>there are people on /v/ at this very moment who don't

yeah people called 'non-vrigins' lmaoing@ur life

>>324132429
what's a non-vrigin?

>>324132491
I don't know man I was just memeing

File: 1404844570503.jpg (19KB, 500x449px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 500x449px

>there are people on /v/ at this very moment who don't play games

I thought about that, OP. But then I realized that it's hard for me to go back to 30 fps now that I've been exposed to 60. I'll never be able to play anything below 144hz again if I get used to that.

I respect that this is like eating shit so you don't get spoiled by good taste and flavor, but still.

>>324132887
Yeah that's true. Only once you've seen 144 you start to look at 60 and go "what the fuck this isn't smooth"

>>324132339
Then recommend me some good 144hz monitors, anon

VR >>>> 4k or 144 or another meme.

144Hz is of benefit only to people running 3D shit. If you buy one of those without intending to use 3D you are no different from the morons buying 240Hz TVs.

You do not have superhuman vision or reflexes, 120Hz is overkill already, 80Hz is perfectly acceptable.

>>324133414
http://www.amazon.com/BenQ-XL2411Z-Monitor-Supported-seamless/dp/B00ITORITU/ref=sr_1_1?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1452952834&sr=1-1&keywords=benq+xl2411z

Affordable and good

>>324133460
VR is trash

>>324132339
My 120hz monitor died 2 weeks ago ;-;

>>324133460
>People still calling stereoscopic imaging VR

>>324133467
One might even say that the human eye can't see above 80 fps?

:^)

File: image.png (752KB, 601x599px) Image search: [Google]

752KB, 601x599px

>there are people on /v/ at this very moment who don't read Reddit in addition to this sub

File: hFDwE8n.jpg (16KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 600x600px

>>324133467

On topic though, it's actually pretty neat. I got my BenQ yesterday and feels so nice.

>no hd 16:10 144hz monitors

>>324132339
I play games in window mode for the sake that my computer can't run games from 2005 and beyond

>>324133581

They already covered this shit a long time ago with Quake 3 and CRT monitors.

Once you hit 45 fps gaming performance to framerate ratio starts to decline. At 60fps it starts to sharply decline. At 80fps it basically stops, increasing the framerate higher resulted in pretty much no improvement.

>>324133482
why the fuck would you get a 144hz screen that doesnt have a displayport?

>>324134321
Why would I need displayport? What's wrong with dual dvi?

>>324134517
doesnt that go only up to 120hz?

>>324134548
no
dual dvi-d does 144hz just fine

File: 1450489061780.jpg (32KB, 250x242px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 250x242px

>>324133589
>that fucking picture

File: 200percent_MAD.jpg (78KB, 500x738px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 500x738px

ALLUHA ACKBAR

File: 1361693422400.jpg (15KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 300x300px

>>324132339
I had to pick between 144hz and 1440p.

>>324134717
That's tough.
I guess I'd pick 1440p if I knew I could do 60 steady

I'll rather wait a few years until 4k/144hz will become a standard.

File: top_kekleesi.gif (864KB, 160x270px) Image search: [Google]

864KB, 160x270px

>>324132339
>Being a pkek
>in 2 0 1 6

>>324134717
1440 for singleplayer
144hz for multiplayer

>>324134795
And then you'll say you'll just wait until 8k/288hz

File: 1426856925198.jpg (62KB, 297x508px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 297x508px

>play mostly indie shit
>buy 144Hz monitor
>everything is capped at 60
>lightboost fucks everything up

144s are only for competitive esports faggots

>>324134932
There comes a time when upgrading becomes necessary

I'm getting a 144hz monitor next month for my 21st birthday and I've always thought 60 was too "jittery"

I play a lot of FPS multiplayer so I think this is a good purchase for me

i bought a 144hz monitor for my competitive gn3 matches now im mg2 lollll it's so much better than 60fps

all these dumb fucks falling for marketing

>>324134932
almost VR right now

>>324132339
i play games on a 59hz monitor works fine, stay mad you stupid virgin faggot.

