[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /tv/ - Television & Film - 1869. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: [MUFFLED BLOODY TEARS].jpg (114KB, 1920x800px) Image search: [Google]
[MUFFLED BLOODY TEARS].jpg
114KB, 1920x800px
Evil Dead 2013 was a genuinely good horror movie and great example of well done body horror. The only reason it was rated so poorly was upset fan boys.
17 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
Ridley Scott hasn't made a bad film this side of the millenium
>>
>>86232101
From what I heard it was rated fairly well
>>
>>86232101
>the shower scene
Only time I've had to pause a movie and take a break.

File: 1505311686031.jpg (190KB, 1280x1061px) Image search: [Google]
1505311686031.jpg
190KB, 1280x1061px
How useful was he?
29 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
File: cm.png (537KB, 927x492px) Image search: [Google]
cm.png
537KB, 927x492px
I'm on him
>>
>>86231687
and absolutely no memes spawned from this movie, and the dark knight rises remains Nolans meme movie for another 2-3 years until his new film comes out.
>>
is the fucking br rip out? no? then I don't know.

File: IMG_3170.jpg (2MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_3170.jpg
2MB, 2448x3264px
So /tv/ what have you purchased recently?

Amazon UK is having a sale on the Criterion Collection, most of them are £12.99 each.

HMV is also doing 5 for £30.
14 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
>>86231644
I have just purchased a whole chicken at the store and am in the process of consuming it while watching some stolen cinematography. Why?
>>
>>86231811
Sounds tasty, what sides do you have?
>>
File: Capture.png (158KB, 1294x609px) Image search: [Google]
Capture.png
158KB, 1294x609px

File: maxresdefault.jpg (35KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault.jpg
35KB, 1280x720px
Fuck it, Dude. Let's go bowling
11 posts and 8 images submitted.
>>
File: gif_temp_1502302591240.gif (101KB, 200x108px) Image search: [Google]
gif_temp_1502302591240.gif
101KB, 200x108px
Nice marmot
>>
>>
File: socialism-big-lebowski-ethos.gif (512KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]
socialism-big-lebowski-ethos.gif
512KB, 500x281px
>>86231641
Dude did nothing wrong

Was it autism?
347 posts and 81 images submitted.
>>
File: 1491917341494.webm (3MB, 1280x536px) Image search: [Google]
1491917341494.webm
3MB, 1280x536px
Was it autism?
>>
File: 1502495247183.webm (3MB, 802x640px) Image search: [Google]
1502495247183.webm
3MB, 802x640px
>>
File: Czjaon2UUAAPlFO.jpg (273KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]
Czjaon2UUAAPlFO.jpg
273KB, 1200x900px
ffs americans

File: fuller house.jpg (481KB, 2048x1153px) Image search: [Google]
fuller house.jpg
481KB, 2048x1153px
Why don't the Olsen twins want to return?
17 posts and 6 images submitted.
>>
>>86231635
They're too big and successful to waste their time for some shitty revival of a show they did when they were kids.
>>
File: GettyImages583805656.jpg (2MB, 2556x3836px) Image search: [Google]
GettyImages583805656.jpg
2MB, 2556x3836px
>>86231635
No one wants to see these gremlin-faced weirdos in HD
>>
>>86231676
Jesus christ, what the fuck happened to them?

File: 1489724484365.png (377KB, 844x322px) Image search: [Google]
1489724484365.png
377KB, 844x322px
How many films have you watched?
18 posts and 5 images submitted.
>>
about tree fiddy
>>
File: pi-1338548_1920.jpg (601KB, 1920x1440px) Image search: [Google]
pi-1338548_1920.jpg
601KB, 1920x1440px
about
>>
>>86231575
Four. One of them had a ghost in it and I think one of them had someone driving a fast car. I don't remember much about the others.

