60 fps

>>602291
I see pool fucking on the cover, anything else going on in that one?

>>602292
It's just under an hour long. About a third is talking, a third is oral, a third is actual sex. The girl is cute and quality is great, but there is nothing unexpected.

It is worth seeing to see what 60 fps looks like. I can't wait to find 1080p 60 fps, this is only 720p.

>>602300

>It is worth seeing to see what 60 fps looks like. I can't wait to find 1080p 60 fps, this is only 720p.

Its 2014 and you're just discovering 60fps videos? You reeeally need to check out akiba-online. 60 & 59fps 1080p is common for community blu-ray rips there.

Second, can we get a magnet?

I tried for a while to at least get the torrent url. javjunkies has a bunch of javascript that purposely makes it difficult to get a url that can be pasted directly (the url from history gives an error). I'm sure someone more familiar with javascript dev tools could figure it out, but I gave up after a while.

Looks like akiba-online is down :(

>>602291
post a proper cover stupid fucker

>>602344
It's actually a bit tricky to rip the image. I'm sure it's possible but I had trouble with it. So let me know if you get it to work before you throw around language that hurts my delicate feelings.

Can you post some thumbnails to see if I might be interested? I can't fap to framerate alone...

>>602291
requesting magnet for this. javjunkies server is under heavy load.

also needs webm preview.

>>602291
Can I get this video?
shit, I don't care about 60 fps just want fapping

>>602413
The link is literally in the post you replied to.

Anyway, is 60 fps vs 30 fps that much of a difference to you guys?

My Kingdom for a magnet! javjunkies refuses to let me even get to the page.

File: c0c44f4e502efc0b9876087fe1f88921.jpg (40KB, 700x388px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 700x388px

magnet:?xt=urn:btih:7pyde5phpjyt3shkxt6n3jy6xb4vwmk4&dn=Mywife-00522_KASUMI_TOYODA-1&xl=1611052944&fc=62

shitty video

File: Thumbs.jpg (290KB, 1920x970px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 1920x970px

>>602355
Thumbs for Anon

>>602464
What was wrong with it?

File: 1f2.gif (2MB, 235x180px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 235x180px

>>602426
>Anyway, is 60 fps vs 30 fps that much of a difference to you guys?

>>602767
Console gamers, amirite?

...so they made porn look like a soap opera?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soap_opera_effect#Soap_Opera_Effect

>>602803
it could actually be recorded at 60 fps, the technology has been available for years

if it's recorded at 60 fps you won't see this effect

>>602803
It works because people like realism in their porn, but not for big movies because it just makes it weird.

File: 1399574524086.png (159KB, 419x500px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 419x500px

>>602307
>thinking interpolated 60fps makes movies look better
Why are people stupid?

>>603438
>impying all 60 fps videos are interpolated

>>603465
it's like censored porn on /t/

if it's not specifically stated to be real 60 fps, it's safe to assume that it's interpolated

>>602769
I don't own any consoles in fact. I don't watch that much movies/videos so I don't really notice. Anyway I try some more videos, and 720p 30fps isn't that noticeably different to 1080p 60fps, much less 720p 60fps.

>>604664
>720p 30fps isn't that noticeably different to 1080p 60fps

Maybe to you. And the legally blind.
Admittedly some types of content gain more from 60fps, like porn.

Is there actually any 60fps porn that isn't interpolated?

File: Marina Matsushima - TWD058 Bakunyu Hardcore sex.webm (3MB, 702x528px)

3MB, 702x528px

>>604710
interlaced stuff is usually 60 fields/s (barring stupid stuff like telecined for no reason), and when properly deinterlaced the result is 60 frames/s.

>>604718
but that's still interpolating 60 half-frames into 60 full frames, with quality depending on the de-interlacing interpolation algorithm

Is there not actual 60 fps progressive content?

>>604720
main problems are that
bluray doesn't support 1080p60
studios go for 24/25 fps to get a cinema feel.

Supposedly some studios offer 60fps VOD

>>604718
Please tell me this is available somewhere. at this framerate. PLEASE

File: tsubomi.webm (2MB, 1280x720px)

2MB, 1280x720px

Gachinco gachig140 ????14 ???

http://sukebei.nyaa.se/?page=view&tid=289586

enjoy

> webm is from 2nd vid in the torrent

>>604811
>http://sukebei.nyaa.se/?page=view&tid=289586

Thanks!!!

>>604666
Probably because I don't wear my glasses, lel
Nice devil trips

File: muchfps.webm (3MB, 382x912px)

3MB, 382x912px

obligatory

>>605477
what a whore

Surely there's other 60fps JAV out there?

why i cant download from javjunkies

>>605967
Because you touch yourself at night.

