Is the truth really non binary?

>>7855885
op why did you post a screenshot from my facebook?

>>7855885
You can define it like that if you want.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuzzy_logic

File: 1451491891953.gif (24KB, 210x200px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 210x200px

>>7855885

it's trinary :^)

>>7855885
Truth is as non-binary as gender is.

>>7855905
>Fuzzy set theory defines fuzzy operators on fuzzy sets
I hate you.

File: 579128769124.png (27KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 400x400px

fuck this guy i'm gonna find his facebook and shit all over him

>>7855885
>Is the truth really non binary?
Nothing we know can be, since we can not be certain of anything.

Whether or not beyond our own uncertainty actual truth exists or if it stays simply a collection of probable answers no matter how refined the understanding of something could be, we dont know, because even if there was absolute truth, and even if we saw it, we wouldn't know we were looking at it.

>>7855885
Are you gay? The truth is non-binary.

>>7856082
While a strictly correct perspective, it is still a garbage one.

Also: implications given axioms, that is an absolute correctness.

>>7855885
Formulas depend on the signature of the signature. Then you must define a language in that type. Then you can talk about structures in which formulas in that language are satisfied.

>>7856747
Signature of language, my b senpai.

>>7856082
That's not true. We can know math.

>>7855885
I don't get it. Is he trying to imply gender is an analog quantity rather than a digital one?

Truth is how things actually are. What is inadequate is human language which leaves too much room for interpretation.

>>7857372

This by the way is the main reason for use of math in science. Math is used a lot in physics, for example, because words are not sufficient enough.

>>7855885
of course truth is binary, but we can only know it with a nonzero error probability

>>7856082
>we can not be certain of anything
Are you certain of that?