Where is high-level art house?

File: Dark_knight_rises_poster.jpg (67KB, 290x430px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 290x430px

>>64510480

>>64510480
Damn, I remember the first time seeing this chart and feeling like a filthy pleb. Now that I've seen almost all of these though, I'm not sure I agree with most of the choices

Syberberg's Hitler

>>64510588

What would you replace, And with what movies? I'm curious.

>>64510480
Because if you attempted to make a high-level chart there would be a thousand anons using le meme arrows to tell you that your choices aren't really "high level"

Not that any of them would give any better suggestions.

Still love to see someone attempt it, though.

File: Essential_Cinematography_by_Decade.jpg (505KB, 1193x2048px) Image search: [Google]

505KB, 1193x2048px

>>64510480
>>64510588
>>64510946

I have this one too, but they're not necessarily art house

>>64511083
I know it's a meme answer and it would get lots of (you)s every time it gets posted, but in a chart about cinemtography alone, I'd unironically put Interstellar in the 2010s. It might have a lot of flaws but the cinemaography certainly isn't one and that alone makes the movie worth watching.

>>64510480
Nobody knows what "high-level" arthouse movies are because nobody actually watches them

>>64511199
Interstellar had great cinematography, aside from the occasional hair on the lens...

However, Under The Skin wins in 2014. No question.

repulsion is kek the tenant is far superior

>City of Sadness
>Through a Glass Darkly
>Ashes of Time
>not entry level

>>64510685
Some Jarman too I guess

File: parturissa.jpg (9KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 480x360px

Numbskull Emptybrook franchise

>>64511083
2046 and Russian Ark are amazing.

Nowhere to be found on this shity Star Wars board

>>64510480
What's the point of this? Entry level selection is way better than mid level one

File: 1441838066505.jpg (8KB, 276x277px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 276x277px

>>64511083
>not including Werckmeister Harmonies

ignore those charts, they dont even include eisenstein, the most influential film maker of all time, or any other early russian films.

its not as if they are even obscure/

Chinese Series (Brakhage, 2003)
La Région centrale (Snow, 1971)
Ο θίασος (Αγγελόπουλος, 1980)
輪るピングドラム (幾原, 2011)
The Hart of London (Chambers, 1970)

>>64511083
For the 10s i would add
Under the Skin
Hard to be a God
The strange color of your body tears
Only God forgives
The turin horse

>>64513684
art, not hipster bullshit

>>64513140
How much do kinofags want their own /lit/ tier shit board to circlejerk on?

>>64513697
>Only God forgives

Nice meme.

>>64510480
L'Ascension du Chevalier Noir

File: trashhumpers_text_7.jpg (354KB, 800x1155px) Image search: [Google]

354KB, 800x1155px

When you get to highest level of art, then you can start over

>>64510480
Most of the entry-level art house aren't even art house and are basically entry-level cinema considering they're some of the most well-known films in the history of cinema, so considering that the right side should be called entry level art house.

>>64513767
>Only God Forgives had bad cinematography

How edgy do you have to be?

>>64513848

what

>>64513984
Trash Humpers
A Film By
Harmony Korine

>>64513507
>not including any Bela Tarr

>>64513848
>film
>actually shot on video
|0\

>>64513848
Spring Breakers is superior.

File: ----.webm (29KB, 128x150px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 128x150px

Bump