>"too few females!"
>"females are always male sex fantasies!"
>"males are always male power fantasies!"
What if all game characters were androgynous? Then no one could complain about such silly things, plus the fans of androgyny would be happy.
The solution is to just put everybody in heavy armor/exoskeletons. Looks baller, too.
Of course people will complain no matter what. Just try not to go overboard, unless it's all cartoony and wacky to begin it.
I've always wanted a game protagonist to be like Kino in beginning of Kino no Tabi, where her gender isn't really touched upon and it's never imperative to the storyline.
I get to play vidya and the SJWs can imagine that they're playing a pan-gendered sex-queer.
Can't actually show dicks, but here's a couple of penised people.
Sure, let's just remove the concept of gender from video games entirely and make all the characters amorphous identityless blobs. People who hate how something is represented in a piece of fictional media is totally entitled to whatever changes they want and it's our responsibility to guess what those changes are and deliver it to them.
"But what about the people who don't cry like a bitch over the idea of media not promoting an image of a society that behaves exactly how they want it to?", you ask? Well those people are supporting something that made others feel bad, so they're bullies and we shouldn't listen to them. It's not like they're the 99% majority or anything. If they were, it wouldn't matter anyways. If there is one thing I've learned from Tumbler it's that even someone with the most exclusive emotional needs is entitled to having all of society go out of the way to accommodate for them. Your feelings matter more than anything else in the world.
>implying the people who complain are grounded in reality
Reminder that homosexuality is a mental disorder.
And that this thread is not video games
This is the fourth time you made this fucking thread with the same image, we have gone over this enough you shit-art posting retard
They arent grounded in reality, they just want to dismantle. Fuck.
Then my posts are also video games
This one blur the lines better?
Head is far too feminine, would clearly be a woman on its own.
Chest is pretty masculine, would be a girl with pecs at best.
Rest of torso, arms and legs are androgynous, I'd say. The lithe frame could belong to either a male or female. Leans towards female, if anything.
The package breaks it, but that's hard to complain about, since it can't 'look like a penis' without actually being a penis.
6/10 Still one of God's abominations
Something's wrong/unsettling with this picture but I can't put my fingers on it..
I don't care how fucking "politically incorrect" it is, I can understand completely why parents don't want someone with a penis in a room meant for people with vaginas. It has nothing to do with "social constructs"
You still don't get it.
Androgyny doesn't mean "hurr put woman head on /fit/izen body and it'll be like that".
We call person androgynous when you simply have troubles telling if it's man or a woman.
What, you don't have unisex restrooms? All you gotta do is make sure that it's only one person at a time.
Anyways OP, that's always been a case, and it's always been solved by ignoring them or giving them what they want so they realize how stupid they are. Here, have a car designed by women. See it's wonderful features, like an oil change that requires pulling the complete front end of a car because engines are ugly.
Giving into the wishes of complainers is the last thing you want to do.