>This will begin to make things right. https://www.chang

>>64697989
>"Hey george, look at this page, they're collecting signs to make a petition to put you back into making star wars movies, haha what a bunch of faggots
>"haha what?...*gets out of his golden swimming pool filled with the dollars he made by selling his franchise to disney*

File: George.jpg (21KB, 500x318px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 500x318px

George, you are shit. You have almost always been shit. You made three good films and then you ran out of ideas. Entirely the fuck out. Irvin Kershner and Richard Marquand had to step in because you wanted to fucking sell toys to kids, and then 15 years after Mr. Marquand does his thing, you make utter, puerile shit with wooden acting and special effects that don't hold up today.

Apologize? I won't fucking apologize. My parents took me to see Return of the Jedi when I was 8. You know what I remember, George? These fuzzy cunts called "Ewoks". That's it. Fucking EWOKS. That's your entire fucking legacy to me, you no-chinned cunt.

Apologize? Fuck you. You didn't have the STONES to continue with your dream of being a filmmaker. You had to settle for being a BUSINESSMAN.

Apologize? Son, you have no fucking idea how much I'd like for YOU to apologize to ME.

Id like a Lucas directed Episode 0 about Sheev

>>64697989
>15000 retards signed the petition
LOL

>>64698199
>You made three good films and then you ran out of ideas.
No he fucking didn't, idiot. He directed Star Wars and his ex-wife had to edit it out of the shitter.

If Lucas comes back then it will bring balance to the films

>>64698581
Only when he throws himself down a chasm at the end.

>>64698581
flicks you mean

>>64698581
this

Lucas is the chosen one

I don't think people understand how much danger Episode 9 is in. The guy slated to direct is a complete retard. Getting Lucas back will save the entire franchise.

>>64698747
>franchise

Kill yourself. I truly mean that. If you don't know *why* I want for you to kill yourself, kill yourself in a more painful manner than you had intended.

>>64698773
You sure get triggered by odd things, anon. Is everything alright at home?

>>64698350
>he didn't sign it

You're the retard here, pal

File: 1420132147555.gif (2MB, 200x149px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 200x149px

>>64698773
You need some help

>>64698773
Guy, you need a hug.

George does not want to return. He sold it partly so everyone would shut the fuck up about him and the prequels already.

>>64698747
>The guy slated to direct is a complete retard.

Come on now, Jurassic World wasn't *that* bad. Actually, it was generally pretty good. The worst that can be said about it is it didn't fully capitalize on the idea of a dinosaur outbreak in an open park besides the pteranadon attack. Not that that's an insignificant flaw, but they could have done a lot worse. Hell, Spielberg did a lot worse following up on Jurassic Park.

>>64699026
Are memes how creatively bankrupt normies view worldbuilding?

>director of fucking jurassic world to finish the star wars saga

fucking kill me now. Id love for lucas to come back

PLEASE COME BACK GEORGE
Does the director of Jurassic World do scenes like this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hoXNXSpmng

>>64699175
But where was the action? The practical sets? The quips? Both actors were white too, that's a big no-no.

>>64699157
>>64699175
>the man responsible for Jurassic World

Suddenly bringing back George doesn't seem to be such a bad idea

>>64699026
> look how much we are talking about them.

Exactly. A failed movie is a movie that get's a lackluster reaction like "it's a competently made movie". The prequels are anything but failed movies. Over a decade after their release they are still incredibly divisive and talked about, this speaks of their merit. When you create art the last thing you want is someone to say "meh, it's ok I guess", you want a passionate reaction, you want people to love them or hate them. I seriously doubt anyone will discuss TFA after 10 years.

File: sheev-unlimited-power.jpg (17KB, 604x259px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 604x259px

>When you create a work of art, the initial expression is completely pure. It may not be polished, it may not be edited, and parts of it may not even make sense, but it is untainted by public opinion. Of course, as you start to revise, and solicit opinions, and even (gulp) start sending your work out to agents, your work will invariably change. It will become what you (once your left brain is in charge) and they (whomever they happens to be) think it should be. And that’s where you have to be careful.

>Not everyone is going to love your work. In fact, some people may hate it. The trick is realizing that sometimes, that’s okay. Of course, you should be open to improving your work. But, be careful not to mainstream all the punch out of it. To satisfy everyone can require that you sacrifice what could be the most compelling parts of your work. In the end, it is completely impossible to satisfy everyone. So, if you get your work to a place where everyone is “okay” with it, it’s quite possible you’ve pushed your work over a cliff into a sea of boredom.

>Before you revise to please the masses, remember that a “meh” response is worse than a hate response. Because if your work is strong enough to evoke hate, chances are, in front of the right audience, it is strong enough to evoke love.

>>64700728
P O W E R
O
W
E
R

>>64698094
He donated all that money though.