/erpg/ - Tasteful Dominance Edition
I think it's time we admit the usual copypaste thread intro doesn't work.
But let's talk about scenes of actual BDSM. How do you play them, have you enjoyed them, do you want to do them, and do you have one in mind?
If you're not a BDSM focused character, feel free to share your profile anyway, and talk about what scenes do interest you.
JOIN 4CHAN /ERPG/ CHANNEL
Just get on https://www.f-list.net/chat/ and type
That will take you right to the channel.
- Nice cutesy hug-lewds
- "Big Sister" style stuff (18+ only tho)
- Back-alley beat 'n' fuck stuff
- Criminal stuff
- BDSM (Loving/Cruel)
This is no longer a character hub and doesn't fit the theme of the thread, but I'll post her anyways because I like this image. None of you can stop me.
I'd recommend being proactive on approaching people when you're an "unpopular" sort of character archetype like that. It's definitely not impossible, but don't expect much now.
also looking for thoughts on profile + advice to update profile
First paragraph of Appearance could use more sentence variety, every single one uses "and" at least once which gets a little jarring. The rest of that section is nice, second paragraph especially.
As far as kinks go, I'd say to perhaps include a couple of "guiding" ones to give a better idea of the sort of scenes you want. Probably not outright scene suggestions, but "Nice cutesy hug-lewds" and "Big Sister" stuff wasn't exactly the first thing that popped to mind when I read over the description or checked the kinks. The other stuff did though, so I suppose that's a good sign.
Overall it's decent quality, good job.
What's not tasteful about dominance?
Use gelbooru for pictures. It's really just a preference, but most people here are going to be a lot more comfortable with drawn images than real life images, and even among people who like real life images, you're still just using headless twinks.
Second, your characters aren't really characters, they're just avenues for your fetish. Sure, that's ultimately what F-list is for, but you have to entice someone to play with you first, and people are more likely to play with characters that are unique and interesting.
The Sherman character is also just really dumb and a stereotype/trope that I find increasingly more ridiculous as the world goes on. You're telling me that this "nerd" stock character has a massive cock and somehow never noticed? He's in the demographic most likely to look up internet porn, but he's somehow never so much as Googled his junk? You can end up learning about dicks by accident on the internet. I know the American education system is atrocious when it comes to sex ed, but come the fuck on, anyone over 16 is going to know what dicks are supposed to look like, and which dicks get labeled "Monster Cocks". Even guys who don't pour over Wikipedia articles will still Google around to learn what size is average to ensure themselves they aren't 'small'.
Anyway get better pictures. This might surprise you, but most women are attracted to faces anyway, so... Creepy headless images aren't going to get you much play.
>I think it's time we admit the usual copypaste thread intro doesn't work.
I think there's no harm in leaving it in, and taking it out leaves newcomers utterly confused. Bring it back, I say.
Some of us (well, just me, okay) like fronting the more antisocial aspects of it outright. Just doesnt feel right to me dressing it up as something super-mystical.
I mean dressing it up like that can be fun, but in the back of my mind I am still thinking "Yeah... I'm just getting off on beating someone up, arn't I?"
Split it into two posts or something, then
Best BDSM scene I've done was barely even sexual. It started with 2 people who trust each other agreeing ahead of time, meeting up and then the Dom proceeding to beat the shit out of me in rather deliciously exotic ways while of course making sure every now and then my character was okay (particularly after the bamboo sword beating and the water-torture)
People seem to always forget that Masochists exist
That doesn't mean that dominance can't be tasteful. In fact, when I say "tasteful dominance" I mean "not brutal rape where you love it because this shemale has the biggest cock and girls love getting painfully raped with a foot long kidney puncher, right?"
Renovated an old profile's text. Kinks are to be edited. Any thoughts?
(Inb4 real pics -- I can't really get better art that looks similar.)
I feel like you repeat too many of your customs between profiles, such that it diminishes each different/individual profile's focus and impact, makes it hard to get a handle on who they are (sexually) and what you're after with them. If I were to read your kinks I'd think that almost every single one of your profiles was for abduction and vivisection by Lovecraftian aliens, and it distracts from any other message the profile might have.
Unless that is the intended message, in which case, rock on.
I think that every character should have unique kinks tailored to them.
This may be one of the reasons I haven't made any new profiles lately. My last really doesn't really have much in the way of customs https://www.f-list.net/c/lorelai%20walker/
Or anything else. One reason I haven't "used" it for anything but sitting around
Maybe one day I will! You don't know me!
I'll have you know I'm even technically running two games, when I'm not sleeping for hours on end. On that note, time for a nap.
'Technically' being a key word. How long has that first one been in set up without a single ACTUAL session run yet? The fact that you started a second game without actually doing much for the first is something I'd be a bit peeved about as a player after jumping through hoops to get a character made for exactly what you want to run.
Looking for partners, rather new character to booth. The best way to win my heart is sending me a note, since I am probably going to hit the chat a little less than usual these days.
I feel dirty for having made this, but I made it just the same
>no male-type characters
>pictures mostly involve going down on male dick
If that was the joke, it's a pretty good one. There's a ton of 'pansexual' female profiles who do that and are completely serious about it.
Mistook you for someone else, then. Not a character, a player. They had a similar attitude about men, and claimed that it was for the extremely plausible and definitely not made-up reason that their mother (that is, the player's actual RL mother) is a dominatrix.
Yeah. It was pretty much hilarious.
Honestly I think it's dumb. I "get" the "joke", but it's still dumb. It also just feels inconsistent. Also, Poison makes handcuffs as a bracelet work.
I feel like you can't decide whether you want an actual Redpiller's strawman of a feminist something else. And you shouldn't write an in-character intro if your character's personality is annoying. I'm also not sure why you used [big] for all of it. Or why you put the last bit in a [quote].
I wish someone would link the Elzi edit of that image, too. The one with smegma on the dick.
Also you've copied your kinks over from another profile instead of rewriting them, so your Toilet Play kink is dominant, and refers to "the hideout", probably from some supervillain profile.
In fact, most of your kinks refer to the reader, not your character.
Honestly, I feel like if you're going to do something you should do it right.
That might be the best bullshit f-list story ever. Right up there with that murderhobo elf chick that was like a legal council, dying of literally every disease, got locked in a freezer, shot in the head, and was part of a gang.
I think some of what Kliss says is true. The trouble is figuring out what. Ironically, "I'm a clinical sociopath", while ridiculous sounding, is the most plausible.
Less than usual? who are you? Or did you mean the /tg/chat?
>In poetry the name Bellona is often used simply as a synonym for war, but the goddess often appears as a character in the Thebaid of Statius, symbolising war’s destructive and belligerent aspect. There she is represented as carrying a spear and a flaming torch or waving a blood-stained sword and riding in a chariot.
