>Every ability just uses one button!
Why would you need it to be more complicated when it's about countering heroes with other heroes and their abilities?
>It has microtransactions at 40$
Their skins and HoTPaywall flopped. Get used to it.
>Get used to microtransactions
How about fuck you, buddy? If you charge me money for a game and then put microtransactions in that game, I will stop all support of your game from that point forward.
Or you could just keep buying and supporting these bullshit practices while I enjoy all the games released this year that offer DLC for free/substantial content that is well worth the price of admission.
>The Witcher 3
>Hotline Miami 2
Enjoy your cancerous MOBA community and constant in-game advertising, faggot.
>/v/ is outraged when a game has micro transactions
Why? Why do you care so much especially when a game has cosmetics micro transactions that will have absolutely no effect on the gameplay? How autistic are you people?
Anon, Overwatch isn't worth 60$. It's a 35$ game at best.
Besides, Tf2 has microtransactions with the Mann CO store and nobody gives a shit.
>Enjoy your cancerous MOBA community and constant in-game advertising, faggot.
I will, thanks. They're marketing towards me and making a game I like playing mechanically, and I enjoy all the communication the devs make on social media and on the OverPwn site.
I also enjoyed playing during the stress test weekend and will buy the game on release for $40.
Is this thread cathartic for you? I'm happy, I guess you deserve a chance at being somewhat happy too.
Blizzard shills out in full force today.
Remember that advertising budgets for games can easily run over $10 million, depending on the expected return. Paying a group of 20 people $10 an hour to shitpost on the Internet barely makes a dent in marketing budgets.
You'd have to be a moron to think there aren't shills.
Who do you think you are?
also putting darkest dungeon and hotline miami 2 next to these good games.
I think you have a mental illness anon. But i think you might already know this.
>TF2 has microtransactions with the Mann Co. Store and nobody gave a shit
Except everybody did give a shit. TF2 going F2P was literally the worst thing to happen to the TF2 community. It's selling better than ever and player counts are the highest they've ever been, but don't even fucking TRY to tell me that the people playing aren't meme spouters or Russkies or that the community is anywhere NEAR the level it was in skill back before it went F2P.
>Diablo 3 has gone thru an expansion and many patches of fixes and additional content
>sells 30+ million across consoles and PC
>TF2 russians mad that a 1st person team shooter is going to come out with a $40 price and sell millions again, because Blizzard and a decade of guaranteed support
I look forward to each and every assblasted post you tryhards make in protest. Which milestone will fuck you the hardest? 10 million units? 15 million? 20 mill?
I can't wait.
It's pretty pathetic the lengths Blizzdrones will go to justify their interest in pure garbage that will go F2P within a month of release because CS:GO and TF2 already has everything the FPS crowd wants.
Blizzard might as well just give away everything to Valve. It's obvious Blizzard is incapable of delivering anything of value in 2016.
That's twice someone has responded to the person calling them out.
And this is three times.
You really need to work on your subtlety, unless you're purposefully just trying to get more eyes on the thread. If that's the case, you should have picked a better OP picture, as it's not a cute girl.
Well you seem to know allot for someone who claims to not be a marketer.
Fuck off shill.
>Paying a group of 20 people $10 an hour to shitpost on the Internet barely makes a dent in marketing budgets.
>You'd have to be a moron to think there aren't shills.
You;d be right, except
I do it for FREE. :^) I play everything in the launcher except Starcraft 2
I know because I was a marketer, many years back. I did it for EA, using the same tactics you guys are doing now - except I was better than you guys are, since you're poor AND stupid.
I actually believe you, since your image uses the file name that you would get by default downloading it from 4chan.
Legion will flop
Hearthstone will die out
HotS is dead
Warcraft the Movie will flop
Overwatch will be successful for a while but will fall apart over time (see: WoW)
Blizzard is doomed. They'll rely on Starcraft 3 or a Starcraft MMO or a Diablo movie to save the but it'll be too late.
Overwatch is pretty much a guaranteed flop. Multiplayer-only paid games are unacceptable in 2016. Maybe if it were F2P it would have stood a chance, but nope. Not like F2P would be actually free like Dota 2. It would be P2W like HotS and Hearthstone.
Not even Star Wars could entice people.
I really, really think you are underestimating the power of Blizzard marketers. These are the same people that sold an expansion of basically nothing to 10 million+ people, and charged more for it then any other expansion to boot.
