Gentle, throbbing reminder that Asians know no concept of mercy

Or a world where people would spend $599 on a PS3 too, right?

>>323163043

>please buy a $349 PS4 and $399 Sony VR

:/

File: apply Superman to the burn.jpg (203KB, 1013x379px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 1013x379px

>>323163043

>people still think it's a real account

>>323163043
SAVAGE

>>323163668
It's actually pretty fucking great at this point. I wouldn't be surprised if Kaz is literally funding this person's life just so Kaz gets some street cred.

>>323164010
>Kaz personally sponsors his own banter brigade

That's canon now

>>323163395
It's a fake twitter account

the price is way less suprising than people were making it out to be
only slight id give to facebook is that they deliberately hyped vr as something people will get cheaply soon while they full well knew it'll be enthusiast product for years

>>323163395
you mean $800 Sony VR right?

check the news

>>323163043

Cant wait for the price Sony wants for their cheap plastic VR.

>>323163043
You mean the white guy who pretends to be Kaz on twitter?

File: Still+didnt+make+a+halloween+special+this+year+_9d22af6ad9673f3a0e974d609482fd06.jpg (8KB, 205x246px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 205x246px

>>323164507
N-NO STOP IT. IT'S NOT FAIR!

KAZ, IT'S ME I'M HERE TO GET YOU OUT

File: kaz ces.jpg (189KB, 2040x1360px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 2040x1360px

>tfw the rift will be the cheapest of the three VRs

>>323164463
>almost double than expected is not surprising

>>323165137
Is that real?

>>323165414
PS VR is $799 and the Vive will be at least the same as the Rift, I guarantee it.

>>323165469

Gonna be hilarious if Valve can somehow put the price point at around 400$ at launch.

>>323165141
telling people itd be <400 is just hyping it "oh wow its so cheap anyone would buy, all aboard the hype train"
its effective business strategy

>>323165469
Hahahaha. Retard.

>>323165469
No you dumb fuck. The images behind Kaz.

VR is DOA
R

I
s

D
O
A

Thank god, now we won't have wasted talent on this gimmick like we did with Kinect/Wii motion shit

>>323165621
if its similar quality product why would they take take 200$ loss for every unit compared to their rival?

File: kaz lol.jpg (24KB, 320x440px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 320x440px

>>323165621
>>323165686
If it was going to be any cheaper, they would have announced it by now and rekt the pre-orders of the Rift. Inb4 they don't know the price even though it goes on sale in a month.

Man I hate this place
people hype the oculus for months, then it comes out and people slam it

pathetic

At the end of the year the Oculus Rift will be about 400-500$ I wager. Why would they sell it for less now when their production capacities are still not great enough to even supply the people who are willing to spend 1000$ on it? No reason. Palmer is a lying shit, but probably mostly because he was completely disregarding laws of supply and demand.

>>323165761
>tfw it will be unsubsidized by valve just like the steam machines, controllers, and link

maybe starvr will be good

>>323165693
Yeah

>>323165761

I dunno, maybe to corner the market and establish dominance? Like the PS4 did with the Xbone.

Oculus either dug their own grave with this price or set the standard. Which of these remains up to valve.

>>323165778
Any day now. They were just waiting for oculus to fuck it up, and they did.

File: 1452183737824.jpg (76KB, 268x265px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 268x265px

> complaining about the price
> being a lower class

File: 1442271705252.jpg (85KB, 680x680px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 680x680px

>>323166017

File: htc-dead2.jpg (35KB, 771x422px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 771x422px

>>323165761
HTC is a sinking ship. Valve could afford it, but they're too Jewish. They could sell it at the same price as the Rift and it would still be a better deal just for the controllers, though.

>>323166017
Jesus christ that is foul

>>323165761
To be fair. Valve has the backing of HTC and their ridiculous tech infrastructure. They are already manufacturing a lot of the tech they need for VR. That brings the cost down a lot.

File: Lucky quote2.png (98KB, 600x334px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 600x334px

>>323166343

File: d494caeff7a54ae47f0b0390c3e8032336654558639b004cce5bf6466c378009.jpg (62KB, 625x779px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 625x779px

>SONY is going to poison the well

why i'm not surprised

they exist only to do that

>>323166153
>wanting VR to die before it ever got a chance

VR will be useless unless it becomes a cheap consumer grade item that everyone can own. Until then all that it's gonna have are shitty gimmicky indie games and badly implemented tacked on shit for proper games.

