I don't really see the point in females posting in rate

>>23287844
I hate it more when they make their own threads saying "rate me" AND THEN PROCEED TO GET ABOUT 200 REPLIES

WHAT THE FUCK /SOC/

>>23287855
yeah precisely
and to think that it's me that's a virgin
I sometimes wonder if those people have brains or are some zombies or bots replying automatically when they detect the poster might have a vagina

This is the most beta board on this whole website. Ever one here is desperate.

>>23287905
"Oh I called her cute, I'll definitely be able to get into her pants now!"

>>23287907
I might be a 22 years old insecure virgin but I'm not THAT desperate

>>23287916
forgot to say, I'm not a misoginist either, because it sounded like that
>>23287929
Well meme'd, amigo mio.

>>23287916
I am 20 years old virgin but yeah, I'm not that desperate either.
>>23287929
Can you kill yourself already?

>>23287932
>misoginist

I realized this after I posted in rate threads a couple times, now I don't do it 'cause there's no point. Girls will never get an accurate rate here unless they're fuck ugly.

>>23287939
>20
why is every male virgin here younger than me rrr-eeee
>>23287940
fuck you I always mess up the spelling of this word
my English might be fluent but I'm not a native

File: IMG-20160121-WA0259.jpg (81KB, 425x425px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 425x425px

>>23287844
'Honest rates'
For the entertainment of the inevitable rage actual honest rates generates.

I was faceless on /soc/ until I saw the ridiculous rates given out on those threads and decided to join in.

Why do so many men post though? I posted and I got rated highly, but realistically that's because there are lots and lots of gayish men on here.

>>23288041
that feel when it's only making me insecure that I'm not that attractive because rates are inflated
on the other hand, most people who post here are above average I think, I'd say about 6, with bit smaller portions of the populace being 5/4 or 7 and fewer people yet <=4 and >=8
so I'd say it's justified that rates look a bit high

>>23288048
wot
after spending months on /soc/ looking at faces I can tell 'objective' male attractiveness level pretty decently
t. straight

>>23288048
I think it's genuine curiosity for many.
Some of the mentally ill on this board have to have a daily dose of validation though. Some might just enjoy judging others and want their rates to have a 'face'

>>23288077
I got called "gorgeous" and "beautiful" and I just assumed it was all gay men fantasizing about blasting my butthole.

>>23288091
iktf

>>23288070
I always rate honestly. I've noticed if I find the posters before me are mostly attractive and give them 6-9s I get 7-10s. If the posters before me consist of 1-5s then I get rated 4-9. It's all subjective and I just can't take those threads seriously.

Don't feel paranoid about rates on /soc/ because who really fucking cares?