127876071
Eugen fucked up by adding "hero" to wargame
>>
>>127890898
The game does support landing scenarios, but an actual D-Day landing scenario isn't available (nafaik). I could design one from scratch, but I don't have the time for that right now. Actual landing crafts are introduced much, much later and I am not entirely familiar with the rules anymore.

I guess what you want to see is Germany vs USA, where the Germans have less units/equipment but are set up in a fortified position and have to defend? If so, there are enough of those kind of scenarios. Usually a D-Day+X sort of setting.
>>
>>127827259

Excuse me, I was told cocks taste good. These cocks DO NOT taste good!
>>
>>127828437

God he looks so sad.
>>
>>127893073
I was that teammate. Biggest fluke of the century. 4 panzerfausts and nothing. 99% of the time, however, it's a straight OHK on everything it hits. It's so infuriating. Their stealth rating is the biggest load of bullshit, as is their SP price. One cheap, early game unit shouldn't be able to stretch out complete match dominance for the rest of the round by deleting any vehicle that isn't closely guarded by a full, multilayered perimeter of infantry.
>>
File: properusageofanspg9.webm (2MB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]
properusageofanspg9.webm
2MB, 960x540px
>>127894137
Your reasoning is sound. 2sp for a nazi ninja death squad with AT weapons is a bit ridiculous.
But having an officer out really helps combat that.

Whats a good resolution for webms?
>>
>>127888604
>not doing it on purpose to trigger autistic slavaboos
:)
>>
>>127894668
I've settled on 1200x700, personally.
>>
>>127894668
>200mp for a single unit that can't fight or cap in any real way.
>Gigantic micro-sink with binoculars
>Just for a meager chance to spot ubermensch death squads that can come out within the opening 4 minutes of the match and split up to infest your rear lines.

I don't think most good players will let you float that much MP so early in the game that isn't going towards attacking or defending cap zones. Especially when the same damn faction gets TWO early game options for auto cannons on wheels and treads that can BTFO your entire force if you don't get a vehicle hard-counter of your own up in time.

It's not just the balanceburgers, it's the structuring of the entire faction that just kinda stacks the odds high as fuck. Autocannons, ubermensch, best elite marksmen now that Rangers(The only redeeming unit of the US faction) got positively nerfed into a subterranean trench, free snipers, panzerfaust squads even before burgers are on the field, the best early game medium, etc
>>
>>127894668
I just go as small as I can get away with whilst still showing what I want to, highest bitrate to pixel ratio possible.
>>
File: americaninfantrytraining.webm (746KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]
americaninfantrytraining.webm
746KB, 960x540px
>>127897328
Yea. Germany is pretty fucked.
Even against people I know I'm better than I struggle with them.
They also get their share of unreadable late game units also.

Anyone up to play some AS2?
>>
>>127897963
Not until I fix my ethernet. ;_;
>>
File: 1451924594746.gif (253KB, 280x213px) Image search: [Google]
1451924594746.gif
253KB, 280x213px
>>127890127
Planes exiting cloud cover give me a strange erection.
>>
>>127897963
Consider upping your bitrate, btw. I'm still trying to find a good rate. MoW is super finnicky about quality levels compared to most games since it's very 'loud' visually.
>>
File: Russian Turn 3.png (477KB, 1115x505px) Image search: [Google]
Russian Turn 3.png
477KB, 1115x505px
>>127890757
By the by, if anyone is interested, I could "teach" the basics of the game here.
>>
>2016
>DCS F-86 still doesn't have the correct fucking textures to make it shiny
>>
File: witness.gif (2MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]
witness.gif
2MB, 500x281px
>>127900392
>Wanting a shiny combat aircraft.
>>
>people are reaching Mach 3 in the 2000C

heh
>>
File: wallpaper-39127.jpg (716KB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]
wallpaper-39127.jpg
716KB, 1680x1050px
>>127900540
It looks like it's made of plastic right now.
>>
File: 1443494220822.jpg (67KB, 359x960px) Image search: [Google]
1443494220822.jpg
67KB, 359x960px
http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=156907&page=2

>that response
>>
File: Really kebab.jpg (62KB, 582x463px) Image search: [Google]
Really kebab.jpg
62KB, 582x463px
>>127901176
>>
>>127870003
In practice, the HMS really isn't all that useful. With only 45 degrees, you may as well just use vertical scan.
>>
>>127897963
That was an intense match.

>mfw my Pershing is immobilized and taking shot after shot from all angles but is too burger stronk.
>mfw my last Airborne soldier with a carbine mows down 5 krauts in a glorious last stand
>>
>>127903059
Shame I missed it. I love Pershing matches because it's like the only cost-effective US tank that suddenly goes from a roster of dogshit that is over-priced to being Kraut-mower-3000, even against a King Tiger.
>>
>>127901885
For me HMS is faster in most situations when you have a visual. VScan is used when you don't see the target and let the selected sensor pick it up for you.
>>
>>127901885
>he doesn't have a headtracker
>>
>>127903318
>implying anything can mambo the Jumbo
>put Jumbo near kraut meme tank
>detraks kraut and gets detracked
>send another thign to kill kraut tank while they focus on Jumbo
>>
>>127906865
>Balanceburgers can still instagib your 1000mp Jumbo because panzerfausts have 200 penetration.
>>
New Call to Arms update, but it seems to coincide with the vanishing of the steam forums, so no patch logs just yet until that's resolved. Will poke around in test mode to see if anything was added.
>>
>>127908750
Weird, the forum returned after the patching finished.
>>
File: German Turn 4.png (626KB, 1119x579px) Image search: [Google]
German Turn 4.png
626KB, 1119x579px
>>127898679
German player uses his last smokes to advance in the large complex. Both the defensive as offensive fire proved largely ineffective. The German player malfunctions the HMG in the south east, in combination with the 3 broken squads being continuously fired upon the fire support from that area of the map is minimal.

The Russian defensive fire manages to break a single squad here and here. Russia has pretty much secured their route towards the complex.

German player advances into CQC across all 3 remaining enemy hexes in and around the complex in a desperate attempt to secure it completely before the reinforcements arrive en masse.
>>
File: German Turn 4.2.png (635KB, 1113x571px) Image search: [Google]
German Turn 4.2.png
635KB, 1113x571px
>>127909294
end of CQC of this round.

Germans clear out western most hex.
The middle hex is locked in melee, neither side taking losses for now.
The western hex is also locked in melee here both sides have eliminated 1 squad.
>>
Oh. Well. Shit. New CtA patch actually includes a new vehicle-centric gamemode where you capture fuel depots.
>>
Where can I join the Men Of War games?
>>
>>127910706
It's actually pretty fun, too. Income is increased quite a bit while CP is lowered so you can only have one vehicle out, and one engineer or tank crew squad for capping(Or you can just have a crew member hop out to cap). I couldn't immediatly tell if points now resupply vehicles or not, though.

>>127911924
ReRaeGa. Check the OP.We usually get together at least once a day lately.
>>
>>127911924
Rereaga group. I'll be on in a few hours to play also.
>>
>Corsair
>Viggen
>Tomcat
It's like LN read my mind and made exactly what I wanted.
>>
>>127912026
How do you resupply vehicles in CTA anyway? They don't have supply trucks or anything.
>>
File: Russian turn 4, movement.png (626KB, 1128x563px) Image search: [Google]
Russian turn 4, movement.png
626KB, 1128x563px
>>127910572
The Russians forgo any firing and charge the complex, they don't seem interested in slugging it out over another 4 rounds.

With the HMG in the south east out of action for now and 2 hexes locked in melee, the Germans only have 2 fire teams covering the streets leading to the complex. The remaining German MG's will undoubtedly manage to mow down some Russians, but will it be enough?
>>
>>127912268
You can't. Pretty dumb, but that's early access for you. I'm not entirely sure why they don't just temporarily allow outposts to do it like they can for infantry until they finally make a vehicle-specific method. I wasn't sure if they were doing it in the armored warfare mode, though. I wasn't getting an icon above the unit, though it did feel like I was firing more TOWs than I ought to have. Was kind of heat of the moment, though.
>>
>>127912463
Oh okay. I felt dumb when my TOW ran out and I couldn't figure out how to resupply.
>>
>>127912412
The Germans manage to kill 4 Russian squads, 3 that went down the centre, and 1 that looped around south, they also managed to break a unit which will have to retreat.

However, 2 squads in the north got through, another squad can now potentially lock the engineers in close combat (who broke their Russian stolen MMG because Vatnik can't make durable equipment).

In the south the Russians made a successful push and are now nearly on top of the MG nest that is covering the street (it is this MG nest that killed the 3 crossing units).
>>
How do you complete Single-player missions in MOW AS2 on heroic, AI just constantly shits on me even in Introduction.
>>
>>127913641
>>
Anyone wanna play some Call to Arms? Couple of us are gonna play the new game mode. Hop in ReRaeGa
>>
>>127875015
top banter
>>
>>127913960
I will in like an hour
>>
>>127913889
Russia forfeits the game.
All close combat was won y the Germans, a couple of squads were lost in the process. Russia manages to get a tiny corner of the complex back in the north, but without any leaders nearby 2 squads have little hope of holding on for long.

Russia simply doesn't have enough units left. The Germans now have more squads, more and better leaders, more and better equipment (some of which was taken from the Russians) and are now defending rather than assaulting. The German 9-2 leader in the south leading the MG nest is going to be near impossible to dislodge, and without doing so another "human wave" assault has no chance of succeeding.

The Russian units in the complex were overrun too fast, the strongest equipment of the Russians was located here (2xMMG+1xHMG) and they barely got any use out of it. Not defensively against the German assault from the east, not offensively to support a breakthrough in the west.

My mate and I were thinking of doing another Rus vs Ger urban infantry scenario, anyone interested?
>>
>>127918347
Note that aside from the units in the graveyard, Russia has 5 broken units and 1 berserking unit. The majority of these have no hope of coming back into the game.

Russia has 9 combat effective units with 2 leaders and 1 LMG, against 11 combat effective Germans who have 4 leaders, 9 LMG's and 2 MMG's.
>>
File: штука.webm (3MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]
штука.webm
3MB, 640x360px
>>127918347
I am.
>>
>>127919862
Will have to wait a bit, the guy I play against had to go out for a bit, reckon he'll be back in an hour or so.
>>
The new mode for CtA is fun as hell. webms pending.
>>
>>127919862
is that real footage?
>>
>>127922132
No its nazi cgi propaganda made in the early 40's
>>
https://www.reddit.com/r/hoggit/comments/401w4i/did_a_little_experiment_flight_in_the_mirage/

fifty dollars

>50.00 x 1 united states dollar
>>
>>127922549
reddit
get
out
>>
File: 0c7e825ea46a4972837e7fcd21148280.jpg (860KB, 788x1072px) Image search: [Google]
0c7e825ea46a4972837e7fcd21148280.jpg
860KB, 788x1072px
>>127898502
>take maximum file size allowed on 4chan which is either 3 or 4mb
>divide by length

wow so hard how do I bitrate????
>>
>>127923493
> it's MY PRIVATE SECRET CLUB!!!!

give me upvotes already
>>
File: PzIII_107STB_1942_3.jpg (378KB, 2000x824px) Image search: [Google]
PzIII_107STB_1942_3.jpg
378KB, 2000x824px
>>127923501
>take maximum file size allowed on 4chan which is either 3 or 4mb
Why here so small limits? I can't spam with my chechnya webm.
>>
>>127923501
>Expected to know everything about video editing from birth
>Just to make casual webms
Sorry, Pewdiepie. We can't all be as great as you.
>>
>>127924115
>video editing
don't pat yourself on the back shitter
you're merely converting formats.
>>
>>127925070
>All this autism and elitism over little video clips.
>>
>>127923501
shut up weeb nerd
>>
>>127919862
>I can hear the sounds even if the web doesn't have it
Goddam autism
>>
File: Mig-23-DNST8908431_JPG[1].jpg (2MB, 2904x1928px) Image search: [Google]
Mig-23-DNST8908431_JPG[1].jpg
2MB, 2904x1928px
mig 23 when?
f-16 when?
mi-24 when?
ah-1 when?
f-4 when?
>>
>>127926679
>>127925275
>use computers daily
>have no basic understanding of how a computer works
>I'll call him an autist that'll show him

I wish americans and american tripfags would fuck off
>>
>>127927174
its just bants nerd
>>
>>127927421
I was merely pretending ;)
>>
>>127927174
What does computer use have to do with knowing shit about optimum bitrates for video clips?

Do you just flip the fuck out and piss your pants whenever you run into anyone in life that doesn't know something that you do? That's why you're autistic as fuck, not because I didn't know something, but because you act like a complete fucking sperg over it and have to be a rude asshole for no reason.
>>
>>127926785
>all of those
literally never . alternatively, coming Q3 2096
>>
>>127927583
Because bitrates aren't exclusive for fucking video and are used in any type of streaming format?
Also had you fucking used google like a sensible person instead of posting half a million shitty webms nobody would hurt your feelings.
>>
File: TUSK vs T-80BV.webm (2MB, 1200x600px) Image search: [Google]
TUSK vs T-80BV.webm
2MB, 1200x600px
Armored warfare mode is pretty good.

>That detail on tank shells.
>>
>>127928181
why not load apfsds? I thought the M1s have it.
and you up to play?
>>
>>127928073
It's almost like

And bear with me now

Someone is new to something.

If you don't like it, make your own shit and stop being a gigantic fucking baby that needs perfection delivered on a plate just for you in all things you consume. I've never seen someone so fucking asshurt about something so trivial, even on 4chan of all places. I did google about it and got a bunch of conflicting shit and decided to just find it out myself over time, because it turns out there's more than one road to this sort of thing.

But man you sure showed a stranger on an imageboard.
>>
>>127928605
its okay hes just autistic.
>>
>>127928553
It's hard to tell because of the shit quality due to video length, but I tried APFSDS a few times before realizing he was just too far to penetrate frontally with it because of kinetic bleed, so switched to HEAT to try and break his gun and it ended up working since it maintains it's penetration over distance.

