it wasn't that bad.

>>322983639
Next you're going to say Assault was good

ass salty?

EDO SOO TAVOOK GENERAL SCALES

File: 1399272297107.jpg (334KB, 560x560px) Image search: [Google]

334KB, 560x560px

>Peppy and Slippy looking like they do something relevant in the game from that cover

show me the stair fax!

>>322983639
Wasn't that good either.

>atrocious voice acting
>enemies are all meat walls that take ages to beat down, but they only come at you one at a time, making it a tedious beat down
>backtracking

On the flip side
>fantastic dungeons, solid puzzles
>excellent music
>haggling
>good grafics

It's a mixed bag. 8/10 because the positives outweigh the negatives significantly in my opinion.

YOOU PAY THIIIIIS MUCH

I liked Assault more

64 was a game 2

>>322983929
it was good

>>322984773
"Wasn't that good."
8/10

C'mon IGN.

graphics were suck. 9/10.

>>322985739
That's my personnel subjective opinion. I like it because I have nostalgia for it and am willing to overlook it's flaws when playing it.

Objectively it's probably around a 6.5

>>322985739
MMMMMMMM NO THATS TOO HIGH

File: sticker DLC.jpg (65KB, 282x445px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 282x445px

NOBODY BRINGS ME GAMES ANYMORE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOPx4s0sxfU

is Jon still friends with new york?