Archived threads in /tv/ - Television & Film - 3373. page

>>85011670
>didn't watch Taboo
he was Aiden Gillen bad

>implying Bane was good

>>85011693
>Aiden Gillen bad
Uh, that's an oxymoron.

>Well, at least I don't have to get treated for AIDS now.

Why didn't he just say this.

>>85010614
The winning move was to not be an awkward fat faggot that women want to ridicule

>>85010670
Because then the world would think he had autism in addition to being fat and pathetic

>>85010525
Cara is looking fine. post feets

>>85010525
He's cute but that's a dumb haircut.

File: 1478115257819.webm (2MB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 800x800px

yes

>>85010476
nope, not even the big D knows what the hell he made

>>85010476
Yeah.

>>85010379
Spider-Man: Homecoming is nothing but another in a long line of process-paneled, audience-tested products, designed to put "story" and "character" ahead of form & thematics, it's clear from the very first image exactly what this movie is going to be- a wide shot of Avengers tower over the skyline of NYC, this isn't the New York of Raimi's trilogy, a seemingly endless city of verve and excitement, where the citizens are passionate about their home and Spider-Man the icon of the people, no, this is the New York of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, a place where in-jokes and easter egg references are leaned on far more heavily than genuine emotion and well-developed characters. When the film culminates in a scene at the all-gray, completely concrete Avengers home base, dominated by garish CGI, it's obvious just how much of a cash grab this film is. (2/?)

Ah fresh pasta. Nice

>>85010400
I don't know if Jon Watts is a good director. I really don't. It's impossible to tell from this, although the direction here is probably the worst I've seen so far this year, because Marvel reshoots everything and rarely allows directors creative freedom to take risks and do something visually interesting. It's obvious that the sense of color from Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 has been removed completely, this again looks just like the ugly, grey, concrete aesthetic of Captain America: Civil War (which is interesting because the film actually opens with that scene shot from Spider-Man's perspective), which is a shame because if any hero's movie should have an abundance of color it's Spider-Man's. This movie just gets literally everything wrong- it gets high school movies wrong, it gets character dynamics wrong, it does Michael Keaton, Marisa Tomei, Jon Favreau, Laura Harrier, Tom Holland, Zendaya, and Donald Glover wrong (egregiously), it gets movie-making wrong, it gets villains like Shocker & Scorpion wrong (they're here, but they are barely recognizable, their flamboyant and colorful comics costumes having been removed). Marvel claims to be all about character but the way the leads and the villain are treated here come off as not as genuine but instead as written for maximum recognizability, characters like Flash Thompson & Liz Allen especially, the filmmakers never punish Peter for the horrible way he treats Liz over the course of the film, and her exit leaves a bad taste in the mouth, as she suffers way more than she deserves to. Perhaps the most egregious example of this way of treating character is the MJ drop at the end- I have no doubt that Zendaya could make an excellent Mary Jane, but that reference came off as one of the worst references in a comic book movie since "Robin" in The Dark Knight Rises. (3/?)

Aliens 2 when?

This had to be the most emotionless, scatterbrained, most uninspired thread I have ever seen.

Good work,OP.

I don't get why they haven't ever tried to remake something really actiony like Aliens over and over again. Wouldn't it be a safer investment for mainstream audiences and easier to avoid these kind of clusterfucks?

>>85009445
No, it looked like he wiped chicken grease over the camera lens. Also, what the fuck was up with that yellow background?

>>85009445
No he's an irritating man child and that could never be hidden by even the best directors. If he's not on the autism spectrum they need to widen the criteria

>>85009445
I'm Doug Walker and I'm here to say

Just from seeing the still I know that is from his interview about Drug Courts with Hitchens.

For a man so opposed to faggotry, Hitchens certainly raped that ducking faggot live on TV.

Peter Hitchens is a faggot.

>>85009124
Link

tour de force

I want to FUCK that monkey

bonobokino

ramsay via repeated elbowing to 'tiny' tom cruise's windpipe

File: 1457728906258.jpg (47KB, 450x742px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 450x742px

>>85008962
>tom cruise
manlette

>gordon
6ft+

>>85008962
Why are Tom's abs sucking to the left?

>>85008662
>admitting to watching Disney wars
Hi plebbit

Star Wars has always been a kids film.
You should grow up.

>>85008698
Found the redditor.
Disney is /ourstudio/.

you guys do give a shit about this don't you?

Chris Pine crying during the performance for "Glory" from Selma finally pays off

File: 1487296020283.png (57KB, 299x172px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 299x172px

idk looks like it could be Kino.
I always fall for movies with trailers that have modern "epic" renditions of 80's songs, for some reason. I should stop falling for it.
Why the fuck is Oprah an actress now though?

>>85008245
NOOOOOOOOO FUCKING NOOOOOOOO MY FUCKING IS GONNA LOOK LIKE A DYKE FUCK NOOOOOOOO

>>85008245
Look at the top of her head!

So they are copying Stranger Things?

Do these people just recycle one another's shows?

you missed paul dano giving another classic performance

>>85008237
>sage is a downvote

>>85008271
literally who?

SELL THE VATICAN
FEED THE POOR

>>85008140
No but she used to be ridiculously hot before she started removing all her body hair for some stupid reason. She had really nice arm hair.

>>85008140

I think she'd be a lot funnier in my oven.