Also, in a bit, I've got dinner soon.
>>
File: ju 87.jpg (157KB, 1440x806px) Image search: [Google]
ju 87.jpg
157KB, 1440x806px
>>127926772
Everyone know that sound.
>>
>>127928798
oh I see it now.

How do you switch ammo types like that? whats the hotkey?
>>
>>127929486
Space
>>
>>127924002
>Why here so small limits?

Because 4chan is stuck in fucking 2004
>>
File: Falcon 2-2.jpg (60KB, 1360x768px) Image search: [Google]
Falcon 2-2.jpg
60KB, 1360x768px
>>127926785
>mig-23
No idea, maybe if leatherneck gives it some love at some point
>f-16
Try BMS. It's free so there's nothing to fear.
>mi-24
>ah-1
Belsimtek was making these last I heard. the AH-1 version they were planning to do (G) got bashed for being essentially a glorified huey with no transport capability so they started making the W version instead.
>F-4
No idea on this one.
>>
>>127930271
Sorry, I don't think it's the W version of the AH-1 either. It's either the S or F IIRC
>>
File: corsair repair.jpg (481KB, 1880x1435px) Image search: [Google]
corsair repair.jpg
481KB, 1880x1435px
>>127930141
Fuck no, the size limit is a pain at times but I'd rather not go back to no inline quotes and shit.
>>
>>127930890
Well 4chan was stuck in 1998 back then.
>>
File: 1371196787621.jpg (27KB, 319x344px) Image search: [Google]
1371196787621.jpg
27KB, 319x344px
>start first silent hunter 3 campaign
>sink 3 cargo ships
>decide to take a break
>see end mission report
>allied ships suck: 0
>neutral ships sunk: 3
>war hasn't actually started yet
oops
>>
Finally, some patch notes for CtA.

Update 23
0.760.0

• Added new gamemoded Armored Warfare (work in progress)
• Added new barracks building
• Added mod activation
• Added game version tracker
• Added avatar graphics for campaign
• Added ability to capture flags to IFV
• Added custom unit selection (you can customize the units used in a multiplayer match)
• Improved LODing
• Reduced the ATGM flexibility
• Reduced re-charge time of 100mm and 105mm guns
• Reworked accuracy by motion
• Reworked vehicle ranges
• Reworked vehicle accuracy
• Fixed session chat has no smiles
• Fixed ranked icons are swapped in session chat
• Fixed third person lock in cut scenes and on game save/load
• Fixed threat info on window borders
• Fixed several object issues
• Fixed several vehicle issues
• Fixed crash on ping update
• Fixed crash in chat
>>
File: 1451601797470.jpg (683KB, 800x1135px) Image search: [Google]
1451601797470.jpg
683KB, 800x1135px
>>127934234
>• Added custom unit selection (you can customize the units used in a multiplayer match)

How do you do this?
>>
Mirage 2000 gud yet?
>>
>>127936916
ED are on their crimbo break so even if RAZBAM have done any fixes they can't push any patches.

So no.
>>
Rip wargame general was there since 2013 ill never forget u bro
>>
File: 2016-01-08_00001.jpg (631KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
2016-01-08_00001.jpg
631KB, 1920x1080px
>>127929597
I'm noticing a balancing flaw.
>>
File: TOW.webm (767KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]
TOW.webm
767KB, 960x540px
>>127938210
>>127929597
TOWs have no range limit and also do not lose any penetration over distance.
Meaning you can park a TOW unit on a hill and dominate the entire battlefield and nothing can touch you since they need to move within range, where you can easily back up and let your AT infantry ambush them
>>
>>127934857
No clue. Will investigate

>>127938440
This is true of all ATGMs. It's not as OP as you think when both teams are competent. It only really fucks with idiots that silhoutte on top of hills.
>>
>>127939150
also the points do resupply your vehicle, but not with fuel.
I was having to send men around with gas cans siphoning fuel from dead vehicles.

And GRM ATGMs are the worst in the game.
>>
File: TOW vs BMP-2.webm (2MB, 1200x600px) Image search: [Google]
TOW vs BMP-2.webm
2MB, 1200x600px
>>127938210
>AI
Well yeah, AI vehicles have no concept of cover, and wont engage at long ranges.

Played with the devs and some pubbers tonight in a 6v6 and the TOW's stopped being spawned after early game because they just couldn't really keep up in armor and firepower.

>>127939512
Wat? They have pretty much the same penetration value. None of the ATGM's do very well against MBT frontals unless they hit the turret. Refleks is pretty based, also very good for sniping off enemy TOWs since you don't have to worry about ammunition over-matching.

Regardless, against heavies, ATGM's are best for trying to break shit, rather than outright kills. They're long-range tools, and excel at ranges where cannons can't take advantage of superior firerates and lack of guidance requirements. I mean shit you can park on an incline and kill a TOW with the DShka on top of your T-80 if you want, I've seen it happen a couple of times. Autocannons can smack it at extreme distance to, webm related.
>>
>>127940527
I have yet to try any real multiplayer so you're probably right.
And I used a nice side shot with the TOW on the bmp-3 and it didnt do anything to instinct's M1A2.

This was before the latest patch though.
>>
File: 1443310516369.jpg (751KB, 3924x6516px) Image search: [Google]
1443310516369.jpg
751KB, 3924x6516px
>>127940527
This game and men of war look so bad and completely unrealistic. Gtfo this tread faggot.
>>
>>127941105
>how to spot someone who's never played it
I bet you're a plane poster aren't you?
>>
>>127941390
At least planeposters have respect for other games.

Guy probably only found the thread a few weeks ago, don't go hard on him.
>>
>try CTA new update
>no singleplayer at all
>try hosting multiplayer game
>game deadlocks and I have to close it through task manager

It gets worse with every update.
>>
File: 1389912740932.jpg (76KB, 824x421px) Image search: [Google]
1389912740932.jpg
76KB, 824x421px
>>127941390
Stop taking bait.
>>
File: Manlytears mocaps big boss.jpg (853KB, 1536x1024px) Image search: [Google]
Manlytears mocaps big boss.jpg
853KB, 1536x1024px
/wgg/ is Squad any good?
>>
>>127942949
Its fun with friends and people with mics in your squad. By yourself its boring as fuck though.
>>
>>127943082
I have yet to play in a Squad without mics
>>
>>127942949
>Mgs5
The game thanks which i'm not buying any AAA ever again, and hardly any other games as well.
>>
File: REEEEEEEEEEEEEE2.webm (341KB, 670x560px) Image search: [Google]
REEEEEEEEEEEEEE2.webm
341KB, 670x560px
Starting up AS2 if anyone wants to joing.
>>
>>127941105

nigga that game is perfectly within the realm of realism. Plenty of well modeled penetration stats
>>
File: sneak attack.webm (1MB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]
sneak attack.webm
1MB, 960x540px
>>127943925
Pretty sure it was bait.

The squad should all hop on though and lets get some games going.
>>
>>127944168

I love the game so much but all the micromanagment required for multiplayer just kills it for me
>>
File: compact commander.jpg (460KB, 1603x1117px) Image search: [Google]
compact commander.jpg
460KB, 1603x1117px
>>127942949
>>
>>127944287
I never have more than 2 squads of infantry in at once.

Just split them into teams of 2 or 4 and the micro is hardly even a thing.
Static guns are just place them and forget. And tanks are easy to manage
>>
>>127942949
As someone who's played PR for years, I find it to be pretty dull right now. There's nothing that really differentiates it from other shooters apart from most people working together. Once there's some vehicles and a logistics system it should be a lot more interesting.
>>
>>127946302
>Once there's some vehicles and a logistics system it should be a lot more interesting.

So in like 5 years.
>>
>>127946741
2 years before we get broken humvees
2 more years to fix them
another 3 years to add trucks for other factions
2 years to fix those
1 year to add logistics
Then it will finally enter version 0.02
>>
>>127947482
Then the netcode will break.
>>
File: T-34.jpg (248KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]
T-34.jpg
248KB, 1600x1200px
BMP
>>
>>127950883
>T-72 BM
>BMP
Is this the newest meme?
>>
File: f15clangley_2[1].jpg (59KB, 640x380px) Image search: [Google]
f15clangley_2[1].jpg
59KB, 640x380px
reminder that the cobra maneuver is useless and god's plane still turns better than the wanker
>>
>>127951498
neo-neo planeposter detected
>>
File: not this one, retard.jpg (62KB, 640x432px) Image search: [Google]
not this one, retard.jpg
62KB, 640x432px
>>127951498
It's an old meme.
>>
File: ss+(2015-11-28+at+10.03.45).png (28KB, 1028x109px) Image search: [Google]
ss+(2015-11-28+at+10.03.45).png
28KB, 1028x109px
>>127952609
What the fuck are you doing? That's my meme/bait and it's trademarked. Fucking make your own you fucking faggot.
>>
>>127954592
You honestly believe yourself the only faggot here who appreciates the confirmed best aircraft?
>>
north korean kh-21 pilot-guided missile
>>
>>127957754
Stop trying to force this meme, newfag
>>
File: Capture.png (24KB, 185x173px) Image search: [Google]
Capture.png
24KB, 185x173px
Where were you when Cobra confirmed a Block 6 VF-1 Valkyrie for DCS?
>>
File: y37W7Ex.jpg (165KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
y37W7Ex.jpg
165KB, 1920x1080px
ayy
>>
File: rip.webm (2MB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]
rip.webm
2MB, 960x540px
It's another shoah.
>>
File: 2016-01-08_00002.jpg (480KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
2016-01-08_00002.jpg
480KB, 1920x1080px
Oh boy, ANOTHER eastern bloc deck.

Well, do you think this competitive? Too little command units?
>>
>>127960694
Competitive for what?

And no, it's not competitive. EB is the weakest faction right now, except maybe cmw.

Even without that, you have a lot of errors. Here are a few:
>mi-24a over 24d ever
>LAZUR or any 3/2 fighter taken at below elite vet
>dogshit/no bomber, no AT plane
>spamming line in the mot. faction
>t-72m1 over wilk
>dogshit antiplane
>overcosted command
>supply helo
>>
>>127944287
Part of the skill ceiling in the game is learning when to micro and when to just save your effort so you can stay focused on the big picture. You'd be surprised, watching tourny matches, just how much people delegate to the AI so they can keep their entire force effective instead of just one guy with a grenade.

Not to say micro isn't important, but it's nowhere near Gookclick levels. It's about finding a healthy balance and learning how to force your opponent to micro more than you so he makes mistakes and can't pay attention to everything he has.
>>
http://exhentai.org/g/708947/9509111cd0/

anime

>>127942949
Yes, gud fun with me.

Soviet weapons are very satisfying too, RPK gives a mean roar. Hopefully we see vehicles in soon with humvee and some technicals mounting KPV.
>>
>>127963149
poor panda
>>
>>127963149
>Hungarly
>palatrooper
Yeah, I shouldn't be checking this out for the text, I know.
>>
Does the BTR series have the same paper thin armor as the BMP series? Or is their armor even thinner?
>>
>>127965963
Worse. It's armor is pretty thin, with the side potentially vulnerable to 7.62mm below 100 meters. Any sort of explosive, anti-tank or not, is largely capable of at least damaging it's systems. It's just not really made to take any sort of heavy fire, small arms or not.
>>
>>127966586
What about autocannon rounds? Why even call them "armoured" personnel carriers when they're just closed up trucks?
>>
>>127966697
It keeps the infantry less frightened.
>>
>>127966697
Contains hepatitis outbreaks.
>>
>>127966697
Because APC's are only mean to deal with small arms. Very few, from ANY nation, can stand up to any serious fire. They keep you alive against shit like shrapnel while advancing with armor, or bring you to objectives and then dump you out to provide light fire support. That's pretty much it. It can bounce any small arms coming from the front, or that isn't in close quarters to it's side(at which point you've got bigger concerns anyway, like being roasted by a molotov). It's better than being in a half-track. You gotta remember, at the end of the day it's just an armored car. A car.
>>
>>127966697
>>127966962
>>127967052
>>127967053
>>127966586
>>127965963

APCs in general aren't particularly armored, they are protected against small arms. The point of APCs isn't to be a tank, it's to bring troops around without being shot by stray bullets and in places where there aren't great roads.

The BTR has the added advantage of carrying a 14.5mm machinegun that can destroy helicopters, shoot through a lot of walls, and is a real danger any light vehicle.

Russians consider the BTR a mobile Heavy MG nest.
>>
File: amused_frog.png (157KB, 547x471px) Image search: [Google]
amused_frog.png
157KB, 547x471px
>>127827581
>hexagons AND squares
>you can have your cake and eat it too
game?
>>
>>127960694
I stopped after looking at your command unit
>>
>>127887837
game?
i've a thing for TOE porn
>>
>>127960694
>another nswp deck
>as if there was any to begin with
Anyway.
>worse possible choice of cv
>supply helo
>strela-2
>fjb
>in mi-24a
>no motschutzen '90
>non-space age tube arty
>kub
>no wilk m1
>any t-55
>no airforce to speak of
>>
File: 1210151405.jpg (4MB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]
1210151405.jpg
4MB, 4160x2340px
Constructive criticism?
>>
File: 14431428333852.jpg (126KB, 986x591px) Image search: [Google]
14431428333852.jpg
126KB, 986x591px
>>127970865
Everything is wrong with your post. Everything.
>>
>>127970865
Please be trolling.
>>
>>127970865
screencap instead of taking a picture like some autist
>>
>>127968545
>The BTR has the added advantage of carrying a 14.5mm machinegun that can destroy helicopters, shoot through a lot of walls, and is a real danger any light vehicle.

