Both are good even if Inquisition is nowhere near as good as DA Origins. Witcher 3 is far better and one of my GOAT games. But go play W1 or at least 2 if you haven't. Hell, go play Dragon Age Origins right the fuck now if you haven't.
These faggots can't give you a proper answer because DA:I triggers them so incredibly hard.
Getbeither W3 or if combat oriented exploring is more your thing Dragon's Dogma. DA is very story driven but not very good gameplay wise. W3 is better on all fronts except story which would be subjective (though I think its better) and combat which isn't very good
Are you saying that The Witcher 3 has worse combat than the MMO gameplay of Dragon Age?
I prefer Witcher's story, but that's subjective. The dialogue is miles ahead in Witcher.
Get Witcher OP.
this cuck is the best written quest arc of 2015
I dare you to save those kids OP
at least you have "some" depth to your character build .. which is non existant in the witcher .. and yes i completed the game .. both games ...
and as stated above .. the witcher has more value overall while dragon age has by far the better gameplay.
The combat in Inquisition is literally just holding down a trigger and pressing an ability button when the cooldown resets. This applies to every single class. It's a step below the Ultimate Alliance games and more mindless than the average MMO
Inquisition is a timekiller. Not a particularly fun or engaging experience and I say this as someone with over 100 hours on one character.
>upgraded Arkham rip off that is Witcher 3?
Why do people keep saying this when it's not true? If you can't tell the difference between Witcher 3, Mad Max and Shadow of Mordor then you're retarded because latter two are Arkham rip-offs combat wise, not Witcher 3.
I disagree wholeheartedly.
Okay, I was being hyperbolic. It's not a rip off, but it is clearly influenced by Assassins Creed and Arkham.
Which is fine by me, I think it serves it's purpose better than any of those other games.
okay if you pin it down to that then witcher 3 is no different .. except you dont have that many buttons
(not that many buttons/abilities/cooldowns are better)
maybe i just played it wrong then since i found the witcher far more repetetive and dull
>Criticizes people for recomending TW3
>"W3 is better on all fronts except story which would be subjective (though I think its better)"
Great, so The witcher 3.
What a fucktard.
One is action oriented. The other is trying to be action oriented while maintaining its RPG roots and fails on both fronts
Did you even play inquisition on any difficulty above normal? It's tedious and boring. Enemies stand there soaking up damage while you contemplate taping the 'hit stuff' button down for the remainder of the 5 minutes it'll take for them to finally fall over
And they're not even long fights in an "Oh fuck this guy is tough I better be careful" kind of way. They're just damage sponges.
>witcher combat is bad meme
I don't understand it. Did you guys play on normal or some shit? Did you just spam quick attack and whirl until everything died? There was a ton of variety available and you needed to use all of your tools on deathmarch
hell, it has 2 dodge moves for goddamn sake
It really only gets grating with Iron Bull and he traps you in a conversation about his tranny friend. If you're a completionist (or just enjoy talking to him), you WILL get slapped in the face with his little equality speech.
Even if you're playing a pure asshole inquisitor, there's no way to shoot him down either. It's not game breaking, but it's cringey as fuck.
Also Dorians whole bit with, "My dad tried to make me straight". What the fuck were they thinking?
so how much do you need to invest into magic (or igni specifically) until it becomes gud. I have the fire stream but i find it better to just aoe and try to ignite as many blokes as i can
are the later levels that much better or should i have invested in Aard instead?
dont get me wrong igni is still fun as fuck but really, seems lacklustre at the moment
I played pirated DA:I on release and dropped it after 4 hours. I wanted to like it, since there were no wRPGs to play at that time, but god fuck it, its awful.
Combat is MMO-like, you cant really be tactical since you cant chain up commands for you followers properly, everything feels rushed and unpolished.
Picking up items drove me nuts, since you had to stand right above the loot to pick it up.
Its shit....in my opinion.
Witcher 3 is my favorite game since Gothic 2. I have no opinion on combat, since I played it on easy. Steamrolled through enemies and still got 100h in. My GOTYAY.
Witcher 3 is by far the better game,but if you even need to ask then DA:I is probably the game for you to be honest.
I don't think you would appreciate it, especially if you're a casual that hasn't played the previous games first before trying the third one and/or played Dragon Age II and even considered byying DAI
DA2 is entirely skippable. So it DA:O really, but it's a genuinely good game that's worth playing.
The one thing I like about DA is that each story is self-contained. There weren't any major differences between my DAI only run and my 'career' run.