>>323166468
blame your country not me

>>323166520
I would be genuinely surprised if they dont put Morpheus for lower now and do the E3 all over again.

Its actually a really legit tactic when you think about it.

File: Lucky quote3.png (106KB, 600x334px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 600x334px

>>323166468

File: Lucky quote4.png (84KB, 600x334px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 600x334px

>>323166610

>>323167034
"sucks you werent born someplace else, that'll teach you"
lovely guy

>>323164507
what news? Yet another good for nothing Amazon leak?

>>323167283
Wow, he literally cant put his company in the ground faster than acting like this on social media as a fucking CEO in 2016

>>323167283
pointless pic to keep posting, obviously the 2 arent comparable

File: Lucky quote7.png (88KB, 600x334px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 600x334px

>>323167283

>>323167283
If the Rift actually had a good display he'd have a point but that shit isn't even 2560x1440

VR is going to need 4K or beyond to minimize the screen door effect

File: Lucky quote8.png (88KB, 600x334px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 600x334px

>>323167562

>>323167497
I don't know I got one of those free Star Wars ones and while slightly lower quality still functions as a good headset even if barebones.

>>323167562
Wow, did he had smartass answer to that?

>>323163043
That isn't kaz's twitter though...

>>323167636
http://vr.mkeblx.net/oculus-sim/

>>323167283
Good god this is full out Sony 2006 level arrogance.

Except Sony had just come off the back of the PS2 - the most successful console of all time.

Oculus is off the back of...absolutely nothing.

>>323167732
>...

hello reddit

>>323167762
Yes, its quite uncanny how similar it is to 2006 Sony. Gonna be fun for them whey they share the same outcome.

>>323167762

Faceshit. And right now, Facebook has more pull than Sony and Microshaft combined.

File: 1369926904540.jpg (30KB, 409x366px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 409x366px

>"If something’s even $600, it doesn’t matter how good it is, how great of an experience it is — if they just can’t afford it, then it really might as well not exist." - Palmer Luckey, June 6 2013

>>323167757
Interesting site that helps prove my point

I've only done VR via google cardboard using a galaxy S6 and the screen door effect was pretty bad despite the fact that it's a higher resolution screen than the consumer version of the oculus.

For $600 they could have at least used that 4K display that was used on the Sony Xperia Z5 premium

>>323167952
Higher resolution, but more wasted pixels.

>>323167926
But this has absolutely nothing to do with Facebook's core business.

It's an autonomous acquisition.

>>323167952
see
>>323167283

'almost totally gone'
'more like a fine fabric than a screendoor'
'only there if you focus and actually look for it'
is the general consensus

There's been quite a few reviews during last few days, take a look.

>>323167926
The Facebook website is popular with the normies but absolutely no one actually respects the company, it has no pull at all.

>>323167952
ppi isn't the only factor in screendooring

>>323168106
>more like a fine fabric than a screendoor
>games look like they're rendered using fabric
>only there if you focus and actually look for it
yes, and jaggies are only noticeable when you look for them

I guess I'll just wait for the Facebook jew to not cheap out on the second gen edition and use a display that is higher resolution than my phone

File: RiftBTFO.webm (323KB, 854x480px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 854x480px

>>323163468

File: htc-dead.jpg (271KB, 1637x687px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 1637x687px

>>323168218
They literally bought Oculus for more than what HTC is currently worth.

>>323167819
Why hello. I was just upvoting my reblog so I could retweet and
pepe rageface this derpinuh rage comic about my cool me..maymes. Check out this new peic lewlz that I did for my new social feminism race intersectional class.

I'm am totally a read it.

>>323168356

Was HTC ever relevant in any way?

>>323165651
Higher end monitors alone can go beyond 1000 dollars brah.

Like it or not, it's completely reasonable for bleeding edge technology such as this to be priced as such.

>>323167926
>Facebook has more pull than Sony and Microshaft combined.
lol what?

Microsoft is the 3rd most valuable company in the world behind Apple and Google. Facebook has struggled to monetize their shit services and will likely see a massive correction within the next year or two.

>>323168356
That doesn't make it more respected.
Facebook has no hardware experience at all, HTC is known for making high quality phones.

