Archived threads in /tv/ - Television & Film - 4848. page

>tfw labia from Arabia

>(((Hollywood)))
Why do you think?

>>83963776
Right? The few they have really seem to blow up to!

>>83963561
Didn't read.

He looks jewish, and his surname sounds jewish too.

>>83963561
Has to be wrong. The Avengers and Star Wars The Force Awakens aren't on there.

>>83963561
>2 “The Wolf of Wall Street” (2013, Martin Scorsese)
Disregarded.

File: nr.jpg (20KB, 182x268px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 182x268px

>>83963516

>>83963516
Why do their faces look pasted on

Has that Angela Anaconda vibe

>>83963559
FUCKING PHIL HARTMAN (75 EPISODES)
merciful jesus, i need this

looks fucking terrible but you can't go wrong with Mel

>>83963472
Holy shit that movie got a sequel??

Only way I'm paying to watch sue sie skwad 2 is if mad mel directs it. Take notes you filthy dc shills

>>83963445
>the weakest bait on modern internet

>>83963514
What's your problem? Sofia Boutella absolutely did a 10/10 job as Ahmanet. No other actress could have handled it so well

>>83963556
I was picking a dingle berry out of my ass the other day with some toilet paper. Then I through it into the toilet and it looked like a better mummy than that dumb whore.

File: kino.jpg (70KB, 833x1000px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 833x1000px

fuck off cancer

>>83963273
this movies loses 99% of its appeal when you find out that its pretty much just a puff peace for Jodorowsky's weird cult.
Kinda kills any of the fun in trying to interpret it.
Really overrated desu

>Holy Mountain
It's fucking shit, mate. Get your head out of your pretentious arse.

Threads.

>>83963242
>the film was the first of its kind to depict a nuclear winter
neat, thanks dude.

>>83963199
i thought this said shit movies

>>83963193
queen?

>propaganda
>The Queen
pls explain more

File: Queen-Elizabeth-II-of-House-Saxe-Coburg-and-Gotha.jpg (47KB, 803x496px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 803x496px

>>83964013
the film's entire purpose is to "humanize" while still glorifying an out-of-touch aged aristocrat and justifying her undemocratic position and influence

the woman in real life is a complete sociopath, she was raised to be one as are all members of her clan, anyone who marries into their brood all agree that the British royals just do not behave like humans and are rather alien at best and demonic at worst in their constant power moves and manipulations

it's kino because it does offer a bizarre insight into the other side of the palace window, it even manages to succeed at times in trivializing Princess Diana and the common people who loved her

it's very effective in getting you to empathize with Elizabeth and the Windsors in a twisted way, that's why it's propaganda kino

is that le hothead man on the right?

I spent a million hours in McDonalds as a kid, but the ones I was in didn't have all that wood trim, they had the usual 90s gray, purple, and fuchsia color scheme.

i miss ronald mcdonald

File: spinal tap.jpg (13KB, 195x258px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 195x258px

>>83963061
i kinda unironically write screen plays. closest thing i have to being published is i helped a film school friend's group with their final. what's your plot, characters, and setting like?

File: best in show.jpg (66KB, 475x703px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 475x703px

>>83963061
>>83963326
>I'm not comfortable posting the details online.
even if you gave me a setting it would help. i doubt anyone of any caliber would lurk /tv/ for film ideas.

>>83963326
Ok, it's basically a documentary about a homeless population of a small backwoods town in Southern Wisconsin. There are some mildly surreal elements in the film that I don't want to divulge explicitly atm, but I aim to make those elements as believable in the context of the film as possible. The real story of the film is about the director (a semi-exaggerated version of myself) who is a fairly pretentious progressive art school film student that grew up in the town. He comes back to make this documentary about the plight of the lower middle class, but slowly begins to get sucked into the town, drops out of school, has his ideals destroyed, becomes obsessed with an old girlfriend who lives there, starts doing drugs and escalates to hard drug use, and eventually becomes a homeless person.

Themes are paranoia, metafiction, stoic minimalism, and the ambiguity of class systems.

Shaq's Mac & Cheese
Formerly Chuck's

I'm sorry for your loss. Try to branch out into hot dogs, nachos, or pizza.

>>83962867
go for the tofu bites next time

File: guy.jpg (34KB, 640x352px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 640x352px

>watching Houdini: Inside the Secrets
>this guy appears and explains a trick
It's Teller!!!! look at the shape of his head

>>83962631
I'm going to see them live this very night

>>83962759
Yeah I'd bet money that's him. Almost the perfect crime too, not like anybody would recognise his voice.

>>83962403
I think so. It's a last hurrah for real rock stations.

>>83962428
>get in truck
>radio comes on
>"99X here playing the best rock"
>"never feared for anything"
>"never shamed but never free"
>change it to oldies

File: 1462296060542.jpg (77KB, 723x540px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 723x540px

>the rainbow is a symbol of LGBT propaganda
>director Stanley Kubrick (born Abraham Coen) is Jewish[2][3] according to internet encyclopedia Wikipedia.com
Like clockwork! /pol/ is right again!

>>83963104
Moron. Kubrick was basically a fascist.

>>83963104
>makes movie basically outing the cosmopolitan elite as depraved monsters who organise secret orgies with prostitutes and kill them if they get out of line
>movie deals exclusively with heteronormative themes
>hurr durr Kubrick is promoting faggotry

Yea, try harder next time.
If you really want, here's a more plausible accusation: Lolita is paedophilia propaganda, and it is well known that Jews control the human trafficking trade, especially concerning underage girls. But that is neither here nor there, since these are all MOVIES. Kubrick is a fucking reactionary next to the degenerate filth coming out these days, in any case.

>>83962182
Plenty of stuff has happened, you're just being obtuse.

>>83962182
Be honest with me on this /tv/: I don't care if nothing happens but is it at least nicely directed? Lynch used to be such a visually gifted, formalist filmmaker. Rewatch Eraserhead. Then compare it to Inland Empire, where he completely stopped caring, the digital cinematography looks absolutely digusting. Completely senile, zero visual effort. Is he at least trying to make aesthetically interesting scenes this time, or is he the same lazy Lynch from Inland Empire?

>>83962250
Interesting things do happen in it but cinematographically it looks just like every other crime drama on TV.