> Her priests were known as Bellonarii and used to wound their own arms or legs as a blood sacrifice to her.
Also, your guestbook is a testament to how easymode canons are, especially MOBA characters. Three days old and already more Guestbook posts than most Bitchbreakers.
Main advice is to not just copy kinks, though. First one I hit on looks like the generic "Kink References" kink for Bad Ends. Same with Ass to Mouth.
Kliss is still around? I honestly was affraid she kicked it.
I've run the three preludes and Thursday the game starts for real. I just happen to have also started doing a one on one for someone.
None of my current players have had to jump through hoops. The one person who made ME jump through hoops is no longer part of the game.
Ehy, thanks for the feedback! I know about copying kinks and I am sorry, but I am slowly adding my own. I just felt like I needed some custom to better specify what I am looking for.
At no point did I say that. Rape is a perfectly legitimate fetish too, as is cannibalism, or scat, or soul vore (look it up, it's a thing). But what's being discussed in this reply chain is not "dominance" in the sense that F-List (and the broader BDSM community) understands it.
Some people get off on (roleplaying) being a selfish jerk. Some people get off on (roleplaying) having it done to them. Neither fact changes the definition of any of the words involved. You can't point at a duck and say "that's a cupcake". I mean, you can, but it'd be false.
man whats with this guy
Naw naw. Its more that people like to dress these things up as something much more there. Trust is a pretty big thing even if you are looking at it casually but I guess if I had to put things bluntly, I don't get or understand the 'tastefull' side of it.
"Tasteful" as in "treating the other person as a person and using proper safety techniques, or at the very least some sense of verisimilitude to make the whole affair more than just beating someone".
Well I mean, I have.
No, you're a cunt because you're bitching up the thread. But to the point at hand, >>23252701 is saying that >>23252156 >>23249284 is a selfish jerk for "fronting the antisocial aspect of it", and failing to understand th--Oh Goddamnit that's Bunchacrunch.
Bunchacrunch you missed the whole fucking point.
Most likely (concepts just not that tasteful to me) but I imagine its a big 'thing' for some people. They just seem silly to me.
>>23252945 however is either even more oblivious - or a troll. But probably both!
You've literally told someone their sexuality is wrong, mate you're an idiot
>How i feel knowing there are people this stupid
I like you.
This thread is off to a lovely start.
Indeed. Let's derail it with lewds (from our characters)
You think I have lewds of my characters?
I sure hope you do!
I wish! Maybe one day.
This is what I enjoy about Canon Characters, you find lewd without having to commission it. Though I also have characters based around images I've found, like this one (warning: might be a little strong for someone)
I really like to play a female sub in hardcore bdsm.
The problem i allways encounter are that
a) if i am bound i cant really say anything else then i wiggle around and what i feel. Oftentimes doms get bored that they controle the hole action.
b) that i have to dom myself because the dominant partner has no idea what he wants in the scene or is afraid that i bail ship if he gets to extreme.
Anyone have an idea to get around these things?
How're these Screenshots for Images? It'll probably be a long road to finding art of the specific hair style, color, horn, etc. so hopefully they're serviceably erotic until then.
a)gitgud and find better partners
b)find better partners and gitgud
More seriously though: yes, wiggling and feelings is what you do. No way around it, doms just have to accept it if they do this degree of bondage. Read some Aislinne's logs, even if latex isn't your jam, she restraints victims pretty severely so you can pick up some hints.
On b, be more explicit with stuff you like in profile text and actual discussion with partner.
What's the appropriate amount of times you should message people before giving them a chance to either message you first or take a break from you? This is my concern 24/7 when talking to partners.
You mean they didn't have to all get their characters tweaked and okay-ed by you to fit into a stupid setting because you felt that using Batman mythos would help you avoid world building?
No more so than they'd need to get their characters tweaked and okayed by me to fit into a New York setting.
I had one character who was proving problematic, and he was the one most interested in the Batman aspects. The problem is he wasn't as interested in the Werewolf aspects, and felt that it was my place to get his character into that world, as opposed to working with me on it to make someone who had the system-assumed ties.
Plus, >>23254499 that's how RPGs work.
Looking for your big break, trying to get into the movie business, or something more risqué? Will is the guy to know, if you're willing to work for it.
N'bad at all. I'm surprised the good ol' casting couch doesn't see more use around here.
You are trying real hard to shitpost here. As one of the aforementioned players, I knew what the assumptions of setting and system were, and made a character to fit them. Just like I do any time I make a character for a game.
You're just really reaching.
Hrm. Which is that? Menage a 3?
No, it's that one with the transgirl and the robot buddies and the dumb nerd main character. Shortstack? It's one of those long running comics that's mostly slice of life but somehow still popular. Gets cross referenced on TVTropes a lot.
Yes that's the one.
Although Dina is probably less "LESBIAAAAANISM HO" and more "I don't see the big deal about orientations. And also not very good at borders between types of attraction.".
>Let's derail it with lewds (from our characters)
>noteplay with someone
>wait a bit before asking if they lost interest or just busy
>thought she had sent a note when she hadn't
>goes on for a little while longer happens again
>too afraid to seem pushy to ask again
>months go by
>profile is deleted
>half a year later other two profiles i knew of are deleted
Never figured out why, but the latter disappearance came somewhat after i personally felt my own notes weren't quite good enough. Not knowing annoys me.
Kinda happened again more recently, pretty much exactly the same way, me feeling my latest note was fucking terrible after things having gone so well. Still no profile deletion so i still have time. But course for me to believe it's something i'm doing wrong.
The hiatus bits are why I never really do noteplay. The alternative of chat-based RP feels a bit forcefull at times to try and churn out a post in 10 minutes, but honestly I think it keeps the momentum going.
So much this. The shame of sitting on a reply for 20 minutes is the only thing that keeps me from taking literally forever. Notes would just never happen.
>screwy unreliable oppertunities to chat
But this is also a thing, and it makes me wish I thought for even a moment that I was capable of notes. I am so not.
Yeah, that's the big thing that makes noteplay viable at all. Still doesn't outbalance the ease of loss and funked-up flow, for me.
>a) if i am bound i cant really say anything else then i wiggle around and what i feel
Cheat. Look at people with eyes that almost say something, have expressions that ask questions, take advantage of the written medium. There is a limited pool of things to do without speech or agency, but you can play around with things you technically can't do, but do anyway.
You know what just ruins my day? .jpg artifacts
Hey /erp/, how do I make this profile good? I got really excited when I was making it, but the interest is... minimal. Is yandere just not a thing? Are mimics just not a thing?
>Is yandere just not a thing?
