[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Home]
4Archive logo
Lolita
If images are not shown try to refresh the page. If you like this website, please disable any AdBlock software!

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 78
Thread images: 12
File: unnamed.gif (1 MB, 500x277) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
unnamed.gif
1 MB, 500x277
Can we talk about lolita?
>>
>>64480103
This is Emily Lind's favorite film

https://www.instagram.com/p/_NWVK2FZkO/
>>
>>64480276
Can you imagine a remake of Lolita in this political climate?

Holy fucking shit, people would fucking die.
>>
>>64480276
In a few years when sjw turn into heavier stuff like poligamy and pedophilia
>>
>>64480276
certainly none of the two movies make justice to the book, its more heavy
>>
>>64480103
Never seen it. Will it give me a boner?
>>
>>64480318
If they made one in 62 that got approved by the MPAA, I think it could be easily made today.
>>
>>64480417
That's ridiculous. People were never more sensitive than they have been in [current year].
>>
File: 1297829197174.jpg (50 KB, 300x394) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1297829197174.jpg
50 KB, 300x394
>>64480103
Anytime you like.
>>
>>64480497
I currently use this film to pick up girls from 14 to 17 years old, I'm 27 yeas old
>>
Lolita is fucking garbage, shota when?
>>
>>64480318
The book is taught fucking everywhere. You're paranoid.
>>
File: image.jpg (222 KB, 989x649) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
image.jpg
222 KB, 989x649
>and then I told them: no no this novel is just my tribute and proof of passion for America and the English language
>>
>memelita
>film
more like flick t. patrician
>>
>Muh tarantula redditor faggots liking this over the original Kubrick film

FUCK OFF FUCKING PLEBS
>>
>>64480276
heh, as soon as they get done with the remakes of Maladolescenza and the uncut version of Pretty Baby, mate
>>
>>64480588
Normies react to the book with weirded-out reactions.
>I-it was a good book, but it was disturbing...
>I'd like it if I didn't hate the main character so much
>Really a grim allegory for our oversexulized society
>I've never heard about this book, what is it, anon? O-oh, t-that sounds interesting...
>>
>>64480103

one of my favorite movies, ever

not for the obvious predictable reasons, but simply for the power passion sometimes has on a man, and the power that certain women have on men
>>
>>64480588
>The book is taught fucking everywhere. You're paranoid.

I'm sorry, i don't live in the middle east where is okay to fuck little girls.
>>
>>64480276
You don't remake classics. And that classic was already remade once; we really don't need another such catastrophe.
>>
>>64480795
Lol, that reminds me, anybody ever read Nabakov's proposed screenplay? He published it later as its own thing. It's good, but it's funny in a cute kind of way, because Nabakov didn't have the slightest idea about writing scripts.
>>
>>64480795
Your bait is atrocious, but I'm afraid you're having a bad influence on the suggestible youth that lurk on this board.

Kubrick's film was one of the best films of the century.
>>
>>64480318
You're joking right? Liberals want people to accept Pedophilia.
>>
>>64480835

kubrik's version was really tame
>>
>>64480791
>I'm deliberately and proudly stupid
>>
>>64480906
Only because he was forced to cut the sexual portions.
>>
>>64480885
I was going to mention this, but yeah, it's a growing thing can't waitbut there's a lot of liberals being all like "whoa son, waitaminute."
>>
>>64480103
I want to see a remake where the main character is a dark skinned man.

Preferably a muslim. I would get rock hard.
>>
>>64480872
>Kubrick's film was one of the best films of the century.

>starring a 19 y.o hag as Lo
>not trash

lmao
>>
Where are the webms?
>>
>>64480987
Normies like to brag about how patrician their film tastes are, but actually praise schlock that deviates wildly from the source material.
>>
>>64480708
Dude. Even Kubrick didn't like the Kubrick film.
>>
>>64480987
So you have to lie because you're incapable of formulating a decent argument?
She was 14 during filming and 15 at the time of release.

>>64481018
Please indulge me with your patrician tastes, anon.
>>
File: ped lit v1.2.jpg (4 MB, 4000x7700) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
ped lit v1.2.jpg
4 MB, 4000x7700
all the books in pic related need a movie adaptation, tbqh
>>
>>64481133
You cannot make a good film out of Lolita. There are things that should remain only in literature.
>>
>>64481175
most of them already do
>>
Haarun meets young little Farisha in a romantic comedy for the ages
>>
>>64481175
How many of those actually contain a romantic relationship solely between two people, and not just sex with certain character types for shock?
>>
>>64481175
>Death in Venice needs an adaptation
Lel!
Do you even cinema?
>>
>>64480872
Um no. It wasn't even one of the best films of the year.

The acting is very dated, even for the time.
The humour isn't very funny, and I'm a massive Peter Sellars fan.
The script is atrocious, which hurts to say.

I wish it were good, I usually love Kubrick, I love Nabokov and Sellars, but it was just a fucking let down.
It's always been coasting on
>how could they make a movie about that scandalous book!
Which no one cares about anymore.

