Blade Runner 2

why does this movie need a sequel?

>>64959929
Sounds pretty neat. Farmlands and sci-fi are really neat together, at least to me.

File: 1450625321892.gif (3MB, 220x212px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 220x212px

>Ridley Scott claims Deckard is a replicant
>yet, given how much Ford has aged, we are obviously going to see an older Deckard, implying he lived for longer than 4 years

Explain this bullshit contradiction to me, /tv/.

>>64959929
>I’m not going to say anything else – you’ll have to go see the movie."
If they're going to remain 100% faithful to the scrapped Blade Runner opening where Deckard shows up to a farm then the scene will end with Ryan Gosling killing the replicant farmer and tearing out his jaw to check his serial number.

File: Bale_oooh.jpg (11KB, 320x272px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 320x272px

>>64960022

This tbqh family
Original is perfect

>>64959929
Hollywood is creatively bankrupt and i already made the mistake of getting hype for TFA.
I refuse to get hype until I've already seen it

>>64960138
I'm also deeply confused by this. I pray they've come up with a way to keep the Deckard mystery alive.

File: 1359233741791.jpg (9KB, 100x100px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 100x100px

>>64959929
>a big man

>>64960022
OP here, that was also the first thing that came to mind when I heard it was being directed. The original Blade Runner is easily one of my favorite sci-fi movies ever, but as far as I love the prospect of getting more BR it really is a self-contained work that doesn't need a sequel.

Plus, how in the name of all fucks can they possibly live up to the original, especially in this era of capeshit and action flicks where no one's going to bother with sitting through questions about personal identity and biogenetic ethics? They're most likely gonna have to dumb it down, and that thought frightens me.

>>64959929
Dont forget based Roger Deakins is doing cinematography as well.

>>64960022

$

>>64960202
I'm also deeply skeptical about Blade Runner 2 but to be fair Ridley Scott has been wanting to make this film for a while. It doesn't seem like a soulless cash grab.

>>64959929
>a big man

> Big man
MOTY confirmed

>>64959929
>What are your expectations for Blade Runner 2
Low

>>64960247
>>64960589
>>64960817
> He steps onto the balcony and he goes to Harrison’s side. The cottage actually [creaks]; this guy’s got to be 350 pounds. He says, "Dr. Deckard, I'm Bane"

Im hype because of Villenueve and The Goose. Villenueve is reportedly a huge Blade Runner fanboy and didnt want to do it until he read the script.

>>64960476
Him doind cyberpunk is a dream come true.

any word on vangelis?

not worth it without him. same goes for the actress who played rachel.

>>64960022

Ridley Scott and Ford need to go out on a high.

>>64959929
It's a shame this won't live. But then again, what does?

>>64959929
thank god it's not a reboot

they should set it another 1000 yers in the future and get a fresh story going

>>64961333
This so much. I hate that Deckard is in it. Also nice trips

>>64960138
half as ight etc etc

terminator aged they can give whatever bullshit excuse they used for blade runner replicants they did have pretty dvanced genetic parts

File: 1445266504688.gif (4MB, 192x136px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 192x136px

>>64961252
>>64961252
>>64961252
>>64961252
Holy shit, I almost forgot. WHERE THE FUCK'S VANGELIS?! HE'S LITERALLY IRREPLACEABLE, SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME THE OLD GREEK CUNT CONFIRMED HE'S COMING BACK

File: sarah-gadon.jpg (57KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 960x960px

>>64959929
I hope Villeneuve casts Sarah as a replicant

>>64961585

what is she watching?

>>64960138
the 4 years was a failsafe for a certain gen of replicants was it not

asan audience we're supposed to be left questioning the difference between human and replicant anyway. as in, there are more replicants among humanity than they suspect, for whatever purpose.

i'm pretty sure the asian cop/blade runner was a replicant as well.

>>64960161
But Ryan Gosling isn't playing Deckard

No Philip K. Dick input == who cares

>>64961635
>>64961585
I would also like to know

File: whymyscenesfirst.jpg (119KB, 634x753px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 634x753px

>>64959929
>denis why are we shooting my scenes first?

File: rooney-mara-aint-them-bodies-saints-premiere-portraits-02.jpg (277KB, 802x1222px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 802x1222px

She would be the perfect Rachel. Admit it.