And dropped. I'm sick of multiplayer-only games, let alone ones that charge me 40 bucks just to play.
Unless it was a like a cosmic horror movie about helpless humanity caught in the crossfire between ruthless angels and sadistic demons, like a straight up horror film a la In the Mouth of Madness where the protagonist is powerless and the things that would see him dead are anything but, I don't see how this could possibly not be just another videogame adaptation that fails to make back 1/10th of its budget.
I loved the Diablo lore for too long to want to see it raped for the masses in the big screen.
SO how scared is every other company to have so many shills shitting up this board?
Such a shame your only argument in this thread is that everyone who likes Overwatch is a shill.
Then you admit that you are a shill.
Fuck off shill.
I never said it WAS 40$. I was just saying that if they charged 60$ for the game as it is then I wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot pole.
What's wrong with that statement? If you have a singleplayer, or multiplayer-only game, why are you charging me full price for it? 10-20 dollars should be the max.
If that's not profitable, then cut back on the realistic graphics and voice acting.
Has there ever actually been 100%, proven factual evidence of any company shilling on /v/ or any 4chan board?
It's not that I don't believe it, not in this age of sponsored content and shit. I'm just curious because people have been throwing that out so much and I wanna know how justified that accusation really is.
>free maps and heroes
I'll take skins micro transactions over dlc characters and maps , I would prefer everything already in the game but that doesn't happen anymore so the latter is better.
Microtransactions are acceptable when in-game currency is easy to acquire and those who do not purchase are not at a true disadvantage (e.g. Garden Warfare.)
F2P games can have either a purchasable in-game currency or premium accounts; I will not play a game with both.
So Just Cause should be $20
That Tomb Raider game coming out
Should I compile a giant list that isn't Blizzard so you can shit up all of /v/ by complaining about them, all being singleplayer games that cost $60?
>Has there ever actually been 100%, proven factual evidence of any company shilling on /v/ or any 4chan board?
Borderlands 1 and the XBLA remaster of Perfect Dark were 100% actually marketed on here.
Any other example is either speculation or bullshit. I have been here way too long and shouldn't know this i hate myself.
At least in the high 90%, they definitely check in on /v/ from time to time especially if a game is truly terrible and they get flooded with negative reviews, they blame it on some concerted effort to make them look bad.
>so Just Cause should be $20
It can be 30 dollars, but not a cent over.
Wouldn't even pay 5 dollars for it.
>Should I compile a giant list that isn't Blizzard so you can shit up all of /v/ by complaining about them, all being singleplayer games that cost $60
Usually they're overpriced garbage whose poor quality speak for themselves. So go right ahead.
>Brink, Battlefront, Titanfall, and Evolve all failed because they were multi only.
>Not because they were badly designed bullshit.
It's debatable whether or not multi only was a factor, but saying that it was the primary reason for such is just retarded.
You people think Blizzard is capable of making a better game? This watered down bullshit of an FPS that makes TF2 look like Quake? No normie or pro FPS player cares about Overwatch, it appeals to nobody.
It would at least stave off the death of the community, but now the community will be dead after a month because the price is unjustified for this little content.
>and then give challenges I can complete with those characters to unlock skins?
hey guys I know we really don't need a widowmaker but I'm only ten headshots away from my new skin
sorry guys i know we've already got someone playing reinhardt but i need to land more ults with him so i can get my new skin
guys go die please i need to resurrect more people for my skin unlock
>wanting cancer in his game
let the blizzdrones buy their skins or let them ruin your matches more than they already do
>Why would you need it to be more complicated
Blizzdrones, folks. Take a good long gander
>I won't play this game so it appeals to nobody
Yeah man, I mean I was at Blizzcon this year and every other word I heard was Overwatch
People were talking about it more than the newest WoW expansion, and the lines to play it were longer than the lines for any other game I'd ever seen at Blizzcon
You can use un-quantifiable buzzwords like "casual" all you like, because you're living in your little bubble where the only "acceptable" game to play is Dota 2
It's called a competitive market, son.
>guy releases game for 60 bucks
>another guy releases a game for 20 bucks, and is better overall
I can get both, but it'd be smart to get the latter.
>shooters are as complicated to learn as fighting games
>It has microtransactions at 40$
Wait what? What the fuck. I thought it was cancelled once they put a 40$ price sign on it.
that is an exceedingly idealistic view. I dont disagree that a lot of games end up being overcosted, but The Witcher 3 being worth $30 at best? I think you have some skewed views and are a tad disconnected with the current market
Yeah man, valve has been going to shit for a while now, and TF2 is nothing more than a money grubbing pile of sadness now.
