Should I?
>>323342642
Nope. It's one of the worst games ever shilled by sjws and gaming journalists.
>>323344571
what's that? the intro?
>>323342642
No.
>>323344634
The entire game.
It's the undertale of 2013. I'm sure you'd like it
>>323344634
No anon. That's the ENTIRE game.
>>323345034
>>323344909
lel wat
>>323342642
yes, but get a refund after 30 mins.
>>323344634
Thats someone skipping everything and going to the point that ends the game.
Not going to pretend its some lengthy narrative experience but its not that short either.
>>323344571
lmao is this really the beginning and the end of the game in less than one fucking minute? unbelievable
Devs were friends with gaming journalists. It's the only reason it got a 10 out of 10.
This shit doesn't even deserve a 2 out of 10.
>>323342642
Eh it's not really worth more than 5$ in my opinion.
It's a short immersive experience about walking through a 90 nostalgia house while listening to a pretty shallow and disappointing story.
It lacks the artistic prowess of Journey, the interesting premise and presentation of Her Story, and excellence of Life is Strange (barring the last bits).
It's basically a hoohum game that is okay but had all the buzz of a god game behind it. It was a classical critical darling. For five bucks it's worth a play unless the plot was spoiled for you. But honestly, not much isn't worth 5 bucks in the world of gaming and there are a myriad of better story driven games (especially those I named) to get before you touch Gone Home.
>>323344634
looks to be the entire game
>>323345315
journey didn't even have dialogue
>>323342642
ilikedit. at least the concept but the sjw pandering was a bit too much
>>323345551
Fuck off polygon.
>>323345315
pretty spot on. it's a nice little experience if you don't already know everything about it, which you probably do. that said, I pirated it and probably wouldn't spend more than a couple dollars on it if pirating hadn't been an option.
>>323345524
Still a better story and more interesting characters than Gone Home
>>323346093
>It's okay when a western developer does it, but it's not okay when a japanese developer does it
Why is that?
>>323347638
Because japanese developers aren't personal friends with western gaming journalists nor did they pay any bribe money like what EA does.