>Gareth Edwards revealed that [Rogue One] will revolve around

>>64474937
To be fair it was never fired until A New Hope, so it'll just be floating around space the whole movie

>>64474937
This is a prequal to A New Hope, so it's the plans that R2 has. It isn't a new Death Star, it's the first one.

>>64474937
>rogue band of resistance fighters
>it's called rogue one because they're rogues
what the fuck come on

They're really fond of rehashing that same fucking plot point.

Wait, it's not Gareth Evans?

>>64475597
>>64475649
So you admit that it's a MacGuffin? And you still defend this obvious attempt to minimize financial risk for Disney?

>>64474937
>implying Star Wars cucks care

More nostalgia. More about the Death Star. CGI Grand Moff Tarkin
The best pilots will be non-white guys
Basically, we're fucked. We'll see nothing new in these films.
The Han Solo film will be predictable stuff.
Winning the Falcon
The Kessel run in 12 parsecs
Smuggling for Jabba

We are totally fucked in the ass.

>>64475811
Well, the schematics are the MacGuffin if you insist on using buzzwords

>>64475755
No, because if it was it'd actually be good.

>>64475597

I think it was fired once as a test on the planet it was orbiting while under construction. I forgot the name though, and honestly I'm not even sure that is canon anymore.

File: Screen-Shot-2014-11-10-at-1.52.27-PM.png (244KB, 680x350px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 680x350px

>>64474937
I don't know what I enjoy more. The new Star Wars franchise or the autistic reactions to it.