I really hope overwatch is successful and kills TF2, someone needs to show valve they can't just sit on their over 7 year old game pumping out hats forever.
>thinking Blizzard won't go back on their "word" about no paid heroes
>thinking there won't be advantages for people willing to pay up the shekels for them
Where have you been the past 6 years or so?
And you're right, it's b2p.
>all games have DLC
Seriously nigger? Are you legit retarded? Please show me the paid dlc in The Witcher, Demon's Souls, Devil May Cry, Dynasty Warriors, Tekken Tag, et cetera.
>voice actors don't ask for millions just to say 2 lines over and over
>stupidly realistic graphics don't require countless man hours rendering the billions of polygons
And you say "i'm" deluded? If your precious game can't hold itself on gameplay, then no amount of graphics and Tara Strong/Nolan North ego stroking will fix it.
Blizzard threads are always filled with EA/other companies shills.
That's why every person who says something positive about overwatch is called a shill and the threads derail. Bitches are scared because blizzard is actually making a great game.
Other threads dont have nearly as much shill talk being thrown around.
i guess that would be a good plan if your ultimate goal was to make your product as cheap as possible, but that isn't most devs goal.
For better or worse people are very used to paying 40-60 dollars on games with high end graphics and care about those graphics a great deal.
Valvedrones who have literally nothing to justify their taste other than "muh Twitch views" and "muh prizepools"
if Twitch views are the only metric of quality, then LoL and Hearthstone are the best games in the world
When idiots tried to claim their game wasn't dead. HotS is dead and LoL and Dota 2 are thriving, Twitch proves that. It also scales how popular something is.
It would be easier if Blizzard weren't complete cowards hiding numbers, but you know, jews and all that.
>Twitch and Steam stats.
>For a game that isn't even out yet.
Do I need any further proof?
>T-They'll fuck it up you'll see!
>They've definitely gone back on their word and fuck it up, it's happened before!
When then faggot?
>For better or worse people are very used to paying 40-60 dollars on games with high end graphics and care about those graphics a great deal.
People are used to playing DOTA, counterstrike and TF2. By your logic those games are perfect and can't be criticized because of "muh popularity and bandwagon acceptance."
>Shitty version of King's Field with fedoras
>Poor man's Shenmue
>Squid loli pedo shit casual tps that's so simple, you shoot at the floor
>paying for a level editor when there are free ones
>le git gud indie trial and error pixel shit that tries to hide that the artist just can't draw worth a fuck
>the only roguelike more stupid than Pokemon Mystery Dungeon
wow, great list, anon
Amusingly enough, Blizzard chose their words very well. They said that for 40bux, you get "access to all the heroes CURRENTLY in the game"
Meaning, if they later on add paid heroes, they can still cover their asses (^:
>Blizzard is making great porn material
Fixed for ya, family. We all know the only thing that will still be around and in use of Overwatch after a year or so are the SFM models.
Stop moving the goalposts. The point is that it's wrong to charge 60 bucks for a multiplayer or singleplayer-only experience. Just because people think it's okay doesn't magically make it so.
Before you bring it up, yes, I do have the authority to say that it's wrong to charge that much, because other companies have done far better at lower prices.
Valve haven't produced a worth while update for TF2 in over a year at least, I know it's longer but I can't be arsed going and looking.
Every update now is just more ways to make money, you even have to pay into their events, everything is community made and it's all just hats and skins.
And as for valve itself, they've been doing some dodgy shit too, but everyone gives them a free pass on the bullshit they pull because all their eggs in one basket levels of Stockholm syndrome.
Blizzard said they wanted to put in some system with unlockable cosmetics in overwatch but they didnt want people to grind out one character just to get them because overwatch is all about "dynamic team composition".
They're thinking about alternative way for now and haven't confirmed anything.
Most shit will still be paid though. They want to make money somehow
Devs have said there will be a progression system of some sort that will most likely give you skins for hitting certain milestones. They have apparently tried out a few systems and havent been happy with any of them as of yet
Literally a rock paper scissors system to cater to people with low skill.
>Get used to it.
To flops you mean.
I'd rather play a fun game with a small community than a shit game that everyone is playing. You're telling me you'd rather play Call of Duty than Unreal Tournament just because its playerbase is inflated by a million twelve year olds?
