Archived threads in /tv/ - Television & Film - 4605. page

>>83772402

>my room ... ten minutes

of course she did you silly virgin.

>>83772402
all blonde white women were made for BBC

more like Idris got SYNTHD

Buddy there are guys in the world right now who ate 5 or 6 wounds from an AK to the torso and survived.

Compare the bullet wound from that to what happens if a dinosaur puts a tooth the width of a shot glass, or a claw the size of a railroad spike.

You're fucking retarded. Modern technology is meant to kill PEOPLE, not dinosaurs.

File: ribbit reddit.jpg (46KB, 745x467px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 745x467px

>>83772205

>i think you instantly die the second a few bullets hit you

dumb frogposter

WE

if dubs your mother dies tonight

Dubs and he dies

>>83772367
reroll

File: BENIS.png (111KB, 655x977px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 655x977px

FUGG

>>83771842
He did though as Alex Jones

who the fuck is kinison

>>83771842
this guy was a huge unfunny faggot. Man i sure want some bitter nihilistic piece of trash "telling it like it is". In other words BE MORE FUNNY

He's not even a real hamster

>why couldn't it have been clarkson

MEOW IT'S NOT!

File: 1487484938107.jpg (548KB, 1616x2896px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 1616x2896px

No its just another dull day in one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>83771616
>violent white man appears on screen
>some cheap heavy metal music starts playing