So shitposting aside i think we can all agree that Fallout 4

>>324059330
F A T
A
T

>>324059330

Didnt read but those legs, I would eat them

>>324059330

jesus fucking christ dem thighs. this chick is 70% thigh.

FAT
A
T

This is now a thick thread
If you roll dubs you post thick

I'd love to have those soft thighs around my fucking head.

>>324059437
>dub
yeah right.

>>324059437
>thick
>dubs
jesus fuck you're so green

They could have made the settlements useful, eg, each settlement can create a useful thing, like ammo. As it stands, it's like 2 games in one.

File: 1304733687584.jpg (128KB, 477x640px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 477x640px

>>324059330
I don't think you understand what a base 10 scale is.

7/10 is a good score. You would give it to a good game.

5/10 is an average score. You would give it to a game that does nothing unique and does not stand out or is not particularly fun.

3/10 is a bad score. You would give it to a bad game, such as Fallout 4.

No need to thank me. I know that rating things out of 10 can be a complicated process, but you'll get it with practice.

>>324059330
HIGH TEST

File: Bethesda on dialogue.jpg (106KB, 450x577px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 450x577px

They should have hired someone that wasn't an incompetent fuckface.

Pic related, just look at that punchable face.

>>324059437
>dubs
Lol

>le hi test thread

>>324059330
How does one get such huge thighs in comparison to the rest of their body?

>>324059586
High test is large hips, ass, and tits. Large thighs do not equate.

>>324059578
Fuck you. 7/10 is alright but passable. It's not a guaranteed buy is all i am saying. For Fallout games, i would expect a more solid effort.

>>324059868
>>324059586
Still a forced meme

>>324059795
too many Krabby Patties

File: 1451268541513.jpg (90KB, 634x953px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 634x953px

Since this whole thread is now shitposting, might as well bump.

>>324059868
Why would anyone want a girl with high testosterone?

File: 1436026033656.jpg (64KB, 632x1265px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 632x1265px

>>324059330
requesting a drawfag to draw OP's image with chun-li as the girl

>>324059437
Off to 2x4chan you go.

>>324059330
>those thighs

Unf

>>324059330
I'd say somewhere between 5 - 7 out of 10 is about accurate depending on how much you liked the game. Personally, I think even a score of 6/10 is a bit high. It improved on some aspects of FO3, but also went backwards in some of them. It had a lot of interesting ideas but they were all poorly implemented and the story was about as immersive as the original double dragon's storyline.

As for what they should have added or changed, I think one big one would have been how melee combat works. Its oddly a step back from even Skyrim, which wasn't even that good combat wise. Better combat overall would have been appreciated.

File: 16543634.png (1MB, 640x783px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 640x783px

I dunno OP, lots of people love Fallout 4 and for them, it's a 9/10 game.

>>324059996
good man

>>324059907
7/10 is actually good in regards to scale. 5 is average, remember.

>>324060279
because they havent played other fallout games

>>324059330
Fallout 4 is not an RPG

File: tumblr_ntpog88KDA1tjw456o1_500.jpg (60KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 500x500px

>>324060234
I feel that. The unarmed was really not as good as i thought it was going to be. Which sucks because the shooting was SO good.

>>324059330
>disappointing
>7/10

a 4/10 at most. it does everything mediocre.

>>324060059
Second this

File: 1446210033462-1.jpg (170KB, 1024x691px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 1024x691px

>>324060371
I mean i did enjoy Fallout 4 for awhile. Not saying it's bad but it was disappointing.

>>324060420
It was pretty fucking terrible honestly. Your choices for Unarmed were either Drugging up to an absurd degree to even have a chance fighting normally, Go slow and Stealthy, or just fucking cheese it with VATS blitz and crits.

They really fucked up bad making block something anyone could do regardless of what you're attacking with.

File: 600ed2b6951cec02f3d7d00a9893035d.jpg (121KB, 600x1000px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 600x1000px

>>324059668
I don't think that a guy like this should be the vice president of a company that makes rpg games.

>>324060549
Just explaining the scale, though to explain further, 5 isn't a bad score either. Average just means it doesn't do anything spectacularly well, nor poorly.

File: 1451183413179.png (157KB, 516x440px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 516x440px

>all the thick in this thread
it hurts brehs

File: _andrea-rincon10-fbdf2474-fdc9-102d-bbac-0019b9d5c8df.jpg (82KB, 773x1080px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 773x1080px

>>324060496
>4/10 at most
I said disappointing, not almost unplayable and awful. I know i'm weird saying 7/10 is somehow bad but 4/10? Come on

>>324060850
it failed to even meet the most basic level of expectation.

it's not even a Fallout game anymore.

>>324059437

more like tubs.. of lard lmao

>>324060850
4/10 would just be below average, which I can understand some people saying. Below being that the negative things the game has outweigh or outnumber the positives.

Still can be perfectly playable, just not very good.

File: 1449433164521.jpg (358KB, 1101x1257px) Image search: [Google]

358KB, 1101x1257px

>>324061001
Expectation of maybe you.
Of a Fallout game, i can see a 6.
As a game in general, you're fucking stupid.

>>324059668
100% punchable face and the quote doesn't make it better

>>324061247
it is unworthy of being a Fallout game. that is what gives it a 4.

File: 1448984450159.jpg (376KB, 1536x2048px) Image search: [Google]

376KB, 1536x2048px

>>324061049
But it's clearly not below average as a game. I don't understand the disconnect in this thread. I want possible improvemnt that should have been included in the game, not fanboy wank reviews of a game that tarnish what it means to call a game a 4 or 3/10

>>324059330
>>324060231
>>324060850

Mmm

I miss my mami.

File: 1430092500547.jpg (741KB, 710x854px) Image search: [Google]

741KB, 710x854px

>>324061540
You can see how that's not a valid criteria for any game right? Some people believe this is the best Fallout yet so what do you say that or do you just brush it off as troll posting? Fuck off

>>324061614
I can kind of see it, but its down to personal preference really. It comes down to does the game do enough to counter the bad? And to some people, that answer will be no.

I mean if you really think about it, there is a LOT of shit bad with the game. From the half assed implementation of the settlement system all the way down to the shitty story, factions and dialog options.

Theres a good bit people could take issue with. That said, I think 4/10 is probably the lowest reasonable score I think someone could give, but at the end of the day its down to personal preference when it comes down to a point or two.

>>324061614
there are plenty of other games released in 2015 that have much better gameplay and everything else.

Everyone wanted Fallout 4 to improve and it didn't. It remains on the same level as Skyrim, a game released 4 years ago.

There is no excuse and no reason to continue to defend their shoddy work at this heap of trash.