Why does this look so much better than Batman vs Superman?
Because Batman vs superman is trying to make the exact same movie except without the decade of build-up and attempting to take a concept that is silly at its core (men in tights flying around fighting each other) and make it dark gritty and serious.
> worse than BOYS
> worse than DO YOU BLEED
> worse than She with you?
Because you were tricked into thinking the last captain american movie was good by social media
and with batman vs superman looking like shit too, you really need this to be good or your capeshit sensibilities will be hurt
it'll be well assembled and of high production quality, but it's still mediocre capeshit. it looks better than bamham vs superman because zack snyder is the shittest director in hollywood.
even antman was entertaining. when was the last time people were praising a DC movie.
Its the first one I actually think looks decent
Maybe its because the trailer makes it look like they are attempting some type of character development
>taking do you bleed over anything
One of the worst lines on the story of kino.
henry v, hamlet and dead again were all dogshit you imdb movie buff
>It looks like a high budget tv movie
Both Cap 2 and Antman looked exactly the same and turned to be alright, IM3 and Thor 2 trailers looked pretty good and turned out to be pretty shitty movies. I no longer trust trailers,
>Ayer also touched upon the idea of making all of Warner Brothers' and DC Entertainment's future films connect in some way but (unlike Marvel believes) there's a little more to it than simply "dropping a cut scene in the end credits to link projects." He added: "You really have to be thinking three movies downrange and how today's movie will impact more later-cycle projects."
>Suicide Squad will BTFO Civil War after BvS
Who cares? Aren't you people sick of superhero movies yet? They've been shitting out the same movie year after year for God knows how long now. Who the fuck watches this shit unironically?
>dude stuck in mom's basement
>part of general public
>No impact in MCU
>Not watching Every single solo and team up Marvel Movie and seeing how it impacted the storylines of the cinematic universe (except for Guardians of the Galaxy - yet)
>Being this fucking retarded
Do you even watch
Why does this look better than every other capeshit film coming out this year?
>Ramin Djawadi's Iron Man
>Patrick Doyle's Thor Soundtrack
>Alan Silvestri's Captain America TFA and The Avengers
>Brian Tyler's Iron Man 3
>Henry Jackman's Captain America The Winter Soldier
>Album Mixes of Iron Man 2 (ACDC)
>Guardians of the Galaxy Vol.1 Mix Tape.
These are so far the best ones of all, but that's a good bunch.
>in a capeshit thread
>calling others young
>actually believing Suicide Squad looks good
Civil war look bland gray and boring, colorless
Whilst bvs actually sounds awesome, looks awesome ect
>Why does this look so much better than Batman vs Superman?
because you are reddit
Bat vs Sup looks great except for Jewish women
It didn't at first, but that was before
>I thought she was with you?
>Cave Troll Doomsday (Khazad Dumsday?)
>Batman trying to do a hit and run on an alien god, and revealing that the "Do you bleed?" was a pathetic follow up
>rumors that not only is the main fight followed by Doomsday, but also an army of Lexdrones
>sometimes i want to punch you in your perfect white teeth
Good example, but I'd put that into the same tier as those, which is
"memorable blockbuster-tier scores."
And yes, dat TDKR 80s retro music is goodness. But it's very derivative of Zimmer too.
I know this is a fucking stupid company wars thread, but can we at least stick to the comparison of BvS and Civil War?
I think BvS will be better simply because it's focused on Batman , Superman, Lex Luthor and a small role for Wonder Woman.
Meanwhile CW is about Cap, Bobby, Ironman, Scarlett Johansson, Scarlett Witch, Black Pandar, Spider Man, black ironman, black guy with wings, Hawk guy and probably more.