>>324135150
>144hz is just marketing

I pity you. You'll notice the difference immediately.

>>324135253
60 is fine
but 144 is better
and anyone who denies this is either a salty consolefag or has never seen 144fps

File: 1424726021637.jpg (9KB, 233x164px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 233x164px

>>324132339
>falling for the 144 myth

Because I'm fucking poor

I can hardly play at 1080p 60fps

>>324135360
>the human eye can't see past 1 fps

File: 1426402149531.gif (102KB, 758x696px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 758x696px

>>324132339
I know, there is no excuse to not use 144hz and G-sync. It's not really worth playing anything without those two, even watching Chinese cartoons becomes better thanks to your monitor rendering the frames at a more stable rate with G-sync.

>>324135330
how is it better?
it doesnt increase performance,

>>324135489
It displays an additional 84 frames per second?? ? ? ? ? ? ?

>>324135489
You do it for the silky smooth, senpai

How are we on 1080p/144hz/IPS screens these days?

I still use my korean 1440p monitor, and I love it, but since my work laptop refuses to acknowledge it I wouldn't mind changing back to some legit 1080p screen if I atleast get 144hz, and possibly g-sync since that seems pretty neat too.

Are there any cheap ones out there yet?

>>324135489
first of all, what the fuck are you even trying to say
performance of what?

an extra 80 frames PER SECOND means faster possible reaction times from the player

>>324132491
Something you'll never be

File: 1450573594541.gif (403KB, 245x118px) Image search: [Google]

403KB, 245x118px

>console plebs rallying for/against 60 fps in their games
>we're able to get over twice that much

Why would I want a 144hz monitor when graphics cards cant even hit a consistent 60fps? For 4k of course.

>>324135694
http://gaming.eizo.com/products/foris_fg2421/

File: 2015-06-10_00001.jpg (387KB, 2560x1080px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 2560x1080px

Why aren't there any 144hz 21:9 monitors? Or there is one, but it's prohibitively expensive at like $1,600.

>>324135806

You don't really need 4k

>>324135689
I'm literally on my way to help him with that just to spite you.

>>324135806
>playing in 4k
now there's a spicy meme
you could get two or three 144hz 1080p monitors and eyefinity them for glorious resolution and framerate

File: the feelz.jpg (44KB, 500x393px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 500x393px

I'm poor dude.
Really fckin poor.

I just want a big curved monitor that runs at 144hz and has less than 1ms input lag, great contrast and warm colors. Preferably it needs to be OLED as well.

>>324135650
>an extra 80 frames PER SECOND means faster possible reaction times from the player

As much as you want to believe your reaction times are on the scale of milliseconds they are actually on the scale of hundreds of milliseconds, far slower than even a measly 60fps. When you up the framerate all you do is up is the amount of frames that pass before you react, not increase your reaction times.

>>324132339
I use a 1280x1024 monitor

Most games won't be able to achieve that framerate without turning down some settings. So its usually better to get an ips 1080 or so panel with 60 hertz

>>324135945
You dont really need 144hz either.

>>324136001
Get a job
Don't have friends who invite you for things
Live in a cheap apartment
Eat cheap but healthy food
Don't get a car
Walk everywhere

>>324136132
get this though

at 144fps the enemies have the ability to appear 2-3 frames earlier
If you think 3 frames is irrelevant in multiplayer FPS games then I don't even know why I'm talking to you.

>>324136210
Are there any IPS screens with 1ms though? They are nice but last i checked they only go down to 4ms

>>324136132
Fewer frames between you making an input and the game responding to it.

And if you are playing on a server with a lower refresh rate than you have the client side interpolation could result in enemies being visible when they wouldn't normally be. While you couldn't kill them it'd still give you information you wouldn't have otherwise.

>>324136210
>"most games"
Simply not true. Modern games, yeah, but stuff like WoW? Heck no.

