Are casuals bad people, /v/?

Only when they try to force their influence on games I like.

Because they don't commit to getting better

>>322866526
Yes.

>>322866652
Explain.

>>322866694
No.

>>322866921
Casual

>>322866526
No. They mean well, but they're still shit.

>>322867025
If you need me to explain then it is you who is the casual.

>>322866526
People who want 100% of content to be accessible without any effort aren't any worse for the hobby than people who insist on high skill ceiling being a good thing in itself.

File: 1448774407155.jpg (83KB, 358x300px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 358x300px

>>322866526
Are people with responsibilities bad people?

You kids these days. I TELL YOU.

>>322866526
How does having a life outside videogames make you bad people?

>>322866526
If you don't play vidya for at least 17 hours a day, you're a casual.

Only Koreans are not casual

>>322868213
>people who insist on high skill ceiling being a good thing in itself
Seems like a truism to me. It's not like it will dilute the experience like excessive length, so why not have more?

Only if they're the type to be mad at people for being relatively good at video games. And I do mean just relatively.