File: image.jpg (68KB, 640x708px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
68KB, 640x708px
Should men play trans women in movies? Or should only trans people get to play trans people? Please be respectful in this thread guys, this is a very sensitive subject, an important subject, and there's potential for a really meaningful conversation if we don't devolve into /pol/-tier angry Nazi posting.

Why does Jeffrey Tambor, Eddie Redmayne or Matthew Macoughnehey get to play trans woman when there are so many transgender actresses working in Hollywood? Laverne Cox for example. These people need jobs, but instead they go with cis men. It's the same thing like when they get a white kid to play Aang in the Avatar movie. Or the black man playing L in Death Note. If Idriss Elba can be James Bond, why can't Dallas Buyer's Club be played by an actual woman?
24 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
>>86231538
Sauce on the pic?
>>
>>86231538
traps are gay
>>
>>86231538
Dallas Buyer's Club was about a closeted homo who was a crossdresser to try and hide from himself that he was gay, not a tranny

File: movieposter.jpg (29KB, 279x402px) Image search: [Google]
movieposter.jpg
29KB, 279x402px
Post Christmaskino
61 posts and 16 images submitted.
>>
Jingle All the Way
>>
File: images.jpg (20KB, 200x300px) Image search: [Google]
images.jpg
20KB, 200x300px
>>
https://youtu.be/j9jbdgZidu8

File: IMG_1265.jpg (30KB, 300x450px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_1265.jpg
30KB, 300x450px
What're your thoughts on Samantha Bee's body of work?
39 posts and 7 images submitted.
>>
Like Amy Poehler but uglier and unfunny.
>>
>>86231354
DUDE DRUMPF LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
Sam Bee supports racial segregation for her kids.

File: PDh2Er9.jpg (348KB, 736x1078px) Image search: [Google]
PDh2Er9.jpg
348KB, 736x1078px
is it true she was only killed off because the irl actress demanded no more nude scenes even though she is a nobody who signed up to play a who are?
50 posts and 8 images submitted.
>>
>>86231347
Redheads like her always tickle my peepee
>>
>>86231347
Fucking stoopid whoare! You don't cross made men like Dabid!
>>
>>86231347
>is it true she was only killed off because the irl actress demanded no more nude scenes even though she is a nobody who signed up to play a who are?
Maybe? That's be pretty funny if true, since that was literally her whole character.

File: raises paw.jpg (97KB, 375x398px) Image search: [Google]
raises paw.jpg
97KB, 375x398px
Why didn't they cast a child actress who could act for Hermione Granger?
29 posts and 5 images submitted.
>>
File: 1453656323224.jpg (1MB, 1588x2862px) Image search: [Google]
1453656323224.jpg
1MB, 1588x2862px
I doubt any change in actors could redeem the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
>>
>>86231304
>"No!"
>The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
>I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.


I have seen this before.. Twitter?
>>
>>86231304
wow, that's one of the best written comments I have read on this site.
Yet I disagree about cause and effect. Even if Harry potter is setting kids up for shitty literature, it at least makes reading an option for them.
I have a few friends who never acquired the habit of reading books, and at 20+ years old feel like they cannot start.
HP is shit, sure, but it isn't it better than not reading at all?

File: 1488020984185.jpg (111KB, 1200x1144px) Image search: [Google]
1488020984185.jpg
111KB, 1200x1144px
machill54 Edition.

Previous thread: >>86179627

>Not sure what letterboxd is all about?
The mission of /lbg/ is to promote the intelligent discussion of film as art by providing members with opportunities for intellectual discussion, by recognizing patrician taste through examinations and by calling out embryos as they arise.

>Directions for use
Post profiles and discuss what you have recently watched, if you dare.

>Haven't got an account? Follow this link and sign up today!
http://letterboxd.com

>discord
https://discord.gg/MJ9EDND

>News
insufferable tripfag shows up, wise anons block him: >>86225557
Cinebro sums up /lbg/: >>86209294
weeb posts dumb collection: >>86193645

Use >>>/tv/lbg as a link to find the /lbg/ thread.