>>324132339
Buy me one, fuccboi.
Buy me a proper desktop while you're at it.

>>324136132
You also make the game a lot smoother

Just check out any of the many 60hz vs 144hz comparison videos on youtube that slow it down so even a monkey like you notices

File: aku1_745.jpg (618KB, 800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

618KB, 800x1200px

Are there any 144hz displays with pivot? I play some games at 9:16 instead of 16:9.

>hurr just mount on wall

Landlord won't let me.

File: 1450305090492.gif (239KB, 473x471px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 473x471px

>>324135963
>eyefinity
I seriously hope you fucking niggers don't actually do this.

>>324136314
I don't think response time matters as much as input lag

>>324136489
Its preferable though

File: 2015-02-21_00002.jpg (865KB, 4480x720px) Image search: [Google]

865KB, 4480x720px

>>324136464

Why not? :(

File: 1451752029619.jpg (124KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 800x600px

>>324136464
and give me a reason why not

>>324136580
>>324136604
What the fuck is the point? Are you a fish?

>>324136452

I'm sure dem expensive ones atleast have pivot -in any case you could just get a desk-clamped stand and use that, if its VESA compatible you'll be able to reuse it for the foreseeable future

>>324136275
>If you think 3 frames is irrelevant in multiplayer FPS games then I don't even know why I'm talking to you.

It is.

At 144Hz 3 frames is like 20ms. You are not superhuman, stop trying to pretend you are.

File: 1415039152415.jpg (11KB, 285x200px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 285x200px

>buy G-Sync 1080p/144hz monitor
>mfw this fucking smoothness

Seriously, I don't even play CS or anything but it makes so much of a difference.

>inb4 muh IPS

I have a seperate, cheaper IPS monitor for watching movies, photoshop, etc. For gaming I don't care about colours.

what's the difference

>>324136678
>I don't have peripheral vision
cyclops detected

>>324136747
stay bad and uninformed

>>324136747
Thats 20ms earlier you see the enemy, your reaction doesnt change but you start reacting earlier

>>324136747
these
>>324136914
>>324136891
but like I said I'm done talking to you

>>324136464
I'm not using it (or the nvidia alternative since that'swhat I'm on), but it's pretty good shit.

4k is a really bad idea with new way better monitors on the horizon that won't support 4k from the get go. Best to use current monitors orultracheap 1080ps together until new shit hits with lower prices.

1440p 120+Hz are the way to go boys. Both are simply too good to miss on.

VR might be the better choice over a new monitor in the future

>>324137135
Who the fuck likes VR?

>but I want to "play" this rollercoaster or being a bird simulator

>>324136747
>20ms not noticable

Hah.
Hah!
>3 frames
invincible frames gone and you missed the opp
G.G.

>>324137257
People who arnt poor and are interesred in it

I'm pretty happy with my 60hz. no joke

>>324137338
What a waste of money, call me in 10 years when VR isn't garbage

>>324133467
You have absolutely no clue.

I will grant you that 120 - 144 is negligible, but the rift between 60 and 120 or even 80 to 120 is evident if you have ever used a 144hz monitor and played games with an uncapped framerate. Crystal clear, no debating it when you sit down to play, and yes it makes gameplay smoother and snappier as fuck if you have a decent mouse with high polling rate.

This feels so ridiculous having to always read shit like this online while I use a 144hz monitor to read said nonsense.

Used to have the same bullshit arguments with people saying "30 to 60 fps is negligible".

>>324137257
You even tried it? It's the natural evolution of displays. Sure there's not much games but how could there be for a new trend?

TF2 at least is supposed to have support

>>324137482
Had the dk2 and ordered the cv1, Its pretty good desu

>>324136747
Average human reaction time is 250ms to a visual stimulus, gamers often have even faster reaction times

10% faster reaction time is a huge deal

File: dose.gif (4KB, 218x200px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 218x200px

>>324132339
>Not playing games at 4k
Enjoy your low res / tiny screen

>>324137605
It's not just the reaction time.