>The point is that it's wrong to charge 60 bucks for a multiplayer or singleplayer-only experience.
I'm so glad the industry moved on from catering to retards like you.
Remember when every game needed tacked on multiplayer that would be dead on arrival?
>Valve haven't produced a worth while update for TF2 in over a year at least,
Stopped reading there. The new maps, massive balance changes, and cosmetics that don't affect gameplay would say otherwise.
>inb4 "they're all shit"
Quick match search is around 3 minutes
Hero league search is always faster so probably 2 minutes or a bit less
unless you believe in god and objective morality then the only thing thats "wrong" is what the market wont tolerate
If the game flops then they did something wrong, but to say its morally objectionable for different products to charge different prices is idealistic nonsense.
come the fuck on
>20 tick rate servers for 6v6 official servers
>no community ran servers
>designed for shitty console play
>edgy plagiarized anime backgrounds for half of the characters
>casual trash that will die after 6 months
Nobody on /v/ is going to be playing Overwatch, just like nobody plays Blizz or Riot shit.
Things are popular for a reason, but things are also dead because they are shit games.
Worthless tacked on multiplayer is a consumer right now?
tick rate servers for 6v6 official servers
>>no community ran servers
>>designed for shitty console play
Who gives a shit?
>>edgy plagiarized anime backgrounds for half of the characters
>>casual trash that will die after 6 months
No it won't.
devs have said there are quite a few characters in varying stages of development. They like the current roster for launch but we will get more free characters as time goes on.
Nice missing the point entirely. I'm the one arguing that games shouldn't need a tacked on multiplayer. If you're gonna have it, it should be good and then have a singleplayer designed to make you good at it. Something more than just a glorified tutorial.
IF your game has no multiplayer, then the game has to be cheaper. No singleplayer is worth 60 dollars.. I'm not paying for a game that's half-assed.
>IF your game has no multiplayer, then the game has to be cheaper. No singleplayer is worth 60 dollars.. I'm not paying for a game that's half-assed.
Okay, this is bait.
never again will I touch that shit
>it's bait if you don't want to pay 60 dollars for a 3 hour hallway simulator
Triple A games, everyone.
I totaly agree with from 659. TF2 is one big advertising slogan. Cosmetics out of the Lore just killed this game. Last time(about 1 month ago) when I entered to game, it was totaly garbage of diodes hats with effects, totaly out of lore pile of junk hats etc. Valve literaly killing every game cause of that Jewish Blood in their veins, TF2 isn't the only one, DotA2 itm is in Agony, becouse it becaming same pile of junk.
Usually I agree with /v/ about the shittiness of modern AAA games, but then a great game like Overwatch comes along and everyone still hates it. You faggots just blindly hate anything popular without playing it or applying critical thinking.
People calling it "casual" LOL, I'm sure you're a pro at Quake right?
if thats how you feel then thats fine i guess, just know that not very many people feel that way and its unlikely the market will cater to you given the general populace's predilections.
you can wax philosophical about right and wrong all you want, but in the end all it means is that at the price-points you are demanding you have to resign yourself to indie steam games
I dont know mang.
It's kinda fun.
Haven't paid a single $ and I have over half the cast. I can deal with not having the newest heroes for a while and I dont care about skins.
It's a nice break after I get too stressed from playing SC2 ladder.
What? People outside of /v/ have something valuable to say? Like who? Nobody comes here because people outside 4chan aren't blind dumb drones.
What am I going to hear except that it's the best game ever from Blizzdrones who buy store mounts from WoW? Am I supposed to treat that like an intelligent opinion?
Seems likely a good number of them are shills from other companies that seem terrified of the game. A lot of the complaints are literally about wrong information and such which has been corrected over and over yet they repeat it.
It's awful weird how you guys are okay with Blizzard charging 40 bucks for this, and the defense is "they're a company, they're allowed to want money."
Why is nobody else allowed to make money though? If Valve charge 20 bucks for Counterstrike, they're considered the devil.
It's the only moba that tries to do new things and bring some freshness to an extremely stale genre. Blizzard stopped trying to make it an esports game and went for boring ol' fun.
Cry shill all you want, doesn't make it any less true.
>almost 200 posts in
>still no Mei tubs.
People here are old enough to know that Neo-Blizzard and Blizzard aren't the same people. Blizzard USED to make good games a long time ago, but not now. Nobody does or at least should be playing their new games.