Anything that implies killing generally cuts the audience pretty substantially, from what I've seen, unless it's an audience that's already pretty okay with the idea (like vore furries or something). In this case, you're primarily angling for /tg/ and related sorts, and they're generally more the happy ending sorts (or at least, the more formulaic bad endings, breeding and enslavement and the like).
Huh. I guess I didn't think of it that way; I figured the RP'd be more about the desperate affection and less about actually eating the competition, but I can see how it'd come off otherwise. Time for an overhaul.
Plenty of people like yandere. 4chan NEETs think having a clingy girlfriend who exists only as a cipher for their own neediness and insecurities would be just the best. The "murder you" part is not the big attraction, the "obsessed about you" part is.
Yeah, which means I probably ought to find a way to make it seem less about the brutality and more about the clinginess. I don't think it's really clear enough what the profile's geared toward; it needs better focus.
Honestly it looks fine to me. You only made it yesterday, don't worry if you're not getting swarmed, especially when your character is niche and doesn't even have genitals.
Although on that note: Keyhole
Problem is, I sort of did get swarmed. Just by the wrong types. Two blank profiles, a generic anime boy who described himself on his profile as 'bland,' and an OC League of Legends character. That's... not the sort I want to attract. Like >>23258136 said, I'm angling for /tg/ sorts, and right now it looks like I might be using the wrong kind of bait. Unless I'm just overthinking the whole thing, since I get paranoid about stuff like this.
I don't want to sound rude, I am just wondering what the rationality behind role playing is? Do you mostly view it as a chance to be someone else because you dislike your self? Or is it just innocent fun to pass the time? I've tried rp before but I just felt silly and awkward. Again, I don't want to sound rude or be offensive, I'm just curious as to the rationality behind it for people, cause maybe I'm just looking at it wrong
It's fun, mostly. Like improvisational acting and character writing all in one. Building up a character and developing them and bouncing them off of other people's ideas and characters to see what falls out.
And then, of course, the fetishes.
>Do you mostly view it as a chance to be someone else because you dislike your self?
Do you play video games because you view it as a chance to be someone else because you dislike your self?
In a way, this is a video game not confined to the limitations of coding. And also >>23258405
>And then, of course, the fetishes.
"I hate myself" isn't uncommon, especially in our first world of antidepressants and psychological illnesses, but that's not the root of escapism. "I want to experience something different" is. The reason is the thing itself.
So most of you just view it as a way to express stuff you would find hard to do other wise? Like with your fetishes or character traits? I usually play comp games tho, so it's more about improving my skills in the confines of the game, not improving my character in the game. But I'm not unfamiliar with the game tropes of rpgs, so I do understand your point
Imagine being able to custom tailor pornography to exactly your desire every time, no matter how outlandish it is. No restrictions, no rules, just the full freedom to fuck whatever you want, however you want.
See that dick? You can climb it.
I think, while that might draw some people, creative types probably, it doesn't hold a lot of stock with me just because of the way I think about things. The entire time I would just focus on how undeniably fake it is. Like I tried dnd for a while with friends, but I always did things in 3rd person and was just in it for the cool battles. It wasn't that enjoyable to me, I guess.
Different folks, different strokes--nothing wrong with not liking it if it's not your thing. These threads originated on /tg/, if that gives you any idea of the type of people you're dealing with.
The vast majority of us do all our work in third person, too. Self-insertion, at least amongst our little group, tends to be regarded as rather gauche.
/tg/ was one of my favorite boards to read. They always made me chuckle one way or another.
Buy you still imagine yourself as partaking in the experience, right? Even if you use 3rd person to talk to each other?
The world even adapts to everything you do. You see that woman? if you impregnate her then when you come back she'll have children and they'll want to know where their dickgirl mother has been.
Do you not get immersed in the setting or story of a video game? Have you never enjoyed something interactive beyond the flashy lights and the combat?
If you ever get the chance to do D&D again, put on an accent. Trust me when I say that it's really helpful.
Also, you really might want to ask this question on /tg/, although you'll probably get trolled for asking a dumb question.
My problem has less to do with self insertion--in doing 1on1 GMing I keep trying to avoid "you", and when I'm 1on1 as a player I go full first person noir, same as my usual writing--and more to do with narrative flow. If I use "I" to refer to my character and you use "I" to refer to your character, it gets really awkward. Plus, /me doesn't flow well except in third person.
I don't really get immersed in games' universes. I can get into a book, but that's usually just to see if I can guess what happens next correctly. I just don't think my brain is weird to think that way, ya know?
Honestly? Kinda depends on who I am with. If its with someone whos mostly a stranger, I imagine myself controlling the character then rather then being the character.
On the flipside, if its with someone who I really care about (almost-love levels) or if the scene setup lends itself to it, I do then tend to gravitate towards 'being' that character for the moment of the scene. It's quite nice, although the only way I think I could compare it without either being or feeling like an utter weirdo (too late) is to just compare it to acting. The best actors out there are able to 'pretend' to be their character on something so long as the camera is rolling.
I getcha though, although honestly I think you should still try it. If it still feels overly weird to you then that's that, but you might enjoy it, iunno. Or if its any consolation? I don't get SnM in the way some people above have pointed it out to me.
As another note on more masochistic stuff like the guy above was getting at? I actually enjoy that stuff when I'm really turned on. There's probobly some messed-up bit of psychology there, but really I don't like to question those sorts of things.
I like to have fun.
>To prevent fraud, people impersonating me or stealing my art claming it as thier own I have this account.
Your profile tells me nothing, says something confusing, has no pictures, has no info, and every single thing that you've written has at least one typo or awkward phrasing.
I don't see anything that'd make you interesting enough to impersonate in the first place.
A quick Google search suggests the name is attached to a transphobic creeper with a shitty, uncreative fursona. I suspect your very short time here is going to be extremely interesting.
(a). Focus on what you're thinking, how you're feeling. Try to pick a position which allows you to move a little; it takes practice!
(b). Really, this is the big problem. Some doms don't know how to dom but it is possible for a sub to lead a scene, by hinting at what they want.
>Even if you use 3rd person to talk to each other?
Yes, when in character
>"Suck on it bitch", declared the bitchbreaker, brandishing her cock.
OOC discussion is just regular chat, like we're having here. If it's in the middle of the scene it's denoted somehow, often by parenthesis.
>username: [post with some actions]
>username: (Oh sorry, I have to run off for a minute, the cat is on fire.)
>People steal fursuits
Looking over this tumblr reminds me of Dreaming Of Utopia.
I wasn't, but now I kind of am.
Doing a quick character search, there are a handful. Only about seven, and one is submissive. Seems to be more females than males.
