Archived threads in /tv/ - Television & Film - 239. page

She used to be funny before Trump broke her. It's a sad condition that has befallen many comedians recently.

File: IMG_9060.jpg (119KB, 1280x640px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1280x640px

>>87440567
Gross. Here's an actually funny woman

>>87440567
>MY VAGYNAAAA
every fucking time
women are insufferable

That was completely terrible.

Bump, others must suffer like I did

File: 1492922484256.jpg (63KB, 278x251px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 278x251px

NETFLIX MUST BE STOPPED

the flare

File: jurassic-park-john-hammond.jpg (77KB, 1000x450px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 1000x450px

>>87440540
this idiot, he doesn't "respect nature"...or dennis nedry for being a fatass jew

>hello john
>hello john
>hello john
>hello john

>>87440540
Disgusting reptilewashing.
Where are feather? Are feathers not good enough for you nazis? Fucking birdfobes bigots.

Hector

>uugghh I HECTOR this mooovee!

>>87440534
motherfucker's in every movie

who is that

>>87440483
Kylie

Idris Elba

oh boy a remake, and look! they even included a diversity hire for no fucking reason!

>token black guy
>kenneth branagh with hilarious facial hair
>daisy ridley
it's going to be amazing

They all did it. They all stabbed the guy.

>>87439968
I don't even understand that scene

>>87439968
And neither will the book readers...

>>87439968
wtf i want to burn my daughter now

I'd set it...28 months later.

>>87439917
unironically think both movies are one of the best of their genre

What are some decent zombie kino? I always want to explore the genre but the films are bad, not bad in the way I can enjoy them, either. I'll list what I know
>dawn of the dead
>revenge of the dead
Then there was one where a meteorite landed in some 80s town and zombies happened, low budget but good.

I'm dying here, help me out

>Another good rule about journalism is that it’s always best to be honest, because readers can sense artifice. So I’m going to hold up my hands here and say the reason I totally missed this story, despite being the person who literally wrote the story, is that, well, I agreed with Cameron.

>The people who got so angry forget where he’s coming from, which is the 1980s and 1990s. Now, there are plenty of bad things one can say about those decades (don’t even get me started on the jeans), but Hollywood was a lot better back then at getting female characters on to the screen. No, it wasn’t all perfect – we are talking about the era of Pretty Woman, after all, the happy story of how sexy prostitution is. But there were so many movies about women back then that Susan Faludi could dismiss the 1987 comedy Baby Boom as anti-feminist garbage in her seminal book Backlash. Today, a movie about a woman in her early 40s who kicks ass on Wall Street, doesn’t want a baby, inherits a baby and then builds up her own business empire sounds, compared with what’s playing in your multiplex right now, downright Dworkin-esque in its radicalism.

>This is the Hollywood into which Cameron emerged, in which he wrote original heroines like the brilliant and prickly Dr Lindsey Brigman (played by Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio) in The Abyss, and Sarah Connor (Linda Hamilton), a teeny bit wet in The Terminator and then breathtakingly awesome in Terminator 2.

>Which brings us to today, a time when women have been so neglected by the movies that we have to get excited about Wonder Woman, a character Hollywood has been knocking out since the 70s. It was extraordinary to see how defensively women reacted to Cameron’s comments: do we have so few heroines that we have to cling to the ones who come along?

>Look, I liked Wonder Woman. You’d have to be as heartless as the Terminator not to enjoy it, and I’m glad that if Hollywood’s focus is now superheroes, then someone finally got round to making a movie about the one well-known female superhero. But I can also say that a movie in which an objectively gorgeous woman, played by a former Miss Israel, kicks ass in her underwear isn’t exactly breaking down the barriers in terms of representations of women on screen. It’s not fashionable to say this now, in an era where strident opinions must be expressed in fewer than 140 characters, but things don’t have to be all or nothing.

>I get why women would be so angry with Cameron – a man, and a former arsehole at that – mansplaining feminism to them; but it can also be acknowledged that the man does know a thing or two about female characters. The truth is, the most interesting female characters are now on TV, in shows such as, and hardly limited to, Transparent, Chewing Gum, Orange Is The New Black, Crazy Ex-Girlfriend, Scandal, Fleabag and Game Of Thrones. I hope movies get more heroines, too – maybe even ones who spot a news story when it hits them in the face. But surely only a superhero can do that.

>women with internalized misogyny

sigh

girls trip

Scary movie

Men in Black

>>87439517
Blade

he didn't exist.

well imagine living a live without eyebrows, must be hard

He is a spirit from the Black Lodge, trying to capture his universes version of Cooper.

File: 07ROTTENTOMATOES2-superJumbo.jpg (543KB, 2048x1537px) Image search: [Google]

543KB, 2048x1537px

>Some studio executives privately concede that a few recent movies — just a few — were simply bad. Flawed marketing may have played a role in a couple of other instances, they acknowledged, along with competition from Netflix and Amazon.

>But most studio fingers point toward Rotten Tomatoes, which boils down hundreds of reviews to give films “fresh” or “rotten” scores on its Tomatometer. The site has surged in popularity, attracting 13.6 million unique visitors in May, a 32 percent increase above last year’s total for the month, according to the analytics firm comScore.

>Studio executives’ complaints about Rotten Tomatoes include the way its Tomatometer hacks off critical nuance, the site’s seemingly loose definition of who qualifies as a critic and the spread of Tomatometer scores across the web. Last year, scores started appearing on Fandango, the online movie ticket-selling site, leading to grousing that a rotten score next to the purchase button was the same as posting this message: You are an idiot if you pay to see this movie.

Partly right

Movies with average 4.8 and 17% vs movies with average 5.6 and 90%.

70% normies take 90% movie, and totally ignore 17% one, even if both have close quallity.

People look at % more than average. RT should swap these. Make % smaller and under score, make score showing bigger, inseat %.

>>87439339
Most new movies nowadays are plainly, just shit.

File: 1504260628349.png (291KB, 549x631px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 549x631px

>>87439277
>Gaynasy
Is this some hip neologism I'm not up with?

>>87439428
Fantasy Gaynasy it's first grade

>>87439277
Can you blame Hollywood? Most hacks don't know how to right a decent world

>>87439144
only lovers left alive

it has a bit too much of jim jarmusch jacking off to his own intellect, but it's still pretty good

A few things the American remake of Let the Right one in did
>Inspired Cinematography
>Better representation of the 80s
>Far more brutal bullies
>Richard Jenkins

>>87439537
Everything else was shit tho

>>87439065
Day of the Dead of George A. Romedo

The Wicked Witch in Wizard of Oz.

>>87439065
The first one to do it hardcore was the 80s The Fly for me, and it wasn't all the rest of it as much as it was the birthing scene. I'm over it now obviously but the young me was fucked up.