>>323168326
Using one screen results in wasted pixels even before IPD adjustment.

>>323168356
Facebook's valuation is ridiculously inflated though. They don't actually have that much money.

The fact that they spent $2 billion on Oculus means they are really riding on it being the future.

If it flops (almost inevitable at this point - either VR fails outright or Oculus is beaten by another VR company), it could seriously hurt Facebook.

File: FB_MODEL_100_x900[1].jpg (132KB, 900x534px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 900x534px

>>323168489
>Facebook has no hardware experience at all
http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-open-compute-project-history-2015-6

kek

>>323168487

And who has a bigger chance of buying a rift, the company that needs the whole Office and Windows suite or the normies that eat up everything social media throws at them?

>>323168495
Who cares, the point is that they could have gone with much more pixel dense displays, they exist but instead they decided to go with something cheap and low res, meanwhile charging out the ass for it.

>>323165761
because it's Valve and they want to maintain their dominance in the PC market

1. they can subsidize the cost through selling VR games on Steam, the dominating game platform
2. they're a private company and don't need to please investors

>>323168604
The core technology in the Rift is the main driver - two built-for-VR OLED displays with very high refresh rate and pixel density, a very precise tracking system, mechanical adjustment systems that must be lightweight, durable, and precise, and cutting-edge optics that are more complex to manufacture than many high end DSLR lenses. It is expensive, but for the $599 you spend, you get a lot more than spending $599 on pretty much any other consumer electronics devices - phones that cost $599 cost a fraction of that to make, same with mid-range TVs that cost $599.

>>323167562
>tfw all the big online companies tax dodged your country leaving unpaid billions with Irish and Swiss bank accounts

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOyAwIFSt1I

>>323168703
Except you can get a lot more use out of a TV than a VR headset that barely has any games for it at all

File: 1452140988288.jpg (49KB, 298x247px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 298x247px

lets get this shit started again

>$599

>>323165836

Oculus was dead to /v/ when facebook deal was announced. Lurk moar, faggot.

>>323165836
people have been slamming it since the facebook acquisition you retard

File: 1444452233448.jpg (150KB, 771x741px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 771x741px

>>323166017
Mmmmmm, tasty!

File: 599 us dollars.jpg (14KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x360px

>no cheaper version without all the gimmicks
I just want a thing that plasters two screens in front of my goggles and nothing else.

Fuck their controller, headset and whatnot.

File: gsmarena_002 (1).jpg (105KB, 728x314px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 728x314px

>>323168604
>wanting a 4K, 24Hz panel for VR
>has only 2/3 of required RGB subpixels

hurr higher resolution = better!

>>323166017
Thanks for bringing this sort of shit to our world, leftism

>>323168703
CONSUMERS

DON'T CARE

They only want a useful product. VR has very little software support, and is not very convenient to use.

Phones can sell for a lot because they have lots of software support (including a killer app from the start - making calls on the go) and are one of the most convenient devices ever created.

The PS3 was a better technological deal than than the Wii for its money, and yet people stayed the hell away from the PS3 for years until the price went way down.

>>323168794
Watching a movie on a VR helmet is probably more immersive than on a TV.

>>323166017
Wat een gek joh

BAH vieze buitenlanders.

>>323169024
>probably

>>323169024
>probably
The lack of clear benefit won't exactly fill your average consumer with enthusiasm.

>more immersive
So were 3D TVs and look how far that went.

Nobody except hardcore gamers want more immersion.

>>323168489
Also I attended websummit and they do a lot of hardware stuff, they're making drones to deliver the internet to another 1 billion people, and are working on AI //recgonition shit a bunch, aside from VR that's their 5/10 yr plan

>>323164439
then how am I reading it if it's fake, moron

>>323169195
>>323168564
None of which are consumer products.

>>323168898
>0.5mm

Who the fuck cares. Not going to use the thing under a telescope.

I'll wait for the Vive's release at the very least, and probably Sony's as well, before deciding which platform to go with.
Oculus is seriously behind as-is with their Facebook-funded platform though, even ignoring their PR mistakes.
Having a mature platform like Steam, which is rather unique in not screwing over devs as a publisher, as the basic platform is vastly preferrable.
Even Sony has something over them since they have actual experience funding and developing games, and they're aware that weeb-experiences like gf simulators and similar will sell it.

