>tfw the poll for the next big Battlefield game is curren

Fuck you, 1942 is still the best BF

where was that first posted on? leddit?

also it's funny how after all these modern/near future war games people start to crave for WW2 again

>>323282113
>Strawpoll
So it's completely meaningless?

File: 43949592.jpg (230KB, 800x697px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 800x697px

>>323282113
>2143 will never be a thing

Still, I want a new WW2 battlefield, that is not the abortion called 1943

>>323282113
>Vietnam not even on the list
Top lel

>>323282561
Meme war.
We had Bad Company Vietnam already.

>tfw Dragon Valley was god tier
>tfw Comm Ops was god tier
>tfw DICE LA literally saved BF4
>tfw DICE Sweden destroyed Battlefront
>tfw DICE is working on 3 games for this year
>tfw BF5 will probably be made by DICE LA

Maybe, just maybe, it won't be garbage.

>>323282113
The ones that don't vote for BF2143 are stupid babbies. Titan mode was the best bf history and the future setting can have very cool gadgets to play around with.

>>323282742
And motherfucking mechas.

If they made them the same way as Titan Fall they'd be great.

>>323282113
All this shit taste, holy fuck.

>Battlefield thread

I guess I can repost this. It was posted like 4 months ago on /v/ I believe. I copied it.

>Dice Stockholm Employee here. Not providing proof. Not doing anything to compromise myself. Def not going on the shitty Reddit. Next Battlefield game is 2143, we don't have the name set in stone yet, but it is the same setting as 2142. The one thing we are very worried about is that people are going to say we copied CoD because of the Future shit. I know most of /v/ hates BF, but I just wanted to tell someone. The gameplay is still pretty much Battlefield 3/4 style though, so don't get comfy thinking you will have the old clunkiness back. Another thing to note is that the Naval Conquest Mode from BF4 was a test for a better, less shitty version of Titan Mode in 2143. Despite our best efforts, EA will not let us ditch premium and they are forcing us to do a SP Campaign again. One thing we did manage to fight for, for now atleast, is Dedicated Servers and a Server Browser (Battlelog.) They pushed HARD for Battlefront not to have it, but that is not the case for 2143.

>no WW1 trench warfare with gas attacks
Why even bother

>>323282932
There's Verdun for that.
http://store.steampowered.com/app/242860/

>>323282876
DROPPED
R
O
P
P
E
D

>>323282876
>Dice Stockholm Employee here. Not providing proof.

Post discarded.

>>323282979
I mean, it was a shitpost on /v/, it was probably fake. Everyone, including EA, has been pointing fingers saying SP will probably be dropped because it is terrible. They dropped it for SWBF even. EA has also been saying Dice Stockholm has 2 teams and 1 is working on hardline patches while the other is working on SWBF2.

File: 704.gif (17KB, 300x225px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 300x225px

>>323282113
>not wanting another WW2 FPS

the last good WW2 shooter was cod:world at war

it's been too long. plus i'm a huge naziboo so any WW2 games gets my dick going

>>323282593
>Spot the underage

>>323282965
Have you played it? Is it fun?

>>323283142
>the last good WW2 shooter was cod:world at war

You mean RO2 you shitter.

>>323283198

It's pretty dead.

>>323283198
It's nice but lacks player.

WWII would be awesome, I'd get hardon just by thinking about plowing through walls with a Tiger.

>>323282678
>tfw Dragon Valley was god tier
Nigga I have done nothing but play this map since it released. It has been hilarious reading all the mad in chat about how the map is too big when people try and play the whole map instead of objectives. I went 32 and 0 last game doing nothing but Gunning in a Viper, it was a blast. Also the remixed BF2 music was nostalgia bomb af

https://youtu.be/SxuHGXRQSjU

>>323282479
I liked 1943

>>323283257
RO2 had shitty controls it felt like I was playing QWOP tbhfam

>>323283198
Its great, just dead lmao

I just want like something 80s or 90s

something close enough to modern era but no stupid BAJILLIAN TACTICAL RAIL ATTACHMENTS THERMAL NIGHT LASER SCOPE weapons

Imagine Omaha beach on frostbite, they could make an awesome campaign behind enemy lines.
I much prefer the 'less tacticool' guns for online too.

>>323283376
The controls are naturals.

wasd +Lalt for all interaction including dynamic cover
And zxc for stand, crouch, prone.

You have to be retarded to find it hard.

>>323283397
>>323283310
how dead are we talking

can i atleast find one server to play on

>>323283310
>>323283324
>>323283397
It isnt dead, its true there are not many players but you can hop on a filled server any time of the day.