Of course, this is only searching "Klingon" so I think anyone with something like a caste name instead (I don't know how Klingon work) wouldn't show up.
Okay, I searched for Female, Transgender, Herm and Shemale Klingons. The first result is gay, the second has a blank profile and hasn't been online in over a year, the third hasn't been on in five months but seems fine otherwise, fourth hasn't been on in over a year, fifth is online but isn't a Klingon, sixth is gay, and the last one is confusing, not to mention she hasn't been on in two months.
So basically nothing.
Wonder why. You'd think Star Trek is a natural fit for ERP, what with all the boldly coming.
Actually I'm sorta surprised there aren't more space captains and such in general, at least in the /tg/ crowd. Such an obvious setup for banging hot alien babes.
Most of /tg/ is focused on fantasy. Scifi doesn't get as much love in terms of RPGs. I bet the reason for that is Elves and Dwarves and Orcs are cultural touchstones at this point, and common among multiple settings, while Star Trek and Star Wars and Mass Effect and so on don't really have similarities. Sure, you've got Proud Warrior Races, but they're not as similar as Orcs will be across franchises.
Basically, despite ostensibly being more open, Science Fiction is actually more niche and closed off for players. Even if Sindorei and Altmer and Eladrin are radically different, you still know quite a bit about them just from them being (High) Elves.
Sci-fi is love; sci-fi is life. We need more sci-fi.
First time making a profile in a long time, feel free to take a look and tell me everything I've done wrong.
Fat Orc NEET who certainly isn't interested in any 3DPD sluts.
Shouldn't have laughed at that as much as I did. You'za git, but you'ze an alright git.
I need to fix up my Shadowrun character.
Also, you should really get better pictures. At least a better avatar.
we speak in character whenever it's funny
I thought fucking was what we did around here, heads and otherwise.
Interaction tags like that were changed, it's now "with", presumably to avoid having twice as many tags depending on who's doing the fucking. futa_with_futa, futa_with_female, futa_with_male, so on and so forth.
You really need more than "no description set yet" and almost every one of your Faves is "when I'm dominant", despite you being set to "Usually Submissive". Just how submissive can you be if that's the case?
Fantasy is closer to us. If there have been people at one location for a couple of hundred years, you can bet your ass there are tales about fairies, spirits, ghosts, monsters, elves, gremlins, and other things just a stones throw away from a location. It's easy to relate to because you have likely heard tales through grandparents or childrens books of the knight saving the princess from the horrible dragon, while it's rare to hear about Johnny Austronaut saving Digital Princess from the evil existentiall threat Kli-Klongs in childrens books.
Well shit, might as well.
Tasteful BDSM you say? (I mean apart from the OP being not tasteful at all.)
I'd totally do a new sub character due to being sorta tired of doming all the time.
My interests can be summed up as:
Classy and tasteful BDSM between consenting (and loving) partners with a focus on anal. I have a tendency towards really eager and active submissive, or ones that flop between being active and passive depending on the situation. (I'll also note that I prefer pink, orange and blue character, in that order, over different colours, but if you have a good idea I might go with it anyway.)
If you have an idea for a character you'd like someone to make for you that fits with that I miiight be up for it. Just try to sell me on the idea.
Also have a cute.
>Love everything about a profile
>Except for footplay, which is always on faves
>Can't get over that one kink, even Scat Torture would be better
What one kink kills all your interest in a profile /erpg/?
Lili, haven't seen you in a while. You good for the game tonight?
Time to finally get this train barreling off the tracks and into the civilians.
>post pictures of girls going down on dicks
>this is 4chan
Also, the fact that males is a huge dislike of yours and you blatantly post heterosexual hentai makes me question if you're serious or not.
There is no profile. I'm trying to get an idea for one. That is the whole point.
Have a profile I made a while ago though.
Aye. I'm just not feeling anything too specific to try to make and put out for adoption. (Like pink vs. lavender vs. orange, young vs. old, eager vs. reluctant, etc., etc.) So I thought I'd see if someone has a nice idea they want to sell and I can get into.
You set yourself up for failure because >>23266157 >>23266163. On top of that, all the things I said >>23251268
You've made a bad profile and you're confused why people with good profiles haven't contacted you. Why would they? I don't understand why you'd make a bad profile and expect glorious effort from anyone. You really did set yourself up to only get approached by shitters.
You made a meme profile with confusing kinks and barely any information.
>You made a meme profile
I feel like people doing this should get shamed a lot harder than they do around here. But hey, JET BEAMS CAN'T MELT STEEL FUEL guy gets away with being /pol/ memes and smug about it, so clearly nobody gives a fuck.
>I feel like people doing this should get shamed a lot harder than they do around here
Yeah, how dare they have fun on their own time? Who cares if that /pol/ person actually plays, how dare they?
There's nothing wrong with meme profiles, stop trying to kill fun.
Is there some reason you like following me around to just be a dick? Yeah, part of me hopes I don't have to run. I've been sleeping more awkwardly than usual and feeling like shit lately. I've got problems. I'm not going "WELP GAME'S CANCELED".
Didn't Lili herself (or maybe it was Caeleb) tell you off for bitching about the game? You're not one of the players who was asked to sit out, are you?
I don't think they actually get any play. Being a meme profile makes it hard to get play.
Being worried about starting a game comes part and parcel with being the ST
[02:55] Lorelai Walker: Damn, tomorrow is game night. Part of me hopes Lili is still sick. Then I can sleep all day.
This coupled with the fact that you haven't planned anything, always express distress over the game, and beg people to watch anything you do run to achieve some petty validation just make you insufferable as a GM.
You're lying here, or the former player is lying on chat.
Either way, why are you so upset if you clearly dodged a bullet? PM me and we can talk about this like adults, instead of dragging drama all over the thread (even if that does mean it gets bumped)
But that would imply I don't actually run things. I've got logs from the last three weeks, though.
Also, on the subject of being hilarious to watch, I've never heard of anyone complaining that someone likes lurkers when they run a game. Usually I have people PM me asking if they can watch, so I make it known that, yes, anyone can watch.
It's like watching politicians at a debate: you invent "facts" from thin air, and then build off them as if they're true.
It'd be more believable if actual facts and actual players didn't contradict you, but I guess that's not how 4chan conditions people to conduct arguments. More the "plug your ears with your fingers and scream la la la can't hear you" sorts, I guess.
But hey, you'll just point at me, yell "circlejerk" and declare yourselves the victors, so, y'know. You do you. I'm obviously not able to stop you.
>Rory just realized tonight is wednesday, not thursday
sheer gold desu
Suck my diiiiiiiiiick
This is what happens when you sleep all day. Your scheduling gets fucked up. I must have looked at the clock at 1am or something and saw that it was Wednesday, but thought it was midnight.
