draw a scene from a movie
other anons try and guess the movie
starting out easy
yes, too easy
stepping it up, no one got this last time
I think Kindzadza is pretty unique, I can't think of anything similar to it. Google "soviet sci fi movies" and you will get a list of all of them and can check them out on youtube.
Only true auteurs can interpret this minimalist representation.
Imagine being Arnold in that scene and having to be all like "damn, Jamie Curtis, you fuckin' fine, all sexy with your tight body and horrific androgynous monster face. I would totally have sex with you, both my character and the real me." when all he really wants to do is fuck another 16 year old in his dressing room. Like seriously imagine having to be Arnold and not only sit in that chair while Jamie Lee Curtis flaunts her disgusting body in front of you, the favorable lighting barely concealing her stretchmarks and leathery skin, and just sit there, take after take, hour after hour, while she perfected that dance. Not only having to tolerate her monstrous fucking visage but her haughty attitude as everyone on set tells her she's STILL GOT IT and DAMN, JAMIE LEE CURTIS LOOKS LIKE THAT?? because they're not the ones who have to sit there and watch her mannish fucking gremlin face contort into types of grimaces you didn't even know existed before that day. You've been fucking nothing but a healthy diet of blondes and supermodels and later alleged rape victims for your ENTIRE CAREER coming straight out of the boonies in Austria. You've never even seen anything this fucking disgusting before, and now you swear you can taste the sweat that's breaking out on her dimpled stomach as she sucks it in to writhe it suggestively at you, smugly assured that you are enjoying the opportunity to get paid to sit there and revel in her "statuesque (for that is what she calls herself)" beauty, the beauty she worked so hard for with personal trainers in the previous months. And then the director calls for another take, and you know you could kill every single person in this room before the studio security could put you down, but you sit there and endure, because you're fucking Arnold. You're not going to lose your future political career over this. Just bear it. Hide your face and bear it.
It's actually Godzilla vs machagodzilla II but you're not far off.
>tfw her smile couldn't be protected
I will say this one line and you have to guess exactly which film
>An evil galactic order has made a huge spherical shape weapon that can destroy planets and the good guys have to destroy this weapon
WE WILL NOT GO QUIETLY INTO THE NIGHT
WE WILL NOT VANISH WITHOUT A FIGHT
WE'RE GOING TO LIVE ON
WE'RE GOING TO SURVIVE
TODAY WE CELEBRATE- eh fuck it i don't care anymore you get the idea
Basically, the idea is that once an artist submits his/her work into a gallery or to the record company or on a brick wall or to the publisher or anywhere else, their interpretation and intent becomes secondary. Their "intent" and interpretation is far from irrelevant, as it gives their work context, but at the same time it is not the exclusive interpretation. I'll use a rather "concrete" piece of art to make my point, but of course this is easier to digest with more abstract works. I could look at Picasso's Guernica and I would be foolish to state that it does not represent the bombing of the Basque Country during the Spanish Civil War. BUT, if I see other meaning in the image as well, I believe that such an interpretation is not invalid at all. It can be debated, sure, but because these interpretations are subjective to begin with I can't be objectively "wrong" either. I would like to hear other perspectives on this and see some quality arguments to the contrary. Thanks!
> Ghidorah will be in the 2018 Godzilla sequel
Posted this in an old similar thread, but no one ever guessed it.