>what is .50 cal
>>
>>127971048
.50 Cal is only 12.7mm
>>
File: caliber.jpg (20KB, 130x359px) Image search: [Google]
caliber.jpg
20KB, 130x359px
>>127971048
An inferior weapon system.
>>
>>127963149
>giant as val
>micro pkm
>20mm aksu
>>
File: 5041d70148[1].jpg (591KB, 994x779px) Image search: [Google]
5041d70148[1].jpg
591KB, 994x779px
I know it's afghanistan, but fuck. Every road, whether in Germany or Iraq or wherever, is a series of mountains that tanks can't see over, apparently.
>>
File: 1443232263458.gif (650KB, 315x258px) Image search: [Google]
1443232263458.gif
650KB, 315x258px
>>127971785
Yeah, at least it was only drawn in 1995 so I guess back then there weren't autism games to know the correct size rifle.

Someone post that oversized FAL in the armory
>>
File: 20mm SLR.jpg (203KB, 327x408px) Image search: [Google]
20mm SLR.jpg
203KB, 327x408px
>>127972391
>>
>>127971929
What game is this? Looks interesting. Been looking for Soviet-Afghan war games.
>>
>>127973585
WINSPMBT

gameplay's somewhat annoying but it's an excellent resource for TO&Es
>>
>>127934857
This is what the KPV on the btr is for, stupid japs
>>
File: Dutchko 1.jpg (95KB, 600x849px) Image search: [Google]
Dutchko 1.jpg
95KB, 600x849px
>>127974052
I reverse searched the image, and now realise the guy who made that /wgg/ picture draws the funniest hentai ever.

Finally found a place that produces porn that caters to the very niche russian military equipment fetish.
>>
>>127974764
Is he the guy who also made that image where a polish btr gets cluster bombed and she is ahegao?
>>
>>127974940
I am pretty sure he is.
Whom ever he is, he draws really well, but jerking off to anime girls getting killed is still pretty weird.
>>
File: cute.jpg (384KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
cute.jpg
384KB, 1920x1080px
>>127900739
I thought every plane has a specular map support now?
>>
File: 1436679568324.jpg (183KB, 984x722px) Image search: [Google]
1436679568324.jpg
183KB, 984x722px
>>127975008
I'm sure our comrades win the battle enough in the manga for the jacking off to be justified.
>>
>>127975008
I just took a look and what is this where I see a korean "special forces command" in a very tight situation, is he drawing his own nation's commanders like this?
>>
>>127975138
The thing that always irked me about that image is that the screenshot shows the player on the American side.
>>
File: 1428672088787.jpg (328KB, 423x600px) Image search: [Google]
1428672088787.jpg
328KB, 423x600px
>ptur konkurs magazine
why wasn't I informed
>>
File: 1451946132357.jpg (550KB, 800x1093px) Image search: [Google]
1451946132357.jpg
550KB, 800x1093px
>>
>>127973643
>WINSPMBT
What do you mean by annoying? Just curious.

Any other recs for good COIN combat games?
>>
File: RelicCoH2 2016-01-08 22-59-03-97.jpg (155KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]
RelicCoH2 2016-01-08 22-59-03-97.jpg
155KB, 1280x800px
So quiet all of a sudden
>>
>>127977679
>Company of Heroes 2
I haven't played this in a while and I hear that the british forces released with some stupid shit like bofors just one shotting garrisons.

Even now in the game I tested that a low caliber bofors can act as artillery seems ridiculous. Not to mention great infantry with a nice light machine gun. I guess this is just typical COH2 DLC bullshit.
>>
https://youtu.be/F4EmjU_JTS0

The british are using WW2 submachine guns in this what the fuck

>here we are doing damage control
>>
>>127876125
yeah I do. I'm so autistic I used a spreadsheet to calculate mortar coordinates.
>>
File: RelicCoH2 2016-01-08 16-10-04-39.jpg (202KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]
RelicCoH2 2016-01-08 16-10-04-39.jpg
202KB, 1280x800px
>>127978093
>bofors just one shotting garrisons
Never built one since they weren´t that great in the first game and just seem so expensive to build
>great infantry with a nice light machine gun
Suprising how good the brits can be when they don´t need a guy with a revolver/sten needing to babysit them isn´t it?
>>
File: 14513071385920.gif (2MB, 296x142px) Image search: [Google]
14513071385920.gif
2MB, 296x142px
>>127975138
>>127850318
>>127887196
WGG maymays - best maymays.
>>
>>127975008
It's pretty pathetic.
>>
>USA accidentally shipped a hellfire rocket to cuba

literally
>>
Turns out that the BMS campaign is actually fun as fuck if you set the missions up yourself and don't fly the generated ones
>>
>>127832058
Is that combat mission?
>>
>>127987719
Yes
>>
>>127989065
Is it possible to pirate the newest version?
I would like to try it and the demo doesnt work
>>
>>127989136
I have no idea I've never played it. Was just answering the question
>>
What is the point of 3mil $ tanks if they can be destroyed by 500$ RPG-29?
>>
>>127990218
because money is infinite for the goverment and that 500$ rpg is going to take alot of effort to get through the infantry support any competent world power uses with their tanks.
>>
File: fry.png (188KB, 603x452px) Image search: [Google]
fry.png
188KB, 603x452px
>>127990218
>What is the point of 200mil $ aicraft if they can be destroyed by 5$ screwdriver?
>>
>>127990218
Whats the point of living when your life is destroyed by your pure idiocy.
>>
File: 139723997682.png (58KB, 853x543px) Image search: [Google]
139723997682.png
58KB, 853x543px
>>127990218
>What is the point of 3mil $ tanks if they can be destroyed by 500$ RPG-29?
>can be destroyed by 500$ RPG-29?
>can be destroyed
>
son you know thats not possible
>>
File: 1015628-doc2fb_image_02000007.jpg (36KB, 640x513px) Image search: [Google]
1015628-doc2fb_image_02000007.jpg
36KB, 640x513px
>>127994241
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWkgNp-5Orc
>>
>>127994538
that wasnt EVEN a mobility kill
>>
File: 1444186233244.jpg (182KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]
1444186233244.jpg
182KB, 1200x900px
>>127994621
Nah side armor of turret is useless against even old RPG-7 though it's a problem all modern tanks
>>
>>127970719
arma 3
>>
Anyone has working link for modern battlefield 2 for MoWAS? I computer died some time ago so i lost it
>>
File: just.jpg (1MB, 1920x1040px) Image search: [Google]
just.jpg
1MB, 1920x1040px
Guess I'll have to read the manual
>>
>>127996972
>tfw paid out the ass for WitE
>did the operation boot camp
>started reading the manual
Still getting my shit kicked in.
>>
>>127975078
If they do, why don't they fix the default (read: the only ones selectable in multiplayer) skins to reflect (:^)) this change?
>>
>>127975891
>>127975495
tfw no scans
God damn obscure korean shit
>>
File: Presetup.png (403KB, 1366x728px) Image search: [Google]
Presetup.png
403KB, 1366x728px
Today a German assault on an American position who have entrenched themselves on a hill.
>>
File: BS15.jpg (292KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
BS15.jpg
292KB, 1920x1080px
bmp
>>
File: graddy.jpg (371KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]
graddy.jpg
371KB, 1024x1024px
>>127970865
>>
>>128006972
Why does it say "gyaddy ashayad"? What is that supposed to mean?

fukken retarded font designers
>>
Who here /hexshit/

What have y'all been playing?

Need recs beyond the average stuff (Panzer Corps, basic Matrix stuff).
>>
>>127995042
But the round clearly did not penetrate.
>>
File: 1449932168446.jpg (1MB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]
1449932168446.jpg
1MB, 1500x1000px
>>128007625
I'm enjoying Flashpoint Campaigns with the mod that one local anon made for East Germany OOB and campaign, though I think it might fall under basic Matrix stuff category as well as WitE
>>
File: kurwa.jpg (206KB, 671x875px) Image search: [Google]
kurwa.jpg
206KB, 671x875px
>>128007625
I've been working on the polacks.

Converting the BTRs to SKOTs is on the table right now, but I'm having trouble finding a reliable TO&E.
The Poles were unique among Warpac armies in that they preferred a more flexible command system and spacing, making them somewhat more like a NATO army than a Warsaw Pact army. Should make for some interesting even engagements, as the Poles will mostly be facing second line NATO units that they can take on (Leo 1s, Older Chieftains, M60s and early M1s)

>>128008196
Glad you like it.
>>
>>128007625
Steel Panthers MBT, probably gonna start a generated campaign as china to remove some sushi
>>
How can anyone like call to arms?
a fucking TOW Humvee gets:
>1500 penetration
>unlimited range
>SACLOS

I have no experience in designing games and I can tell it's a very very bad game design.
>>
>>128010974
TOWs really aren't that impressive, anon. It's an expensive and highly situational solution to a problem that can be solved for a lot cheaper, and can be countered by being remotely cautious instead of going XAXAXAXAXAXAXAXAAAAAA MOTHERLAND and 1A'ing your vehicle across the map. Even in the new armored warfare mode it gets BTFO now that people know how to deal with it, and the map in that game mode is the most ideal and perfect for TOW's
>>
>>128010974
A TOW Humvee can be erased in seconds with any moderately armed APC.
>>
File: 1443459425536.gif (2MB, 294x224px) Image search: [Google]
1443459425536.gif
2MB, 294x224px
>>128011264
>>128011207
>units one-shotting eachother to infinity is good gameplay design

Where did everything go so wrong?
>>
>>128011652
>things die fast in real life
>muh balanse

I think you're better suited to an Arcade game like Wargame: Red Dragon.
>>
>>127978093
Bofors can instagib Kraut squads in seconds if you aren't careful.

However, OKW is obscenely overpowered, with the Wehrmacht at a lesser extent. German factions literally play themselves. Stick with CoH1 where there's a semblance of balance.
>>
>>128011652
They typically don't. And even if they did, that's what tactics are for. If you're too lazy/retarded to use combined arms and positioning so your precious late-game unit you floated a ton of MP for doesn't instantly get slapped(Likely leading to your ragequit, from the sound of it), then maybe you should play Clash of Clans instead of an RTS, because even Wargame would punish you with the same exact shit. Tanks aren't some 'I win' button. They're a tool for specific tasks. You don't just build vehicles for the fuck of having vehicles. They have intended roles and you have to make a judgement call as to if you need their toolsets and if they are worth the cost, and if you can manage handling them properly in the first place.

Fuck out of here. TOW's are fucking nothing compared to Brandenburgers or Kamikaze. It's far easier to keep shit alive in Call to Arms if you're remotely cautious. Not least of which because if you zoom in until black borders, you reveal stealthed shit
>>
>>128011652
Hard counters encourage tactics, things like working hard to avoid your counter. Soft counters encourage gookclick.
>>
File: 14368934581170.gif (2MB, 500x258px) Image search: [Google]
14368934581170.gif
2MB, 500x258px
>>128011750
real life engagements don't take place on like 500 meters squared maps either, guess I am better off with wargame.

>>128012065
> TOW's are fucking nothing compared to Brandenburgers or Kamikaze.
>comparing infantry units with extremely limited range to a highly mobile vehicle with infinite range.
fuck off with this bait.

>>128012412
>hard counter
>counters everything since it can just splash infantry by hitting the ground next to them

Hope you're a better clicker than your enemy because whoever clicks the mouse first wins. :)
>>
>>128012573
you know, the point of hard counters is that no matter how fast you click the mouse, that tank is gonna anally obliterate your humvee if its in a range where it counters it
>>
>>128012803
Which tank? The same tank that will get obliterated by my TOW if I click first?
>>
>>128012573
>This entire post
Maximum shitter detected.

>real life engagements
>Wargame
I'm not going to even touch how pants on head retarded this comparison is.

>Infantry units with extremely limited range
...That also have insanely high stealth ratings, and an AT weapon that can fire on an arc, and has higher penetration than not only any other handheld AT in the game, but higher penetration than most tank destroyers at anything other than sub-50 range with APCR. And you get 4 of them, as well as a fireteam with an MG-34 for the fuck of it.

>TOW counters everything because it can kill infantry
Extremely bunched up infantry. In the open. With no obstructions in the way. On the second longest weapon reload in the game. In a thin-skinned armored car with a gunner with no protection. That can be completed decrewed or outright destroyed under any sort of small arms fire since it can't defend itself against direct attacks. That costs 550MP and puts a huge hole in your force composition
>>
>>128007625
Currently playing War Plan Orange before diving off the deep end into War in the Pacific.
>>
>play blufor for a change
>win infantry battles
>win tank engagements
>atgm actually hit and do good damage
Balanse aint free.
Well, more specifically I don't have to use combined arms and a ton of support units to win engagements, it's pretty comfy actually.
>>
>>128013115
tow has a travel time, tank shot does not

I'd love to see those ultra magical clicking skills that let you make ATGM faster than boolet.
>>
>>128013224
>...That also have insanely high stealth ratings
still gets beaten by properly set up frontline

>AT weapon that can fire on an arc
TOW not only can fire on an arc but it can also fucking turn mid flight

>and has higher penetration than not only any other handheld AT in the game
Which is balanced by the fact it's single use and the accuracy is pretty shit

>but higher penetration than most tank destroyers at anything other than sub-50 range with APCR
Probably because their range is even lower than 50?

>That can be completed decrewed or outright destroyed under any sort of small arms fire since it can't defend itself against direct attacks.
Why the fuck would you need to defend yourself when you have no range limit, you can sit out in your spawn and snipe from there, let alone the mobility is more than enough to get the TOW from most tight spots.

>>128014169
I'd love to see you spot my TOW when it's sitting in my spawn 3 trillion kilometers away :^)
>>
>>128014310
>I'd love to see you spot my TOW when it's sitting in my spawn 3 trillion kilometers away :^)
Are you pretending that you didn't read my post where I explicitly mentioned range or are you just retarded?
>>
>>128014656
>if this very situational thing happens I'll counter your unit

yeah totally made your point broski.
>>
>>128014310
>Properly set up frontline
They can literally crawl past anything that isn't within 15 range open ground and 10 range in grass. And there are four of them. And their AT has a range of 45. And can penetrate almost every tank in the game frontally. Learn the actual game mechanics.