Remember the following:
>Patricians occasionally read these generals and have posted here before.
>Patricians may pretend to be normal users asking for recommendations and when you recommend something, they laugh at you for your plebian taste
>This is a thread for patrician purposes only don't offer or expect frivolous discussion.

>QotT
Stop enjoying garbage and thinking it's great.
26 posts and 7 images submitted.
>>
First for realism sucks
>>
File: 9703ffe44fc582155edfb2eb8c0fad95.png (485KB, 1041x711px) Image search: [Google]
9703ffe44fc582155edfb2eb8c0fad95.png
485KB, 1041x711px
letterboxd.com/albion
hello!
>>
>>86231200
Rec me a mumblecore that's available in HD and might watch it.

File: dunkirk vs ghostbusters.png (310KB, 425x323px) Image search: [Google]
dunkirk vs ghostbusters.png
310KB, 425x323px
Dunkirk vs Ghostbusters 2016

>Visuals
Dunkirk: drab, blue filter, unrealistic colours. Peacefully dreamlike, which creates dissonance with the gritty subject matter of war and the anxiety that is being conveyed. Not enough soldiers and airplanes because of low budget.
Ghostbusters: High contrast, colorful and cartoony, visuals are in service of setting the tone.

>Story
Dunkirk: Three seperate stories told simultaneously only so that Nolan can intertwine them, comes across as pointless, pretentious and distracting. The pilot story has no personal growth, the father son story on the boat was novel and nice, the soldier story was inchorent fleeing and running and hiding, most boringest of them all.
Ghostbusters: Classic hero's journey, all charachters except the blonde crazy one have personal growth. Derivative of the original ghostbusters, but more low brow humour, reminds me of family guy a lot.

>Tone
Dunkirk: Anxious. Anxious. Anxious. Tense music throughout the movie, my body and mind isn't capable of feeling anxious for more than 10 minutes then it turns into BOREDOM. Some individual scenes are meant to make you feel good but it falls apart since Nolan decided to be "artistic" and make all his characters without any personality whatsoever. As someone who went in to the film rooting for the germans Nolan did NOTHING to make me root for the brits, if anything the brits were acting dishonourable and made me hate them even more.
Ghostbusters: Comedic with an emotional core. Dumb but doesn't take itself too seriously.

Overall Dunkirk is a 0/10, a movie where only one emotion is conveyed is more boring than any other movie you can mention to me. Ghostbusters gets a 4/10, some good jokes, some jokes that were so bad they were good and the happy atmosphere somewhat made up for the boring bad jokes and action.

>inb4 nolan fanboy normalfags who couldn't make a good argument on film if their life depended on it
21 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
I thought dunkirk was incredible. It kind of makes me sad that some people think it is so terrible. I am realizing that there are people who are almost fundamentally different from me. the things that I thought were great about the movie and really resonated with me are completely meaningless to alot of people
>>
>>86231159
nolan fanboy normalfag who couldn't make a good argument on film if their life depended on it resorts too talking about his bitch boi emotions

>oh no guys I'm making him SAD :(
>>
Haven't seen either of them but it baffles me that someone would spend the time writing all this out for the purpose of getting attention on an Afghanistani flower-arranging forum.
At least tell me it's a copy-pasta and you didn't come up with it yourself OP

MISTER SHEFFIELD
117 posts and 35 images submitted.
>>
NIGGERS BROKE IN AND RAPED ME EHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEH
>>
>>86283554
More.

Inb4 that guy who gets off mentioning her rape.
>>
>>86283554
reminder that she got beaten and raped and her ex husband was forced to watch

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [1859] [1860] [1861] [1862] [1863] [1864] [1865] [1866] [1867] [1868] [1869] [1870] [1871] [1872] [1873] [1874] [1875] [1876] [1877] [1878] [1879] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.