File: take.webm (3MB, 720x400px)

3MB, 720x400px

Lots of people think movies look "fake" or "CG" or things like that when they are in 60 FPS.

Unrelated note: interpolated framerate increase is not the same as actual higher framerate and personally I would actively avoid watching anything interpolated.

>>605980
But thats why i need to download

File: cdpvndel.jpg (165KB, 800x500px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 800x500px

Did someone say 60fps?

magnet:?xt=urn:btih:243FA7DFD3F4A880470131283F91632F40AFA76A

Are any of these links actual 60 fps or just interpolated 30 fps as usual?

>>606809
>interpolated

No. Interpolation is what fancy TV's do, which is adding fake frames in between real ones.

All purely interlaced content is 60i. Technically 60 frames at half the resolution. Pretty much all JAV is like this. Most of the 30fps rips you see on the internet are missing half the frames.

>>606946
can you explain? confused. the P in 720p is progressive. what's the difference between 60i and 60p? Both will still be 60FPS or no?

>>606953
60i is 60 fields per second interlaced, or 60 half-resolution frames per second, because a field has only every other line
60p would be 60 full frames per second, progressive but that only exists at 720p or lower because bluray a shit

>>605990
Source?

>>606966
>bluray a shit
BD has no reason to be a shit, though. The format is more than capable of doing 1080p60, and with higher-speed drives in the future (think 16x) should be able to do 2160p60 in 10bit color without breaking a sweat.

I think more of the problem is that HDMI a shit and support for HDMI 1.4 and 2.0 has been astronomically slow to roll out.

>>607064
BD is a fucking shit. It does not support 1080p60 nor anamorphic content.
even hdmi 1 supported 1920x1200 60p 24bits colors.

>>605760
I want to know more too. I wish javjunkies would add a detail to their description stating the framerate.

Does anyone know other studios that produce 60FPS jav? just want their ID prefix. just like others like MIDE, ABP, or other popular brands.

>>607120
most if not all JAVs DVD/BD are 60i, it's just that all rips are cut to 30/24 fps.

>>606808
god yes. i love this. anything else by the group that released this? i remember they were going to do more 60fps stuff

>>607252
Yeah, just watched it. So smooooove~

>>608267
name of the other stuff this group did in 60fps?

>>602291
bumpzing this thread

>>604720
>>604722
Bluray does support 1080/60. 1080/60i is just a broadcast/blu-ray player limitation. Older players didn't have the processing power/read speeds for 1080p/60 and didn't have the correct AVC spec for playback.

For a truly 60/50hz interlaced video, you already have 60/50 frames of movement. Converting 60i to 30p is actually dropping frames. Most digital cameras actively record at 60 frames of movement. People convert down to 24/30 mainly because deinterlacing software tends to do this automatically and because they don't know any better. Jap porn releases are notoriously horrendous when it comes to encoding quality in general.

It's only in cases like film the source most likely isn't 60i and it's interlaced for the purposes of interlaced TV/dvd player compatibility, which means the frame data separation exists for timing and doesn't actually have 60 frames of movement.

>>612781
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluray#Video

no BD will be ever made 1080p/60 because of older players not supporting it even if it's 0.001% of the total.

>>602291
Actually amazing. Great passionate pron.

File: unNrLcm[1].png (117KB, 1121x650px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1121x650px

>>602354
Not the person you replied to, but I found it fairly easily and quickly.
If you're using Chromium (or a variant of it):
>Right-click on cover
>Click Inspect Element
>Developer Tools should pop up with <img src="/main/jj.jpg"> selected
>Look above it for <div class="iH" and click it
>On the right-side in Styles you should see "background-image" with a link

>>612782
what...did you not even read your own wiki link?

>Many current Blu-ray players and recorders can read and write 1920×1080 video at the full 60p and 50p progressive format.
>Panasonic DMR-BWT720

AVC/blu-ray is not "hard capped" to 1080/24p. It all depends on bandwidth and processing power.

>>613029
The technical capability exists, yes, but the Bluray standard does not allow it because of compatibility. If you make a "Bluray" with 1080/60p you will not be allowed to call it a Bluray or use the logo, because it does not conform to any published Bluray standard, even though it will work in most players.

And that's why no studio will ever make one. At best you'll get amateur stuff who don't care about licenses.

>>613099
Cameron will push Sony to write another standard

Our Savior

>>614036
"Dear James, plz make you future movies home release in 1080p60 anamorphic. kthxby"

File: 1409171736826.webm (3MB, 506x900px)

3MB, 506x900px

aw yay

>>602936
Wait...LOL...Porn is real?

And here, all this time I was thinking they were just fucking strangers for money.

TOP KEK