You can see the difference.

Once you've used 144hz for a while going to 60hz will make you be disgusted at how choppy it is.

>>324133467
non-superhumans can detect single images at 500 fps

>>324137670
Thanks doc

>>324137698
but that's really only 1 fps
idiot

>>324137729

>>324137729
>being this retarded

the single frame lasts for 1/500th of a second

what is there to talk about, 144 hz is better and if u can afford u get it

>>324137683
I have 4 monitors hooked up to a rack in front of me. 144hz main monitor, 144hz above and 60hz to the sides. Simply moving the mouse cursor to the sides reveals how fucking choppy 60hz is compared to 144hz.

I never noticed it before, and you will never know until you look at it with your own eyes. Dragging a window to the 60hz monitors is jittery as fuck.

Once you see it you can't unsee it - it's like when everyone went from SD to HD television and movies. You go back to an old movie or show one day, and you look at it asking yourself how the fuck you even watched it in 4:3 or <480p. Can never be unseen.

I really don't recommend buying a 144hz monitor if you cannot run newer games at least at a minimum of 144 fps which is very unlikely.

File: 1385208854276.png (37KB, 213x200px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 213x200px

>>324132339
>>there are people on /v/ at this very moment who don't play games only at 4:20 AM
>>in 2 0 1 6

>>324134796

whats a pkek?

>>324138053
you dont have to have 144fps for it to be noticeable, 100fps is already 40 more than 60

but yes obviously 144 would be ideal

File: 1452897359794.jpg (79KB, 669x664px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 669x664px

>>324132339

So whats the problem. I play on 69hz.

>>324137698

Is this that bullshit air force test again?

That has nothing to do with this. What happened there is that a single, simple black shape on a white background was flashed for a fraction of a second. It was gone long before the cells in the eyes could even begin to realize it's no longer there so the image is actually retained on the retina for far longer that it exists. The brain gets that information and registers that something was there for a flash, it doesn't know how long it was there, it just knows there was that image at that location for a "fraction of second".

That test does not translate to what we are talking about at all. On the contrary, extensive tests have shown if you try the same test except flash the image in motion footage of something or other nobody sees it at all. Even when you greatly increase the amount of time it's displayed it still doesn't register.

>>324136749
which one did you get?

File: 1417039414938.png (289KB, 492x492px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 492x492px

>>324132339
>playing vidya on PC

>still using a 120hz monitor
its getting old but all my console bros fucking cream over it

the difference in quality for anything fast paced is just mad. how anyone can settle for less and then attempt to defend outdated old shit is mind blowing.

>>324139770
The AOC 24 inch one. Decent build quality, better viewing angles and colours than my old TN display and it's the cheapest one here in Britain.

File: 1396977007887.jpg (71KB, 560x631px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 560x631px

>>324139882
>playing vidya on consoles

File: Tips homura.jpg (41KB, 265x281px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 265x281px

>>324140165
>being a NTR fag

File: 40989785_big_p23.png (224KB, 900x525px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 900x525px

>>324140226
It's not NTR if they're both girls.

>>324135012
This guy gets it. I have an Asus VG248QE and the only game that really benefits from it is CSGO and TF2, neither of which I take too seriously.

>>324134131
>At 80fps it basically stops
Don't just make shit up dude. I can play Half-Life for an hour with fps_max 80, then uncap it and immediately see and feel the difference.
And don't say 144 is the cap either. Because of the way frame latency works without vsync, there are benefits to playing at framerates above the refresh rate of your monitor. I can feel the difference between 300fps and 400fps in CSGO.

File: Dancing Grill.webm (2MB, 634x316px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 634x316px

>>324132339
>there are people on /v/ at this very moment who don't play games

Too expensive and most game devs are cuck that cap their games at 30 or 60 FPS

File: sinka.png (319KB, 729x663px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 729x663px

So I just got a 1ms response time 144hz GAYMEN MONITOR.

What games can I play to take advantage of this?

>>324141105
those are some cool shoes