In the words of Scrooge: There's still time!
Easier said than done!
I can never feel rested. I may have sleep apnea.
>mfw i live near alaska and can never lock down a schedule because the sun keeps fucking changing
Get over yourself and stick to a schedule. Nobody ever feels fully rested.
Use blinds and an alarm to make the sun irrelevant.
You could try getting some of those Lumie lights/alarm clocks.
>It'd be more believable if actual facts and actual players didn't contradict you
Absolutely nothing contradicts the quote I'm laughing at here
[02:55] Lorelai Walker: Damn, tomorrow is game night. Part of me hopes Lili is still sick. Then I can sleep all day.
You're acting like I was wishing harm on someone out of laziness.
Plenty of people feel well rested. They just don't live in first world countries with tons of light pollution and lifestyles that discourage proper sleep. But I feel LESS well rested than the average person. I have trouble doing basic tasks because I'm fatigued.
>But hey, you'll just point at me, yell "circlejerk" and declare yourselves the victors, so, y'know.
Your script is boring and predictable.
No, no. I hope you've got Cholera, clearly.
pls indeed. This is why no one comes around anymore. Because every day two or three people jump out of the woodwork to start drama about how terrible a human being I am.
Everybody else has long left after your constant shitarguments with anybody who dared to say anything contrary to your stances.
Now it's just you, your circus and the laughing audience.
>you cry circlejerk and keep going
>you declare yourself the winner and keep going
>you declare yourself the winner and keep going
When did that actually happen? Seriously, point me to one self-congratulating post that isn't a reply to your defensive dances anywhere in recent threads.
So no. We just die down until he does new hilariously shitty thing.
She's a limber slut
To be fair just let them. The real problem is that they keep popping up.
You're sitting here proving me right. I get complaints on chat of "ugh, the thread is being dumb" or "the thread is shit" and most of the time it's someone bitching about me apropos of nothing. Most of the day here we've had bitching because someone decided to take things I said in chat and then make a big deal out of them in the thread. Currently, you're shitflinging with Lili because she pointed out how fucking stupid that was, especially since it concerned her.
This is why no one posts. No one wants to get involved with this shit. You've got old names who've either left or just avoid the threads because they don't want to deal with this. These threads are dying because you and >>23269747 just want to fucking bitch.
For fucks sake, you people will bitch about me even if I don't say a fucking thing, but you act like I'm shitting up the Goddamned threads. You can't leave well enough alone and your hateboner for me is so massive that you have to ruin a good thing for everyone.
If you stick around when people hate you, and you stick around when people ignore you, then you can't really claim any high ground about teaching people "important 4chan life lessons" or whatever it is you think you're doing with posts like >>23269765 that.
But hey, you'll just chuckle about le circus and pretend you're not just grasping for straws to bitch about. So have fun I guess?
Soo I see a total lack of example in here that would disprove the "important 4chan life lessons".
The fact that you're still here after wasting I-don't-even-know-how-many threads desperately trying to troll your way into Rory-sempai's attentions and contributing nothing topical isn't evidence enough? Do I really need to spell it out to you when you know what you're doing and you know the answer to your own question?
I think I wrote that sentence in the poorest way.
What I mean is that if OKCUPID can work to find a girl that could be into kinky stuff, but not all the way into the kinkiest shit.
I mean, there's already a social network for people who are absolutely into those things. I guess I want someone who's more casual about?
>desperately trying to troll your way into Rory-sempai's attentions
And obviously I ain't going to vanish in a puff of smoke because you stopped replying for once.
He's still hilarious.
But do you really not see the difference?
>hey look rory did a thing
>hey look rory did a thing
>hundred of posts arguing that the thing he did is Just and Right and everybody disagreeing is Bad and Evil
A fucking disaster, that's what.
Except that doesn't happen, you just come back a few hours later and try again, and again, and again. I've seen you go all day with nobody replying to you and you'll still repost your shitpost with slight alterations every few hours. You're trying to act like the wise troll master teaching the padawan the arcane ways of 4chan, but none of it's true.
No, not really. As far as I'm aware people on OKCupid want to get dates and relationships. I'm sure there are people with kink desires on their profiles, but that's not exactly the main thing. I would suggest Fetlife, but that site is sort of skeevy and I've never really heard anything good about it.
Honestly if you want that kind of thing you're in the wrong thread, though. This is for roleplaying, not actual sex having. For that you'd want one of the other hook up threads.
Or we could cut out that first step where people ride my nuts for some reason.
>you just come back a few hours later and try again, and again, and again
Are you gonna claim that me, bKOqguzE and dK5UfMAU are same guy using separate networks for maximum rusing too?
Exactly! And you're still doing it. Glad you're finally starting to see my point, at least.
Would you two please either fuck or shut the fuck up?
I like this pairing no matter who's on top.
Infinite ribbons combined with an intensely dependent personality is a hell of a drug, yeah.
Intensely independent, you mean.
No, I think dependent is on the money for someone whose crippling fear is losing the affection of others and being alone.
Also god Damn that is a nice pic.
And with this, I'm spent on not sfw pics. Good hustle.
>leave for a couple hours
>thread becomes a shitshow
So just a regular Thursday then?
Just another day in paradise, yeah.
>Finishing a scene three hours before I need to wake up
Worth, but fuck.
Don't worry, one day we'll rise out of the ashes. One day.
Good lewding is always worth it, now get whatever sleep ya can anon.
Shine on you crazy anon, only through fire can this thread be cleansed.
If you keep striking the matches, the gasoline will flow on its own.
And all I wanted was someone to play with and give me an idea...
Don't be ridiculous, none of us actually play.
>new sub character
Monstergirl scientist who gets into BDSM relationships with her students and interns.
>Mighty Jill Off is a 2D platform independently developed freeware video game designed by Anna Anthropy, with art by James Harvey and music by Andrew Toups. It stars a submissive named Jill, who has a boot fetish and is forced to climb up a tower after her Queen kicks her down it as punishment. Jill does this by jumping and slowly descending over obstacles. Jill can be defeated in one hit by these obstacles, but will return to the last check point. The game serves as an homage to the 1986 arcade game Mighty Bomb Jack. It had follow-ups, such as Mighty Jill Off - Jill Off Harder Edition and Jill Off With One Hand. Jill made a cameo appearance in the 2010 video game Super Meat Boy as a playable character.
>The game's BDSM and lesbian themes were implemented by Anthropy, a BDSM practitioner, for the purpose of providing legitimate "dykes" in video games. She also made the game difficult, to fit in with its BDSM theme. James Harvey attempted to make this game appealing for the BDSM community. Mighty Jill Off has received praise for its BDSM themes from critics of websites such as Rock, Paper, Shotgun and Game Set Watch. It was also praised for its high level of difficulty by editors of GamesRadar and Bitmob. 1UP.com included it in its list of favourite free PC games of 2009.