>>64961433
same. also nice dubs

File: 22-pris_eyes_glow.jpg (89KB, 1434x668px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 1434x668px

Anyone else who saw Blade Runner as a kid was emotionally scared by the death of pic related? Her spasms on the flooor while she gets shot twice were horrifying, jesus fucking christ.

>>64961771
Damn. I just saw Blade Runner in theater a couple days ago. You'd swear it was still 1982 today.

>>64962094

No but I was scarred by the bit where Roy starts making out with Tyrell before he crushes his skull, I was like WHaT tHe FuCK

>>64961458
I mean it's pretty easy to come up with a reason why he aged. The entire motto was "more human than human."

>>64962094
Zhora's death had a bigger impact on me

>>64961946
hell no

>>64961946
>tfw no young qt Rachel with curly locks

why live

>>64959929
>>Ridley Scott remains heavily involved nonetheless
>>confirmed to be starring Harrison Ford and Ryan Gooselooseling

I'm expecting a horrendous bag of shit.

>>64960544
>but to be fair Ridley Scott has been wanting to make this film for a while. It doesn't seem like a soulless cash grab.

Neither was Prometheus nor Robin Hood, the guy is just fucking over the hill man, let it go. He's destroying his legacy at this point. What a sad cunt, get the fuck away from movies already, you had your run and will ruin Blade Runner.

Is it true Sean Young is completely insane these days and replies to everybody on her youtube and twitter? Like beyond Carrie Fisher levels of crazy?

>>64962365
How is Carrie Fisher "crazy"? because she openly and honestly talks about sex and aging?

I don't see it working out. They'd probably update everything so that it's the future from a present day perspective instead of an 80s one. The original takes place in 2019 for pete's sake. They would HAVE to make the movies take place in an alternate universe. They had the technology to create the replicants, THIS YEAR in the movie.

File: 80240.jpg (25KB, 259x400px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 259x400px

>>64961746

>No Philip K. Dick input == who cares

PKD certainely didn't anyway

>>64962365

Yeah she still gets work in tv movies tho

>>64959929
>ryan gosling
good
>harrison ford
not good

>>64962365
DUDE FISHER IS CRAZY HAHA LOL XD

JUST FUN YOURSELF XD HAHA

>>64962479
hard to care about rape when you're dead

>>64962693
>>64962417

back to Reddit, Star Shit nerds.

>>64962765
DUDE HAHA GO BACK TO SCREBBIT XD IM PART OF ANONYMUST

GO BACK TO REKKIT HAHA XD GO BSCK TO SCRIBBIT

XD
XD XD XD

File: ShitpostKing.jpg (59KB, 706x674px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 706x674px

>>64962830

Why do redditors complain about a sequel to one of the best science fiction films of all time, but simultaneously lap up Star Wars reboots and capeshit after capeshit releases every year?

If you aren't looking forward to this, you're the cancer this board needs to remove. Even if it is shit, it will in no way detract from the original. Now fuck off

>>64962859

Pretty much my attitude too tbqh senpai

File: 1438974917107.jpg (124KB, 500x667px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 500x667px

>>64962830
Keep bootlicking m'brave sir, remember the white knight always gets the girl!

File: 1421181471025.webm (3MB, 1280x528px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x528px

What will 30 years into the future of Blade Runner's future look like?

>Gosling holds Deckard who is a Replicant nearing the end of his life cycle.

>"I truly am a Blade Runner too."

>>64962859
>uh, like, uh, why are they, like, making a sequel to Bladerunner? Soooo unnecessary
>OH YES CAPTAIN AMERICA: RETURN OF THE AVENGER PART 3 I AM SO FUCKING HYPED RIGHT NOW

neo-/tv/ needs to fuck off back to /co/

>>64962942
Hopefully the same.

>>64962984
Are you dense or do you just aspire to be?

>>64962942
This was done without the use of CGI. Fuck.

File: image.gif (500KB, 320x230px) Image search: [Google]

500KB, 320x230px

>>64962853

>>64960486
which is kind of funny considering blade runner flopped

Who would you like to make the soundtrack? Vangelis again?

>>64959929
More doge-face women like OP's pic.