The game has some really good ideas and when it works it's really fucking fun, sadly the technical side is a broken mess. The game looks, runs and feels like shit.

is this an offocial poll by EA/DICE or some reddit meme poll that is irrelevant?

>>323283690
>>323283690
Take a guess

>>323282390
Yep. Especially because it was made by a Youtube shill. You get to guess who.

>>323282593
Underage go home

>>323283690
>>323283802
Its a Reddit poll being monitored by DICE, like the last 3 polls that determined things about the game.

File: 1448343838037.gif (2MB, 468x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 468x360px

>no Korean war

I think they've taken the modern combat stuff as far as they can. WW2 would keep it fresh and add so much variety.
I am aware we complained about too many WW2 shooters a few years ago

>>323283107
BF4 campaign was pretty good senpai.

>>323283568
I think he meant that it's clunky, which is true. I'm 200 hours in the game, but I feel like I'm actually controlling a mech-exoskeleton and not a real human being.
A WW2 fast paced shooter ala Battlefield might be cool

>more votes for modern warfare than 2143
Fucking kids man

>>323283942
>>323283145
I'm talking recent battlefields you retards.

Is BF3 Premium Edition worth getting? I played Medal Of Honor on console and now I'm going onto the PC games starting with BF3 (unless anyone recommends a different one).

>>323284218
Nobody wants spaceman games because of the gay shit Activision has put out.

File: 1450059293252.jpg (82KB, 770x720px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 770x720px

>>323284158

>>323284252
Fuck no, get BF4 instead, it's better in practically every way and it's cheap as fuck now.

>>323284305
Try COD Ghosts campaign and then tell me that BF4 has a bad campaign.

>>323283932
Jack made his name on BF, of course he's shilling.

File: lau559208153.jpg (126KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1280x720px

>>323284252
>Is BF3 Premium Edition worth getting?
No.
With BF5 around the corner take basic BF4 while waiting for it.

>>323284158
pic related
It was a chore and only did it for the m249.
Never again.

>>323284264
You never played 2142 did you? That game was fucking amazing and a sequal has the potential to be bretty gud (provided dice don't butcher it. Funny joke I know) but I guess the 11 year olds weren't concious enough to have experienced it

>>323284252
No get BF4 premium when its on sale

It might be worth picking up later if this goes anywhere

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DtjQQUp_80

>>323284375
>this other turd smells worse so ill put the less smelly one in my mouth

>tfw shit at flying helis and jets

>>323284398
nigga 2142 is ass game
ur retarded homie

>>323284312
>>323284397
>>323284418

Singleplayer campaign, I don't care to play online with squeakers that's what CS is for.

>Battlelog

does anyone like this shit? it's infuriating having to open my internet to browse servers and shit

>>323284535
here's your (you)

>>323284535
(you)

>>323284375
Tried both, Ghosts was an uninteresting shit with one of the most boring settings I've seen so far, but BF4 was by far the worst I've played out of cinematic shotan games. It was incredibly inconsistent and full of inane plot holes. Didn't play Hardline.

>there will never be a gun that felt as good to use as the M1 Garand and M1911 in BC2

Captcha: 2124
ITS A SIGN

>>323284565
If you're getting a battlefield for the solo, you picked the wrong franchise bud.

Maybe Bad Company 2 will fit your taste.

>>323284565
oh god no
and premium only adds stuff to MP

>>323284565
BF4 campaign was ok I guess, nothing special
I can't even remember the BF3 campaign, some shit about a nuke in a briefcase?
>2016
>buying AAA FPS for the campaign

i just want them to stop making battlefield games

>tfw bf2
>hoping for bf3
>6 years later
>suddenly they notice the money and pump multiple shit games out

fuck

>>323284660
That's what it looked like to me.. why did EA DICE fps games go to shit after 2010?

>no vietnam war

americafags cant handle playing a game featuring a war they didnt win

>>323284758
BC2: Vietnam was fun though

>>323284789
This Tbh.. I fucking loved that DLC

>>323284695
>some shit about a nuke in a briefcase?
Yes
It was mostly dull, except for GRU levels.

>>323284396
Jack and his other Youtubefag friend Levelcap shill for any f2p or indie game that asks them to.

>>323284418
I'm honestly surprised they haven't received a cease and desist order, DICE didn't even like people removing the blue filter

>>323284818
>that M16A1

OH BABY

>>323282876
I don't believe this simply because it's a well known fact EA doesn't actually exert much pressure on their studios to cut or include anything beyond DLC and microtransactions.