They were a fad, they made gold once and now only make garbage. Simple as that. We've all moved on. At least those of us who were smart enough to see their jew tricks after D3.
I mean long term.
If you plan to support game for a long time with meaningful content you need some money maker.
Fighting games do it by releasing tons of expansions. Same with RTS. Just selling cosmetics is a good way imo.
You want me to record getting a match? Stop being retarded.
Hots isn't the most popular moba but there's enough people to find games.
there was big thing with the tortanic, someone anon latter fessed up to being a shill and provided evidence.
I'm still not convinced it wasn't the greatest troll ever though, since its done irreversible damage to this board
If it was a step in the right direction, the game would have free DLC forever, and would only cost 10 dollars. But considering Starcraft 2, I doubt they'll keep the DLC free.
>promise it'll only be 3 installments
>chop LOTV into two segments and ask 100 dollars for both
Nova missions. Lol.
I bet you think the human eye can't see past 30fps as well.
>implying Blizzard, the company that made Diablo 3 always online and absolutely fucked SC2's arcade will allow community servers
>Who gives a shit?
People that don't like consoles holding them back? Did you play Oblivion? Could you feel the casulization? The consolitis? The dumbing down of the game to suit younger people that owned Xboxes? The same principle applies here. Why play a dumbed down console shooter on PC when you have better games you could be playing?
kek, Widowmaker is literally just the bitch from Taimanin Asagi, but French instead of Japanese. Genji is Hakumen from BlazBlue mixed with gray fox, not to mention that a fucking cyborg ninja is completely out of place here. What's next? A kamen rider? We already have a yoichi wielding yakuza member with a samurai haircut, a power suit equipped Egyptial version of Samus Aran, a jet set radio character, a mecha pilot (who's design is stolen from an Eva plug suit and the robots from Patlabor), and chink pyro. There's even a randomly pink haired female that can lift weapons far beyond what women can normally lift, so it's just like my Japanese animes. Better get Jam Project to do the theme song and it will be all set for broadcast.
>No it won't.
because Blizzard will force an esports scene before it's even remotely balanced and ready for serious play because they let Pewdiepie and a bunch of other nobody streamers play it for a few weeks?
>If it was a step in the right direction, the game would have free DLC forever, and would only cost 10 dollars.
Why, is $10 your weekly allowance from your mommy? Just save it up for 4 weeks and buy OW
>can't play more Gigantic until they get their playtesting schedule shit together
>never got my account flagged for $40 TF2
God fucking damnit Blizzard fucking give it to me NOW
>If Valve charge 20 bucks for Counterstrike, they're considered the devil.
when has anyone ever said that?
Valve uses a different model because they have the very well established steam workshop and can effectively give games away with the relative certainty that they will make significant microtransaction money off of them.
Combine that with a system that has the community doing most of the legwork in creating those cosmetics and valve would be fools not to price their games as low as humanly possible.
Im not trying to say blizz is the best ever or even the overwatch will be good, just that you have to look deeper into an issue before you declare you understand exactly how things work.
SC2 was pretty good other than the story. Lotv has really nice multiplayer
RoS fixed a lot of things about D3 and is still getting patched, huge improvement. D3 was a huge disaster on release.
No excuses for WoW
Hots is good for what it is, casual quick moba
Same with hearthstone
if you think /v/ is always right you must lead a sad life where very very few games that arent jrpgs with fan service are acceptable.
If thats really how you feel then i just feel sorry for you.
Because that totally excuses the shit early life of the game and the insultingly terrible story.
Also DRM is great! Everybody loves DRM in single-player games! Wouldn't want people to mod the game and detract from Blizzards PERFECT VISION.
>My opinions are FACT
You're contradicting yourself too, since you said earlier that dota 2 is the best game because it has more twitch views. Well, HS has even more, so well done
>f it was a step in the right direction, the game would have free DLC forever, and would only cost 10 dollars.
Are you asking them to be less Jewish or go fucking bankrupt?
>implying Blizzard, the company that made Diablo 3 always online.
They fixed D3 a long time ago lad.
>People that don't like consoles holding them back? Did you play Oblivion? Could you feel the casulization? The consolitis? The dumbing down of the game to suit younger people that owned Xboxes? The same principle applies here. Why play a dumbed down console shooter on PC when you have better games you could be playing?
>PC mustard race meme.