>>323169180
>So were 3D TVs
I beg to differ.
I hate 3D on screens and at the cinema, but I'd love to use a 3D headset for gaming.

>>323169165
Nice quoting.

>>323168441
No.
When they first arrived their name sounded like some garbage chink firm. Then I thought they where ok, but a company I'd never buy from. Now they're sinking.. well, NEVER EVER

>>323169306
>Complaining about screen door effect
>Wants a screen with bigger gaps between pixels
>Not looking at a screen with LENSES like a MICROSCOPE
hurr

FIVE HUNDRED AND NINETY NINE US DOLLARS

>>323169383
>hate 3D on screens and at the cinema, but I'd love to use a 3D headset for gaming.

Did you read my post?

>>323169318

Won't Sony's VR be exclusive to their consoles? Wouldn't that limit their market A LOT?

>>323169306
You know that's exactly what you do with a VR set, right?

>>323169293
nice moving the goal posts

>>323169443
>>323169539
Pretty sure the lenses don't magnify so much that 0.5mms spans several centimetres.

Protip: There are 200 0.5mms in every cm.

>>323169553
Nope, I was always talking about people's respect for Facebook.

>>323169519
Yes, but unlike the other two they already have a willing market in Sonyggers and a guarantee of a slew of Sony-tier quality games.
Hell they can probably push it as the closest thing to a "PS5" and increase their console market share that way if they're smart about it.

>>323169584
screen door effect, google it

>>323169519
Yeah, to 40 million and counting. The NES only sold 60 million, didn't stop them from releasing ROB, Power Glove, that stupid mat....

I assume vr is mainstream around 2020 when majority of pc gamers have good enough gpu to run it without nauseating side effects.

how expensive will next gen consoles be when everyone expects them to run a vr? 800$?

File: moving-the-goalposts-300x2402[1].jpg (28KB, 300x240px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 300x240px

>>323169705
>Facebook has no hardware experience at all
>None of which are consumer products.

>>323169584
>There are 200 0.5mms in every cm.

File: D5.gif (1MB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 400x225px

>>323169519
>PS4 had 50% of the marketshare a few months back
>It's more now
>It'll be much more by the end of 2016

Even though there are many more PCs aout there, there are MUCH less PCs cabable of handeling VR than there are PS4's

So no, it's not a limit at all

>>323169519
It'll sell like Kinect and have no games.

File: laughing comics.gif (3MB, 480x320px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x320px

>>323165137
>HD remaster of a classic press conference

>>323169832
Who is this literal semen demon?

>>323169808
First anon said Facebook had more pull than Microsoft and Sony combined.
I said no it doesn't, no one respects it, no one has ever heard of Facebook doing hardware while HTC is famous for its phones.

You can be pedantic all you want but in the end the public opinion of Facebook is MUCH MUCH lower than MS or Sony's, especially when it comes to hardware.

Oculus Rift, it might as well not even exist.

>>323169516
Yes, and?
I'm saying there are people out there that can't stand 3D TV/cinema, but would be interested in a headset.

>>323170110
burden of proof, etc.

facebook literally has 1 billion daily users and is gaining hella goodwill from zuckerberg donating 99% of his money to charity, providing free internet for billions of people, etc.

normies eat it up

>>323166543
vr is more than just videogames.

>>323169832
>Even though there are many more PCs aout there, there are MUCH less PCs cabable of handeling VR than there are PS4's
That's not true, PS4 can't handle immersive VR. You need at least 60 FPS per eye with a yeast 1080p per eye. That means half the FPS of any current 1080p titles and they need 4x the FPS. Every game will look like shit or just won't be immersive.

>>323167636
OLED ain't cheap.

>>323168903
You do know right wingers are more likely to have fetishes like this, right?

>>323170303
You are not immune to burden of proof either m8.

The Facebook WEBSITE is popular, but only because you can connect with your friends/family there, no one cares about the company itself and if a better alternative comes along people will just abandon it just flock in droves to it.

That's why social networks are so fragile, because what matters is WHO is using it, not WHAT the site is, they simply use it as a tool to talk to their friends.

Facebook is in a huge bubble right which WILL pop and it doesn't have a strong foothold outside its social network.

>>323170824
>no one cares about the company itself
>Facebook is in a huge bubble right which WILL pop and it doesn't have a strong foothold outside its social network.
[citation needed]

>>323170824
>literally no evidence whatsoever
Okay.

