your move belicheck

gay

>

what is le blitz

>Three person stack is hard to tackle
An NCAA III player could easily take down people on top of each other.

>>64669585
>you just need to take the first guy down and the ball will be thrown with little precision
>qb will mostly get intentional grounding and ints
>there will be 3 players to tackle one tower

No wonder the OP is a murrican

>hurr durr it's a bait
>niggers will tell themselves that

>>64669085
wouldn't it make more sense to have the WR's standing on each others shoulders or do a simple boost higher than the defenders can reach since they can't be tackled before they already have completed the catch? you could throw super high balls without fear of interceptions

File: Brock%252BOsweiler%252Bgb6cEl2k3zym.jpg (29KB, 360x240px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 360x240px

Yeah, that works.

Why even throw the ball with a 3 person stack? Since it's impossible to tackle they should just keep walking forward until they cross the goal line.

>>64669754
Shitty o line m8.

Simple. Have Brady's boy Trump build an even higher wall of defenders.

>>64669647
Why would you be allowed to tackle someone who doesn't have the ball? Isn't that highly fucking illegal?

Why can't you just have the QB hand the ball to a literal midget RB and the get the oversized FB to hurl the cunt into the endzone

>>64669798
thank you for the mental image

>>64669147
>>64669585
>>64669647

How would a 3 person stack be easier to tackle? The fact that it's more height and weight would make it harder than anything. It's just simple physics. And even if a 3 person stack WERE easy to tackle they'd only have to fall forward to make up the yardage. Assuming the three players are all about 6 ft (2 yards) tall and they fall forward that's an easy 6 yard gain.