Bioware, Maxis, doesn't matter which - if you look at stuff employees say EA's main flaw is that when they buy a studio out they fail to retain the upper level talent and give them such a big budget that they then expand their own scope hugely, and without their old leads they crumble under the pressure.

There's no fucking way EA would demand an SP campaign if the devs didn't want to add one, especially the team who saved 4.

>>323284758

Vietnam is a shitty war, thats why.

The game would be either hiding and placing booby traps all day as the VC, or burning down empty swamps as the US.

There's a reason Vietnam games are so unpopular.

>>323284851
THey've stopped supporting bf3 so if anyone's going to tell them to stop it'll be ea

>>323284721
Appeal to consoles with Bad company spin off.

>>323284953
Bad Company 1+2 were fantastic though

>>323284834
Ronku is an easy way of spotting a 100% shill

>>323284985
Yeah, but they caused the drastic changes of BF2 to BF3.

>>323284913
That sounds great

>>323284851
They may as more people get familiar with it

>>323284913
then why was BFBC2: Vietnam so popular

>>323284913
Black Ops was pretty fun especially the singleplayer. Granted, that was because they had the whole conspiracy/cia shady shit/super technology mystery thing going on but it was a good ride

>WW2

Like we haven't had a load of WW2 shooters before.

>>323285029
Oooh yeah.

>>323284985
BC1 was mediocre, both multiplayer and singleplayer, which mostly consisted of going to the point and killing enemies there.

>people want WWII shit again
>not superior sci-fi shooters

God, why is everyone so retarded. Can't wait for a boring game with no movement options and the same weapons everyone has seen a million times.

>>323285087
but wasnt Black ops more about black operations than being part of the army during the vietnam war?

>>323282113
>thinking a modern BF would be as good as older ones
My fucking sides

Even if a new sci fi BF got made it would be utter shit anyway.

>>323285184
That's what I'm saying, it relied more on the behind the scenes/cold war side of Vietnam more than the war itself. It did have some pretty cool levels where you fight the VC tho

>>323285162
At least it was better than BC2.
That was one of the worst campaigns I've ever played and the multiplayer suffered from the worst hit detection I've ever had to suffer through.

File: 1451339542429.png (1MB, 1169x800px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1169x800px

>>323285176
>sci-fi shooters gives devs more freedom to do crazy stuff
>people would rather have safe "realistic" shit instead since it doesn't go out of their comfort zone

it doesn't help that the Battlefield fanbase nowadays mostly consist of COD fans who also hate the future shit for the same reasons

>>323282113
>no piloted aircraft carriers and battleships

why even bother? Plus, what made 1942 so great was the plethora of mods to choose from, but the BF modding community died out after Vietnam barring the BF2 realism mod.

Although I have been dying for some WWII games as the market is over saturated with "Modern Shooters" I think the only way a shooter can be old fashioned and modern is if you take the Black Ops approach where its staged in an early to mid Cold War era and there are some high tech weapons that are all secret black ops type shit but for the most part they keep it pretty basic, rugged and old fashioned.

I mean you could still keep in drones and shit where as in a WWII game you are much more limited in tactics and warfare, still I feel like vehicle combat would be much more interesting and you could be much more stealth.

>>323285358
I don't want to play shooters without wallruns and slides anymore. And I want movement like that in a battlefield game together with future vehicles and so on.

But the fans have spoken, we want semper fi mosin nagant kill the nazis and nips ooraaah again.

>>323282113
A BF game set in ww2 wouldn't work anymore.

>people played WW2 shooters for eight years
>"dude that's so lame change a bit fuck"
>make modern ones
>"wahhh why all of this shitty futurist shit i want muh old noble wars back!"
you CAN'T go into cycles you stupid fucks. they still haven't done the korean war, a near-future one or a proper vietnam game. chill out. even an actual middle eastern war, or some russian kgb shit.

>>323285087
This.

If they set it in the 60s-70s they can still push modern super tech stuff (within reason) and make it seem really top secret and scarce.

Wouldn't work well with a WW:II game but id love a WW:II game bad but only if the singleplayer is half decent as I can imagine the multiplayer for that getting stale pretty easily, however at the same time I can see that changing shit for shooters and making things interesting, you couldn't just lock on and shoot down planes like in BF now.

>>323285398
And Forgotten Hope 2

This is the true 1943.

>>323285748
>korean war

No one cares about this one.

>>323285758
>they can still push modern super tech stuff (within reason) and make it seem really top secret and scarce.