That sounds hilarious but damn the actual game content...
Funny, that's exactly the thing I did when I played that moff girl. No one wanted to play with me.
It's a fun game, I played it after Super Meat Boy. It was a good time. It's light hearted BDSM.
>no one wanted to play with me
It happens. Just gotta bang your head against the wall until someone does.
Of course they are, it's not like they would actually go... oh, I don't know, play the game and form their own opinion on it or anything of the sort. Nope, just gotta categorize something nice and conveniently based off first impression readings :^)
Also the safeword is the esc button. As in it literally says that.
Not having fun with the torturous jumps? Call the end to the game.
I mostly dislike the aged graphics. Could've done higher res if still simplistic spirtes for it.
So Anastasia Steele being excited means 50 Shades isn't a problem?
>Also the safeword is the esc button. As in it literally says that.
Okay, that's cute.
Also, I downloaded it and took a shower. I haven't had time to play it. I formed my opinion based on what I saw on the site.
Yeah, I can't disagree with that. Still though, the CG's were pretty nice.
Yes, that's exactly what it means. Now straw man me harder oniichan.
I tried that too once. They still didn't end up playing with me. Life = Suffering.
I'm deliberate in my hate flinging, thank you very much.
Oh thaaat again.
Your bullshit of when you pour buckets of shit on things it's nothing serious! It's nothing to get up in arms in! And thus you are allowed to shit on things whenever you like! And keep that fiction of being the innocent sinless perfect internet person rolling!
Shut the fuck up you horrid hypocritical twat.
How about something to lighten the mood of the thread:
Seriously you fuck.
From the perspective of people that actually LIKE those ultra-hard platformer games (that is, are actually INTO bdsm in the meta context), the hardness of levels is the pleasurable spankings. They WANT more and harder. And the game gives them what they want. Also it's a rerelease that includes a whole second tower with harder levels. Because they WANTED IT and meta-dom gave them what they wanted.
You here are bitching about difficulty, thus in meta context you are a normie looking at people spanking each other and wondering why anybody would tolerate it and why they don't safeword immediately.
But nooope it MUST be abusive 50shades because it's a kink you don't like and thus it's baaad
Honestly though? I only know of the character from Super Meat Boy, where she's the second best character in the roster due to her ability to parachute her jumps.
(The best one of course being Flywrench who can not only triplejump but also slide up walls. His weight takes some getting used to tho)
>have multiple RPs set up on multiple different characters
>people never log on, but I have so much stuff set up that I'm uncomfortable looking for new partners
Does anyone else know this feeling?
If they're setup as "kk whenever we both up we totally should do X" and not "At YY time on sunday we do the thing", then you totally can jump into other RPs.
If they made you wait for days before showing up it's their own fault.
Although this time try a different approach - no setups for later, jump in NOW.
Get some one-off flings going. Lightweight things you can easily thrash through in a sitting or two, no strings attached and no complications.
Things are already better now that I'm a shemale. I feel like I was missing out for years.
I really need to do some dick on dick scenes.
As other people have pointed out, I don't really play much, if at all due to my sleep issues. I've also got a few profiles that I don't really wanna do anything with. But I should probably just get over it and >>23274633
Honestly I think part of my problem is that I make great character ideas that I'm not sure I want to play, but I'm not really sure what kind of character I *do* want to play.
I keep coming back to the idea of the kind of character that would attract bitchbreakers... but that's only so that I can enjoy their rough degrading sex and then go "that was pretty good" instead of being cum addicted and broken.
More interesting smut related content
This is literally my life.
Thankfully the people I do have ongoing stuff with log on frequently enough when I do that I'm not left completely hanging, but that is probably the biggest Thing facing me on this site.
One-off flings would technically be the perfect solution to this but I keep turning those into stuff I want to do long term.
Through dick, unity
I feel like you still need more kinks (and some of them are a bit confusing), and I've been wanting to do something more subby, but what the hell. It's 3am but I could go for a quickie. Did you have anything in mind? How do you feel about things like abuse?
I've also got a few profiles I can sometimes play as shemale
Personally I've been looking for big burly musclegut men, but that's unlikely around these parts.
Anyway, I think if I'm going to try to power through, I'll need a wake up shower and some early breakfast.
I hate to disappoint you, but I wasn't planning on doing anything right now because I'm about to go to sleep. Which kinks are confusing? I can think of some subby things for later, and I honestly do have male characters which are versatile, so I could use those instead. Abuse is fine.
Oh. C'est la vie. That's always how it turns out when I feel up for a scene.
Anyway, I'm not sure what's up with the slime one, since it mentions "the slime girl I roleplay with". You've also got some "no description set yet"s, which are always disappointing. Everyone should have more filled out customs.
Nah, don't sweat it. I was actually half worried I'd once again have someone wanting to roleplay only for me to go "oh, no, I don't actually RP"
Yes, I have actually RPed. But it's rare. Between the Werewolf preludes and the one shot for Malice, I've done more STing than RPing.
Maybe I should just give up and try to do that Silent Hill fuckhorror thing.
Trying to get back into playing this character:
>Sittin on f-list.
>Suddenly a message.
>Person clearly refers to me in ooc as I was the character
>Even though I have a custom made kink JUST ABOUT NOT TO DO THAT.
I only have one 'No' custom like that, and I am considering removing it because it's pointless, and badly stands out from the actually useful custom Nos.
The people that would understand have enough brains to figure it out from the context, and the ones that ignore it or don't understand it might very well be shitters.
>not enjoying it if it's light hearted
Do you hate fun?
>its been over two years since I started ERPing
Time flies by waaaaay too fast.
That's also a good idea. The thread needs some non-hostile content, and most people who play don't post their profiles because chances are they've got regular partners, or find the thread too hostile. So let's talk about kinks.
Except not me, because my current fetishes are the kind of thing that turns people away. I don't need people complaining about extreme kinks.
It's funny how I like the ideas surrounding watersports, but watersports aren't appealing at all to me.
Girl who can't control her body? Hot. Girl being humiliated in public? Very hot.
I guess it's how things are publicly perceived. If a girl pees herself in public, in my mind people would just think she's a normal girl who had an accident. If a girl is playing with one of her nipples and breathing heavily in public, people would think she's some kind of freak, which is way hotter for some reason.
Having an accident in public is still pretty humiliating. Especially if she's playing with her nipples and breathing heavily while she does it.
But I like watersports more for the filthy raunchy nature of it. Pissing on each other, drinking it, that kind of thing. I like it because it's "dirty". Whether it's used for humiliation and to make someone feel 'low' or just because the people indulging in it are perverse, I like it.