>TOW can turn mid-flight
Big fucking whoop. It's not like you can straight up loop it past walls at tight angles. Especially with the lag-time of direct control turn rates.

>Single use and shit accuracy
It only needs a single use when it costs no man-power and kills units that are several hundred MP or large chunks of your SP pool. Also it's accuracy is largely the same as any other handheld AT, which is pretty good, considering your target is a gigantic fucking tank that is almost impossible to miss unless you're shooting at it from a weird ass angle.

>Muh range limit.
Maps aren't flat, open spaces with no obstructions.

You're welcome to play against me and display the OP-ness of a TOW
>>
>>128014894
TOW counters tank at range
tank counters TOW up close
this isnt a difficult concept
>>
File: 4eb1801e7b[1].jpg (493KB, 1039x800px) Image search: [Google]
4eb1801e7b[1].jpg
493KB, 1039x800px
The highlight of the engagement is when a drunken mig-21 pilot bombed one of my Danas.

I'm still annoyed by how the AI hates tanks. I set it to "tank heavy" and it still only bought light inf + 2 gepards.
>>
File: F16_SCANG_InFlight[1].jpg (969KB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]
F16_SCANG_InFlight[1].jpg
969KB, 1800x1200px
Actual greatest plane of the cold war. Shame you can't fly it in DCS.
>>
>>128015829
Don't bother. Notice how dude went silent at the offer to actually put his dumb theory to the test?
>>
>>128019559
>compares infantry to vehicles
>ignores the fact that brandenburgers and kamikaze cost SP too
>posts wrong information
>dumb enough to stand still long enough for infantry to sneak up on his tanks
>expects me to reply to his stupid post
:^)

>>128015829
Which brings us back to this: >>128011652
They might as well throw the entire armor simulation bestway perfected into trash if the game is all about units with infinite penetration.
>>
>>128018389
>greatest plane of the cold war
>Incapable of BVR for most of said cold war
>>
>>128022478
Sure the Sparrow was a piece of shit, but the Russians didn't really have anything that was much better. It completely shits on the Mig series in WVR and is still an excellent multirole capable of doing any job.

Nevermind it's historical success and production run: With more than 4000 produced and in service with a wide array of countries, it decisively outnumbers any peer Soviet aircraft. It is virtually undefeated in air-to-air combat barring scenarios where it was operated by poo-in-loos.
>>
>>128023146
But muh F-15.

I don't disagree with your post, but
>Mig series
you should know better, that's like saying F series or A series for US aircraft.
>>
>>128023512
F-15 was the greatest plane by technicality alone, but the F-16 was far more successful in production, service, and versatility.
>>
File: 8645214650_592929599c_b.jpg (369KB, 1024x648px) Image search: [Google]
8645214650_592929599c_b.jpg
369KB, 1024x648px
>she was never given a chance

;_ ;
>>
>>128023823
Yeah, that's a shame. Otherwise great design was obsolete by the time there were any fights to fight.
>>
>Conquest 2v2
>Enemy is Scandi and amerifat
>Amerifat enemy is taking a shit and scandifag begs us to wait
>nope.jpeg
>750-0 in 15 mins
>>
>>128020380
>All this asspain because you don't know how to play
If you don't like down to earth portrayels of vehicles, then why are you in this thread? Don't do stupid shit and you wont get rekt by an expensive as fuck counter that's only useful against very specific units.
>>
>>128024457
why even play online if you don't want opponents, it's not like you're getting points for the win
>>
i just finished the H Hour, 1994 scenario in Command Modern air naval operations. In this scenario, the cold war never ended and in 1994 the Soviets decide to attack. In this situation, i have to play as Norway and defend it from Soviet air and naval assault. Sweden declared neutrality (lel) and Finland let themselves get invaded and left their planes on the ground because they had to be cucks due to Finlandization. Anyways, i was getting fucking raped at the start because the Norwegian F-16s are pieces of shit with only short range air to air missiles, but once the americucks sent me F-15s with AIM-120s i did better.

My final score was 49: Average.
SIDE: Warsaw Pact
===========================================================
LOSSES:
-------------------------------
40x Su-27S Flanker B
6x RK Osa II [Pr.205U]
40x MiG-29 Fulcrum A
4x MRK Nanuchka III [Pr.1234.1 Ovod]
7x MiG-27K Flogger J
2x Su-25 Frogfoot A
7x Mi-24P Hind F
5x Mi-24P Hind F
3x Mi-8MTV Hip H
42x MiG-23MLD Flogger K
6x Su-17M-4R Fitter K
21x Su-24M Fencer D
1x PL-877 Kilo
4x RK Tarantul III [Pr.1241RE Molniya]
6x An-12BP Cub A
2x Su-24MP Fencer F
1x MiG-25RBS Foxbat D
2x An-12BK-PPS Cub D
2x Su-17M-4 Fitter K
6x BMP-1 [AT-3 Sagger B] IFV
>>
How would you handle infantry in wargame - style RTS set in ww2?
>>
File: 1446864604188.png (1MB, 788x872px) Image search: [Google]
1446864604188.png
1MB, 788x872px
>want to play DPRK tank heavy
>Fucking base T-80 is miles better than my Chonma-ho IV's
>No solid mid range tank for scouting and work horse duty.

Trying to play offensively where all you can use in an open field is t-90's turns the game into a game of protect the t-90s' from suicide planes and arty spam.
>>
SIDE: NATO
===========================================================
LOSSES:
-------------------------------
1x Radar (GLOBUS I [Creek Maid ELINT Station])
2x Radar (AN/FPS-110)
2x Radar (AN/FPS-6A HF)
2x Radar (S-600 Gapfiller)
1x Bunker (ELINT Station)
2x Bunker (COMINT Station)
1x Radar (GLOBUS I [EO/IR/ELINT Station])
46x F-16A Falcon
2x P 960 Storm
3x P 980 Snogg
3x P 986 Hauk
2x Falcon 20C-ECM
1x E-3A Sentry
3x Vehicle (RSS-40 Skyguard)
5x 40mm/70 Single Bofors
1x P-3N Orion
1x Lynx Mk86
4x Radar (S-244 HF)
2x Radar (S-266)
2x Radar (Coastal)
1x KV Nordkapp [W 320]
2x F 300 Oslo [Dealey Mod]
19x 7.62mm MG
1x A/C Hangar (4x Large Aircraft)
2x Building (Control Tower)
4x NM135 APC [M113A1]
1x E-3A Sentry
4x F-16AM Falcon MLU
14x F-5A Freedom Fighter
3x RB 70 Rayrider Mk2 MANPADS
1x Structure (Pier [Extra Large, 200-500m])
1x Building (Small)
5x Structure (Tunnel Entrance)
1x P-3C Orion Update III
5x F-15C Eagle
3x F-16A Falcon
2x Bunker (ACINT SOSUS Station)
>>
>>128026859
T-72M is better than the base T-80 however
>>
File: Balance.png (831KB, 966x643px) Image search: [Google]
Balance.png
831KB, 966x643px
>>128027159
I beg to differ.
>>
>>128027716
>better AP (which is by far the most critical and important quality for tanks in this price range)
>better autonomy
>better optics
>>
>>128027875


actually ROF is very very important
>>
File: hp pool.png (118KB, 1180x1326px) Image search: [Google]
hp pool.png
118KB, 1180x1326px
>>128027875

Lets break ity down barney style:

T72M advantages:

+1 AP (range scaling)
+200 autonomy
+med optics

T-80 Advantages:

+175 range (most important tied with accuracy)
+5% accuracy (range scale)
+15% Stabs (range scale)
+1 front, side, and top armor (god send against clusters)
+10 speed
+2 ROF (extremely important for second shot speed against 10 rpm blue mediums)

The combination of speed, stabilizer, ROF, range, and armor make the T-80 a far better offensive tank.
>>
File: -69502755_394589481.jpg (121KB, 1000x666px) Image search: [Google]
-69502755_394589481.jpg
121KB, 1000x666px
BTR
>>
>>128025096
as NK use Type 63 and bochongsu for your pushes, instead of medium tanks.
>>
File: 1ax0yyA.jpg (1MB, 4876x2276px) Image search: [Google]
1ax0yyA.jpg
1MB, 4876x2276px
>>
if every wargamer was posting with "wargame" as name and every planeposter posts with "planeposter" as name we could just filter each other and have two threads in one
>>
>>128035561
Try bumping the thread without shitposting next time.
>>
>>128035561
The only people I want to be gone are some of the Eugene babbies and all of the armafags. Also fuck off.
>>
File: f8c4d4bfeb[1].jpg (656KB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]
f8c4d4bfeb[1].jpg
656KB, 1680x1050px
SKOT Battalion is done.
>>
>>127888894
>Corsair won't have a proper adversary for fuck knows how long
>D4Y Suisei will get made once I'm on the verge of death and I'm on my mid 20s
>>
I just did a DCS mission, I got 6 kills
2 were missile kills, 3 cannon kills and a ram. But I survived the mission

How did I do?
>>
>>128038765
congrats
>>
File: f yeah.jpg (39KB, 301x267px) Image search: [Google]
f yeah.jpg
39KB, 301x267px
>>128038765
>ram kill
>survive
>>
eugene gibb buk m3 pls http://sputniknews.com/russia/20160109/1032883553/buk-new-anti-aircraft-weapon.html
>>
Are there any good Rhodesian bush war mods for Men at War?
>>
>>128039553
no you stupid racist
>>
>>128039168
>0.9999 percent certainty
>the speed of a missile fired by a US-made MGM-140 ATACMS surface-to-air missile launcher doesn’t exceed 1.5 kilometers per hour
What the fuck slavaboo wrote this?
>>
>>128011947
How do the russians factor in all this?
>>
>>128039553
No. Not exactly a compelling theme for Men of War, and the game has enough redpilled faggots as is.
>>
What's the best medium-cost AA unit for supporting tanks in Bloc? Obviously I already have TOR and Tung, but that's only 3 total units.
>45 point Shilka
Too slow
>Strela 10
Poor vs helos
>Sopel
Good speed and acc but low DPM
>>
File: 1a135un9.jpg (851KB, 1658x2220px) Image search: [Google]
1a135un9.jpg
851KB, 1658x2220px
>>128039553
>>
File: 1a136ek7.jpg (1MB, 1620x2178px) Image search: [Google]
1a136ek7.jpg
1MB, 1620x2178px
>>
>>128040653
BUK
>>
>>128040653
OSA-AK obviously
is the base OSA okay to use as non-radar AA when upvetted or is it trash, haven't played since last patch
>>
File: 2016-01-09_00001.jpg (202KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
2016-01-09_00001.jpg
202KB, 1920x1080px
>>128038885
>>128039151
Here is the immediate aftermath
Unfortunately I never got the F15 exploding in the background
>>
>>128040653
kub-m
>>
>>128040653
strop 2 if general deck. if limited to tracked, then sopel or strela-10
>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathias_Rust

>be german hooligan
>get in civilian biplane
>fly through several hundred kms of "imbenedrable" soviet AA net and land in moscow

But muh AA net was supposed to shield them from NATO air rape?!??
>>
>>128043730
>biplane
>soviet pilots were denied the permission to splash him several times
Are you genuinely as retarded as the average vatnik or just pretending?
>>
>>128044314
> Rust's flight through a supposedly impregnable air defense system had great effect on the Soviet military and led to the dismissal of many senior officers, including Minister of Defense Marshal of the Soviet Union Sergei Sokolov and the Commander-in-Chief of the Soviet Air Defence Forces, former World War II fighter ace pilot Chief Marshal Alexander Koldunov.

Even the Soviets knew they fucked up
>>
>>128043730
>comrade we have aircraft entering airspace
>is not responding to iff tags
>what is
>has flight characteristics of civilian propeller plane sir
>can we shoot tovarisch commander
>no
>>
>>128043730
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathias_Rust
>Stabbed a girl in 1989 for not wanting to fuck him
>>
>>128028608
Range is very far from being the most important thing in tanks though, it's just that it is tied to other offensive stats due to scaling.
>>
>>128045157
>fuck with germans
>>get killed