>doesn't know about the recent interview where they say there's going to a a whole JL shot in BvS with Batman/Superman/Wondy/Cyborg/flash (I think aquaman)
BvS will most certainly be bloated too.
man people who doubted Evans got BTFO when these set pics emerged
Didn't the Russos claim before that they're not gonna adapt this storyline 'cause it was utter shit? Why backtrack? Did Disney realize with Ultron they can churn out garbage, but if it has an ensemble cast, then tumblrinas will still line up in the cinemas for it?
it's better there all in movies together, solo movies were getting boring. However I'd rather that just kept Captain America with Widow, Bucky and Falcon.
Having Iron Manlet had ruined it for me.
They should have just made Iron Man 4 with Hulk. And left Thor with the Warriors 3 and Sif.
Marvel have no idea what there doing, they've gone to far up their ass.
no doubt they'll be a "whose side are you on" scheme soon with a Iron Man centric trailer full of quippy quips, even though Russos probably toned it down but RDJ probably cried and got his way.
every MCU director who goes on a repeat directorial job makes an atrocious 2nd movie.
Jon Favreau made IM 1, which was good.
Then he made IM 2, which was utter garbage.
Joss Whedon made Avengers, which was good.
Then he made Memetron, which was shittier than shit.
Russos made TWS, which was good.
Now they'll make You, Me, & Dupree: Electric Boogaloo.
Civil War looks like the exact same generic capeshit that they have been producing since Iron Man 1.
Takbir vs Supermam looks like the special kinda of shit that DC movies usually are.
I'm not a fan of either, but Zack Snyder has a good visual sense. If you compare the stills of this picture you'll see that there is no rhyme or reason about the photographic of Civil War. Every scene has a character looking at nothing behind a boring scenario without any composition.
So at least BvS will be pleasing to look at.
except the Russos are fast, while Zach dwells to long on single "pretty" shots
the point of the civil war trailer isn't to wow you with cinematography, it's to point out things like Panther and the cape brawl
DC knows that the public isn't inherently interested in Superman and Wondy so they HAVE to make them look cool
adding onto this, it shows that DC essentially lacks so much faith in its product that the movie has so many "made for trailer" shots whereas the civil war footage is just random bits that fit in the movie
every bit more of the movie DC shows is embarrassing
>Zack Snyder has a good visual sense.
No he fucking doesn't. His movies look like garbage. He apes the aesthetic of more respected directors without understanding the purpose behind that aesthetic, and uses it to make cheap, pretentious nonsense.
>shitty fan art tier photoshopped by a 12 year old quality shots
>clean, professional looking stills
One is trying too hard, can you guess which?
Doesn't look better, but it definitely seems more complex and mature than BvS, and the worst part is that they keep telling us DC movies are mature while Marvel movies are for kids (and the really worst part is... since when superheroes shouldn't be for kids?)
>hulk would btfo captain america
>iron man btfo hulk
How is this movie supposed to make sense, anyway? How is Captain "muh shield" America supposed to win against a guy who can literally, and I mean literally, call down from space an indestructable prison to build around the Cap? How is this guy going to punch a guy who is encased entirely in a suit made out of the material of your only weapon/strength? How is his shield going to stop the vast array of missile barrages and various laser attacks Iron Man has at his disposal? Iron Man can literally encase the Cap in a suit of armor and send him to the moon. Iron Man can literally make 50 AI-controlled copies of himself to shoot at the Cap from all directions.
Marvel Universe has to be the most plot hole filled story of all time.
Caps represents the American spirit of fighting against all odds for what you believe and winning because freedom always triumphs
Not even that guy, but good fuck. Everyone who isn't 12 knows that average TV shows like Law and Order have smaller budgets and production values compared to movies, so the composition of the shots from these are more basic and, with their shorter deadlines, quite rushed with little thought given to lighting and framing.
That's why well-shot movies have a different feel and are said to look 'cinematic'. Now, maybe TV cinematography makes you feel comfy because you're used to binging generic bland crime procedurals, but it objectively looks like shit compared to, say, shots made by Deakins and Hoyte van Hoytema.
In no universe will I put Larry Fong at the level of those two, but holy fuck. You have shit taste if you can't see that those Civil War shots look nowhere as cinematic as the ones from BvS.