I really want to do more scenes where people ask for watersports and other forms of humiliation. I want consensual humiliation, as opposed to the rapey stuff. I've done on scene like that. With watersports, at least
No thanks. Pessimistic optimism is my drug of choice.
Pic related makes me want to do something with magic skintight bodysuits and witches.
So do any of you nerds roleplay as [spoiler]Fire Emblem Canons?[/spoiler]
But when your brain is puddy you ahegao twice as hard.
>not always wanting to do that
The "mojo girls" thread on /h/ of all places is giving me ideas for an overhaul of Lorelai.
Unfortunately I don't think anyone wants to be abusive to a creepy yandere with low self esteem who thinks it's romantic because she's also delusional.
As you well know, a good pitch can sell anything. The problem is that everybody around here knows you don't play, so the characters you make are irrelevant from a smutting perspective.
I also have a bad pitch with natives. Although really none of the people around here really interest me all THAT much. The people who's kinks I love are all subby.
Finding the right domme has been near impossible in my experience. Part of that is because there are just no pink name dommes on the site. I've only found two people that I clicked with perfectly, and now, neither of them play with me because they've moved on to other people. Most of my scenes do focus around BDSM, but it's generally pretty gentle and tame. That kind of comes with the mommy domme dynamic. I love to focus on the control the domme has, rather than the actual kinkiness of the act. It's why I love subspace so much. It really showcases the trust the sub has for the domme. I love BDSM, though I rarely play it to where Jess is full time. I like a mix of sweet romance and kinky dominance. I think focusing on one or the other too much can cause the play to get stale and boring, which is why I opt for a mix of both. It's also just fun to see how are characters interact when it is "Mommy and Kitten," and when it is "Jess and your character."
I have a number of scenes in mind. Usually, I play Jess as a college student. Roommates and nightclubs are very overplayed. Professor is getting that way too, but I'm still willing to do it. One of my absolute favorite setups is that our characters were introduced by a mutual friend. It's simple but it makes sense. And it adds a bit of depth, as perhaps the mutual friend suspects that Jess is gay and tells your character she thinks as much. It's a simple one that's not too overplayed and that has a lot of possibilities.
Other setups I enjoy are that Jess gets dragged to a party, and being a "good girl," she doesn't drink. She finds your character drunk out of her mind, upset, etc., and offers to take her home, not having any sexual reason to do it, but more to help your character out.
TL;DR I'm a faggot, and I really enjoy BDSM, but I don't get to play too often. If you're interested in my profile, send me a message. I'm also open to suggestions on the profile.
>Part of that is because there are just no pink name dommes on the site.
There are plenty. I'm really getting frustrated of how I keep giving suggestion that you don't even think of taking. Even what you've got in this post is better than a lot of the stuff on the actual profile.
Your profile isn't a college student. It's a clustered mess with way too much information about parts that don't matter and not enough about the ones that do. You could cut your profile down to only the College section and it would be much better.
Didn't catch the dick in the thumbnail.
I understand the frustration, but as I've said a number of times, the things you think are issues are things I disagree with. I have the other sections, because I play her occasionally as a adult or a child. College is just my preferred setting.
I prefer detail, and every character that I've enjoyed playing with has had a profile similar to mine. I would much rather someone have a fleshed out character that they'd be willing to change some minor details about than have a bare, "concise and to the point," profile.
And there really aren't that many pink name dommes that are interested in females and that can write multi-para. I can think of three good ones off the top of my head, and I've gone through every character listed as female, gay, bi, or pan, usually or always dominant, and that has checked either strong or multi-para for desired post length.
The things I think are issues are things like the rambling, unfocused nature of the profile and the fact that you have several contradictory things that add nothing. Detail means nothing when the detail is aimless and disjointed. If anything, you DON'T have a fleshed out character, and that's the problem.
My suggestion to you has always been to focus your character on what you want instead of constantly undermining yourself with "or I could play something different". It's not about having a bare profile, it's about having a profile that gives people something to work with. You're consistently failing to do that, and as a result you're consistently failing to get the play that you want.
>I play her occasionally as a adult or a child.
I'm going to do something I hate here and pull the shit >>23282299 pulled: You clearly aren't playing her at all or you wouldn't be complaining like you do.
Likewise, perhaps you're being too demanding. I've seen several people that would be good, but you want one of the least fitting post lengths.
And the problem with that is that from your profile I feel that you wouldn't even be good writing multi-para in the first place. Try asking for something reasonable.
I'm honestly curious which parts you think are rambling and contradictory. I read over my entire profile, and couldn't really find anything. And I feel like being able to play something else than the specific thing you want is important, especially if you're not getting much play in the first place.
I do get some play, though. It's just not what I want. I'll ask a person if they can do multi-para, they'll say no, and I'll settle because I want some play, even if it's not what I'm looking for.
>perhaps you're being too demanding
I honestly, probably am. But oh well. Even if it is too demanding, it's what I want to play.
Ignore Rory, he doesn't even ERP anymore and has lost touch with the community.
Ohkay lets see
>the profile consists only out of a bunch of collapses
That's not a good sight.
Okay, that expansive backstory: how often do you expect those details to come up? How often have they come up?
I totally get the thing about the collapses, but how can I get around it without my profile looking like a mess.
Honestly, the details come up pretty often, especially the childhood ones, since the plays I'm in usually contain a lot of orientation play, Jess reflects on her childhood fears about being gay.
Did Rory the faggot get banned yet?
Okay, that's for you.
But consider this: the other character doesn't have your backstory to such detail, do they?
As for general look, at least having SOMETHING before the collapsocalypse starts would be pretty helpful.
Just give one paragraph of who you are and what you want.
You can practically copy the post you've made in the thread.
Overall what I think is: you can have the short concise profile upfront and then have all the details you like to write out plugged after that.
So people opening the profile would see the basic version, decide whether they want to get in on that, and then read the other parts.
Also a little more specific: collapses that hide only a couple lines look just bad. You can have your list of canons as just one big collapse, without the big gaggle of tiny collapses inside of it.
I'm trying to give her advice. The same advice that I've been trying to give her across several threads now. Whether I RP or not has no bearing on that, and honestly you people constantly going "you never RP anyway" doesn't help me want to RP.
She is clearly not getting what she wants. NOT changing is going to hurt her more than changing.
Fuck me I just wrote 3,298 words about your profile. I'm sorry that I'm too damned condescending, but I've tried giving you advice some six or seven times by now. I've been polite. You don't listen to me, tell me "well I don't want to do that" and then come back the next thread talking about how you're still unsatisfied. And half the time I'm the only one who even gives your profile advice in the first place.
