I don't get it. Why didn't he just tell them what

File: 1449317594943.jpg (141KB, 669x664px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 669x664px

>>64737166
>obviously evil regime that committed atrocities daily and waged offensive war on the rest of the world

Because he was fighting for his country, even if he was a bad guy.

>>64737166
Perspective

It's also the movie saying "Yes, there were in fact perfectly noble german soldiers who wanted nothing more than to defend their homeland. This movie doesn't care about those soldiers"

>>64737166
>The Nazis were the bad guys

Well memed my friend.

File: 1452442720660.jpg (77KB, 564x491px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 564x491px

>>64737166
/tv/ is a containment board

File: 1452222035670.png (320KB, 774x2300px) Image search: [Google]

320KB, 774x2300px

>>64737166

History is written by the victors. It isn't hard to see from an unbiased point of view, Germany wasn't the villain in WWII.

>>64737166

Before Nuclear Warfare changed everything, it was not uncommon for countries to try to expand their influence and boost their quality of life (and the quality of life of who they conquer) through militaristic land expansion. The American did it too when they conquered land from the Natives and Mexico.

They were also retaliating against being politically abused by the victors of WWI, a war in which there truly was no real "bad guy" or "good guy".

>>64737166
Because he did not want to be responsible for the death of other Germans. He was hoping everyone else was the same and would also politely decline. Maybe the Basterds would have killed a few of the Germans that were up ahead. Maybe they would have killed them all. At least he didn't rat them out and send the Basterds out to butcher them. He may have been a Nazi, but he still cared for Germany and the Germany people.

>>64737166
>Why didn't he just tell them what they needed to know?
he was loyal.I know its a strange concept for modern people
>obviously evil regime
allies where not anti eugenics or basically anything the nazis did until the war started and they had to claim moral high ground (like with the communists later)

>>64737166
Maybe because people have different points of views and thought what he was doing was right? It's really not that hard to understand unless you are brain dead.

Also the Nazi's were the good guys, I would've done the same in his shoes.

>for an obviously evil regime
what did he mean by this?

>>64737166
To dispel the tired trope that Nazis = baby eating monsters & Allies = knights in shining armor 100% of the time and with no deviation.

>>64737408
>>64737408
What are we going to do about it?

>>64737166

>Selling out your comrades to a bunch of capitalist pigs then having to live with it

in the context is makes sense

>>64737166
the jews were the bad guys in this movie, except tarantino is a moron and probably didn't realize it when he wrote it. Probably too busy huffing feet in Walmart changing rooms or something.

>>64737166
They would have killed him either way.

It seems that both the people who hated and those who liked the movie missed the point entirely.

>>64737166
The whole movie is about hunting SS not just killing Germans. Giving up your brothers in arms locations for certain death is about as cowardly and evil thing you can do.

i love diane kruger

>>64737408
Globalism is the best way towards world peace and it is funny that this chart denouces the USSR for taking North Korea as a spoil of war but says its a positive that Germany would take parts of the USSR. Not even the most obvious hypocrisy in it btw

>>64737166
Because you don't understand honor.

>>64737166
LONDON

>>64737166
It was about role reversal. The Jews are the ones committing the ugly violence against someone who seems like a decent human at least as an individual.

Its probably some sort of comment on modern Israel and Palestine.