So a super secret thing that fights in "large" scale battlefields?

Great.

WW2 would be a huge step back for the BF series.

A very limited amount of weapons, all single fire, no attatchments with no sights and only iron sights available. No gadgets, only sticky and frag grenades.

A WW2 BF game wouldbe a heavily stripped down version of BF with next to no content.

Yeah, lets go with that instead of having a load of new and interesting stuff with different vehicles and weapons.

File: 1428299068234.jpg (101KB, 639x588px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 639x588px

>tfw we're finally going back to ww2
>destructible environment
>bombing german bunkers with naval guns
>rushing omaha beach
>glorious ww2 weapons

Really hope COD will follow up and make a crazy ww2 jet-pack super nazi soldier shooter.

>>323286302
>limited amount of weapons
>all single fire
>no attachments
Nigga what? Please tell me you're joking

>>323286302
>A very limited amount of weapons, all single fire, no attatchments with no sights and only iron sights available.

Watch some documentaries or something.

This should do you some good.
https://www.youtube.com/user/ForgottenWeapons

>>323286418
>thinking they are going to reintroduce goof destruction

HA

>he wants ANOTHER futuristic/modern setting for a generic FPS

it's time for WW2 to make a comeback

>>323286302
>thinking this is bad
>thinking grind and unlocks are good
please leave /v/

>>323286423
RO2 tried and the best they could come up with is unlocking bayonets, drum mags and bipods, which should have been standard issue.
WW2 has no unlocks unless you make Battlefield 1946 scifi-WW2

File: 321651.jpg (51KB, 750x614px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 750x614px

>>323286418
>ww2 game
>not on the eastern front or Africa
Western front is over done and blew out of proportion.

>>323286645
and in 5 years time

>he wants ANOTHER WW2 setting for a generic FPS

it's time for futuristic/modern to make a comeback

Do the kids of today even have the attention span to play a WW2 game?

>>323286645
>here is another bland berabones WW2 shooter just like the many we hadfor years before modern shootes appeared

Yeah, nah. Kill yourself.

>call of duty announces world at war 2
>jet-pack is a 3 killstreak or item pick-up
>remove regenerative health
>players spawn with 2 hp packs that heal 40 hp
>super nazi and allied tech allows for fun times weapons
>perks and killstreaks out the ass
>awesome maps in england, germany, murica, russia and nippon
OUR RECON PLANE WILL FIND THEM

>>323286743
yeah, then infinity ward and EA and treyarch and whatever will deal with that in 2020

WW2 FPS games were always the best. just simple shootan and killan instead of 500 different attachments and jetpacks and other retarded shit

>>323286663
Except RO2 also has weapon sights

And saying attachments like those listed, apart from the bayonet, should be standard issue is fucking stupid of you.

>>323282113
>Battlefield 3 DLC told a story
>That story led into Battlefield 4
>Battlefield 4 DLC told a story
>That story leads into the future
>People think it wont be 2020

>>323282678
they have already announced dice sweden is working on the battlefield releasing this year.

>>323286884
Close future games are shit.

See Arma 3.

>>323286645
No it isn't. We have had what, maybe 2 or 3 major future shooters. Fuck off with your overdone grandpappy war.

>>323286771
do you honestly enjoy all that extra garbage? the feeling you get with an m1 garand when you pop some kraut in the face with the last bullet in your clip and hear that ping is just the best

>>323286970
already got rising storm/RO2 for that shit

>>323286701
But that means Americans wouldn't get all glory.

America saved the world and brought freedom anon.

>>323282113

World War 2

>40vs40 or greater.

>dismemberment and gore.

>fully destructible environments.

>bullets, shells and explosions do realistic damage through walls, barriers and foliage.


battlefield once again returns to form.

>>323286970
Go and play 1942 then, gramps. WW2 shooters are obsolete.

i feel like most people who grew up with FPS games pre-CoD4 are welcome to this, and people who grew up with FPS games CoD4 and later want the futuristic stuff back

>>323287173
>40vs40 or greater.
Nice hope you have there, too bad console shitters exist.

I wouldn't mind Battlefield modern warfare setting if they actually had the balls to go all out.

Stop this shadow war bullshit in some shitty jungles and just go full World War 3. It's not like the recent Battlefield singleplayer stories have mattered.

Opens up a lot more possibilities for maps too rather than just jungle and woodlands.

>>323287250
You feel wrong.
I want a 2143.

>>323287282
Weren't there tons of urban maps in BF3?

