>not joining the revolution
Don't pretend you have an excuse.
what in the name of christ is this oatmeal cookie ass gook even trying to say, that devil's third is so good that it'll take everyone decades to realize it? didn't know it was possible to be that senile at 48.
>game looks like ass and plays like ass
I actually wanted it to be good or at least playable...but this is literally "I can't handle this amount of shit" tier. This coming from someone who played the Drakengard series.
That entire paragraph is so ambiguous that it can be taken in more than one way.
who worries about criticism about devil'd third?
what are the "heralds" and "forerunners" saying?
who is subordinated to criticism?
what "concrete instance" is he referring to?
>fo ren er
>Itagaki believes that those who favor Devil's Third are the *foreigners who are often deprecated.
WHAT THE FUCK DOES THIS MEAN?
It really was a poor man's MGR and MG in general really
>bloody katana man, not specifically derivative on its own
>band-of-freaks boss cast all introduced in 1 min then quickly dispatched
>qt sniper mandatory
>travel through snowy coastal military base passing inside through glowing foundry area
And then to boot
the final boss is a soldier who raised you from childhood to be a soldier after killing your parents and is using WMD to 'save' the world. Then you swordfight.
BRAVO WHATS YOUR NAME
i feel like whatever original vision of the game he had was groundbreaking but with delays and having to start from scratch after THQ went under has made him believe he lives in a world where the current build of Devils Third is anything other than mediocre.