>don't fuck with germans
>>get killed as well

best nation
>>
>>128047005
>germany
>tries to fuck with russia
>gets liberated
>country is split for 50 year
You have pretty low standards.
>>
>>128040653
strela 10 is a great defensive unit, like if you want to entrench after you've extended the line with your tanks
it's only lacking at pushing up against a longbow, for that you have no choice but to use tung or lazur
if you're looking for low-cost then expecting it to counter longbow is a bit ambitious, and strela 10 does will against the other stuff
>>
File: woah woah woah.webm (1MB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]
woah woah woah.webm
1MB, 960x540px
I wish they'd fix the stuttering that happens whenever someone joins or leaves.
>>
No strela 10 is not great. Crotale is great. Chap a3 is great. Sub-2800m anti-helo is pretty shit.
>>
>>128048079
2 base osas are a lot better than a strela 10 now
>>
>>128049890
thanks for pointless USSR buffs I guess
>>
>>128050064
1. Not only the USSR has osa.
2. USSR as well as all the redfor factions need serious buffs if balance is to be achieved.
>>
>>128050248
>people are still out there who think USSR needs buffs
This is exactly why no one uses redfor minors, everything they do the USSR does better.
>>
>>128050248
if USSR needed buffs everything would've been much simpler, the whole problem of red is that most buffs targeted at EB/RD end up hitting USSR as well which is already a tier 1 deck
>>
>>128051097
>>128051119
>only one faction of redfor is not the equivalent of shooting oneself in the foot
That faction must be OP and tier 1!
>>
>>128026816
Bump, I'm just wondering if the metaphor of small infantry squads that each get their own MG/RPG would still be appropriate
>>
>>128051097
>soviet protectorates use soviet equipment
Who would have thought.
>>
>>128051680
can your mind comprehend the possibility that one side could contain both strong and weak factions, or is that too novel?
>>
>>128051839
Why not?
>>
>>128052612
Well I know that the panzerfaust was a fairly new thing and I don't know how widespread it was, much less if the other sides had something similar in mass production.
>>
>>128052893
The option of just giving the early war infantry squad another non-AT support weapon is still present, like a BAR or something. Or you can give them grenades like in EE.
>>
>>128051119
May I ask what makes you think that the USSR is unworthy of the same buffs that could be applied to NSWP and RD concerning inappropriately weak units?
>>
>>128053579
You want me to explain why one nation shouldn't get access to all strong units for its entire faction, or you want me to explain why I think USSR in particular is a strong nation and thus shouldn't be buffed?
>>
>>128054442
Because if a unit came from the soviets (like most redfor units) then the soviets are going to have it also.
>>
>>128054442
>why one nation shouldn't get access to all strong units for its entire faction
This is irrelevant to the issue at hand as it's obviously not the case, unless by "strong unit" you actually meant "anything that's not entirely dogshit" in which case I am interested in hearing your opinion on the matter.
>why I think USSR in particular is a strong nation and thus shouldn't be buffed
Please go ahead.
>>
>>128054642
And that's the problem, if you buff EB to good then USSR will by definition be better than good because it contains everything in EB on top of its own unicorns. So EB should be buffed without buffing soviets, but that's hard because they don't have that many unique things.
>>
>>128054965
see >>128052178
>>
>>128054965
I agree with you.
I wasn't trying to disagree with you in my post.
And honestly, soviets deserve to be the best.
They are the main "boogyman" for everyone during the cold war.
Nobody was worried poland was going to invade with its high tech super military.
>>
File: 1443427881121.jpg (271KB, 900x952px) Image search: [Google]
1443427881121.jpg
271KB, 900x952px
anyone up for some ass squid 2?
>>
>>128055235
>ussr was the aggressor
Nice meme
>>
File: 1249768072275.png (400KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]
1249768072275.png
400KB, 640x480px
>>128055495
>>
>>128055507
They aggressively spread communism in Egypt, Korea, Vietnam, and countless other places. They didn't invade Europe because they knew they couldn't win.
>>
File: harder laugh.jpg (56KB, 363x310px) Image search: [Google]
harder laugh.jpg
56KB, 363x310px
>>128055912
>>
>>127978093
Brits are underpowered as fuck compared ot the ubermensch germans
>>128040505
underpowered as fuck
>>
>>128055912
And USA didn't aggressively spread their ideology? They were involved with the installment and support of several dictators all over the world.


Anyway, Call to Arms seems okay, if I enjoy fucking around in the editor is it worth getting?
>>
File: 152mm%20SpGH%20DANA_2[1].jpg (216KB, 920x669px) Image search: [Google]
152mm%20SpGH%20DANA_2[1].jpg
216KB, 920x669px
Is the Dana considered a purely Divisional level Artillery piece?
>>
>>128054940
If I give you a new unit and you put it in your deck, you're doing that because you think it's making your deck stronger. Most people here call units dogshit exactly when they're not worth putting in a deck, so yeah, non-dogshit units are strong.

As to why USSR is strong. If you have to actually have it proven to you that USSR is a tier 1 faction, you're in way too deep or you're way too new to talk about balance. Anyway, first, the obvious and not very smart argument - it's the most popular teamgame faction and the second most popular 1v1 faction among the top players.

Authority arguments aside, they're versatile. They have no weaknesses. Scandi gets no useful gunships, USA has no good cheap AA or competitive fighters, EB is stuck with bad fire support. Every faction has one or multiple issues like that, USSR has none. You want a strong motorized force, you go either BD or Scandi or USSR. You want efficient AA, you go either eurocorps or USSR. You want powerful AA, you go either USA or USSR. You want unicorn units, everyone has those, USSR included, and there's an argument to be made about USSR's sheer amount of unicorns but I'm sick of typing
>>
I prefer this sound to sex
http://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1452218214658.webm
>>
>>128059243
I just realized how irresponsible it is to shoot at that target like that. If that had missed who knows how far it could have gone and where it could have ended up
>>
File: 71df389cac[1].jpg (262KB, 1122x837px) Image search: [Google]
71df389cac[1].jpg
262KB, 1122x837px
wz.77 DANA is in. Just need to figure out how they're organized now.
>>
>>128060416
>ukrainians
>>
>tfw red dragon is shit and it will never be good
>>
File: f32edf678c[1].jpg (17KB, 285x134px) Image search: [Google]
f32edf678c[1].jpg
17KB, 285x134px
Custom insignias
>>
File: 95aa7a5373[1].jpg (93KB, 174x800px) Image search: [Google]
95aa7a5373[1].jpg
93KB, 174x800px
>>128066185
Tank Regiment (Dywizia Pancerna) is done:
>Regiment HQ
>Recon company: ???
>Tank Battalion x3
>>Battalion HQ
>>Tank Company x3
>>>Company HQ: 1x T-72 or T-55
>>>Tank Platoon x4: 3x T-72 or T-55
>Mech Battalion
>>Battalion HQ
>>Mech Company x3
>>>Company HQ: BMP or TOPAS, HQ Section, MANPADS
>>>Mech Platoon x3: 3x BMP or TOPAS, 3x Mech Inf (1 RPG)
>>Mortar Battery: 8x TOPAS-based SPMtr
>Regimental AA Company: 4x Szylka, 4x Strela
>Regimental Artillery Battalion
>>Battalion HQ
>>Regimental Artillery Battery x3: 6x 2S1

NSWP is poverty warfare. Whereas a good RPG-7 is squad level for Soviets, NSWP deal with them being a platoon level asset, with even their Cat A units main Inf AT being the RPG-18.
>>
>>128059139
Fuck you I just wanted to use T-72s not all this modern bullshit
>>
>>128008196
Where can I find this mod?
>>
File: 2016-01-09_00001.jpg (896KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
2016-01-09_00001.jpg
896KB, 1920x1080px
Well that was a wee bit on the stressful side.
>>
>>128070617
featuring me getting my shit fucked all game
>>
Anyone have a good USSR deck code? I'm overwhelmed by their selection.
>>
>>128071305
jPgQWBdAsGMLQ0VnO4Sk5xQaHPSp3F9TqKomosOXbDiGBSAhBVA+QPLpESUWBhtSAnJNHuRCHZP8s0RCKYlLiAzj9JsQyDgA

not sure if its any good though.
>>
>>128072012
Thanks. I'll give it a shot and tweak with it after a few games.
>>
>>128072158
might want to drop one of the arty units for another AA actually.
Depends on play style and what kind of matches you're doing.
>>
>>128072292
Yeah, I certainly will - every pub I go into these days seems to be flooded with arty spam. Even some tactical matches just have turds in back lobbing shells.
>>
File: victory.jpg (263KB, 500x728px) Image search: [Google]
victory.jpg
263KB, 500x728px
>>128070938
Don't sweat it. Ya held the line and didn't let them cross the river or give them too much freedom to gang up on other team members. That's good enough.
>>
File: 1449167977066.jpg (350KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]
1449167977066.jpg
350KB, 1920x1200px
Real question:

Who would win the air war in a hypothetical WW3 scenario?
>>
>>128074265
I miss red alert 3. Shame they shut down the servers.
>>
>>128075060
Switzerland
>>
File: 1.jpg (95KB, 640x403px) Image search: [Google]
1.jpg
95KB, 640x403px
>>128075060
With nukes: No one

Without nukes, but alliances are allowed: NATO

Without nukes and without alliances: USA probably, maybe China
>>
>>128075060
What year?
>>
>>128075060
Clearly Russia.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PXWJrpA8FnE
>>
>>128076259
>This video again
Do you have the one with that ridiculous ground combat drone?
>>
>>128076259
> ArmedForcesUpdate
>in every video comments are always "my nation is more undedable than your nation"
>>
>>127957754
Fuck you nigga, it's jungle chink
>>
>>128057623
In czechoslovak army yes, in current czech army its brigade level iirc
>>
>>128077000
armed forces update is cancer
>>
File: Sneaky Cheeki Breeky.jpg (170KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]
Sneaky Cheeki Breeky.jpg
170KB, 1600x1200px
>>128078457
>>
File: a743b9e20a[1].jpg (707KB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]
a743b9e20a[1].jpg
707KB, 1680x1050px
>>128075060
Decisively goes to whoever strikes first.
The receiver loses a very large part of their air-force on the ground in addition to a shit ton of confusion and electronic warfare. NATO is particularly vulnerable here due to a somewhat inferior AA net, as well as the long start-up times of many aircraft like the A-10.
A good example of this is the Six-day war: A Surprise pre-emptive strike by Israel, on the first day, knocked out 452 aircraft before most of the arab air forces could even take off. Furthermore, 18 airbases in the rear were disabled, leaving them unable to service arab aircraft for the remainder of the conflict.
In Flashpoint Campaigns for example, a Soviet first strike is assumed. On the first day, huge airstrikes and chemical attacks on NATO bases and airfields destroy most of NATO's air force on the ground. The Warsaw Pact enjoys air superiority on the opening days of the conflict, along with a very intense and sustained EW attack that knocks out much of NORTHAG's C3 for the first 12 hours. NATO eventually recovers of course, and whatever's left enjoys favorable engagements against Pact force in the air, as well as carrying out strikes against Pact C3 and Airbases. The latter half of the game thus features very few planes, maybe 2-4 for a few hours on a brigade-scale conflict.
The Polish forces I'm coming up with here will probably need price changes. This test scenario is a lopsided battle where a smaller Polish force, enjoying plenty of force multipliers, must stop the NATO armoured tide...
>>
>>128079137
Are the NATO tanks just supposed to filly nilly assault the Pole mechanized infantry?
>>
>>128079137
>Veteran Dutch
How are they veterans?
>>
File: b5112f7a0a[1].jpg (359KB, 914x817px) Image search: [Google]
b5112f7a0a[1].jpg
359KB, 914x817px
>>128079805
That's an option. Another would be using them to harass the Poles with screening fires while the Dutch wait for the Mechanized Inf Battalion to arrive.

The Polish jets (4x MiG-21 w/ S-24s, 2x Su-17 w/ Clusters and Napalm) wouldn't arrive until later and I'm thinking of attaching a company or so of PRTL Cheetahs (Gepards) so as to not leave them helpless. Might also attach heavy artillery like M110s if the Poles prove too difficult to dislodge. Although this is a poor example of a proper Flashpoint scenario as only a part of the map is used.

>>128080186
That's the training level (7/10) which is default for all NATO factions. It's silly, but it can easily be knocked down by a player who wishes to do so.
>>
>>128080394
Ah i see, so no dutch veterans of the dutch-chinese war then?
>>
>>128080729
They're actually all mice who live in windmills in old Amsterdam.
>>
File: bwp_2000[1].jpg (120KB, 600x401px) Image search: [Google]
bwp_2000[1].jpg
120KB, 600x401px
bwp
>>
File: RelicCoH2 2016-01-09 18-50-38-52.jpg (194KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]
RelicCoH2 2016-01-09 18-50-38-52.jpg
194KB, 1280x800px
>>
File: 45.jpg (114KB, 1920x1050px) Image search: [Google]
45.jpg
114KB, 1920x1050px
>>
>>128087490
Not a wargame, mate.
>>
>he doesn't listen to old school flight sim music when playing DCS

Get some taste faggots

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQrpcf59IN8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lz4mQUozTdI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xd6ltKo8JA

Flaming Cliffs 2 isn't quite old school, but the menu theme is still fire. First two give me the most extreme nostalgia that I've ever had.
>>
>>128088605
u wot
>>
>>128088605
>Attention grabbing search terms go here:
>/rtsg/
besides i just wanted to bump the thread, don´t get your panties in a twist
>>
>>128087919
Call me when you sink the Aquitania
>>
>>128089086
>current year
>still thinking that all the games about war are wargames
Go read the fucking Wikipedia on what wargames are
>>
File: 43.jpg (367KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
43.jpg
367KB, 1920x1080px
>>128089267
Okay I try
>>
File: avatar92852_17.gif.jpg (5KB, 60x60px) Image search: [Google]
avatar92852_17.gif.jpg
5KB, 60x60px
>Cobra's new avatar
I wonder what plane LN is hinting at this time
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImO4nHKqrOU
what game has the best sniper ballistics and physics
>>
File: 14347211554300.jpg (106KB, 547x917px) Image search: [Google]
14347211554300.jpg
106KB, 547x917px
>>128094456
No one. They all crap.
>>
File: poldef.jpg (1MB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]
poldef.jpg
1MB, 1680x1050px
Hampered by FASCAM, Air strikes, and Artillery, the Dutch aren't able to make terrible progress. They're at least able to shit on the Polish infantry without retaliation as the Malyutka gunners are hard pressed to find any opportunity to shoot back without getting themselves killed.
>>
>>128093665
Just the f14
>>
Can any hexfolks tell me if this game is worth 20 bucks:

http://www.matrixgames.com/products/318/details/John.Tiller%27s.Campaign.Series

On the fence about it.
>>
>>128096467
Is that attack photo some sort of mod?
>>
File: perhaps.jpg (157KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
perhaps.jpg
157KB, 1280x720px
>>128097205
Macross skins?
>>
>>128097283
More than likely or cobra is just a weeb or just maybe we are getting a VF-1 Valkyrie.
>>
File: ww2-141.jpg (249KB, 1391x1102px) Image search: [Google]
ww2-141.jpg
249KB, 1391x1102px
>>128097206
They good for newbies, But you easy can pirate them.
>>
File: d22409671d[1].jpg (785KB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]
d22409671d[1].jpg
785KB, 1680x1050px
>>128096467
4 Hours later...