>>323286876
PPSh-41 was issued primarily with drum mags. It shouldn't be an unlock.
BAR had a standard issue bipod. Removing it should have been the unlock.

>>323287282
>Go full WW3
Did you not play 4?
You are literally fighting a war in downtown Shanghai on half the Launch Maps.

>>323287173
>Frostbite
>dismemberment
>gore
lol

The setting and era doesn't really matter, if it is a good game it will be good.

But, WW2 has been done to death and compared to what we have in modern shooters is basic and stripped down.

Modern shooters have also been done to death but at least they offer good variety with fresh and new weapons, vehicles, gadets and attatchments.

Sci-fi hasn't been done to death and there is a lot of things you can do with it.
You can have completely different weapons, settings, vehicles, ships, location even on different planets.

Would you rather have the same bland settings of WW2 battles with basic weapons in a game we have seen many times.

Or would you rather have something completely diffetent and new with a sci-fi shooter?

people will both ironically and unironically say WW2

>>323287372
There was like 2 that I can remember. Metro and Seine crossing. Both set in France, but they were very closed and limited maps. No air vehicles or anything.

I just wish they would go all out and do whatever. Like a city map that actually feels like a city with air vehicles and everything.

>>323282113
they wont do it because you wont be able to customize guns which for some reason every shooter is doing now so people will get bored and not play

>>323287539
Consoles wouldn't be able to run it.

File: rynnäkkökivääri.jpg (62KB, 540x179px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 540x179px

>>323287428
It's a step in the right direction but the rest of the maps all still follow the woodlands/desert/outdoor theme.

Siege of Shanghai is a pretty bad map too.

I just want cool urban combat in BF.

>>323287539
Like in Battlefield 4?

https://youtu.be/ZjSykcTGrNc

>>323282113
The next big battlefields already in development and is coming out in less than 10 months.

Whatever poll you read has absolutely ZERO effect on ANYTHING. GOOD DAY.

Also
>can't pilot the fucking mechs in BF4 final stand
gay as fuck senpai

>>323287515
This. Sci-fi has so much more to offer.

>>323287658
Yeah some of the BF4 maps are pretty good with this but again theres only like 2 city maps that are very shallow. Shangai is a very linear map, Dawnbreaker is also very linear and small (compared to most open and big maps like Rogue Transmission and others)

>>323287658
It's not a "full" city

4 skyscrapers, a few shops and a mini-mall isn't a city

Half of the map is water.

>>323286925
well time to skip that one.

just kidding i'd skip it regardless. Fixing the game when you've released all the expansions is not good.

BF4 is finally both fun and stable. 2+ years after release.

I am not paying another $120. They had one chance to convince me paying that much at release was worth it and not only did they blow it, they convinced me the series is irrevocably in decline.

There have been TWO BF games out since then and both have been terrible. Small creature comforts and quality of life updates (as well as fixing the fucking netcode which should have been done BEFORE LAUNCH) will not convince me that they deserve anything more than $20 for the entire game, not just a sliver then a big black DLC dick in my ass.

>>323287830
And only one skyscraper that you can actually enter. Every match on that map ends up being a CQC battle over who gets to control it until someone blows it up and gets permabanned from the server.

>>323287515
>they offer good variety with fresh and new weapons, vehicles, gadets and attatchments.


>meanwhile every BF game has the same vehicles, the same weapons, the same gadgets

>>323287823
>the jets on dawnbreaker
what were they even thinking?

I literally don't care about the setting. I just want the game to be about shooting and aim/positioning and whatever instead of adding in a ton of random shit to lower the skill ceiling and make it appeal to casuals.

File: BFBC2Game 2016-01-09 13-43-35-23.jpg (2MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1440px

>>323282113
>no titan mode
Go play 2142 if you wanna move titans next to each other for that awful lag

>>323288003
Why should they appeal to you?

If anything they should just appeal to the casuals, since there's more of them AND they'll always buy something that looks good.

>>323287539
Seine Crossing was such a great map, I wish they'd brought it back for bf4 instead of that shit stain caspian border or fucking firestorm.

>>323288001
There are jets on dawnbreaker but they end doing nothing because of all the tall buildings.

>>323288165
I don't give a shit what's good for the company or what makes the most sense financially; I want another skill-based shooter. CS:GO gets old after 4k hours, Promod is dead. UT is dead, Quake is dead, etc.

>>323288269
That's what I'm saying.

The jets basically exist to enforce a height cap on the helicopters and annoy them if they go east into the bay.