>>64962942
I can already imagine the sterile and clean digital look the sequel will have compared to this

>>64959929
>What are your expectations for Blade Runner 2, /tv/?

To Be Absolute Shit

>>64963118
Hopefully someone like Mica Levi

>>64963174
>muh bleeding-edge near-future cyberpunk movy should be shot on film
do u even realise what u look like rite now

>>64963174
I hope they don't use orange and teal color grading

Would it ever be possible for general audiences to shun a sequel because they have too low expectations or revere the original too much?

I imagine Blade Runner 2 could do that. I'm surprised it isn't something that's happened already.

>>64963174

It will look like the deleted scene in Avatar at the start where he gets kicked out of the bar and the street is all neon lit.

File: total-recall-2012-2.jpg (89KB, 940x514px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 940x514px

>>64963174
I can just imagine it being as soulless as that awful CGI cityscape from the Total Recall reboot.

File: 3-building1_905.jpg (99KB, 900x376px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 900x376px

>>64963275
about that...

>>64963322


Todays general audience is kids who haven't even watched the first one yet.

>>64963384
This isn't color grading, it's just lighting. They did shift the colors to be more blue in the final cut, though.

>obsess over small details
>spends 30 minutes total on the script
that's Ridley Scott

>>64962859

>>64961635
>>64961757

Probably a cat video or SW trailer. She's obviously overacting for e-fame

>comfirmed to star harrison ford

WHY
he's too fucking old, let him go already, why does hollywood have such a boner for this old man?

>>64963384
There are fanmade regrades. Haven't downloaded them, though.

International cut or Final cut? And why? Haven't seen the movie in years.

>>64963520

I want him retired by Gosling in the first 30 seconds.

>>64963520
Fucking this, he was horrible in star wars and Han Solo isn't a deep character like Deckard.

>Ridley Scott and Harrison Ford working on same movie
The insurance costs must be staggering.

>>64963563
>he was horrible in star wars
No he wasn't. He did fine in Star Wars. It was his best performance in a long time.

>>64963563
What the fuck are you saying, Ford's performance in TFA was one of the only saving graces of the movie. Sadly he was completely irrelevant to the overall story and each character's arc. I must say his performance was even better than in the OT in several places.

We could have had Ford acting as Ford being dressed as Han Solo, like Indy fans suffered Ford acting as Ford being dressed as Indiana Jones in Indy 4. Thanks god he gave a shit this time, unlike in Return of the Jedi.

File: sean young 3.jpg (31KB, 600x1055px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 600x1055px

body are you ready for milf reptilian?

>>64963672
STILL

WOULD

>>64963643
>>64963667
All the people from the original trilogy sucked in TFA. Except Mark Hamill, he was better in TFA than the OT.

>>64963748
No. Fisher had a hard time, but Ford was solid. Chewbie was mostly... some guy giving a good impersonation of Chewbie, I guess, since Chewbie had much less screen time than he already had in the OT.

>>64963672
>>64963718
what a slut

>>64963812
Chewie was the same as ever, what the fuck you on about. Ford looked bored and C3-PO had more facial expression than Fisher.

>>64963748
That's just not true. Ford looking like he actually cared was the best part of the movie.

>>64963667

StarShit manbabies are literally incapable of tolerating any criticisms of their nostalgia baiting pander fest franchise without shitting himself and registering a completely unwanted opinion to distract him from the fact that his genitals are withering away and that he is an unlovable waste of flesh.

>>64963889
In his scenes in TFA, Ford looked like he had just read the script 5 minutes earlier and was ready for his afternoon nap, or possibly about to die, he did not look like he cared about anything but his massive payday and possibly securing a good supply of laxatives and adult diapers.

File: givin it to ya.png (2MB, 1280x1596px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x1596px

>>64963812
>but Ford was solid.
He was better than I was expecting, but he does a thing now that he's old where his acting is like over exaggerated cartoon acting and no one dares tell him to tone it down or make it more real

>>64963643
it wasn't even his best of 2015

>>64963889
When did that happen?

>>64963973
Nonsense. Watch any of his other recent films for comparison.

>>64959929

was there a second book? What is the second movie going to be based on?

>>64963983
why the fuck all of them do that. like all of them.
maybe except stallone.
have you seen any new arnie movies the last years?
it is so painful to watch him overact..

