>Star.Wars.The.Force.Awakens.2015.H DTS.XviD-INFERNO >Star.Wars.The.Force.Awakens.2015.H

>HDTS
into the trash it goes.

File: 88507378292956075380[1].png (219KB, 720x320px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 720x320px

>>64514160
quality is fine nigger what more do you want

File: 89136325136956986128[1].png (240KB, 720x320px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 720x320px

cripsy clear

File: Chuckle.gif (993KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

993KB, 250x250px

>>64514265
>quality is fine

>>64514265
Looks like another shitty cam rip to me.

>>64514329
Looks like your mum's pussy.

File: 1449526423770.jpg (11KB, 192x187px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 192x187px

>>64514265

File: 12208552_847582075360143_6363109393915947163_n.png (16KB, 170x132px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 170x132px

>>64514265
>Quality is fine

shit nigga, would rathert spunk £10 at the cinema again than watch this crap

I never understood why cams don't look better. With modern cameras, hell modern cell phones shouldn't you get a much sharper image? Yet it seems to have not improved in over a decade.

>>64514453
inspections after the cinema showers have become a lot harsher over the last few years

>>64514516

Can't you just cut a hole in your crab leg bucket?

File: 86485372314847629419.png (180KB, 720x320px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 720x320px

it's like I'm in the cinema

>>64514453
filming a screen will never look good.

huge loss of dynamic range

just watch it on your phone or tablet you plebs

File: jay.png (339KB, 438x436px) Image search: [Google]

339KB, 438x436px

>>64514265
>quality is fine

>>64514265
looks like an average YIFY file

>>64514611

So they downscale it to cover that up a bit? 320p is pretty shitty

>>64514265
>quality is fine

You must be blind.

File: 1451949236867.jpg (10KB, 480x468px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 480x468px

>>64514265
remind me.....whats that shitty effect you use on paint back in windows 98?

Emboss was it?

>>64514737
Ahhh yify. How brave your were. Never forget

>>64514653
this

>>64514265
It's even worse than the first shitty leak, kek.

File: Laughing-vince_mcmahon-wwe-443x300.jpg (22KB, 443x300px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 443x300px

>>64514265
>Quality is fine

>>64515192
it looks way better in motion

>>64514453
take a pic of your monitor right now and look at it, now imagine your monitor is 200 ft wide and you're standing 50 ft away

>>64514565
>shouldn't we have some character development right now?
>nope, lets just step on each other's lines until han solo shows up and introduces us to some squid monsters

>>64513689

v:8
a:10

thanks yify

>>64514453
lol, recording REAL LIFE with a good camera has a very different result from recording a SCREEN with a good camera.

File: 1441334537750s.jpg (4KB, 160x160px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 160x160px

>>64514265

>>64515555
Then why do the screens in movies look so good?

>>64513689
When will these idiots learn to turn the autofocus off when recording bootleg from cinema.

>>64515613
CGI

>>64515613
Those cameras cost 100000 dollas