>only 8 of them are viable
>all the rest are basically unusable when compared to the top 8
Why do people like this clusterfuck?
Because it isn't slow (besides 64) like the other smash games, and requires lots of skill in order to get gud.
I don't understand this massive debacle about Casuals vs Tourney stuff. Does everyone hate Melee now or something? Would it honestly be so bad if the new Smash had Melee mechanics? Everybody liked Melee.
You have autism if you think Axe and AmSa don't show that the characters are completely fine and viable. Samus is another one that's completely viable. Seriously, kill yourself. You're a fake-ass posing mother fucker if you think you know all this shit and then say "durr these characters arent viable"
pop a glock in your mouth and make a brain slushy you fucking primate.
Majors regularly have 11–15 characters in top 32.
Some of them are rarer than others (sometimes single instances at single events), but making it to top 32 is no small feat when these events have 570, 629, 709, even 970 man brackets. Melee is a great game because you can challenge the meta if you try hard enough. The tools are there, the skill ceiling is enormous.