What are the most well thought out theories of "why&quo

File: 51av79NK71L.jpg (46KB, 331x500px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 331x500px

>>7844303
>What are the most well thought out theories of "why" this universe exists

</thread>

>but I feel that scientific minds are perhaps the only ones
capable of tackling it, even if not through science.
Dumbest thing I've read this week.

>>7844313
What alternative do you propose?

>>7844317
>even if not through science.
Scientists should stick to their own fields. So many scientists spout BS on shit they don't know. It's simple, just never speak on something you have little knowledge of, high knowledge in physics doesn't make you knowledgeable in deconstructive criticism. So why would the physicist speak on deconstructive philosophy? Leave it to the philosophers who spent their decades learning that shit, because it really does take decades to learn.

File: chris.jpg (76KB, 1345x770px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1345x770px

Chris Langan's CTMU (Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe) is pretty insightful. Take a gander: http://www.ctmu.org/

>>7844317
No alternative. The question is gibberish.

>>7844303
Because the "Why" chromosome never shuts the fuck up with questions.

>>7844390
You're gibberish

>>7844371
I was obsessed with that for half a year a while back. It's fascinating, yet so beyond me.

But sometimes I've wondered if his CTMU is the result of some kind of as-yet unclassified neurological dysfunction unique to his almost alien levels of hyper-intelligence.

Or maybe he really does understand reality, and he's the only one who can.

>>7844303
Inter-universal TaiChi theory