Is there a utility equivalent of warmage?

>>44719834
Swiss Army Mage.

>>44719860
Or in other words, the Swissard.

>>44720066
Any real classes?

Journeymage?

>>44720099
If we're talking D&D, Beguiler is the Warmage but with illusion/charm spells.

>>44719834
There used to be a Lovemage class, but it sounded too slutty.

>>44720115
http://www.minmaxboards.com/index.php?topic=16086.0

This one?

>>44720270
I was just making a pun off "journeyman" and "mage", but that looks like an enjoyable enough homebrew class. Tier 3, high tier 4 maybe.

File: samefaggot.jpg (19KB, 298x319px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 298x319px

>>44720146
>If we're talking D&D, Beguiler is the Warmage but with illusion/charm spells.

But Beguiler is part of 3.5, which is not a part of D&D. D&D is a wonderful game and it does not deserve to be tainted with that brush. Same with 4e. Note that I said 4e, not D** 4e. Because 4e is not D&D and neither is 3.5.

5e on the other hand is a wonderful, nearly flawless game and fully deserves to be called D&D, but those other two abominations do not and recognizing them as such means you are part of the problem.

>>44719834
assuming D&D
>5e: Bard
>3.PF: Bard, Beguiler, Occultist
>2e: Fighter-Mage
>OD&D: Cleric, Elf

>>44720669
Nobody mentioned 4e you autist. You should cut off your hands before you ruin any more threads with your edition hate

>>44720974
Bards are really close to what I'm looking for, but they're not full casters and they're focused so much on trickery

>>44721116
Bards are fullcasters in 5E

>>44721218
>>playing 5e

>>44720669
>being this autistically pretentious

>>44721820
Oh, ignore him, he's just trying to start yet another edition war thread and failing badly.

>>44721251
Yes, it's what a lot of people do, since it's the version that's in print now. What about it?