New twin peaks hype thread
New Trailer
>https://youtu.be/vsdRG0mJj-w
old >>82653906
>>82667841
>9 days to go
time to starty my rewatch
>tfw wanna watch the whole series again but I'm a poorfag with windows 10 spying on me so i can't pirate
>>82667859
Same thing here. I think i can finish the book today and maybe rewatch at least one or two episodes today. gonna watch the international pilot this time around.
It's funny because it really wasn't about white people.
Dear niggers bet you think this show is about you
Most people judged it purely by the title.
Perhaps you shouldn't have put the words, "white people" in the title, then.
>Guy Ritchie’s King Arthur: The Legend of the Sword first looks like a video game, then it borrows from assorted action-adventure films – Gladiator, 300, Lord of the Rings – as if genre imitation was necessary to hold the audience’s interest in British legend and history. This quite silly emphasis on fantasy confirms that most gamers and filmgoers today know as little about medieval history as they do about contemporary civics. Both disciplines are currently in disarray, so Ritchie’s King Arthur addresses the mess by making a cultural collage.
>Modern politics — as well as essential, unchanging human personality — come into play in Ritchie’s historical, action-adventure extravaganza. After Arthur (Charlie Hunnam) has fought his battles and just consolidated his governing council, he gives warning to the Norse envoy Greybeard (Mikael Persbrandt): “Why have enemies when you can have friends?” The surprisingly witty scene is entertainingly pertinent to our changing — and challenging — global moment.
>>82667472
>Ritchie replaces the Arthurian romanticism handed down from Malory and T. H. White, Camelot and John Boorman’s Excalibur , with his own Laddish impudence. While the dialogue is modern, urban vulgate — dismissing with “Thous,” “arts,” and “forsooths” — the spirit is authentic. “Oi!” and “You big silly posh bastard!” are national history and modern civics as Brits are living it now. Given the woeful absence of credible political humor in pop culture, King Arthur ’s impudent mirth fills the gap with topical parallels that work satirically. It honestly replicates crude, ignorant, uninspired, and non-committed behavior among our politicians and citizenry. Ritchie’s vision is comic — not nihilistic — recognition. It’s as authentic as a Monty Python skit but with a preferable Laddish tone.
>King Arthur is precisely what Quentin Tarantino could not do with American history in Django Unchained and The Hateful Eight . When Arthur rescues a boy who has witnessed his father’s brutalization by the evil usurper Vortigern (Jude Law), the montage connecting savagery, screaming, silence, and escape specifically improves on the carnage of Reservoir Dogs . Tarantino’s sheer sadism lacks the sexy, game-playing frivolity of Ritchie’s violent jamborees. King Arthur ranks with Ritchie’s best antic japes.
>>82667472
Honorary straight white man strikes again
>>82667498
>We who have been waiting for Ritchie’s waggishly promised sequel to his sleek, stylish RocknRolla (2008) may have to content ourselves with King Arthur . It’s RocknRolla revised as Camelot: egalitarian and postcolonial (multiracial), a muddy, mystically murky, roughly formed society in which Arthur, like other Ritchie heroes, is tutored as a commoner but gains an ethical sense of duty. The redemptive, dreamlike image of Arthur receiving the weighty sword Excalibur from the Lady of the Lake — both suspended in time, both underwater — pays rightful homage to Boorman’s visually exquisite 1981 epic. It reimagines royalty as honor that is earned, respect that is acquired through virtue and courage.
>This fantasy history might seem as remote as the Middle Ages are from today’s berserk political correctness, yet at its core it is a romantic ideal — impressively embodied by Hunnam (now liberated from the nonsense of The Lost Island of Z ).
>Arthur’s first use of the sword Excalibur might be the best battle scene in any Arthurian movie since Boorman’s — the sword vanquishes but it also vibrates, endowing its bearer with obligation. This weightiness refines Arthur’s rascality. There’s a natural resemblance to young Prince Hal carousing with Falstaff, just as Orson Welles dramatized in Chimes at Midnight . This appreciation of wild youth incubating in the British monarchy is key to Ritchie’s instinct that lad culture is connected to a Tory heritage — reminiscent of Bryan Ferry’s cover image for Roxy Music’s timeless, chivalrous make-out album Avalon . All that, plus Hunnam — with his chin-up, goateed, regal profile — knows how to wear a crown.
why critics are so obsessed with being contrarian to popular opinion?
>>82667299
It's almost as if the critics have a different set of criteria than the movie going public. How strange.
>>82667354
then whats the point of critics?
seems pointless
>>82667354
most "critics" these days are just regular shitty plebs. Source: I go to critic screenings as part of my job and is embarrassing some of the conversations I overhear these "professionals" spout.
How can he be stopped? It's getting out of control how such a low IQ, meathead moron has so much influence in this world. It's like idiocracy has happened before our eyes.
Shouldnt this be a picture of Trump with the same text, op?
>>82667252
WUBALUBADUBDUB LMAOOOOOOOO
BLOOMPFGP BTFO OUT
>>82667252
Trump doesnt have nearly as much influence. He'll be gone in four years, and no one will be able to tell the difference. While Joe Rogan is going to be out there pushing his reddit mindset for the next 30 years.
Is Refn a hack? This is the worst ''''''''''''''''''film'''''''''''''''''''' i've seen in a long time
he wasn't up until he made this shit.
>>82666665
Fuck off pleb.
>>82666709
>"he" thought neon demon was good
Heh
There's is a debate in my country over an add that was banned. Nobody knows why it was banned.
It got me thinking, what are some cool interesting adds that were banned in your country?
Starting this thread with the most obvious one
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHood00sNJU
>>82666497
>There's is a debate in my country over an add that was banned. Nobody knows why it was banned.
Do you have a link to that one then OP?
>>82666617
>Do you have a link to that one then OP?
It's not on youtube yet. The add was only on a private channel (they take all vidoes from their channel down on youtube) for some casino. Apparently they were advertising hookers and stuff in it.
BANNED.kylie.lingerie.commercial.VERY.HOT.avi ==>15%
Would Homeward Bound have been more realistic if Chance mauled the cat and golden retriever and killed the children?
>>82666345
Yes.
If you're a low income chav scrubber neet low IQ brainlet leech on society UKIP voting obese alcoholic Spice smoking electronic tag wearing cunt then yeah
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZHx4Q8Zrhk
Post OC if you got it edition
is sex addiction the worst disease a man can have? just imagine being forced to have sex all the time
I'd kill myself to be honest, that would be excruciating
Just imagine being unsatisfied by sex. Would life be worth living?
>>82666220
Not if you're Michael Fassbender because he's handsome enough to get all the sex he wants
What is the American equivalent to this film?
>>82665907
There isn't one. Stop trying to ruin actual kino.
American History X
Pure Skinhead Kino
I just renewed my contract with Warner Bros. today, what have you done?
>>82665444
>2017
>still using Outlook
>>82665444
Back to DCuck shilling eh?
Is the casting couch just for your initial meeting or do you do it every time your contract is up?
ITT: Remakes that are actually good
FULL K I N O
Way better than the original.
I think I'll watch it again today
ITT: completely different types of movies by the same director.
>>82664902
The Evil Dead and For the Love of the Game
>>82664902
Was he our guy?
WAIFU
A
I
F
U
>Danger 5 thread
AWW SHIT
>>82664825
season 2 isn't worth thinking about