Well, it's safe to say that a Cat C Polish force is no match for 2A4s. Dutch Infantry has reached our lines, and their mortars, as well as ATGMs have entered the fray as all our force multipliers are out of ammo. More competent pilots would have helped, and lucky side hits from our Meridas which have suffered in excess of 70% casualties.

>>128097275
Polish skins are available by default for the MiG-21Bis.
>>
>>128097606
Yeah, I see one in KAT, but it doesn't have a serial and even the ones I've found don't seem to work. I'm not very good at pirating games. Is there a better John Tiller game to get?
>>
File: 5529ad90e2[1].jpg (786KB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]
5529ad90e2[1].jpg
786KB, 1680x1050px
>>128097979
Polish Air power wins the day. Although the Dutch devastated the Polish force - inflicting 57% casualties. However, the Dutch likewise suffered heavy casualties - 59%. With Polish Artillery and Air strikes inflicting serious damage, the NATO force calls off their attack, having only captured the frontline objectives. NATO cannot afford these losses when remnants of the WGSF, two Polish armies, and Soviet reinforcements from Belarus are still advancing in the sector.

The Polish have faced a situation very similar to most NATO defensive battles - they suffered very heavy casualties and lost some ground, but not before severely damaging the enemy likewise, to a point where the attack simply wasn't worth the cost in the long run. Still, this is only a minor victory as renewed offensives by the I NL Corps are sure to dislodge the stragglers.
>>
>>128098989
Lessons learned:
>Attrition is a bitch, even in modern war
>Mech Inf in standoff positions is not advisable against tanks - use depth to cover them and thus forcing the enemy into close range
>FASCAM is the most powerful tool available to an artillery unit
>>
>>128098989
Where is the GDR campaign folks are talking about?
>>
File: Новый рисунок (30).png (1MB, 1358x677px) Image search: [Google]
Новый рисунок (30).png
1MB, 1358x677px
>>128098354
Nah, it's too simple. I'd prefer Squad Battles.
>>
>>128099474
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3989155

Here. Hasn't received any serious feedback thus far, and as such I have not made any serious changes. Tuning it right now was a lower priority than creating the Dutch faction however, and it's currently a lower priority than creating and refining the promised Polish forces (themselves due for a release sometime in the near future)
>>
>>128099568
That looks pretty neat.
>>
>>128099568
Is that a mod? What is it called and for which SB game is it?
>>
File: Новый рисунок (26).png (1MB, 1361x697px) Image search: [Google]
Новый рисунок (26).png
1MB, 1361x697px
>>128100182
>Is that a mod?
Yep.
>What is it called
World at War
>and for which SB game is it?
Pacific war.
>>
>>128100394
Where can I find it? Doesn't seem to be on tfe4.
>>
>>128070617
>tfw all Men Of War games are at 4AM for me
>>
File: 1410490337894.png (682KB, 1226x813px) Image search: [Google]
1410490337894.png
682KB, 1226x813px
>>128100572
Nowhere. Author asked delete it.
https://cloud.mail.ru/public/Ezfa/7uVeRAxTL
>>
>>128098989
Poles will include a second category after their primary "Soviet Style" TO&Es from 1979-88.

In 1989, Poland disbanded all of their Mech Division Tank regiments and flushed out their Mech regiments into Brigades, which had 2x Mech Bn(+) and 2x Tank Bn organization in opposition to the common warpac 3x Mech 1x Tank.
>>
>>128100394
Would you say the Squad Battles are the best of the Tiller games?


Cool mod, btw. Can it go over any SB base game?
>>
File: 14096466841000.jpg (240KB, 1000x500px) Image search: [Google]
14096466841000.jpg
240KB, 1000x500px
>>128101423
Yes, but i just like tactic level. PZ fine too. and dont trying PB though
>Can it go over any SB base game?
Nope, only PW.
>>
File: waffle doge.jpg (349KB, 1141x1141px) Image search: [Google]
waffle doge.jpg
349KB, 1141x1141px
What is Eugen working on now?

Wargame 4 when
>>
File: Act_of_Aggression_Cover_Art.jpg (76KB, 300x426px) Image search: [Google]
Act_of_Aggression_Cover_Art.jpg
76KB, 300x426px
>>128102018
This?
>>
File: 1434373819134.gif (1MB, 392x400px) Image search: [Google]
1434373819134.gif
1MB, 392x400px
>>128100963
>>
>>128101861
What's wrong with Panzer Battles?

Also why is this mod only for Pacific? Fuck me I wanted to get Soviet-Afghan War. The Chechnya shit is tempting, though.
>>
File: 14430363644472.png (2MB, 1042x1298px) Image search: [Google]
14430363644472.png
2MB, 1042x1298px
>>128102646
>Also why is this mod only for Pacific?
Using some staff from it. like AP-mines
>Fuck me I wanted to get Soviet-Afghan War.
They have dozens of good mods too.
>The Chechnya shit is tempting, though.
Just pirate PW. It's not so hard.
>>
File: red star.jpg (832KB, 1918x1039px) Image search: [Google]
red star.jpg
832KB, 1918x1039px
>>128101861
Got red star over europe to work. Don't have the other SB games for the other mods. Just have weird white stuff on my screen sometimes but that's not too bad. Thanks again. Also what's wrong with PB?
>>
File: drone.jpg (674KB, 2396x1489px) Image search: [Google]
drone.jpg
674KB, 2396x1489px
WHAT BEGAN AS A CONFLICT OVER THE TRANSFER OF CONSCIOUSNESS FROM FLESH TO MACHINES ESCALATED INTO A WAR WHICH HAS DECIMATED A MILLION WORLDS. THE CORE AND THE ARM HAVE ALL BUT EXHAUSTED THE RESOURCES OF A GALAXY IN THEIR STRUGGLE FOR DOMINATION. BOTH SIDES NOW CRIPPLED BEYOND REPAIR, THE REMNANTS OF THEIR ARMIES CONTINUE TO BATTLE ON RAVAGED PLANETS, THEIR HATRED FUELED BY OVER FOUR THOUSAND YEARS OF TOTAL WAR. THIS IS A FIGHT TO THE DEATH. FOR EACH SIDE, THE ONLY ACCEPTABLE OUTCOME IS THE COMPLETE ELIMINATION OF THE OTHER.
>>
File: VscKZ9j.jpg (142KB, 1200x789px) Image search: [Google]
VscKZ9j.jpg
142KB, 1200x789px
>>128103583
No one cracked it. And i don't want make PayPal acoount.
>>
File: 2016-01-09_00002.jpg (273KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
2016-01-09_00002.jpg
273KB, 1920x1080px
Post yfw F15 shitters BTFO
>>
>>128103825
WHAT BEGAN AS A CONFLICT OVER THE TRANSFER OF CONSCIOUSNESS FROM FLESH TO MACHINES ESCALATED INTO A WAR WHICH HAS DECIMATED A MILLION WORLDS. THE PLANEFAGS AND /WGG/ HAVE ALL BUT EXHAUSTED THE RESOURCES OF A GALAXY IN THEIR STRUGGLE FOR DOMINATION. BOTH SIDES NOW CRIPPLED BEYOND REPAIR, THE REMNANTS OF THEIR ARMIES CONTINUE TO BATTLE ON RAVAGED PLANETS, THEIR HATRED FUELED BY OVER FOUR THOUSAND YEARS OF TOTAL WAR. THIS IS A FIGHT TO THE DEATH. FOR EACH SIDE, THE ONLY ACCEPTABLE OUTCOME IS THE COMPLETE ELIMINATION OF THE OTHER.
>>
>>128103454
Is there a master list for JT game mods?
>>
File: bader thumbs up.jpg (44KB, 306x423px) Image search: [Google]
bader thumbs up.jpg
44KB, 306x423px
>>128104848
>>
>>128105206
Nope, you need lurking forums.
>>
>>128105370
Which forums? The Blitz?
>>
File: mapmod_sample_mc-2012.png (302KB, 460x400px) Image search: [Google]
mapmod_sample_mc-2012.png
302KB, 460x400px
>>128106974
Nah, just google it. Like [i]PZ mods[/i].
>>
>>128105062
>arma fags are so bad they are a minor faction
Ayyyyyyy
>>
>>128107661
I still can't find the ones you're talking about like the Chechen stuff, maybe I'm just an idiot.
>>
>>128104848
>AI

m8...
>>
>>128109263
I'm still learning senpai
>>
File: angry popo.exe.jpg (80KB, 1333x900px) Image search: [Google]
angry popo.exe.jpg
80KB, 1333x900px
>there will never be a game that where units have parts and damage models, types and armou rlike MoW but on a setting and scale of Supcom/TA or Homeworld
Please just kill me
>>
File: 14400211754001.jpg (257KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]
14400211754001.jpg
257KB, 1366x768px
>>128111097
Whatever.
>>
>>128111406
Is there a better way of dealing with mines in this game? I usually get my shit rekd by them with my T80s or scouts.
>>
>>128017198
what game is that?
>>
>>128111818
steel panthers
>>
>>128109114
See
>>128100182
>>128100394
>>128100963
>>
File: 2016-01-09_00008.jpg (671KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]
2016-01-09_00008.jpg
671KB, 2048x1152px
>>
File: 4242342342342.png (1MB, 1365x736px) Image search: [Google]
4242342342342.png
1MB, 1365x736px
>>128111669
Scouts.Tanks much costly for this.
>>
File: aaaayyyyyyy.png (217KB, 434x251px) Image search: [Google]
aaaayyyyyyy.png
217KB, 434x251px
>spaag
>>
>>128080394
I actually live in Overdinkel, never thought I would see it represented in a game.
>>
>>128114489
So I guess it has indeed been taken down everywhere? Why? I just wanted to read info about the scenarios.
>>
>>128115891
I didn't know this either, googled around and found this on the gamesquad forum: "He got in a row with JTS about some graphic improvement included in their newest released products that are similar to elements of his own mods and finally decided to throw in the towel altogether as regards his public SB modding activity"
Too bad
>>
>>128100683
Australian or something?
>>
>>128116202
>tfw I live in Central Asia and pretty much gave up on playing and games online anymore.

The internet speeds are terrible and the time zones are even worse (it's 12:12am here)
>>
>>128116682
You have my condolences.
>>
>>128116102
Just checking this out now. I don't have Pacific Battles, as the theater doesn't interest me that much, although I do have SAW.

How many Chechen and South Ossetian scenarios are there in this mod? Is it worth getting Pacific for?

>>128116819
I'm here for US government work so I'll be back in the US after...a few years.

All the internet cafes here are stacked with kids playing DOTA and I'm just trying to crank away on John Tiller stuff...
>>
>>128117221
>Kids playing DotA
On US East, I bet.
>>
>>128117221
Why not PBEM? PBEM works over the crappiest of crap internet.
Just pick a hexshit game and find a partner to play against.
>>
>>128117221
Nor do I, so I can't really help you. I do know that Pacific also has an Africa at war mod.
>>
>>128117513
I wouldn't be surprised.

>>128117554
I'm honestly not that great at most hexshit, and even then I'm absent from reliable anything (running water, electricity, let alone internet) for what can be long stretches of time.

What the "best" hexshit/wargame forum these days, anyway?

>>128117758
Damn, sounds like a lot of fun. I like the niche conflict stuff. Shame that Pacific gets all the good toys.
>>
File: 1437595055616.jpg (2MB, 1920x1580px) Image search: [Google]
1437595055616.jpg
2MB, 1920x1580px
>>
>>128120802
requesting the "I'm a one man team-my team sucks" one
>>
File: my team.jpg (910KB, 1766x1918px) Image search: [Google]
my team.jpg
910KB, 1766x1918px
>>128121758
>>
>>127861060
>dat propaganda
>>
>>128121858
>>128120802
Ayyy watch out man, reddit's gonna steal all our memes.
>>
File: 2016-01-07_00001.jpg (529KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]
2016-01-07_00001.jpg
529KB, 2048x1152px
:^)
>>
>>128122893
Is of very small and faster, comrade, can't buff price or sovkor OP :^)
>>
File: dat.jpg (34KB, 820x578px) Image search: [Google]
dat.jpg
34KB, 820x578px
oi, stop dying
>>
File: mig-29 loadout.jpg (131KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]
mig-29 loadout.jpg
131KB, 1024x768px
>>128126043
Aiite
>>
>>128111406
>2.09

check for updates m8
>>
>>128128452
why would someone put fins on a drop tank
>>
>>128129074
They old as shit.
>>
>>128129535
Aerodynamics tovarish
>>
>>128129535
Because it's a giant mass with a corresponding drag being suspended under the aeroplane.
>>
How the fuck do I patch my Assault Squad 2 that's pirated?
I looked everywhere and I can't find a single thing, am I screwed?
>>
File: recon.png (703KB, 929x653px) Image search: [Google]
recon.png
703KB, 929x653px
>>
So, predicted DCS open beta releases for 2016? I'm thinking:

-Gazelle
-F-5E
-P-40F
-F-18C (?)
-F-14A/B (????)
-Hormuz (???????????????????????)
>>
>>128132871
MiG-29 external + PFM WHEEEN
>>
>>128133281
After the spitfire IX and Su-33 are done.

http://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/newsletters/newsletter08012016.html
>>
File: MiG-29 polan.jpg (145KB, 1596x1076px) Image search: [Google]
MiG-29 polan.jpg
145KB, 1596x1076px
>>128133467
FUCK

At least the external model will come out soon enough I hope.
>>
>>127876125
I do. Speaking of which, has anyone tried Squad yet?
>>
>>128134165
whoops, just read through the thread, nevermind.
>>
can somebody explain the mig29 meme

it's worse than the su27 in every way
>>
>>128134887
It's fun.
>>
>>128134887
Some people fly for the fun of flying and not for winning easily.
>>
>>128134973
>>128135027

