NASA JWST leak

> they blurred some cables and some metal thingies
wow. its fucking nothing.

>>7849315
DELETE THIS

>>7849326
I'm downloading the hd 60fps video editing version I'm in TOO FUCKING DEEP TO GO BACK NOW

>>7849329
but theres nothing in the part they forgot to blur

>>7849334
are you autistic? Why would they blur it in the first place?

>>7849315
why did they blur it?

>>7849339
HMMM I WONDER MAYBE IT'S BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT THE FUCKING CHINESE STEALING IT?!!?!?!?

>>7849348
chinese stealing what ? You can't tell shit from 3 pixels of unblurred shit

>>7849352
hey anon quick question are you chinese?

>>7849357
nope.

>>7849364
THEN HOW THE FUCK WOULD YOU KNOW?

>>7849370
because I have eyes and I can see the imblurred part.

>>7849377
No I mean how the fuck would you know what the chinese can and cannot take from this image?

>>7849352
Ackchually you can reverse engineer a lot from just a picture . I was just in an RC forum where everyone was trying to work out how this guy managed to build a drone powerful enough to lift a person. One guy analyzed the frequency of the propeller noise to work out the propeller RPM and another guy counted pixels to work out the propeller diameter. That was a video yes but if some RC neckbeards got tat much off of a grainy youtube video I'm sure the Chinese space agency could glean 100x that from just a still image.

>>7849315
Can't see shit, captain.

>>7849380
speaking another language doesn't magically see things that aren't there. the part where you deblurred is just a metal plate and a few hinges. If it was that simple they would have figured it out already.

File: Untitled5432.jpg (62KB, 542x503px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 542x503px

>>7849389
Are you kidding?! LOOK AT ALL THESE SECRETS!

>>7849394
Okay you know what? I'll come clean. Here's what I expected: post the post, get comments saying how it's useless, argue and be racist for cheap humor. but fuck, if you guys can really crack this I'm down.

Fuck bluring in the first place. They probably had to do it because this one senator is paranoid AF about the chinese stealing our 'space secrets'.

Motherfucker fucked up NTRS

>>7849402
Well the only thing that catches my eye is the yellow part with the black lines across it. the black parts below it might be some component of the telescope that we'd rather keep secret.
Fuck if I know anything about how this telescope will work, though.

File: Unbenannt.png (419KB, 542x503px) Image search: [Google]

419KB, 542x503px

>>7849394
look at all these secrets

>>7849414
the yellow part with black lines across it is a hole with wires going over it
the yellow you're seeing is the railing behind it

>>7849422
oh yeah, clearly.

>>7849415
10/10

>>7849427
There are two rings there, an open space for the wires, and what seems to be a port.

File: Unbenannt.jpg (72KB, 542x503px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 542x503px

>>7849415
another one

>>7849426
not sure if you're being sarcastic or not but look at the railing on the right side of the image and you can tell it lines up with the hole

>>7849435
What does the video look like? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcB13kWDGVM

>>7849435
No I'm not being sarcastic, I feel kind of dumb for not seeing it that way at first, i blame the low quality of the image. Oh well.

>>7849442
In the video, the wires move with the machine they don't stay with the railing I'm pretty sure

>>7849443
yes the wires stay with the machine that wasn't the point
the point was there's a hole behind the wires and that's where the yellow comes from

>>7849454
Don't worry, it's obvious that the yellow is the railing.

>>7849464
But do you see the main roundy drill bit between the rings?

>>7849465
That might be where light is being reflected, and the rings might be there to distribute some type of energy, maybe light, or fuel.

>>7849467
The whole might either be:
1: A whole for another segment to connect to

>>7849477
Or
2: Another intentional open point to possibly distribute force or energy

File: DOUBLE FUCK NASA.jpg (852KB, 3768x2328px) Image search: [Google]

852KB, 3768x2328px

>>7849478
HOLY FUCKING SHIT SECOND IMAGE

>>7849498
Kek, NASA dun' goofed.

>>7849498
any more secrets?

>>7849498
How many seconds in is this?

File: zoomin.png (790KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

790KB, 1920x1080px

>>7849502
what can be found now?

File: JWST Leak 1.png (1MB, 1440x900px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x900px

First pic for those who need it.

>>7849506
Exactly 1 minute in, about

>>7849509
I'm seeing some kind of mini engine/motor on the bottom of it, next to a beige square at the VERY bottom left of the contraption.

>>7849522
Currently I am at the process of extracting every single frame from this video to see if I can find any more

>>7849532
Finished converting.

Should we get any other boards involved? Maybe a different chan?

>>7849537
Maybe we should.

>>7849541
Should we bring in /b/?

>>7849544
Your move.

>>7849552
Fuck I want to but I don't know how

>>7849556
I've never done this previously, should I tell them to come to our board, or should I create a new one in /b/?

>>7849315
OP, why would NASA want to blur something like this? What's the importance?

>>7849560
Isn't that part of what we're trying to find out?

>>7849559
No, you should just make a thread on /b/, if you're going to do it. My main concern is that /b/ won't really care for this. I mean, /b/ has really gone to shit recently.

>>7849566
I'll start with /g/ (technology) first.

>>7849567
thread has been posted.

>>7849576
Lurking thread.

>>7849582
>>>/g/52909952

>>7849591
Ah fuck it it'll go to /b/.