People generally talk about Kubrick from Lolita to Eyes Wide Shut. People know about Spartacus but no one really talks about it. Paths of Glory very rarely, and The Killing? Forget about it.
I propose we start talking about him from Strangelove onwards from now on.
>>
>>64481246
I really want to visually experience the fly on Lo's aureola. For reasons.
>>
>>64481431
You can get that elsewhere. No one's going to make a faithful and satisfactory film adaptation of the book. Those who want it only want it for potential nudity.
>>
>>64480318
>>64480321
>>64480417
moonrise kingdom got away with some shit but yea, don't know tBh
>>
>>64481419
>I propose
And you are?

Paths of Glory is a classic. It gets its due, even if you beg to differ.
>>
>>64481419
> massive Peter Sellars fan
> Sellars
> Sellars twice

Go fuck yourself.
>>
>>64480791
People who dismiss Lolita only indicate they can't see good literature for shit. Nabokov's one of the most brilliant writers of all time, Lolita's not going anywhere.
>>
>>64481600
A guy with an opinion.
I don't see people talking about it enough, but maybe I don't go to Paths of Glory forums.

>>64481647
I watch his movies, I don't sit around spelling his name all day. Christ.
>>
>>64481555
I appreciate all the subtext and theme and beautiful writing, but you cannot deny the universal appeal of naked girls.
>>
>>64481175
umm i've read all of the gabriel garcia marquez ones and where is the pedo stuff senpai?
>>
File: barbara alyn woods.jpg (589 KB, 2400x3000) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
barbara alyn woods.jpg
589 KB, 2400x3000
>>64481620
Their mom has big boobs, so it's genetic
>>
>>64481768
watch malle's pretty baby
>>
>>64481840
I'm on it. Thanks!
>>
>>64481996
Chloë Grace Moretz
>>
Can someone post the essential /tv/core picture?
>>
File: 1418527489091.jpg (380 KB, 830x1200) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1418527489091.jpg
380 KB, 830x1200
>>64482043
I have a couple
>>
File: 1431030334574.jpg (595 KB, 1200x1600) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1431030334574.jpg
595 KB, 1200x1600
>>64482147
>>
>>64481996
laneya grace
>>
>>64482189
BASED
A
S
E
D
>>
>>64482170
add moonrise kingdom
>>
File: 1448389421805.jpg (199 KB, 750x767) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1448389421805.jpg
199 KB, 750x767
>>64481620
>>
>>64481996
Emily Lind. >>64480256
>>
>>64480417

Standards have changed. We're more liberal about gayism and general sexuality, but not this. I grew up in the 80s and 90s and 6th form schoolgirls (16-18) were considered a perk of the job for male teachers. Now a British MP got thrown out of his party for sexting a 17 year old dominatrix who contacted him first.
>>
>>64482475
He got thrown out for his shit taste desu
>>
>>64480785
You're an interesting person. Would be cool if I met you in real life.
>>
>>64482475
>femdom
INTO THE TRASH
>>
>>64482253
look again
>>
>>64482170
>Possession

I don't see how this fits in with those.
>>
>>64482692
opsie, also how did the jews get away with it?
>>
>>64482505

Yeah, she is a munter desu.
>>
kubrick's lolita is shit, paths of glory and Barry Lyndon are his best movies, the rest is shit
>>
File: cr2.jpg (14 KB, 372x386) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
cr2.jpg
14 KB, 372x386
>“Lolita, light of my life, fire of my loins. My sin, my soul. Lo-lee-ta: the tip of the tongue taking a trip of three steps down the palate to tap, at three, on the teeth. Lo. Lee. Ta. She was Lo, plain Lo, in the morning, standing four feet ten in one sock. She was Lola in slacks. She was Dolly at school. She was Dolores on the dotted line. But in my arms she was always Lolita. Did she have a precursor? She did, indeed she did. In point of fact, there might have been no Lolita at all had I not loved, one summer, an initial girl-child. In a princedom by the sea. Oh when? About as many years before Lolita was born as my age was that summer. You can always count on a murderer for a fancy prose style. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, exhibit number one is what the seraphs, the misinformed, simple, noble-winged seraphs, envied. Look at this tangle of thorns.”
>>
Never seen the film though I have it on my laptop. Love the novel though. Nabokov's prose is so wonderful you forget you're lusting over an adolescent girl
>>
>>64481800
Ive only read 100 years of solitude and its quite some in there
>>
Reminder that the new Dance Moms featuring BrynnBrynn airs tomorrow.
>>
>>64482506

yeah sure, coffee?
>>
File: cowtits.jpg (116 KB, 765x508) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
cowtits.jpg
116 KB, 765x508
>>64481835
>>
elle fanning lolita remake when
>>
>>64487428
Too late. Closest you can get is watching Somewhere.
Thread replies: 78
Thread images: 12
Thread DB ID: 360445



[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at [email protected] with the post's information.