should i do this trip through europe, or a trip that's exclusively through great britain? i can't decide which one to do, and i want to see them both...
that depends on how much time you have, for the trip you posted I would at least take a month. seeing the highlights in britain takes a week or two and then you've still only seen highlights
Decent choice of cities. But do the "2"'s mean that you want to stay in these cities for 2 nights and then do daytrips to the red dots? Because that seems VERY stressful, so I'd rather recommend you on focusing on less stuff
>Pisa is lovevly, but if you only have 2 nights in Florence, stay there, there's enough stuff to see in Florence
>something similar goes for Dresden. Probably the most beautiful city of Germany, but if you're in a rush and that takes away your time in Berlin and Prague, I wouldn't bother going unless you have to change transport there anyway
>I'd cut out Lucerne, Switzerland is beautiful and expensive. You get the Alps feeling in Austria
>safe time and fly from Amsterdam to Berlin, nothing exiting to see between these. The Ruhr Valley is/was economically important, but not beautiful.
>I'd also fly from London to Amsterdam unless you're going to spend a night in Belgium (Bruges Ghent)
>since your time is limited, maybe you should not go to Venice and spend two nights more in the other cities
You're doing it wrong OP
Do not spend $200 a day to rush around Europe