File: OE_51_1_011003_f012.png (525KB, 1343x866px) Image search: [Google]

525KB, 1343x866px

ENHANCE!

>>7849601
oh shit is that you /g/?

>>7849606
Alright post has been sent to /b/
>>>/b/668286965

>>7849601
WE NEED TO GO DEEPER!
www.esmats.eu/amspapers/pastpapers/pdfs/2006/warden.pdf

The mirrors will curve to form one portion of a giant sphere

>>7849621
/b/ has begun to respond.

>>7849625
/b/ is a fast moving board. Don't know how longer we can keep the thread.

Why is it kept a secret anyway?

>>7849629
That is part of what we're trying to figure out!

>>7849629
No clue.

>>7849315
the samefaggin on this bread is pretty good

>>7849631
How valuable must it really be if the want to censor it?

>>7849635
op just kill yourself no one cares about your little nigger fantasy about sucking cocks

So in the video are we looking at some kind of gantry mounted laser measuring device to calculate the accuracy of the component mirrors?

>>7849638
/b/ was a mistake

>>7849639
and if so they blur it out because they signed an NDA with the contractor who makes the tool?

>>7849639
PDF mentions a "cryogenic nano actuator for JWST", probably what it is.

>>7849639
those are the mirror segments, the bottom, which would either be an engine or mirror contraption, is what's blurred out.

>>7849641
we opened the valve

Thread on /b/ is dead.

>>7849651
/b/ has 404'd

>>7849642
In that case why would they blur it out?

>>7849641
>Intelligence and serious discussion between boards (/sci/ and /g/)
>Maybe /b/ can help
>op just kill yourself no one cares about your little nigger fantasy about sucking cocks

It was a nice thought

>>7849660
Intelligent*

Damn phone

>>7849660
It was nice while it lasted.

>>7849665
No it was not

Its probably just shit they want patents on but haven't gotten them yet

>>7849658
Im beginning to think it has something to do with the specific mechanism that connects the mirror to the frame? But Im pretty sure it has to do with protection of unpatented mechanisms

>>7849315
OP, why are we still worrying about this? It it not just this:
>>7849612

File: This is a load of barnacles.jpg (12KB, 236x236px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 236x236px

>>7849665

>>7849672
No, because at this point, they may have needed to make a dramatic change to their design. That source seems too old at this point.

>>7849630
Blah blah blah export controls. NASA has to deal with a lot of export control bullshit all the time, because SPEHS SEKRITS. Even though what they are hiding has been written up in a journal, they still have to hide it because politicians are dumb.

>>7849671
Hahaha no JWST was designed like 10 years ago, anything patent worthy has already been patented

>>7849677
It takes a long fucking time to build space stuff.

>>7849315
/g/ here, It's blurred because it's proprietary. They're just under a standard NDA.

>>7849682
well then, I have another idea.

>>7849685
If there's nothing "saucy" left for uncovering, then we should do the only thing left for us.

>>7849688
Go on...

>>7849688
How do we fuck with nasa using these images?

>>7849690
Can we get the someone to sue?

>>7849691
BRB I have to make a cake

>>7849691
Should we just spread it and hope for the worst? NASA may just blur out the video and replied it.

>>7849691
I could use some of them nasa bucks

>>7849697
do that. title it: NASA exposed etc. blackmail em. use youtube to mp4 and screenshot, etc. Can you all do this?

>>7849696
*reupload

>>7849703
youtube to mp4, upload the exposed version.

>>7849706
I have to go back a literal chocolate cake brb.

>>7849690
that may costs someone a job, seems pretty mean spirited if you ask me.

>>7849708
don't let this thread die. We need to expose NASA one way or another.

>>7849715
This is 4chan remember? Every mistake leads to a lesson. If NASA suffers the consequences, they'll learn a lesson. If two damn angles of the jwst was exposed by accident, maybe the guy does need to be fired.

>>7849690
Why would you want to do that?

A senator once freaked the fuck out that NASA had technical reports online, so he made them shut down everything and take out anything with defense applications because CHINA MIGHT READ EM. Despite the fact that these reports were published elsewhere, except paywalled.

So now we can't read up on airflow over fucking biplanes, because biplanes had defense applications in the 20s. This one prick made life worse for everyone and increased the amount of bureacratic bullshit NASA had to deal with

http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/tech_ops/read.main/333213/

>>7849715
Incompetence should not be tolerated faggot.

>>7849715
Welcome to 4chan

>>7849715
This may not be /b/ but it's still 4chan

>>7849719
4chan will fulfill its role. Whatever horrors it may bring, maybe people will learn from it. Maybe it might even get better. It's the gamble that we live for. it's why 4chan is pronounced "fortune".

>>7849729
I've successfully beaten the cake mixture to liquid, it's now in the oven.

>>7849735
checking on the cake in 5 min

>>7849738
Did you know that the best way to check if a cake is done is to flip the pan over? If the bottom deforms then the cake is not done!

>>7849738
Goodbye thread, it was fun, but I now have to finish my cake. Do what you will with this thread. I'll come back, maybe in a few hours, with a new thread. new purpose. fucking over nasa. soon, soon. goodbye anons, I have a cake to finish.

>>7849750
yeah, I know.

>>7849755
I am now waiting for the cake to cool.

>>7849805
Cake's finished.