THANK YOU BASED NINTENDO.
I wouldn't know because I don't play Tr4sh
I can't see why they'd add a literal who though, especially over someone like Daisy who's been a Nintendo mainstay since like 1989, in well over 10+ games. The cat from Dragon Ball ain't getting in
>complaining about characters looking the same
>likes orange daisy
>wanted her in Smash
>literally who got in
>this is all we'll ever get
The pigeon costume is ballin as fuck tho.
I offer you one firm, ripe kek for this post
Don't eat it all at once
>That Super Mario Land cameo
And here I thought Nintendo didn't give a shit.
Well to be fair, it's the only thing about Daisy that Nintendo could work with.
She's not a 100% spinoff like Waluigi nor does she have original franchises like Wario. All she has is SML1.
If it wasn't for that, she'd just be an alternate Peach.
>people complaining about slots
holy what? really?
at least in smash there's the arguments of development time, disc space, etc.
Mario maker I could make sprites for a costume in a few minutes and probably rip a few sounds for it too, the longest part of developing these costumes is probably making the levels or in third party cases getting the rights.
Why do people even care about these "slots"? All they do is give Mario an alternate palette with no power-ups whatsoever. You would think make stage obstacles or new enemy AI would be more important than playing dress up.
Is there a cooking based game for the 3ds with RPG elements. The reason I ask is because I think Daisy would be perfect for a Mario game like that, teaching girls to cook and what not. Guys could play too. I would.
But are Kat & Ana in, yet?
This is the IMPORTANT question.