>>323288302
>CSGO
>Skill Based
Your Shitpost Quality is low.

>>323288302
BF4 is skill based. It helps to have a group to play with though. One squad is enough to win a pub match.

>>323288001
>>the jets on dawnbreaker

Jets on that map is retarded, there is nonspace to fly because the map is so small. Plus the jet can't do anything other than fight the other jet making it pointless anyway.

Fucking DICE man.

>>323288359
Of the popular FPS out right now, it's easily the most skill-based. It's a far cry from the beta and 1.6 days (and other arena FPS) and has some absolutely retarded randomness in it, but it's the best we have right now.

>>323282113
I need a platoon for hardcore only servers. Any recommendations?

>>323288427
Meanwhile there are no jets on shanghai despite it being wide open as fuck and a good city-jet map

>>323282313
I can't remember people saying they got tired of WW2 games though.

>>323282313
it's the best war it had everything. i dont think i can ever get bored of ww2

I just want some urban combat maps that actually have something in them rather than just stupidly placed skyscrapers that might aswell be mountains.

Imagine the bigger maps in BF4 like Silk Road and Rogue Transmission but as cities. Something to fill up all that empty space

>>323288574
m8 i'm one of the ones arguing for a return to ww2, but you have to be like 15 years old to think this. everyone and their moms was tired of ww2 games before cod4 came out.

>>323288592
until they make an urban combat map where i can literally kick down any door and go inside any building i will never be happy.

>>323288651
> everyone and their moms was tired of ww2 games before cod4 came out.
I honestly don't think this is true. Back in the day we had mainly good WW2 titles, and they weren't overdone like semi futuristic fps games are now.

>>323282113
>blasting some ss sniper in church tower with bazooka
>blood and brick rains
i like it, pre order when?

>>323288592
What I wanna see is an urban map the size of Dragon Valley, balanced entirely for infantry combat only. No vehicles except one jeep per team that can be used as transport. No overly huge buildings, and rooftop access on the level of pearl market and flood zone. Tell me you wouldn't play the shit out of that as long as it was well balanced

>>323288706
I would be happy if they just made a city that actually felt like a city. The ones they have now are just desolate and empty.

the game is meant to release late this year
there is no way DICE is still deciding on a setting
personally I'd love a Vietnam - Cold War combo, but WW2 would be my second choice

If we do end up going back to WWII I hope DICE includes some battleship action scenes. Just imagining that type of Aircraft carrier scene from BF3 on a WWII setting onboard of a Battleship or Aircraft carrier makes me moist.

bonus points if we get to play the Germans or the Japs this time around

>>323288753
were you even alive in the early 2000s? call of duty, BF, and medal of honor were shitting out ww2 games at the same rate as modern/futuristic FPS now. the argument of quality is purely subjective, but not even 10 years ago, the ww2 shooter was the generic shootan game

>>323288651
>but you have to be like 15 years old to think this. everyone and their moms was tired of ww2 games before cod4 came out.

So you are 15 then? Because every shooter up until CoD 4 was WW2 and everyone and their dog was bored of it.

One of the reasons CoD 4 was so successful was because it was a modern shooter. You can stop pretending to know what it was like ehen every fps game was WW2.

File: lahti-001-lahden-kaupungintalo-2.jpg (320KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

320KB, 600x400px

>>323288760
A bit of the same. I want a relatively small sized European city, lots of apartment buildings and shops. No skyscrapers but few tall buildings compared to the others.

Good rooftop access and open streets.

>>323288706
Karkand was pretty close to this

>>323288760
I just wish they would give more variety to the urban maps. Rather than having it be 10% urban and 90% outdoors

>>323288918
you're literally agreeing with me. re-read my post

>>323288706
oman?

>>323288947
As long as there's not fucking armoured vehicles I'd more likely enjoy it. Tanks, LAVs, AA, Amtrak, and BMPs throw the balance of way too much and a lot of the time they feel like they're there just for the sake of being there

>>323288880
>were you even alive in the early 2000s?
I was, and there was a big quantity of WW2 games, but most of them were actually good and we didn't get bored as fast as we get now with CoD releasing every year, Battlefield every 2-3 years and other titles.

File: 1943multscrnvista2ww.jpg (902KB, 2622x1474px) Image search: [Google]

902KB, 2622x1474px

>>323282113
> 1943 will never be released on PC

>>323289109
why bother playing Battlefield if you don't like vehicles

>>323288574
Medal of Honor was the COD cash cow back then and it had plenty of WW2

>>323282113
>tfw vietnam isn't even on the poll

>>323288918
>I am illiterate

>>323289221
I like vehicles, DICE have just forgotten how to properly implement them and seem to just plonk them in high concentration on most maps without actually giving any thought as to how they affect the game. Add to that all the ridiculous vehicle upgrades in bf3 and 4 and you realise the best thing to come out of the two games are the Close Quarters expansion, and Guilin Peaks.