>>323163043
VR is here and it works. For 600 bucks you can have vr. People are really underselling what breakthrough that is. Sure its expensive now but eventually the price will go down. Something like the rift just a few years ago would have cost thousands of dollars.

>>323170912
>>323170998
god, no wonder the oculus has daily threads

>>323171039
>few thousand dollars

Actually 350

>>323169584
Might want to go back to first grade.

>>323170824
Opinions are like assholes everybody has one and most are shit. This is why social media won't die

>the PS4 VR headset will come with an external processing unit
Do people really think it will be any cheaper? Oh please

File: DK2 vs CV1.jpg (51KB, 700x738px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 700x738px

>>323171139

>>323169584
LOL

>>323163395
>$349 ps4

lol you got ripped off family. i got my ps4 for $299

>>323170998
>>323170912
http://www.afr.com/markets/google-facebook-propel-us-stocks--is-this-another-tech-bubble-20150717-gif6jt
http://amigobulls.com/articles/facebook-stock-when-will-the-bubble-burst
http://amigobulls.com/articles/facebook-earnings-q3-2015-is-facebook-entering-bubble-territory
http://investorplace.com/2015/08/social-media-stocks-fb-twtr-lnkd-yelp/

As for public opinion, that is hard to quantify but if you look at public opinion tracking websites like http://www.whatdoestheinternetthink.net/ for example Facebook has much higher negativity than Microsoft and Sony.

>>323171039
>For 600 bucks
Plus another 250 if you're outside the US.
Honestly I don't think that can be understated. The HTC guys won't have the issue of raping everyone with shipping charges.

File: No gaems.jpg (237KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 1920x1080px

>>323170104
From a non-game on a system with 0 games outside Bloodborne, as confirmed by /v/
Ignore her, she doesn't exist. It's just a figment of your imagination.

>>323170387
>That's not true
It absolutely is. I have a high end PC. 860, 16gb ram, SSDs in Raid0, i7-4710. Not the top of the crop but above mid-range. I can run most games 60fps on my 3k monitor, and the more demanding ones like Witcher3 at 1080p.

I still won't buy Rift/Vive as they'll run like shit and I don't even have 4 available USB slots (I doubt USB hubs fix the problem, as if that was the case they'd just merge the required 3 USB3 cables into 1 from the start)

You must suffer from a serious affliction if you think there are more people with 970's than there are PS4's

>Every game will look like shit or just won't be immersive
Consumers won't care. I'm also sure your standards are very high, so GranTurismoSport looks like absolute shit, and the recent in-engine AceCombat7 reveal trailer makes you want to puke from the visual diarreia it is.
Both of which will be playable in VR

But sure, only on-rails shitty looking indie demos will be on PSVR, as you say. M'lord.

>>323171163
It won't, but nothing says that this particular iteration of social network will survive when so many others died after soaring high.

>>323171039
>it's a breakthrough
>literally the same shit as virtual boy but in higher res
I hate all this overselling of "NEW" technology which is actually fucking ancient shit with more numbers.

tesla x's framework design is a fucking brilliant breakthrough, virtual boy [CURRENTYEAR] isn't

>>323171223
This image does not disprove that a few years ago, something like the rift cost 350.

>>323171139
Okay you got me on that, it would be more than just a few years ago. Still though, people are acting like 250 bucks will permanently kill vr.

>>323171481
It was also subsidized for developers. Compare it to the HMZ-T1.

>>323171039
>For 600 bucks you can have vr.
That assumes you already have a $1500 pc capable of running games at the resolution and frame rate needed.
>inb4 couch, room and house

>>323170998
>>323170912
Would YOU invest in Facebook stock right now?

oculus last year:
>it's going to be $200-$400, guys. definitely not something retarded like $600. it might as well not exist at that price.

oculus 2016:
>are you goyim serious?! what did you expect? $599 is obscenely cheap you entitled fucking peasant pieces of shit.

why do people allow themselves to be treated like this?

>>323171223
This is not really that great of a comparison because the vast majority of the parts for CV1 are no removable so a teardown would look fairly similar to DK2's.

>>323171348
Facebook and Microsoft are 75 on ACSI, Sony is 82. Facebook is increasing, Sony is decreasing.