So, which one is better?
In the case of Ironman vs. Captain America. They're both good guys, they won't try to kill the other. Only disable or incapacitate each other.
This is the misconception most people have when two superheroes fight each other. They think its a fight to the death completely ignoring the characteristics of each character. If Ironman didn't give a fuck about Captain America, or everything they've been through and he just wanted it over with then yeah he would totally just hover out of range and shoot a bunch of missiles and laser at Captain America killing him.
But he won't, because at most Ironman will try to bring in Bucky and Captain America and have them arrested. Killing them won't be a priority, at most they'll knock each other out.
>But he won't, because at most Ironman will try to bring in Bucky and Captain America and have them arrested.
Sure, then he'll imprison Captain America like he did with the Hulk in Avengers 2, right? Or he'll make one of his suits assemble unto the Cap to trap him like in Iron Man 3 right?
Batman v Superman looks better. I still want to find out why they're fighting in he movie.
With Civil War they just straight up spoiled you the reason for their fight, and it's easy to guess how it will go down
If you really want to split hairs about it, the fact is that its a movie about superheroes. They're motivations, actions, powers and abilities are pretty much up to what the story and writers want it to be.
There is no point in arguing what ifs, or what they should or shouldn't do. If Ironman and Captain America worked in the real world, and they fought each other, Captain America will lose no doubt.
>the 14? same old Marvel movie rebranded over the last 5 years
>looking better than the 4th rebranded BB/TDK WB movie over the last 5 years
how in the fuck are marveldrones even more deluded than dcucks?
Comparing their teasers: BvS >>>>>>> Civil War
Comparing the BvS Comic Con trailer to the Civil War teaser: BvS > Civil War
Comparing the recent BvS trailer to the Civil War teaser: Civil War > BvS
As for the movies, I'm sure they'll both bring something different to the table.
You were on to something, but lost your way. There's no on-screen hype with a new Batman and a relatively unproven Superman. Even if they called in Bale it wouldn't make sense because there's no build-up, no paths crossed, aside from retcons and the shared knowledge of comics we have. Under a microscope, everything is silly, all superheroes are. Doesn't make them any less enjoyable. You're just sick of a market inundated with superhero movies, most of which are bad. The worst thing about BvS is that it will stray from TDKR and try too hard to set up Justice League, which will somehow take the best narrative and make it a boring middle movie.
We haven't seen BvS yet, but Man of Steel had plenty of substance. Sure, it is a flawed movie and the acting of some is very wooden, but there's a lot of meat there.
TDKR Batman wouldn't fit into the new world at all.
The BvS Batman is a fucking tank, not a ninja.
He's basically the Arkham Knight batman, but now with Superman and all the others.
Why bother with practical effects if you can make it in a big computer?
Real stakes and consequences.
Better Action, practical action.
Better/more interesting characters.
An actual interesting plot.
Better creative team.
Far less appealing, lots of "literally who?" superheroes like black panther and something-skull, it's a captain america movie, has more iron man...
I don't wanna Avengers v2.1 right now
Captain America was much more the spotlight of the trailer than Iron Man
And Batman has been much more the spotlight of the BvS trailers than Superman. Even when it shows Superman it's from Batman's perspective.
It's simple: "good guys are fighting each other" only has value as a tagline when we have previously looked up to both sides as good guys.
Affleck Batman has never been in anything. He might as well be a villain, because he's being introduced in a movie where he fights the protagonist of the previous movie.
And MoS Superman is dubious to begin with.
>IS THAT THE BEST YOU CAN DO?
>you had to ask
>you gonna show me how to punch? show me how to punch
>go to sleep go to sleep go to sleep
>you didnt see that coming?
