White Bird in the Blizzard
Pretty good, very good, good and decent, respectively. Never really heard anyone here mention them, and I can't imagine they generated much heat. Nice little indie releases, but entertaining.
Share with us. We want good new films to watch.
>Kat Connors is 17 years old when her perfect homemaker mother, Eve, a beautiful, enigmatic, and haunted woman, disappears - just as Kat is discovering and relishing her newfound sexuality.
Oh fuck off.
It's better than it sounds, I suppose. Very Freudian. Plus it doesn't pull punches when it comes to nudity, sex and swearing. And it has Eva Green in it!
What's it about? If RT likes it, it's probably good.
>not being part of the asexual master race
>Straights are the only ones that could naturally make a family.
>A family is what makes man truly happy.
>The rest are delving in shallow pleasure through their unnatural choices.
>implying that defying nature isn't just edgy.
Yeah, pretty nice pic you go there OP.
Poor mans inside llewyn Davis.
But in all seriousness, explain.
>faggots are admitting they're nothing but hedonists
>even in a relationship their love will mean nothing because when they die, their legacy dies with them
I pray the fathers and mothers of gays had multiple children.
>shitposting on 4chan
>wants to procreate
10/10, I'm pissed
>Black and white
>Black and black, or white and white
>Life of the party
>Actually has a coloured background at all
Yeah, this is some Tumblr-level garbage.
>no one notices those beautiful quad/trips
Wow. Tumblr produces some retarded shit.
By their logic, are pedophiles and people who have sex with sheep super interesting as well?
tumblr considers asexuals more interesting than heterosexuals.
Please explain this to me.
Bisexuality is where you're attracted to men and women. Belief in the existence of pansexuality demands you accept that there are more than two sexes.
Although tumblr will tell you something like bisexuality is being attracted to masculinity and femininity, whereas pansexuality is attraction without any preference of gender. But we all know that's a load of shit that someone would only spout if they also thought that heteros should fugg transwomyn.
In summary, there is no difference.
>A bisexual won't be into transexuals
Wow, that's incorrect and transphobic.
Bisexuals and heterosexuals ARE into transsexuals. Even if you meant transgenders, that's still incorrect.
>Bisexuality is romantic attraction, sexual attraction or sexual behavior toward both males and females, and may also encompass romantic or sexual attraction to people of any gender identity or to a person irrespective of that person's biological sex or gender
>any gender identity
>irrespective of that person's biological sex or gender
>Heterosexuality is romantic attraction, sexual attraction or sexual behavior between persons of opposite sex or gender.
I consider myself an incredibly liberal guy, but this new fad for identity politics is something I find it really difficult to give a shit about.
Someone called you bisexual instead of pansexual?
Cry me a river.
Why the fuck does homosexuality have the rainbow when that should belong to pansexuality?
Homosexuality is just as black and white as heterosexuality. It's a binary sexuality. 1 partner of 1 specific sex. Pansexuality, this doesn't fucking matter.
Why is transsexuality and asexuality even up there? One isn't even a sexuality and the other is just pitch black.
What the hell?
Your autism is flaring up.