>>323171617
Same reason apple and razer are still in business, people would rather spend a lot of money in something that impresses other people than use a cheaper alternative even if it's the same or better.

>>323168480

I want palmer to leave my 4chan

File: !.jpg (70KB, 947x706px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 947x706px

>>323166017
Oh shit, what?
WHAT?

File: actual fun combat.gif (1MB, 260x196px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 260x196px

>>323171223
>you can clearly see more components on DK2's front panel that aren't spread out like the image below

Is this a new flaseflagger image or are you just that stupid? You could disassemble DK2 much more than that and it would look just like the 3D model below

>>323171348
>meme site
>The internet is positive about 'facebook'.
>The internet is positive about '4chan'.
>The internet is positive about 'hitler'.
Okay

File: 1435177018420.gif (1000KB, 260x146px) Image search: [Google]

1000KB, 260x146px

>>323166017
what the fuck

>>323171602
Obviously you'd need a powerful computer to run something like the occulous.
The 1500$ line is only true if you live outside the U.S.

File: 1449255086309.png (396KB, 472x575px) Image search: [Google]

396KB, 472x575px

>>323171918
>occulous
>1500$

>>323171823
>ignores the rest of the links
the dedication of a shill and the argument skills of a chimpanzee

>>323171918
I don't think you'd be able to run modern games at 1080px2, at the 120fps necessary for vr at 60fps, on a single 980ti, you'd need at least 2, and that's already $1200 without any other component.

>>323172064
mainstream 2020.

>>323172047
>amigobulls
literally who
>As we’ve said, Facebook has been the exception. While all the rest struggle, Facebook actually keeps growing, and it actually keeps making money.
Okay.

>>323172149
[citation needed] :^)

File: 46930a297b3c7c9e56482029a467af9a.jpg (172KB, 636x767px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 636x767px

>people hyping up pricey shit VR
>expecting any quality titles from this device
>not remembering the motion control fad from last gen at all and the bum rush for that market

Can't wait for those $600 bowling games.

>>323171691
Naturally a simple website designed to serve as the background of social interactions will have an edge over hardware companies like MS and Sony since shit breaks down.
This still doesn't make people trust Facebook as a hardware company, I'm sure the vast majority of people don't even know Facebook is a company but rather just a website owned by the Internet Explorer.

>>323171823
>hard to quantify

>>323172149
What does that have to do with VR now?

>>323171918
*to run the latest games on something like the occulous.

and it's always going to be like this. vr is always go to be a rich person thing because your pc is always going to have to be about twice as powerful as it would need to be to play the same game on a monitor.

>>323169269
I think what anon meant to say is that it's not the real Kaz. It's just someone impersonating him.

>>323172282
>This still doesn't make people trust Facebook as a hardware company,
>Still no evidence
Okay.

> the vast majority of people don't even know Facebook is a company but rather just a website owned by the Internet Explorer.
>Argumentum ad populum
Okay.

>>323172269
The difference is that games don't need to be made from the ground up for VR, since it can be used for older games too.
But that's irrelevant if it's too expensive anyway.

>>323172269

Can I follow the ball on its way with the camera?

>>323172374
Holy shit, are you the retard going "okay" to everything? Fuck, you're stupid as hell.

>>323172064
I'm going off the recommended hardware requirements stated by the devs. The occulous runs at 90fps and games are going to have downgraded graphics compared to the brand new titles.

File: 1452122137322.png (6KB, 96x79px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 96x79px

>>323172374
Yeah thanks for elucidating man. what would we do without you

>>323163043
Holy shit does this twitter account belong to Hirai? Just started reading posts and that shit is fucking gold.

>>323172285
>>323172223
im saying the gpu hardware will be affordable by then, theres vr specific software by 2020 regardless of the price of vr itself

>>323164815
>funnyjunk filename

>>323168338
I do not remember Injustice looking that shitty

>>323172434
you are a retard

i'll reply for you
>Ad hominem
Okay.

>>323172434
It's your turn senpai, I already posted plenty of evidence that stock analysts don't trust Facebook in the long term, and that was only from the first page of google results.

>>323172534
Nah it doesn't. I think a couple Sony Execs follow it though.

Hirai probably wanted to make one at some point, saw the twitter, and decided against making an account because it'll never be as good.