>kek, Widowmaker is literally just the bitch from Taimanin Asagi, but French instead of Japanese. Genji is Hakumen from BlazBlue mixed with gray fox, not to mention that a fucking cyborg ninja is completely out of place here. What's next? A kamen rider? We already have a yoichi wielding yakuza member with a samurai haircut, a power suit equipped Egyptial version of Samus Aran, a jet set radio character, a mecha pilot (who's design is stolen from an Eva plug suit and the robots from Patlabor), and chink pyro. There's even a randomly pink haired female that can lift weapons far beyond what women can normally lift, so it's just like my Japanese animes. Better get Jam Project to do the theme song and it will be all set for broadcast.
So everything in the game is a anime ripoff then? Guess everything ever written needs to be 100% original and not in any way similar to another thing or it's a rip off
>SC2 was pretty good other than the story. Lotv has really nice multiplayer
Are you crazy? Did you forget how every mission can be cheesed by just grouping your units into one big ball of death and killing evrything?
Source: I've beaten brutal, and it's far from living up to its namesake. No skill, no strategy, no need for map control even.
>SC2 was pretty good other than the story. Lotv has really nice multiplayer
The multiplayer is so good that it's completely dead and all the Korean SC2 pros have moved back to BW.
>RoS fixed a lot of things about D3 and is still getting patched, huge improvement. D3 was a huge disaster on release.
"RoS fixed everything!" Except it didn't fix the game being a complete insult to D2 and dumbed down console crap.
>No excuses for WoW
>Hots is good for what it is, casual quick moba
LoL does that already and even it has more depth than HotS. Also It's pricing is much more reasonable.
Same with hearthstone
Hearthstone is good for gambling addicts and faux TCG "pros".
>Are you asking them to be less Jewish or go fucking bankrupt?
WoW is a constant cash cow, they are still making a fuckton of money from other game sales. Removing these microtransactions, they will still be able to fund the future development
Not with the always online mode
>They deserve to go bankrupt for ruining one series after another.
you know i usually hate the word "entitled" as its been overused to the point of meaninglessness, but that being said i dont thin ive ever seen a more proper use than to describe this post
>LoL does that already and even it has more depth than HotS. Also It's pricing is much more reasonable.
Are you kidding, LoL has the worst MOBA business model
HOTS offers daily quests and level-up gold, and doesn't jew you with rune pages like LoL does
>All three SC2 "expansions".
All of them are actually pretty good games.
Saved D3 by pretty much taking out everything that sucked and adding tons of stuff like adventure mode and rifts that made the game fun again.
Okay, with this I have to agree. WoW has been pretty shit since Cata.
Haven't played it since I don't give a shit about MoBAs so I can't really comment if it's good or not.
One of the most popular f2p games atm, you really can't call that a bad game or failure.
Anyone saying D3 has ever been fixed doesn't understand all they keep doing is inflating power levels. What they need to do is change the difficulties increasing them by a factor of 100 or something to balance things out
It's pretty easy, true. But the missions have nice variety and are pretty fun. Some missions are pretty tense on brutal, mostly the defense ones though.
Do you play D2 without LoS?
>The multiplayer is so good that it's completely dead and all the Korean SC2 pros have moved back to BW.
That's simply not true. There are always some guys that were once good at a game, fail at a new one and go back but the SC2 scene is still much bigger.
More "pros" went back to WC3 than to BW.
>"RoS fixed everything!" Except it didn't fix the game being a complete insult to D2 and dumbed down console crap.
But D2 was dumb as fuck too. Diablo was never some hardcore franchise. It could have easily been on console.
>LoL does that already and even it has more depth than HotS. Also It's pricing is much more reasonable.
The pricing is exactly the same in terms of real money but Hots makes it a bit easier to get shit for free without grinding out games thanks to dailies.
>can make tons of extra money by including skins you buy with real money
>decide against it cuz some autist anon got made at me on 4chan
Why do you faggots always blame the dev? This is obviously the fault of the consumer as they've grown obsessed with instant gratification.
Gonna be played for about 3 months
Then it'll disappear into obscurity
Great waifus though
The initial cost is to recoup development costs, and the skins are to sustain the maintenance needed for a long running online game. You know, like lots of online games.
this feels especially petty when free characters and maps have been promised in the future to ensure everyone will always be on a level playing field. If that promise gets broken then ill be very unhappy, but as of now the devs seem quite committed.
Yes but you do it in different ways or with timers, limited resources and other fun gimmicks.
I really don't see how you can make an RTS campaign where you make "Death balls" completely unviable. SC1 was the same way.