I realize it's not your fault that I'm this upset, but Christ. I am freaking upset.
For what it's worth, while I'm not a fan of Rory, I have to agree that the profile at https://www.f-list.net/c/jessica%20eldridge just has way too much Goddamn stuff in it.
Plus all the center-aligned text means I'm not going to bother putting in the effort to actually read any of the stuff in those collapses.
IMO the entire thing should be cut down to a paragraph or two of introduction, a couple of possible setups/scene ideas, and then maybe a small handful of collapses (with no centered text or nesting) talking about favored kinks or inspirations or whatever.
Well, site moderation is close to banning him as well. People keep reporting him when he breaks the rules, and if people keep using the actual "Report User" feature when he breaks the code of conduct that'll be all she wrote.
Mission Impossible: Drow Orgy
Plot: The PCs are Szarkai (white drow) who have been sent up to a major trade city on the surface world in order to run a spy ring. The cover chosen for them is that they are setting up an underground pleasure cult, which is a layer of cover underneath their overt cover as merchants and adventurers who have taken to city life. Various hijinks ensue.
The "official" mission: Get established informants in the city, set up ring of proxy killers, produce potential heirs to prominent local trade houses one way or another, expand the city's underground slave trade and prep the city for open acceptance of slavery in the future.
Tone: Bounces between deadly serious and smut with some light moments.
DM's Fetishes: Blackmail, breeding, BDSM, corruption rape, humiliation, exhibitionism, non-human on human, prostitution, slavery, and various others.
Gameplay balance: 33% smut, 33% intrigue, 33% crunch, subject to adjustment
Characters: Drow, specifically Szarkai, preferred. Gender unimportant.
Initial interest level?
Scheming to get someone banned is pretty fucked up, just sayin'. If that's the thing that brings you joy, you might wanna reconsider your approach to life.
Don't worry, you've already succeeded in running me off, so please spare the rest of the thread from the puppy, circus, etc posts that will just waste time and take things off-topic; I won't be sticking around to respond. Just poked my head in briefly out of boredom. I really shouldn't have been surprised at what I saw.
Seriously Lili, take a break and relax.
Shitshow of random assholes on the internet should not affect anybody this much.
I don't want your post to be completely ignored, but at the same time I have zero interests in any of those kinks so...
They're not particularly unusual so I imagine someone would be interested.
You must die to be reborn, but... I dunno. Things are so threadbare already. There isn't enough to reconstitute if the structure collapses - or at least there isn't enough to make reconstitution worthwhile.
Sure some of us will take all they have and look for greener pastures, many of us already have, but as a veteran of these sort of things I can tell ya that there'll definitely be enough old and new blood to start building again once the dust has finally settled and we've given it enough time. There always is. What rises up in our place might look a little different, or a lot different, but I can definitely say a bit of reconstruction is what these threads desperately need.
You're gonna post that image when you've gone ballistic and refused to be my friend all over me giving someone a warning that some of the posters in /tg/chat are loudly misinformed about transgender people? You keep shouting about slander and hearsay and you're gonna give someone else the "close your eyes nigga"?
No. I give up. I'm tired of constantly making these threads only to have assholes spend most of it talking about how I'm so terrible, or shitting them up trying to ruin my game. Go back and look at every post dK5UfMAU made in this thread. They're all bitching about me. And it's allegedly a jealous player who's pissed off that I said she wouldn't fit in my game. I thought kicking someone before we were at each other's throats would be a good idea. Apparently it was the worst decision I made.
And now they've spent the whole fucking thread bitching about me and driven Lili off. I'm pretty sure I know who the poster is, but asking them in chat and I get the old "wasn't me" and I can't just ban someone on suspicion. Of course, one of the reasons they haven't posted their profile is because they're too chickenshit for anyone to know just who they are.
Then I've got former friends like DM jumping down my throat about every little fucking thing, because her jokes are jokes and my jokes are slander. I've even got people who I at least assume don't hate me, like Traveller (assuming that's who >>23283336 is), willing to jump in at every opportunity to go "you don't even play".
So fuck it. Let Red handle the threads from now on. Everyone would rather bitch and moan about me instead of actually fucking posting anyway.
The longer a response takes, the more crushing the burden of expectations becomes.
>Let Red handle the threads from now on.
I should probably let you know that I'm kind of in the middle of moving and starting a new job right now. It's gonna take me a few weeks to figure out what kind of slack I'll have in the new schedule.
Opening posts are tricky. Sometimes it takes a while to get into gear. If you're already into things, though, then it can't be helped. I think everybody has ended up in the middle of a scene wondering "Christ, the hell am I doing here?" at least once.
Are they ESL? I've done scenes with some ESL people whose syntax is kinda awkward, but I've always been willing to give them (some of) the benefit of the doubt there.
I'm okay with insulting people's writing, but I'm a little more hesitant to call them out specifically. I'm kind of afraid they'll see this thread and recognize their words. Maybe I'm paranoid.
I don't think so. Maybe dyslexic? But their conversational writing isn't too bad.
What's my fault, then? Is it my fault that dK5UfMAU jumps up my ass because she's jealous that she doesn't get to be in my game? Is it my fault that you jump up my ass? Is it my fault that >>23283461 people make a single post in the thread to question if I'm banned yet? And then >>23283472 first-time-in-the-thread posters reply just to chime in?
For fucks sake you even agree that I've got "hatestalkers" >>23285440 you just change your tune when I point out that you're adding to the shitpile, all because you're pissed off over something stupid.
Good. Let it burn. Maybe we can all come back in a month or two when all the old people have forgotten about /soc/ and we can get some new blood.
It's your fault because you've always been an ass.
It's your fault because you always picked arguments in tg until you got kicked, your fault because you presented yourself as some know-all end-all of rp knowledge in threads, your fault because you hijacked thread creation and tried to direct people into some dingy channel created and moderated by you rather than the actual place where all of us met.
It's your fault because you were always a baiting faggot, an ass that would OOC attack friends and randoms that never did anything to you just because you were playing characters with shitty attitudes.
You outright invented things to mislead people away, maliciously removed all traces of /tg/chat from the threads and at the same time you permanently drove the irc guys away from this place too, when they requested people be more mindful of their rules. You though you knew better though, so of course you dismissed them and pissed them off.
You made the threads elitist, circlejerky and conformed to what you and just you wanted. You polluted half a dozen chatrooms with your neverending cycle of arguing and pity hunting. You were sanctimonious, insulting with most and dismissive of the rest.
You are the reason these threads died. You are part of the reason why newcomers stopped coming. Split the community, tired everyone out and the worst thing about it? It's not the first time you've done it.
You should do what these threads need to do and just vanish.