>>323289278
the poll won't actually effect anything

>>323289226
>Reminding me that MOHAA is dead
Fuck off.

https://youtu.be/-ELFxB-tGhE

>>323289132
Everyone was fucking tired of the genre, seriously. Every message board, every magazine, EVERYONE was tired of the dozen of WW2 shooters coming out every year.

>>323289514
Online is still alive. Just need to download GameSpy fix.

>>323289464
yeah I do think vehicles need an overhaul
they should go for a more realistic approach imo
tanks should be able to choose 2 ammo types (HE, AP, Smoke, canister etc) and an mg
they should also be stronger but have weaker armour

>>323289680
>MLS is still alive
>Hellzfire is dead

Man I miss Hellzfire, I read that there leader had a Heart Attack and the group fell apart, shit sucks. It makes me feel old.

>>323282113
Battlefield: Wasteland

The game keeps pussyfooting around nukes. I want to see one where they're actually used.

>>323289849
>Battlefield 3
>One literally goes off in Paris
>Pussyfooting around nukes

Um?????

https://youtu.be/Jb8hUG3_RRQ

>>323288758
>battlefield
>blood

hoping for a 2143 approach like the final stand DLC here
also more destruction
and I hope they'll focus on Rush and CQ

>>323290010
>One literally goes off in Paris
>One

Who the hell plays the single player campaign. I want a BF game set in the aftermath of multiple nuclear exchange.

>>323288576
WW2 is the best sequel of all time.

I just want one game with a convincing middle eastern faction/campaign. Every one is so damn generic. Even something corny like C&C Generals. Just something more to convince me I'm playing a game set in the Middle East than a bunch of sand and people yelling in indistinct Arabic.

>>323290213
>I want a BF game set in the aftermath of multiple nuclear exchange

With le wacky 60s ambiance of course.

>>323290352
>releasing a game where America loose

They are too insecure for that.

>>323290496
You can do it really easy by having a war where Russia is involved, and you play as a mercenary. Soviet Afghan war for instance.

>>323290776
It's even worse.
Since the rebels/mercenary funded by America were what we know today as Al-Qaeda.

With all the terrorist shit happening lately, editors wouldn't allow it.

>>323288574
>>323288753

I remember everyone pleased COD4 ditched WW2, and everyone trashed World at War because it "took a step back" and returned to WW2 again.

I frequently heard "Don't worry, Treyarch don't really get it anymore, Infinity Ward will bring the goods. Why would I want iron sights when I get laser scopes and silencers?"

File: 1451220337222.jpg (81KB, 604x576px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 604x576px

>>323286942
BF4 is close future already. America most likely close to winning the war, PAC forms to conteract this, PAC wins, US never recovers. There are alraedy hover tanks and Titans on some of the maps.

>>323287515
you could easily do a WW2 BF and have great variety simply by including all of the prototype stuff most people don't know about like Sturmtigers and the Horten Ho jet fighters. and infrared sights and etc etc.
WW2 with some liberties taken can be amazing. CoH2 nailed this.

Thank christ. Fuck all that modern shit. Gotta go back to the classics some day

>>323291297
Plus inclusion of a variety of vehicles other than just tanks and jeeps

>>323282113
It was already leaked to be 2143

>>323291689
Source on the leak? The poll doesn't mean shit, Jackfrags made it. Dice confirmed working on new BF since 2014 and we know it's military themed.

File: battlefield-2143-leaked-01jpg.jpg (80KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1600x1200px

>>323291689
This?
it was a fake.

>>323291689

Picked the fuck up..

>>323291837
please
yes

>>323292149
>>323291837
image searching says it was just a PS troll, RIP

File: verboten.png (18KB, 176x207px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 176x207px

>WWII winning by a large margin

I can't tell if this is misguided nostalgia or just plain retardation from people who were born after 9/11.

>>323286701
>clubbing britbong metal boxes they call tanks
sm︂︂h t︂︂bh f︂︂am

>>323287173
>40vs40 or greater.
BFBabby please.

Tribes had 64v64 in 2001 along with full vehicular (both air and land) and infantry combat, jetpacks, top notch graphics and big maps.