>fun

I swear this is the worst buzzword ever
>>
File: 14398797281820.gif (473KB, 500x386px) Image search: [Google]
14398797281820.gif
473KB, 500x386px
>>128134736
>someone actually read thread
>>
>>128134887
Greg pls go
>>
>>128135057
No, buzzword is the worst buzzword.
>>
>>128134887
R77
>>
File: 4820156099_5d3aeba1cb_o.jpg (1MB, 3000x1989px) Image search: [Google]
4820156099_5d3aeba1cb_o.jpg
1MB, 3000x1989px
Would you fly the fuck out of an F-111 module [yes/yes]
>>
>>128137286
Would rather have an Su-34 desu
>>
>>128135978
meme missile
>>
>>128137286
>>128137702
Why not both?
>>
File: 14512044626020.png (348KB, 593x540px) Image search: [Google]
14512044626020.png
348KB, 593x540px
>>128138210
They both crap.
>>
File: shrug.jpg (9KB, 384x313px) Image search: [Google]
shrug.jpg
9KB, 384x313px
>>128138494
>>
File: f-111.jpg (970KB, 3008x1960px) Image search: [Google]
f-111.jpg
970KB, 3008x1960px
>>128137286
Yes, but I would fly the fuck out of almost any module. Fuck trainers though.
>>
File: UNDEADABLE.jpg (468KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]
UNDEADABLE.jpg
468KB, 1600x1200px
ded
>>
>>128144785
You see Vladimirin, american abrahams blowout panels of working, electronics unharmed
>>
File: sabow.jpg (297KB, 1920x810px) Image search: [Google]
sabow.jpg
297KB, 1920x810px
Is Steel Armor - Blaze of War a good tank sim?
I've been enjoying Panzer Elite and want to try something newer.
>>
File: Capture2.png (957KB, 1023x718px) Image search: [Google]
Capture2.png
957KB, 1023x718px
Im trying to get this cheatsmod to work for AS2 and its fucking up, all the text and in game it has huge icons that it gets out of screen, but I think it works since one of the cheats were activated

anyone know what the fuck i should do
>>
>>128148039
It only has T-62 and M60A1 in it. With mods you can get BMP-1 and T-34-85 though (last time I checked)
>>
>>127829510
why are the mountains only half way covered with trees?
>>
>>128148993
That's fine, if those are well modeled and the AI is good I don't mind only a handful of tanks.
>>
File: 11ACRWeb[1].jpg (505KB, 1152x979px) Image search: [Google]
11ACRWeb[1].jpg
505KB, 1152x979px
The US Armoured Cav Regiment is the single most powerful unit of the cold war.
>>
>>128149782
What did it achieve to justify such a claim?
>>
>>128018389
I want a DCS F-16

>inb4 dur hur it's overdone, gimme more slavshitwagons

There's a reason it's overdone. It does *everything*, which is why it's a perfect sim plane.

Gimme a full fidelity F-16C Block 52 and a full fidelity MiG-29M
>>
File: wargame fanbase.webm (3MB, 224x398px) Image search: [Google]
wargame fanbase.webm
3MB, 224x398px
>>
>>128153372
Would never happen because Falcon BMS exists.
>>
>>128153372
The hornet can do "everything" as well including carrier ops.
>>
>>128156870
Fair point, I didn't think of the bug until after I posted

MiG-35 would be sexy as well
>>
>>128157148
It would, I want an f-16 too but I'm happy with the hornet, lets hope they don't fuck up carrier ops.
>grueling night time NOE bombing mission
>return to carrier
>heavy seas, carrier rolling around
>trying to get a trap using the meatball
could be comfy as fuck
>>
File: 1444926771729.jpg (229KB, 1085x900px) Image search: [Google]
1444926771729.jpg
229KB, 1085x900px
>>128158035
That's not comfy jesus fuck
>>
>>128158247
mission debrief with the lads after successful mission and trap, hell yes
>>
>>128132871
That's pretty optimistic, anon. I think the only one we're getting is the P-40F. Maybe the F-5E.
>>
>>128158436
>implying anyone from WGG is half competent at flying except for Greg and Custard
>>
>>128158498
Gazelle had their trailer a few months ago, it looked pretty complete to me. I put question marks on the ones I really don't think are gonna make it.
>>
File: 1922314c76[1].jpg (58KB, 389x252px) Image search: [Google]
1922314c76[1].jpg
58KB, 389x252px
Polish Divisional Recon Battalion. Formoza in each one!
>>
>>128158525
I fly just fine tyvm. though i haven't been online for a few weeks, no dcs ops in 2016 for me yet :(
>>128158498
>gazelle 1st quarter 2016
>F-14 2nd half 2016 (hopefully)
>hormuz has already been shown with the mirage, so I imagine once nevada is out of alpha/beta it wont be far behind.
>f18 who knows?
Also F4U-1D and Viggen but LNS say they wont be beta but complete releases
>>
>>128158925
I still have to see anyone be able to fly properly in formation other then the Australian guy, he was pretty cool.
>>
>>128159007
What Australian guy?
>>
>>128159007
>Australian
>cool
Please don't shitpost.
>>
>>128159230
>>128159738
I can't remember his name. His name was something stupid.
>>
File: 1387859767010.png (353KB, 1132x779px) Image search: [Google]
1387859767010.png
353KB, 1132x779px
>>128159738
Remember remember, 2013's December. Exactly one Australian was a cool guy.
>>
>>128159007
>>128160420
Well last time I flew with you cunts I flew formation fine, flying tight formation 5 feet away from each other in combat is stupid anyway.
Also 2016 DCS ops when? You cunts with hardware issues get them sorted yet?
>>
>>128115109
sup george
>>
>>128160987
What's your name?
>>
>>128162972
Keakaha
>>
>>128163324
You are the Aussie bloke I was talking about, and you flew formation just fine, like I said. Yes the hardware issues are solved.
>>
>>128163731
I'm flattered you think I'm cool but disgusted you think I'm Australian, is that why you cunts got me to rattle off all that poo poo pee pee shit in TS that time?
>>
>>128164028
Yes, exactly.
>>
So I am about to fire up SH3 vanilla (first time in 6 years at least).

Should I post about my game here? Kinda like an AAR, but rather than "after" it will be "during". Any interest? Don't care if there isn't, just don't feel like alt tabbing out and posting images+text if nobody wants it.
>>
File: 1451776333256.jpg (240KB, 900x632px) Image search: [Google]
1451776333256.jpg
240KB, 900x632px
>>128166154
No, fuck off.
>>
>>128166154
If you manually calculate the firing solutions, yes. If not, no.
>>
>>128167392
I will obviously set it to the hardest difficulty. The only "cheats" I will be using are time compression, for obvious reasons, and external view so I can actually make some good screenshots.

Everything else will be set to full realism (unless I am forgetting about some settings that are just cumbersome rather than realistic when left on, in which case those will be turned off as well).

I won't be using any mods for now, simply because I don't really feel like getting all the files right now. Sorta just want to jump in and play.
>>
>>128167975
No fuck off, no time compression you god damn cheater.
>>
>>128166609
en als ik in het Nederlands post? :^)
>>
>>128168124
Duly noted, please send food packages.
>>
File: 1445128214967.jpg (66KB, 909x745px) Image search: [Google]
1445128214967.jpg
66KB, 909x745px
>>128168187
d-dan is het oké
>>
>want to redownload Steel Panthers WW2 and MBT for muh urban combat
>Remember how everybody has 360 degree vision and will reaction shoot you even if you come from 40 different directions at once
>>
>>128168725
That's why you suppress them first to minimize the number of reactions and their accuracy, but urban combat is still going to be a pain, like it should. Use combat engies and erase the hex from the map.
>>
>>128169339
>like it should

yes, tanks and infantry should have the ability to 360 snapshot you, making flanking irrelevant.
>>
File: imp.jpg (15KB, 400x344px) Image search: [Google]
imp.jpg
15KB, 400x344px
>can't even buy Steel Fury on Graviteam's site
>they don't even have a link for other sites selling it like with Steel Armor
It's okay, Graviteam. I'm not that keen on giving you money.
>>
File: Il102_1992_227-ag.jpg (120KB, 1024x609px) Image search: [Google]
Il102_1992_227-ag.jpg
120KB, 1024x609px
Best plane coming through
>>
Any good Cold War games?

Please note I asked for good ones, so Red Dragon fags dont bother replying
>>
Just finishing my hexshit game and then Ill start the SH3 game.
>>
>>128171431
See you in a week.
>>
ural mod was a mistake
>>
>>128171868
NAMEFAG GO
>>
>>128171505
kek, it is a game of squad leader, short scenario, and am already halfway through it.
>>
carl is a faget
>>
File: 4by3.png (1MB, 1040x760px) Image search: [Google]
4by3.png
1MB, 1040x760px
>>128173281
Can someone remind me how to change this to something that isn't 4:3?
>>
>>128170619
nice meme
>>
>>128173281
No, I meant your no time compression SH3 game.
>>
>>128173902
NO TIME COMPRESSION FAGGOT. I WILL SHITPOST YOUR CAMPAIGN INTO OBLIVION IF YOU CHEAT
>>
File: Pregame.png (2MB, 1040x760px) Image search: [Google]
Pregame.png
2MB, 1040x760px
>>128174261
This is the campaign I guess I will be playing, 1939 is boring, the Poles have no boats.

Will be Starting in 1940 as part of the 1st Flotilla
>>
>>128173902
If you want to use other resolutions and 16:9 you need a WideGui mod. Otherwise the gui will be stretched.
>>
File: Settings.png (747KB, 1040x760px) Image search: [Google]
Settings.png
747KB, 1040x760px
>>128174261
>>128173902
Uboots had stabilization, turning it off is pants on head retarded.
>>
>>128175798
Well I'll stick to the default for now then, will get some of the mods tomorrow
>>
>>128175828
NO FUCK OFF MATE YOU AINT TURNING THAT SHIT OFF YA CUNT
>>
File: 34214ec6be[1].png (63KB, 1221x675px) Image search: [Google]
34214ec6be[1].png
63KB, 1221x675px
Spreadsheets~
>>
>>128176794
And yes it's full of errors. Don't worry, am fixing.
>>
File: 14.jpg (190KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
14.jpg
190KB, 1920x1080px
>>128176143
What mods will you get? GWX Gold, LSH2015 or hopefully NYGM.
>>
File: wwg.png (217KB, 700x500px) Image search: [Google]
wwg.png
217KB, 700x500px
MoW - AS2 Game soon to be in progress if anyone wants to join.
>>
>>128176930
Anything that adds realism I will get, anything that adds stupid shit (insofar that even exists) I shan't add. ATM it is crashing my system whenever I start up beyond the menu, so I doubt I will get started today. Will most likely have to wait until tomorrow, with today being spent on fixing this shit.
>>
>>128179530
fuck off you game is shit
>>
>>128176794
>Mechanized Shelf (SKOT)
>>
>>128181976
I don't have any Polish speakers on hand, so I literally translated Pułk from Regiment, and Pułki from Regiments.
>>
>>128182824
I'm a Polish speaker.

Pułk is masculine, so Mechanized Regiment is Pułk Zmechanizowany

Mechanized Regiments is Pułki Zmechanizowane. "Mechanized Regiment Assets" would probably be something like "Podjednostki Pułku Zmechanizowanego" (Subunits of the Mechanized Regiment)

Brygada is fine

Komania Zwiadocy = Kompania Zwiadowcza

Tracked Recon Platoon = Kołowy Pluton Rozpoznawczy
Tracked Recon Platoon = Gąsienicowy Pluton Rozpoznawczy

AA Kompania = Kompania Przeciwlotnicza
SAM Platoon = Pluton Pocisków Ziemia-Powietrze
SP Flak Platoon = Samobierzny Pluton Działek Przeciwlotniczych

I'm too lazy to do all of them but will do if you find these useful
>>
>>128183975
Thank you very much. I'm correcting the names right now.
>>
>>128184046
>SP Flak Platoon = Samobierzny Pluton Działek Przeciwlotniczych
Actually, a better translation is probably "Samobierzny Pluton Artylerii Przeciwlotniczej" (Self-Propelled AAA Platoon)

Artillery Battalion = Batalion Artylerii
Artillery Battery = Bateria Artylerii

SP Artillery Battery = Bateria Artylerii Samobierznej
Battalion is same as above

Antitank Battalion = Batalion Przeciwpancerny
Antitank Artillery Btn = Batalion Artylerii Przeciwpancernej
Antitank Company = Kompania Przeciwpancerna

HQs are Dowództwo
Brigade HQ = Dowództwo Brygady
Rgt HQ = Dowództwo Pułku
Btn HQ = Dowództwo Batalionu
Coy HQ = Dowództwo Kompanii
Plt HQ = Dowództwo Plutonu

Substitute "sztab dowództwa" for "dowództwo" if you're talking about the personnel commanding a unit (the staff). Dowództwo just means headquarters, i.e. the actual command vehicle or building.
>>
>>128184751
>more than three "hard" consonants grouped
My portuguese speaking mind is wanting to throw up in rage and envy. How do you even pronounce that?
>>
>>128185590
which three consonants? "dzt"? They make more of a "tst" sound together. Polish is fucking weird
>>
Did planeposters ever attempt flying BMS together?
>>
>>128192867
Not a lot of planeposters who even have BMS.
>>
>>128185693
Prz, dzt, those acents on consonants too. szt? what the fuck dude, bee speak?
>>
>>128193786
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlOoSsfU6cM
>>
>>128193786
cz and sz are like ch and sh in english

rz is kind of like j in french, so rze will be pronounced similar to je (Je suis... etc)

Accents on consonants aren't really accents, they modify the sound of the consonant.

C is normally pronounced "C" but "Ć" becomes like a shorter version of "chee" (cheeky, etc)

Ś is like a short, high pitched "sh".