>>64963867
There's only one scene when Chewbacca had real presence in the movie, which is in the medic room. In every other scene, Chewbacca is in either the background or in the foreground but only for a few seconds due to Abrams' style of switching cameras every single second.

Compare that with longer shots in the OT, like when Chewbacca is repairing C3PO or when Chewbacca is with disguissed Leia in Jabba's palace.

>>64963983
I'll agree his performance looked more exaggerated, but that's mostly because of his older face, which makes him look more like an old man from an animated Disney movie. But Ford giving goofy faces isn't knew, he already did that in earlier movies like Last Crusade.

Compare that with his performance in Indy 4. Fucking worse.

>>64964065
Just whatever the first thing that pops out of Ridley Scott's head is. He's convinced every idea he has is genius, just look at what he's doing with the Alien franchise

File: 457.jpg (152KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 900x900px

>>64962365
>>64963672
>>64963718

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKdGopLaRic

>Blade Runner

ftrfwiwtbqhmgfidgafateotdbtwiroflmsaoolimnshon1n1iwsnjkkthxbye (for the record and for what its worth to be quite honest my good familia i dont give a fuck at the end of the day by the way i am rolling on the floor laughing my sweet ass off out loud in my not so honest opinion nice one nice one i want sex now just kidding k thanks bye)

>>64964065

There's 4 sequel books all written by PKD's friend and they are all S H I T.

The series basically turns into ghost in the shell, and roy batty killed tyrell by popping out his eyes so he couldn't live forever by swapping out in replicant bodies cause apparently you need your eyes cause they are the window to your soul or some bullshit.

>>64964109
>chewbacca's bowcaster
>chewbacca setting off the explosions
>chewbacca shooting kylo ren

>>64964116
Sounds like he has the George Lucas syndrome, everyone around him thinks he's a legendary filmmaker and are afraid to offer any real criticism, and this fuels Scott's beliefs he is a creative visionary who can do no wrong.

>>64964237
Chewbacca's scenes with the bowcaster are the "joke" at Starkiller Base and the ground battle at Maz's castle, and those scenes are very short in screentime.
Chewbacca takes like a few seconds in setting off the explosives
Chewbacca's reacting to Han's death is even pathetic compared with the same reaction in ESB. There, he goes crazy, throws a few stormtroopers, resists the handcuffs and is tranquilized by Han. Here, he just gives a short groan, shots Kylo Ren and restarts the mission. Again, much, much shorter.

>>64964252

Sounds like you have no idea what you're talking about.

>>64960022
Well, there's four books in the series.

File: big guy.jpg (51KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 1280x720px

You're a big man

>>64961635
>>64961757

my dick

>>64964376
That's what you get when you introduce like 8 new characters. For a non-speaking comic relief character, i'd say he had enough screentime.

>TFW I've wanted to kill myself, but I have to wait until 2017 to watch Blade Runner 2 before doing the deed.

>>64964410
Those are shit spinoofs. Like joanie loves chachi

>>64964551
If the idea was to make the old guard (Leia/Han/Chewbie/Luke) pass the torch to the new guard (Rey/Finn/Poe), they did a poor job. Han is not a parenting role for Rey, the ending suggests Chewbie will stick with Rey for a while, Leia is irrelevant for the new protagonists' stories, and Luke has zero lines.

HE SAY YOU BRADE RUNNAH

fredric jameson should work on the script

>>64964409
stop sucking Ridley Scott's old wrinkled cock for just 5 minutes.

David Peoples is still alive, he just hasn't worked in like two decades

>>64959929
>>directed by Denis Villeneuve
The only reason to be excited tbqh

>>64961712
I know. It sounds like Ridley is taking Blade Runner's scrapped opening and use it for Blade Runner 2 but instead of the protagonist being Deckard it'll be a blade runner we don't already know played by Ryan Gosling.

>>64962335
He isn't writing or directing the film. He's just producing it.

File: why.gif (1002KB, 500x332px) Image search: [Google]

1002KB, 500x332px

>>64962296
>implying the Goose isn't a perfect casting choice

>>64964894
nah, it should Linde;holf again. he re-writes made Promotheus the best Alien-movie yet

>>64963338
do you have a youtube link for this?

>>64965611

This.

Ford and the Goose together in a film is going to be all my dreams come true.