Battlefield: Star Wars instead opted to go for less than 32v32 this time around... We both know these shits aren't going to touch bigger player count with a gun smaller than Gustave.

File: file.png (465KB, 1145x573px) Image search: [Google]

465KB, 1145x573px

>come back after 9 months
>old platoon kicked me out after inactivity
>can't decide/find one that fits me
>stuck forever in pubs with pub teammates
>only once in a great while do I get a good squad
>consistently 1st or 2nd because I'm not retarded, but I'm just slightly above average and everyone is shit
Thinking about CMW or rTr, I guess they'd have a teamspeak at least. I can't find any hc platoons that are recruiting.

>>323292558
Mainly both, but we now live in an age where most peoples first FPS was CoD4 and don't how shit it was when all FPS games were WW2.

File: 7852.jpg (28KB, 225x350px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 225x350px

>>323292558
There's quite a big chance those people never experienced WW2 shooters. I mean, the only options they have is a F2P garbage game and niche PTSD simulator. Can't think of any other recent WW2-themed games, that are not completely alternate history.

File: crew_of_the_Dicker_Max_Schwere_Panzerjager-Abteilung_521.jpg (112KB, 1200x726px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1200x726px

>>323292698
I'l give you the Dicker Max.

>>323292728
64 player servers are objectively the worst in BF4 though. Dice can't balance maps anymore, and we better not take any risks.

>>323292923
Even one of the most recent WW2 games people still play will be 5 years old this year. Hardly anything good is coming out in regards to WW2. I would rather not have anyone AAA bother with WW2 either. They'll shit all over it with the more modern concepts for gameplay.

>>323293009
If dice can't balance maps how does the player count matter

>>323293204
Because Dice balances around consoles, which have less players.

File: ax-man.jpg (64KB, 433x418px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 433x418px

>mfw I don't care whether it's 2143 or 1944 because I really want both of them

Seriously, either setting with faction-locked weapons and actually different vehicles would be boners to space for me.

AAA ww2 games would be the shittiest fps of all time.
1942 were cool since you had shitloads of different vehicles and guns all available to you.
modern model is few vehicles and grind to unlock shit.
ww2 games were the simple fps style, no gadgets no unlocks, no modular shit. you knew everytime that the guys you were fighting had rifles and iron sights.

>Muh WW2 comfort zone.

We really need 2143 or at least near future Titans.

>>323282113

Alternate reality Battlefield when?

I want Blimps with rail guns and Rocket man style jetpacks with flaming swords and Mass effect like mind powers. Also crazy ridable creatures with cannons attached to them and multiple seatable1940's like automobiles with gatling guns attached.

>>323294971
So Battlefield Heroes?

>>323294287
>faction-locked weapons
with DICE Sweden balancing?

you're an absolute madman

>all these people who haven't played Battlefield 2142

Do people not even remember the based as fuck Battlewalker charges? The temporary invincibility, the AA gun on top? The APCs with EMP cannons and pod launchers built in? It wouldn't just be a retread of Black Ops III, a game that came out like 7 years after 2142.

File: Humber_Mk_4_Armoured_Car.jpg (215KB, 800x637px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 800x637px

>>323294971
>multiple seatable1940's like automobiles with gatling guns attached.

Take your pick, they built a million different types of those in WWII.

>>323293297
XB1 and PS4 have 64p now

>>323295467

Nah I was thinking like normal 1940s cars with zany multibarrelled gatling guns and sidecar like attachments.

>>323294971
>>323295548

And to expand on my retarded idea the blimps harness that mass effect mind power bullshit to alter gravity to super charge their rail guns into shooting giant metal rods and shit bellow them. The rods can only shoot down since they use gravity and blimp to blimp combat is based on the occupants who use *Rocketeer (not rocket man) style jetpacks to fight ship to ship. And the mother fuckers on one faction used their mass effect brain powers to tame all the crazy beasts in this world so they strapped guns to them. Then those nigger other teams guys use technology and hybrid bullshit like i mentioned earlier with the cars.

File: 1421882328935.gif (208KB, 354x534px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 354x534px

>>323282113
That sounds great.
Brits vs Germans vs Russians and maybe a German pov campaign please

>>323282113
>Vietnam 2 isnt even in the poll

File: British troops in Burma.jpg (175KB, 1198x864px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 1198x864px

>>323296045
I think Brits + 'Strayans vs. Japan should be included. I've never seen that in a game before.

>>323296290
Where is the poll from, anyway? Reddit?

>>323287515
Original Sci fi setting where they actually try something new