[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Home]
4Archive logo
Half in the Bag Episode 101: The Hateful...
If images are not shown try to refresh the page. If you like this website, please disable any AdBlock software!

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 82
Thread images: 10
They though Hateful Eight was shit.

They have finally been redeemed after their shit-tier Star Wars review.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3wiUNRv7sg
>>
>Right about Hateful Eight
>Right about Star Wars

They're batting a thousand for this year 2bh.
>>
>>64655774
>They though Hateful Eight was shit.
What, is this some kind of bait, OP?
Sounded to me that they pretty much loved it.
>>
le what? They loved it. They thought the projectionist at their local kino was shit.
>>
I had the same issue with my first viewing that Jay and Mike had. I never once thought about how important a good projection operator was till that happened, though our experience was a bit worse to where people actually went to get staff about 20 minutes in, we were given refunds or tickets to another viewing, which was done by another guy, and it was fucking perfect.
>>
Is there big spoilers in it?
Only thing I know is BIG BLACK DINGUS
(and don't know who sucks it)
>>
>>64655774

Did they like the Ridiculous 6 though?
>>
>>64658927

Of course not.
>>
>>64656099
Is the technology so old that they can't find decent film operators anymore, or do they just not care?
>>
>>64658927
They thought it was a better movie than Jack&Jill. Which is not saying much
>>
>>64657544
Not really, they don't say much in the way of spoilers.
>>
>>64659194

So they are still terrible then
>>
>>64655774
>You mainly relate to SLJ

Mike confirmed for crypto-cuck
>>
>>64657544
Everyone sucks it; it turns into a interracial bisexual harem porno
>>
>>64659262
It's really old.
>>
>>64655774
I gave up on Reddit letter media a long time ago. The force awakens was such a mediocre film whereas the hateful eight was entertaining as hell. I've come to realize that the boys there are consumerist capeshit dorks who only really enjoy generic, safe blockbusters.
>>
>>64662235
cuck detected
>>
>>64655774
>they thought hateful eight is shit
No they didn't. Did you even watch it
>>
File: 1426481142983.jpg (68 KB, 630x370) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1426481142983.jpg
68 KB, 630x370
>>64655774
>i loved it
>it was everything i wanted it to be
>>
>>64662235
>i stopped watching a reviewer because they stopped agreeing with me
>>
They said Tarantino makes high gradd schlock, and I honestly never thought of kt that way. I guess its true.
>>
>>64662235
>I didn't watch the review and have no clue what I'm talking about
Thanks for sharing!
>>
>>64662432
"Elevated schlock" is the most accurate description of his films I've ever heard.
>>
>>64662398
this
>>
>>64662235
They enjoyed TFA but loved Hateful Eight. Why even comment if you haven't watched the video and are basing your opinion on them on literally nothing.
>>
File: mikes face when.jpg (292 KB, 1595x1071) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
mikes face when.jpg
292 KB, 1595x1071
>>64655774

>I loved it
>It was everything I wanted it to be

haha, that Jay zing!
>>
>>64662460
Definitely. It also helped me understand why I fucking hate people who treat him as someone who makes fine artistic movies.
>>
>>64655774

First they praise Jurassic World

Then they praise TFA

Then they call Tarantino a genius

They are complete sellouts now. RLM is dead.
>>
wow I just watched a red letter media vid for the first time.

do people actually find this shit funny or entertaining? I mean its certainly not real film criticism.

why do they do that stupid thing with their voice?

is it just a meme to pretend to like RLM?
>>
>>64662725
>not having your opinion validated = sell outs
Don't worry, anon, some day you'll grow up.
>>
>>64662725
>Jay hated Jurassic World
>TFA is objectively a good movie
>Tarantino is a great film maker despite the fact he's an asshole
>>
>>64662810
>vague complaints with no examples
Yes I'm sure you watched the video.
>>
>>64662810
yes. we are obsessed with their personal lives too.
>>
>>64662900

examples of what?
>>
File: just why.jpg (58 KB, 500x497) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
just why.jpg
58 KB, 500x497
Hateful Eight WAS shit.

These dudes just state the obvious, why do people praise their opinions so much?
>>
>>64662594
Yeah but he still makes good films, I dont think tarintino himself thinks hes making some avant garde shit. I just like how he makes films with a unique style, and doesn't try to pander to general audiences. Like hes not afraid of having a black dingus scene in his movie like why not

Doesn't mean I love his movies, but I do think hes a cool guy
>>
>>64662810
just because you don't find it funny/entertaining doesn't mean others don't

/tv/ says they hate rlm but they don't.
>>
>>64662427
They know
>>
>>64662956
>stupid thing with their voice
What does this mean? What the fuck are you talking about?

