There are people in this world who still believe Hyrule Historia is canon. >>>/vr/2882725
There are some people who still believe that Kaepora Gaebora is Rauru and not Gaepora from Skyward Sword.
IT'S A SUBTERFUGE BECAUSE AONUMA AND THE WRITER DON'T LIKE EACH OTHER, JUST LIKE KOJIMA AND HAYTER, YOU FOOLS!
IT'S A LITTLE KNOWN ENGLISH WORD KNOWN AS A "RUSE."
IF THE MGS FANBASE CAN GET THEIR SHIT TOGETHER, WHY CAN'T YOU?
>I don't like it so it isn't canon
>despite it being officially published by Nintendo
Zeldafags are amazing
it's canon and there is nothing you can do to change it
>published by Nintendo
Actually it wasn't. Historia is published by some third-party named Shogakuken that has nothing to do with Nintendo.
They make those books for every thing, and they always have misinformation. They're the Japanese equivalent of Marvel/Star Wars "Unofficial Ultimate" guides you see in Barnes & Nobles or Borders.
>Published 2011 (Nintendo) (Japanese)
There was. It's just that Konami didn't like it and let go of Kojima too.
Ok, they're the official publisher of NoJ, but they're still an independent company and the book is still full of shit.
Ze;lda's dad didn't exist when Ocarina was made. While it is true that the sage mentioned by that Gossip Stone isn't Rauru, Skyward Sword is still a retcon of Kaepora's Backstory.
Among all the other shit SS ruined forever.