Batman v Superman? More like Brandingman vs. Necksnapper
all marvel villains have been shit, even less is at stake here
>better practical action
we've yet to see any from BvS or Civil War
>More interesting characters
literally all the same. While, males, and a shit ton of quips
Very different from the actual Civil War. Cramming Spiderman and Black Panther in there sounds like a clusterfuck
>Better creative team
>>>same marvel formula
Prove me wrong faggot, every single marvel movie feels the same because they make the lead characters way too similar.
>Cap is funny
>Iron man is funny
>thor is funny
>hulk is funny
>hawkeye is funny
BvS wont have Spiderman so why should I care? MoS wasnt even that good and idgaf about WW. Looking forward to Batfleck but that's about it.
>introduction of Spider-man
>introduction of Black Panther
>introduction of Ant-Man in a team up film
>possible huge after credit scene (please be stephen strange)
CW already won in my book. I do think BvS will make more money only because it's the new thing, but CW will undoubtedly be the better film.
I dont like any capeshit but even apart from that both look like trash, batman vs superman already contains way too many superheroes and how anyone can like captain supergymnastics is beyond me
>implying I want them to chance the characters
Cap isnt a character that cracks jokes in every comic panel he's in, but Marvel made him that way.
Someone wants to claim they're interesting characters when they're literally the exact same person with different names? Autism at its finest.
Because Snyder and Nolan are edgy tryhards who can't have
funwith their movies.
Because it seems like WB are afraid to do a Superman movie without Luthor or Zod.
Because it feels dangerously like WB are trying to copy Marvel with that Iron Bat suit.
Because Marvel characters are actually fucking interesting.
>having so much fun it ruins the movie is better
>Implying any character other than Zod is a good first villain, especially after explaining his backstory
>DC copying Marvel
>Miller's armored Batman came before the Hulkbuster
>Implying people wouldn't see a Batman film over any other Marvel solo film
>implying I was referring specifically to the Hulkbuster
I didn't like Nolan's trilogy.
>Looking forward to Batfleck but that's about it.
Okay, so does this mean I'm not the only one who actually wants to see Ben Affleck as Batman?
The rest is sounding pretty unimpressive, but fucking hell, Ben Affleck as Batman. I actually think it could work.
>marvel comics civil war
>literally the most important character is spiderman
>central to the conflict and torn between both sides
>most dramatic points of the storyline are through his point of view
K E K
K E K
It actually doesn't. Honestly, I'm a major DCfag but up until the recent trailer, I thought BvS was going to suck. But the recent trailer tells me that they're at least trying to respond to the criticism of MoS. At least now we know that it won't be some grimdark bullshit.
Both are looking good.
Marvel = Heroes
DC = Legends
Avengers are all narcissistic super hero assholes
Just Batman alone is a better character of course he'll get btfo by most Avengers but his story is better than any backstory Avengers has
>that horrible CGI at the end with Cap and Buck beating Iron Man
Do I need to point out that he looks like a cartoon?
on the other hand
>and the worst part is that they keep telling us DC movies are mature while Marvel movies are for kids (and the really worst part is... since when superheroes shouldn't be for kids?)
The DC movies are factually more mature no matter what because they are actually treating the subject matter as real concepts instead of fucking jokes, that makes all the difference in the fucking world regardless if they are flawed in other areas.
Superheroes inherently being kiddy died with the release of Watchmen.
>But the recent trailer tells me that they're at least trying to respond to the criticism of MoS. At least now we know that it won't be some grimdark bullshit.
Jesse's outlandishness faggyness and how stupid Affleck looks when quipping about WW are the universal things being hated on from the last BVS trailers. FUCK YOU.
BEING DARK IS NOT A MOTHER FUCKING FLAW YOU CAMP ADDICTED WASTE OF FUCKING AIR!
It wasn't edgy in any way shape or form.
Realistically serious with real consequences and feasible solutions instead of mary sue can do anything and everything powers does not fucking equal being edgy.
There is no One fucking way Superman is meant to be, your like one of those people pissed that Batman 89 was not Adam West level campy or the Nolan's films were not like B&R.