Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4
File: 1382727697490.png (141KB, 500x375px) Image search:
[Google]
141KB, 500x375px
Why is the media allowed to publish literal bullshit just because its the January transfer window.
Each year the rumours get more obscene and ridiculous.
How are papers still being printed in a digital age. Who keeps buying these rags ?
>>
These bullshit rumors are mostly spread online now, of course. Papers are irrelevant.
>>
Words/phrases it should be illegal to use without concrete evidence
>Linked with
>Have expressed an interest in
>Are preparing an offer
>Close to a move for/Are closing in on
>On the verge of
>>
>>64643239
>According to anonymous club personnel
>>
>>64643163
because retards are eating it up, see /trans/
>>
>sources close to the club
>>
>unanonymous tip
>>
because it can't be disproved
who cares anyway it's just a bit of fun, why take it so seriously?
>>
>>64643452
Maybe it's allowed because everybody knows sports journalism is shit, but imagine if any other section of the paper just made up bullshit.
>>
>>64643475
this is what papers like the sun do anyway
>>
File: lel hd.gif (105KB, 5000x4227px) Image search:
[Google]
105KB, 5000x4227px
>"sources claim messi to liverpool"
>journalists' faces when the sources are their asses
>>
The worst shit talkers are agents though. Linking their clients to <champions league club> just to get them a new contract
>>
>>64643475
Read the news in the Express or Mail or Sun. That's actually more dangerous because people form and reinforce opinions on important issues based on such piles of bollocks
>>
File: 1450499090201.png (444KB, 800x600px) Image search:
[Google]
444KB, 800x600px
>unofficial yt video in news
>tweets, fb and instagram posts in news
Thread posts: 14
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4