File: 1444188164790.jpg (150KB, 750x565px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 750x565px

>>323172269
This is my concern, that because the price is so barring less people will buy it which in turn means less people will find a reason to make games that support it or mod other games to use it. Unless the vive is set lower I don't think vr is gonna snowball like it needs to succeed.

>>323172550
what is considered good gpu hardware now will be affordable then. you're always going to be playing catch up.

VR will not take off until you can watch VR let's plays in VR. Mark my words.

>>323172678
see
>>323172219

>>323172884
>VR let's plays
Isn't this what Sony's doing? When they first advertised Morpheus, it was all about video - movies, tv, etc. So by extension, it's not a huge leap to realize they'll probably also push Twitch VR/Youtube VR/etc.

>>323163043
Kaz "shamefur dispray is my pray" Mirai

>>323172678
http://pastebin.com/NKGS9Xax

neat

FIVE HUNDRED AND NINETY NINE UNITS OF LEGAL TENDER NOTES

>>323172918
Taking quotes out of context to mislead people, very nice "argument" you have there.

>As we’ve said, Facebook has been the exception. While all the rest struggle, Facebook actually keeps growing, and it actually keeps making money.

>There’s no denying that FB is superior to its peers. It’s highly profitable, boasting a net profit margin of 18% and a fair growth rate. There’s no doubt that Facebook is a great company with an unequaled understanding of the social media business.

>But even the great Facebook can’t avoid being sucked into the bubble like the rest of the social media stocks. FB is finding that it has to spend more and more to keep users engaged and maintain its edge. There’s no escape; the constant need for investment will burden profits.

In the same article is shows how FB's profitability razor-thin and is only getting lower.

In the end the article writer says it's a good short term investment, which is natural in any stock bubble as long as you pay attention to when it will pop and plan accordingly.

File: 1429320056198.jpg (26KB, 475x411px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 475x411px

>$599 for VR set
>$1000 for 980 equiped PC

"We inovated too much, in 2016 people are clearly not ready for virtual reality"

- Facebook CEO

And this my friends, is how the waifu age ends. They didn't even give it the chance to begin. We can never ever have nice things.

>>323173407
How does this translate to users' distrust of Facebook and/or how they feel about Facebook hardware?

>>323170303
> providing free internet for billions of people, etc

They provided only access to facebook while blocking everything else, that's not what you would call internet access.

File: scream internally.gif (972KB, 400x223px) Image search: [Google]

972KB, 400x223px

>>323166017
I can't see if that is an anus, but whatever is it, it's horrible.

>>323173541
tfw 980ti

File: 34567854.png (50KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 1280x800px

>>323172884
>cancerous Youtube e-celebs begin LPing VR games
>try watching it with a VR headset
>half of the screen/one eye is bombarded by a facecam of the guy laying on his couch

I-I can't wait.

>>323173579
It doesn't and I never said it did, I'm simply stating how it's not trusted by investors in the long term.

As for public opinion I already stated what I think and I haven't seen a single proof that it's a respected hardware company in the public eye.

>>323163043
750 Euro shipping to Poland, so I suspect the same for other Euro countries.

>>323173765
The public's opinion has nothing to do with having "hardware experience" when they do, in fact, make server hardware. That's a fact and not some shitty anecdotes or speculation on the market which has yet to be proven.

>>323173741
Good goy. Don't forget to upgrade next year though. You're a real master race PC nobleman!

>>323173967
It does matter when the crux of the discussion has always been about public opinion.
Anon stated how Sony came off the back of the huge success the PS2 was but still failed to gain traction with the PS3, then other anon claimed that Facebook had more pull than Sony and Microsoft combined which was proven wrong in both fronts: consumer trust and raw company value.

>>323174367
Yeah, he was wrong about that. Shoulda said Sony/HTC.

>>323174821
HTC yes but Sony I don't think so.

>>323171413
He's saying the PS4 doesn't have the power necessary to effectively use this VR technology. Which it doesn't. The PS4's APU just won't cut it. Which is actually a big fucking deal because of how it works.

Below 60 fps and it fucks with your perception. It's nauseating, like actually stomach-churning not just bad looking.

And it's looking more like PS4 will run games closer to 30 FPS, which despite all the memeing about the human eye's capability, is going to be horrendous to use. You're going to feel like you're drunk when you put it on and it will undoubtedly cause headaches and dizziness.

>>323175214
It's already being demoed RIGHT NOW and people are not vomiting blood or anything.