The rest of the post is just vague comments that mean literally nothing.
>>
File: 1434670769422.jpg.png (89 KB, 255x255) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1434670769422.jpg.png
89 KB, 255x255
>>64662969
But it wasn't shit and they loved it

> t. Didn't watch the video but posted in the thread anyway
>>
>>64663006
Yes I'm pretty sure Jay knows what Mike said in their previous video because he was there.
>>
I like how Jay tries to blame "theatre problems" for why Mike wouldn't like it
>>
>>64662969
>hey look at me i didn't watch the video but i wanna fit in
>>
>>64662969
They at least talk about film quality and the merits of shooting and presenting on film.

I don't think I've seen anyone critical of the point of the roadshow, which mike was and I agree with.
>>
>>64663097
what? mike loved the first 2 hours and liked the last hour but was expecting a little more. they both really enjoyed it and the picture complains is a genuine reason to complain.
>>
>>64663160
>third reich mike
>loving the hateful 8
>>
>>64663238
> being so invested in memes you can't have a proper discussion

Meme culture was a mistake
>>
>>64663097
Except that's not what happen d at all and Mike liked the movie with some minor story gripes. Why are you autists obsessed with their being some sort of imaginary power struggle?
>>
>>64662725
Little. Baby. Bitch
>>
File: 3dPyfOC.gif (2 MB, 284x288) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
3dPyfOC.gif
2 MB, 284x288
>>64663275
mike setting fire to multiple black churches in milwaukee was a mistake
>>
>>64663466
We call those "happy accidents" anon
>>
File: fuckoff.jpg (116 KB, 707x526) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
fuckoff.jpg
116 KB, 707x526
fuck off
go discuss your virtual friends somewhere else
>>
I'm a cuck and I shill for redlettermedia unironically
>>
>>64663820
Or, you know, you could just hide the thread.
>>
File: bait fishy chan.png (91 KB, 800x600) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
bait fishy chan.png
91 KB, 800x600
>>64655774
>They though Hateful Eight was shit.
>>
>>64663820
I wish Mike and Jay would pay me to shitpost
>>
Is the digital version actually shorter than the 70mm version or is it just lacking the intermission?
>>
>>64666055
5min shorter
>>
Hateful 8 was great, though. I feel like it has a lot of rewatch value compared to something like DU or IB.
>>
>>64659262
It's cheaper to have it automated nowadays. Why bother hiring someone who could fix problems mid screening, even feeding the projection by hand if needs be, when you can just get the cunt that serves you popcorn to press a button every 3 hours.
>>
File: image.jpg (95 KB, 1039x1004) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
image.jpg
95 KB, 1039x1004
>>64662235
>I can't handle differing opinions
>>
>>64662725
It's ok anon your balls will drop any day now.
>>
>>64662810
>confirmation bias: the post

No, but it's a meme to hate them.
>>
Why even watch their shit anymore if its just the same memes we see on here. Cut out the middle man.
>>
>>64667913
For their decent discussions.
>>
>>64667913
Because that's not what their videos are at all.
>>
>>64663466
This fucking gif

>Guy with thick eyebrows and stubble
>HAHA TOTALLY MIKE AMIRITE

Let it go anon
>>
>>64668260
It's. Wry obviously not Mike but your examples of why it's not him are dumb. Mike does have thick eyebrows and stubble.
>>
>>64668612
>It's. Wry obviously not Mike but your examples of why it's not him are dumb. Mike does have thick eyebrows and stubble.

This fucking reading comprehension holy shit.

>Mike does have thick eyebrows and stubble

No shit thats why that autist keeps posting the same gif every RLM thread
>>
How do I get Jay in the bag?
>>
File: 4895865.jpg (75 KB, 400x400) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
4895865.jpg
75 KB, 400x400
>>64669039
Yo tryna Yoko Ono they asses holmes?
>>
>still giving a shit about these sellouts after their TFA pandering
It's hard to see your idols die, isn't it?
>>
>>64669127
I have a squirrel fetish.
>>
>>64669360
They weren't my idols but I did watch their reviews and most random videos.

After that and this review tohugh, I just found I have more free time to other stuff.
>>
>>64669360
The only thing more embarrassing than having outrageous expectations for TFA is feeling outraged when a couple of minor Internet celebrities enjoyed a movie that you didn't.
>>
How the fuck are they still on Everest? The air is thin up there and they would die within a day. Especially Mike, being such a fat nigger cuck jew.
>>
>>64655774
Hello Reddit!
>>
These fellows' opinions on moving pictures have me in a lather. I am beside myself!
>>
>>64655774
>tarantino coffee meme
Jesus Christ, can Mike stop with the /tv/ pandering?
>>
>>64670700
Yep, /tv/ is the only place on the Internet that knows about that clip, indeed. We're a special unique snowflake.
>>
>>64670759
It's from 2008 but /tv/ dug it up and memed it last year. Why didn't they bring it up when they reviewed Django?
>>
>>64670809
>they didn't mention it in a previous video which means mentioning it in this video is definitely a nod to /tv/
Sound logic, you fucking retard.
Thread replies: 82
Thread images: 10
Thread DB ID: 390858



[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at [email protected] with the post's information.