Polish spelling is worse. ś and si (or ć and ci) sound the same in most words but they are not interchangeable. Worst of all is ó. It sounds exactly like "u" and exists purely for aesthetics. It's pronounced exactly the same way as "u".
>>
File: mi8can[1].jpg (58KB, 550x365px) Image search: [Google]
mi8can[1].jpg
58KB, 550x365px
huey
>>
File: mi-24p hungarian air force.jpg (461KB, 1024x682px) Image search: [Google]
mi-24p hungarian air force.jpg
461KB, 1024x682px
bmpv
>>
>>128201953
>>128198192
nerf eugin pls
>>
>>128202324
>tfw russian helicopters are nerfed so badly that the 12.7mm yak-b is the most powerful weapon on them
>tfw hatobabbies claim for it to be nerfed as well
>>
>>128202765
Feels good to have uninstalled that shit.
>>
File: 8.jpg (349KB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]
8.jpg
349KB, 1680x1050px
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4d7Wp9kKjA

Rest in Peace.
>>
>>128203505
If there was anyone I would turn gay for it was him.
>>
>>128203505

I'm about to boot up Unity of Command. I will declare my victory at Kursk in honor of Bowie.
>>
File: 2016-01-11_00001.jpg (258KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]
2016-01-11_00001.jpg
258KB, 1366x768px
It's DDR time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22L5FCNPkrA
>>
>>128204181
Is this deck any good?
>>
>>128204181
>>128204245
I'd take the motschutzen in a 10 point BMP-1 instead of the SPW.

Firstly its got a gun, but is more importantly much much faster for only 10 points.
SPW-50K is total shit
>>
>>128204347
Maybe. 5pts stack up very fast on infantry.
>>
>>128204440
So do a shit ton of expensive tanks. God damn
>>
>>128204547
I mean, the price of infantry transports adds up very quickly since infantry is usually bought in large quantity.
>>
>>128204440
That 5 points however is worth it when that extra 5 points will be able to kill an extra 5-10+ points of units, while saving 20 points of infantry
>>
File: 4614323328_180x180[1].jpg (5KB, 180x180px) Image search: [Google]
4614323328_180x180[1].jpg
5KB, 180x180px
How much destructive power does an FAE have compared to a conventional load of the same weight?

Say FAB-250 vs ZAB-250.
>>
>>128205760
Much less destructive, much more deadly.
>>
>>128205760
That really depends, thermobaric weapons are fairly hard to make, you can measure them in relative effectiveness compared to TNT.

US made FAE weapons are around 1.1 effectiveness, so more powerful than TNT, but less powerful than RDX which is the most common high explosive and is rated at 1.6 effectiveness. The FOAB that the russians made is around 4.8 effectiveness and the composition used for it is probably the most powerful non nuclear explosive material.

But i don't know if they use the same composition for their smaller thermobaric bombs or if it was specially made for the FOAB.
>>
File: 1309749125935.jpg (40KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]
1309749125935.jpg
40KB, 500x375px
Stream Snipers v Filthy Casuals
http://alb-replays.info/rdbeta/php/api.php?download=1951
http://alb-replays.info/rdbeta/php/api.php?download=1952
Stream Snipers win

War Dong v Spectacularly Autistic
http://alb-replays.info/rdbeta/php/api.php?download=1968
http://alb-replays.info/rdbeta/php/api.php?download=1986
War Dong win

ANZ vs Szczebrzeszynska Brygada
http://alb-replays.info/rdbeta/php/api.php?download=1990
http://alb-replays.info/rdbeta/php/api.php?download=1991
ANZ win

Epic vs Filthy Casuals
http://alb-replays.info/rdbeta/php/api.php?download=1992
http://alb-replays.info/rdbeta/php/api.php?download=1994
EPIC win

That finishes up round 2! We are now in the final four with EPIC, War Dong, Stream Snipers and #ANZ.

If you want to see some sweet butthurt then check out the Spectacularly Autistic reaction to losing in 6 minutes.

http://steamcommunity.com/groups/wggtourney/discussions/0/494632768626603894/
>>
>>128207568
what is this and why should we care
>>
>>128207568
Please be bait.
>>
>>128207894
>>128207634
This has been going on since early December and discussed since October. Are you new?
>>
>>128207568
>EPIC win
xDD epic 4 tha win
>>
>>128207568
>Still can't upload this shit to a streaming service like any other normal person would do.

baka desu senpai
>>
>>128208025
Who cares?
>>
>>128209221
>>128209201
>>128208719
>>128207894
>>128207634
shitposting general
>>
>>128209201
>I don't know about alb-replays.info
fuck off newmosque
>>
File: 1432083434228.gif (3MB, 286x258px) Image search: [Google]
1432083434228.gif
3MB, 286x258px
>>128210497
Wew, so knowing about something makes it good?

God, reddit must actually be good as well then.

Solely uploading replays for tourneys is a cop out. Could have just made a highlight reel of each match and turned it into a webm. Simple enough to do.

So you either don't have the know how, in which case just admit that, or you can't be arsed, in which case why should anyone else care? There are very few people who frequent this thread, less still who remain interested in Wargame, and this is exactly why, all you could be arsed to do is linkdump. Enjoy your ded game.

Long story short, nobody is going to be downloading those replays.
>>
File: 1452051507507.gif (1MB, 350x272px) Image search: [Google]
1452051507507.gif
1MB, 350x272px
>>128211006
fuck off mosque
>>
File: 1347689843.png (27KB, 362x884px) Image search: [Google]
1347689843.png
27KB, 362x884px
>>128211152
>>
File: 1433245925742.png (124KB, 362x335px) Image search: [Google]
1433245925742.png
124KB, 362x335px
>>128211152
It looks like you are currently being buttblasted. Do you need any help?
>>
>>128211592
Fuck off, Mosque.
>>
>>128126043
>R77

nice meme.
>>
>>128211907
Don't worry comrade, is just mockup. Not really in service.
>>
>>128204245
no, it's a shitty DDR deck. Missing tung and proper inf, for starters.
>>
>>128212462
>missing proper inf
Did you want him not to take motschutzen in his ddr deck?
>>
>>128212705
>inf in SPW-50K
>recon T-55
>T72M
>no tung

shit deck.
>>
File: donaldBurtonMobley.jpg (22KB, 392x436px) Image search: [Google]
donaldBurtonMobley.jpg
22KB, 392x436px
>mfw 8 am class
>>
>>128213887
meme untis desu
>>
>>128213887
The btr-50 gives bonus avail compared to the mt-lb. Who cares about the offroad speed, inf in 5pts taxi is solely there to be fastmoved into cities.
An invisible t-55 may just be a t-55, but it's invisible and there's not much choice for armed recon in the ddr roster.
The m in t-72m is for "mandatory". Seriously though, I shouldn't have to explain why 50-60pts tanks are good.
Which do you think is more reliable, one 7 HE missile or three?
>>
>>128214110
>tfw I teach at 8am and I know your pain, student, but I gotta make that dolla dolla.
>>
>>128214173
80 pt t72m1 is going to serve you far better that the t72m downgrade edition. It is important to have 2275 on you bread and butter work horse.
>>
File: 14523479316340.jpg (49KB, 540x720px) Image search: [Google]
14523479316340.jpg
49KB, 540x720px
>>128214110
>tfw graduated last semester
>>
>>128214173
>invisible t55

more like 'overpriced, slow, good optics unit that will miss once then die'

t72m is utter dog balls, especially compared to high end t55's, or just the 72m1.

The AA selection in the deck is a useless smattering of low-end shit. No tung, no tor, etc.
>>
>>128216474
>Fuck yeah unemployment!
>>
File: 1439386712123.png (86KB, 333x330px) Image search: [Google]
1439386712123.png
86KB, 333x330px
>>128216498
> high end t55's
>>
>>128216474
>tfw sleeping one day, stay awake for two because retard
>tfw more 4,5 years theoreticaly for me to graduate
>all EE students of my UNI either are retards, don't exist or are ultra normal fags
can't_wake_up.exe
>>
>>128211006
The replays and results are for wargame players interested in the tourney who want to check things out now. The matches are all in the process of being cast by mrsotko (amateur but happy to cast anything) and Vulcan (solid player but is more selective with his casts). So no need to be booty bothered because you weren't spoonfed highlights as soon as the round finished.

I do have a webm from the 6 min match that shows why you at least leave some manpads at base.

http://puu
.sh/mnAAx/1b0c55f18b
.webm

Enjoy
>>
File: 1448238910214.jpg (135KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]
1448238910214.jpg
135KB, 640x640px
I have an idea for a wargame project I'd like some help on.
Bombers in wargame all have their unique spread pattern (like the IL having a wide side to side spread) and it's impossible to know them until you've used them enough.
I want to map out the spreads of all of the bombers and put them into an info graph for newer players.
It would be a lot easier to do this if I have a partner so I don't have to deal with the ai getting in the way and we could map both blufor ml and redfor at the same time.

Would anyone be interested in helping? My steam name is my trip.
>>
File: ddrtankmeme.jpg (188KB, 919x693px) Image search: [Google]
ddrtankmeme.jpg
188KB, 919x693px
>>128216791
>taking the 72m shitpile over this
>>
>>128218891
T-72M has
>autoloader
>higher HE and suppression
>better autonomy and speed
>better armor

They have two different jobs m80. You use the T-55AM2PM for some area denial and veh/tank fights, and you use the T-72M for moving from woods to woods while working as fire support for recon veh or infantry. I know some players pick the base T-72 for this role as well but that is really a matter of taste.
>>
>>128218773
I wouldn't mind helping, but it's something you can really do on your own. Just start a skirmish without an opponent
>>
>>128219208
I assumed I would have to have ai on the other team.
Having somone doing redfor at the same time I'm doing blufor would make things go twice as fast.
>>
>>128218891
>less armour
>no autoloader
>less HE
>less accuracy
>less Stabs
>slower
>less autonomy
>worse 12.7mm
>less main gun ammo

All that for +1 AP and some ATGMs. You're literally buying it for those ATGMs because it's not a better tank.
>>
>>128219693
and 40% ACC ATGM are p close to garbage so...
>>
>>128219907
I wouldn't say pretty close to garbage, personally 40% is my cut off, anything lower I don't even bother taking, but 40% accuracy with some vet buffs is good enough (not good, but good enough) that you can get the job done with them.

That being said, I'd take that T-72 over that T-55, and I'll get my ATGMs elsewhere.
>>
>>128220081
Aren't vet buffs at 40% pretty useless?
>>
>>128220280
Unless I'm horribly shit at math, at Veteran you'll have just slightly less than 50% accuracy, while at Elite you'd have just slightly more, and a number of NATO tanks you'll be shooting at are Big for that extra 5% accuracy.
>>
>>128220280
depends on the deck. If they're elite that 40% acc will become over 60% cth at max range. It's also why elite ASF like the pre-nerf PD are so deadly
>>
I WANT THAT NEW NEW
>>
>>128220280
>>128220553
in a standard deck you will get 46% ACC if you upvet and in an armored deck you would get 53% if you upvet
>>
>>128220691
veterancy seems to affect CTH differently from the tooltips.

http://forums.eugensystems.com/viewtopic.php?f=155&t=54936

ECM works in the same way as size. These results are consistent with every ingame unit.
In short, elite means a 1.6 modifier, but with diminishing returns the higher the CTH. The same way as it worked in ALB.
>>
>>128218891
Dear lord even though I play pretty much every day I actually forgot how bad t-55 were.
>>
File: 2016-01-12_00001.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
2016-01-12_00001.jpg
1MB, 1920x1080px
>They actually fucking built these things
>>
>>128222163
>Tfw soldiers loved them
>tfw hitler canceled them because it had a dumb name.
>>
>>128222389
>made up history general
>>
>>127922229
i know its real footage, i meant is that actual fighting? like are those real russians
>>
>>128222771
They're french, and I seriously doubt it.
Might be real clips, but I don't they're linked.

>stukas hitting moving tanks directly
bullshit
>>
>>128222771
Anon...
>>
>>127928897
now that is a well built plane
>>
File: just trim it out corsair.jpg (90KB, 791x448px) Image search: [Google]
just trim it out corsair.jpg
90KB, 791x448px
>>128223476
It's amazing how much punishment some of those planes could withstand.
>>
>>128218690
helirush b&)))
>>
>>128224050
organizer privileges ;3
>>
>>128223594
>Shot on the ground during the attack on pearl
>>
>>128224582
And it even made it back home!
>>
>>128221362
I use chonmaho- II as a poor man's t-55am2b. No missile and -5 acc -1 rpm, but +1 ap and -15 price.
>>
>>128222163
First two are literally stolen swiss tech
>>
>>128224882
By 'these things' I'm only talking about the mobile 60cm Mortar on the right, not that it even matters 'who' made what.
>>
File: Sarah MiG-23 Cockpit.jpg (19KB, 320x214px) Image search: [Google]
Sarah MiG-23 Cockpit.jpg
19KB, 320x214px
>>
>>128224717
Those are surprisingly ok, a pair has a good chance of killing a ~60pts blufor tank, given it's close enough.
>>
>>128211006
>Mfw even MoW tourny shit gets uploaded to youtube

Wargame has reached a new low of casualness when even the people that supposedly care about it the most can't be assed to put the match up on some form of streaming service. If they don't give a fuck, why would anyone else?
>>
>>128230572
Don't I know it. 16 ap is a 2 hit kill on armor 10. Love killing bluefor super mediums with them. Cool skin on them too.
>>
>>128231671
>doesn't even read replies before shitposting

>>128218690
>>
>>128231671
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pz68IdJ3K_E

latest cast, published today.
>>
>>128232563
>Soon™
>>
>>128231671
oh and here's the latest reddit tourney cast, also uploaded today

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6FKHdvrIiE
>>
>>128224582
>Corsair
>In Pearl
>>
>>128231671
fuck off mosque
>>
>>128232051
You need 8 more AP than AV to kill things in 2 hits, except for some bizarre cases in the very high end (27 AP HEAT if I remember correctly, which only need 7) because eugen a shit and can't even fill a spreadsheet without error.
>>
NEW THREAD
>>128205728
>>128205728
>>128205728
Thread posts: 750
Thread images: 235


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.