I doubt it happened, but supposedly Nolan made his cast or crew watch Blade Runner before he set off on making his Batman movies. It will be shit compared to the original. It doesnt need a sequel with Harrison Ford in it. But its Scott doing it so it will be better than anyone else trying to make a Blade Runner 2. Can you imagine a Nolan directed Blade Runner 2?

>>64966156

http://io9.gizmodo.com/5668338/first-avatar-deleted-scene-shows-jake-sullys-big-brawl-on-earth

>>64959929
>>64960022
>>64960138
>>64960223
Guys, don't worry!
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Blade-Runner-2-Take-Care-Original-Biggest-Mystery-82407.html

>Blade Runner 2 Will Take Care Of The Original's Biggest Mystery
>Fans of Ridley Scott's Blade Runner have spent years discussing and debating one particular mystery: is Harrison Ford's Rick Deckard a person, or is he actually a replicant? Different people behind the production have provided different answers to this question, and on the big screen the truth remains ambiguous. It's a very big part of Blade Runner's legacy, and one that Blade Runner 2 director Denis Villeneuve has full intentions to cherish in the making of the sequel.

Fuck you and your ambiguity Ridley

File: ZZ0023F976[1].jpg (37KB, 550x309px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 550x309px

>>64966337

>>64966287
>I doubt it happened, but supposedly Nolan made his cast or crew watch Blade Runner before he set off on making his Batman movies.
That probably did happen. Nolan has been a massive Blade Runner fan for decades and it isn't unusual for a director to show the cast and crew a film before production begins. I read somewhere that Stanley Kubrick showed Eraserhead to the cast and crew of The Shining before production began.

>>64966287
>But its Scott doing it so it will be better than anyone else trying to make a Blade Runner 2.
Denis Villeneuve is directing Blade Runner 2.

>>64966428
Who is a better director than Scott.

>>64960138
Nexus 7 without a termination date

>>64966456
Wasn't implying otherwise, I was just pointing out that Ridley isn't at the helm.

>>64966287
>I doubt it happened, but supposedly Nolan made his cast or crew watch Blade Runner before he set off on making his Batman movie
Why? His Gotham and aesthetics was so ordinary compared to Blade Runner.

>>64966350
I already read that article. There's no point in getting riled up, Denis on purposely worded his response in the vaguest way possible. "I will take care of it" could mean he'll preserve the mystery or it could mean he'll kill it. We won't know until the film is out.

>>64966498
Is he not? Ok disregard my post then.
>>64966512
Thanks

>>64966564
>Is he not?
Yeah, Ridley is just a producer on Blade Runner 2. Denis is directing.

>>64966350

Decker was a natural born sociopath, not a replicant. That's why the ambiguity had so much deep meaning. We see these creatures as monsters, but these creatures are already among us. The love relationship also made things even more powerful. Only a fuck up like Decker would fall for a half-person like Rachel.

If it turns out he's a replicant, it would undermine the legacy of the movie (and he'd be the world's worst replicant to boot.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwXiaUuuhyY

He looks like he genuinely cares

File: 1435882171502.gif (443KB, 200x183px) Image search: [Google]

443KB, 200x183px

>>64966594
I need to watch some of his movies then.

>>64966337
>gizmodo

Fuck off unpaid intern

File: 1099007261.gif (961KB, 250x188px) Image search: [Google]

961KB, 250x188px

>>64960138
>people who think he was a replicant

>>64967072
That's the only interpretation of the final cut

>>64966990

i spent like 4 minutes trying to find that fucking scene he asked for and the only website hosting it was the one i pasted so go and fuck yourself

>>64967137
Deckard being a replicant is shit

>>64966754
Check out Prisoners and Sicario.

>>64966754
Enemy and Prisoners are both fantastic. I think the movie has a fair shot of turning out great.

>>64967137
this would have been a Shyamalan-level of stupid twist ending.

>>64967310
>>64967193
Whether or not it's bad, it's still clearly the case. Ridley Scott says it himself. It's also the only explanation as to why that guy knew about his implanted unicorn memory.

>>64960138
Rapid aging? Idk man, this sequel should not exist.

>>64962935
>who happens to be a woman.

thanks for pointing that out like it's a broken tail light i needed to be informed of.