>>323166017
>>323168903
What is that? What's going on there?

in a year or two when still no one besides a handful of enthusiasts have bought them, it's going to be impossible to continue to convince devs that vr is going to be the next big thing. they wasted the huge amount of hype they've spent the last few years building up.

File: 1449207284394.gif (2MB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x300px

>>323163043
DAYUM

I'm not buying Playstation VR though

>>323173813
nope its 600euro in poland, no one will ever buy that crap...

>>323176990
see >>323167034

File: GeorgeLucasPhoto-e1338750645178-252x315.jpg (24KB, 252x315px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 252x315px

>>323172269
>Motion control fad

>Motion control in WiiU controller.
>Motion control in PS4 controller.
>Motion control in Steam Controller.
>Motion controls in every cell phone.
>Sony, Oculus, and HTC/Valve all releasing more dedicated motion controllers soon.

>>323163395
>please buy a $349 PS4

already dropped to 299 senpai. sony domination is real.

>>323166520
>vr headset for platform that can barely do 1080P 30 FPS
>when VR needs 1080P 90 FPS

Did you ever think Sony WASN'T putting out a VR headset to poison the well? PSVR exists to make Oculus and Vive look bad so people won't take interest in PC.

>>323169795
yep

>>323169832
But there are zero PS4s that can handle VR with a real game like Elite Dangerous, Star Shitizen, etc

>>323168849
>>323168869
I don't understand the big deal about Facebook buying the Rift. Facebook bought Instagram and changed exactly jack shit about it. If facebook seriously removed the open-source capabilities that would be a different matter, but they're probably one of the few companies who buy other properties and don't change shit about it. I'd honestly be way more pissed if Google or Microsoft bought it.

>>323168874
There'll probably be a headset-only product a couple of months into the release.

>>323179290
>E:D
>real game

>>323179496
You know what I mean.

Stuff that doesn't look like indieshit.

>>323163668
>people still think PSVR isn't going to be around the same price

>>323179754
>external GPU

it's going to be more

>>323179864
There's no external GPU.

Is there a CEO who needs to be told to get off Twitter more than Palmer Lucky?

>>323169789
They sold toys because of the video game crash. The NES was a video game console packaged with a toy

>>323180387
Some one should ask that sony guy if they plan on making any games for the PS4.

>>323180004
good

>>323168898
>24Hz
what are you talking about nigger?
>hurr higher resolution = better!
lower pixel pitch is better, which is the same thing in this case

>>323180183
Google "PSVR external"

Also no porn.

>>323180004
>wanting handjobs from ponyfags

baka desu

File: Armstrong Smile.png (253KB, 500x363px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 500x363px

>>323163395
>Please build a 1200 dollar computer and buy this 600 dollar headset

>>323182854
Anyone building a PC right now is a fucking idiot anyways.

Pascal is going to change everything. If you buy a GPU right now for any reason other than "I have to replace something ASAP" you are legitimately throwing your money down the toilet.

>>323182854
What's the alternative exactly? PSVR is going to be shit.

>>323167283
B T F O
T
F
O

File: jfoxh2oouqey83vkghm5.jpg (319KB, 1920x1280px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 1920x1280px

>>323183286
There isn't an alternative. It's going to be fucking expensive, it's a new technology.

Now if you want it in a motorcycle helmet, that's going to be 1500 mother fucking dollars.

>>323171617
>>it's going to be $200-$400, guys. definitely not something retarded like $600. it might as well not exist at that price.
nobody said that

>>323183749
palmer luckey said both of those things.

>>323167283
I told y'all, he needs to be banned from social media because he literally cannot into that shit.

>fancy wine competes with muddy water
>fancy wine
end it
end it all

>>323183126
Yes. And everyone buying first-gen Pascal is a retard too, just wait a bit longer and you'll get cheaper version. Just look at the history, first-gen is always way overpriced.

>>323184017
Even if you don't buy the first gen pascals, the older cards will all make huge price drops.

>>323163043

kek

Bigger kek to the dumbasses that think it's actually him

>>323173541
There's still Gaben

File: 5mPQjR9.gif (1MB, 331x197px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 331x197px

>>323163043

>>323163206
this
>>323163395
and this

I am pretty curious about the VR porn that apparently already exists for OR.

>>323183569
>VR
>new technology