Why is human cloning banned?

Because you're almost guranteed to either get a stillborn or a deformed retard and even if you don't he's pretty much guranteed to die young.

>>7814226
Cos some people banned it

bcus muh feels

>>7814226

Because of muh scientific ethics n sheeet.

>>7814226
Because they fear to look at clone of Lenin or Tutankhamun

>>7814325

basically this.

also, corporations and enterprising individuals (like myself) would jump at the opportunity to breed and clone an army of cheap mind-controlled workers to increase shareholder value

File: la-ol-donald-trump-greatest-man-world-20150916.jpg (107KB, 1024x715px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 1024x715px

>>7814226
Because lawyers fear questions about inheritance from a clone.

>>7814423
>clone an army of cheap mind-controlled workers
20 years of feeding and educating workers by a firm unprofitable

>>7814428
Trump 2016.

Fuck Hillary 2016.

Think about it. If you clone a gay person and the clone turn out to be straight then it means the gayness is not in the gene.
However, if the clone is still gay than it means it is due to the gene.

There are a lot of scientific usefulness from cloning but nah, it will never happen unless there is a WW3.

>>7814440
>unless there is a WW3
Military do not want wait >18 years while a clone of solder will grow and study.

>>7814457
child soldiers my man

>>7814457
Unless they could be engineering to grow faster from the start. They don't need to live long, in any case, so who cares about the repercussions?

>>7814457
Wars have always encouraged the advance of science. Nuclear race, moon race, etc. were all motivated by wars.
I'm not saying that wars = science advance. However, in wars, people do not care about ethic as much as peace time.

File: pope_benedict_xvi_b(3)__tdwhyba.jpg (217KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 800x600px

>>7814226
Good news 1: we can resurrect a random saint from relics.
Bad news 1: what if he or she, would talk heresy or do not show miracles?
Bad news 2: another life from cloning mean not only one way, Jesus way, of resurrect is.

>>7814226
Because humans think they're special snowflakes compared to the rest of the animal kingdom. It would create minor problems in forensics and religious people hate it but other than that cloning would be amazing. Biology theories could be btfo or validated. Nature vs nature, gayness all that crap. Really though besides research there is no commercial application in human cloning. Harvesting organs would be murder and violation of human rights. Labor, we'll they're just people like the rest of us. Now if you could engineer humans that would be a different story. You could create beings that had a modified human template so they'd basically just be a programmable body. They'd have no mind so they're would be no harm done. So cloning + genetic engineering = huge potential

>>7814321
Not a big problem. If it isn't conscious and can't feel pain yet, it can be discarded.

>>7814479
>Harvesting organs would be murder and violation of human rights

Once again, same applies. If it isn't conscious, nor can it feel pain yet (because it isn't developed enough yet), why not harvest its organs so that those who are actually conscious wouldn't suffer/die because organs for transplantation weren't available?

File: saiceJw.webm (1MB, 250x444px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 250x444px

>>7814226
>Why is human cloning banned?
Never buy a car the first year that model comes out, they're still working out the kinks.
Same deal with cloning.

>>7814515
More like:
Never buy a car, and forbid cars from being manufactured, ever, because I assume that a non-existent magic deity doesn't like to be challenged.

>>7814226
Because it would create someone with the same DNA, fingerprints etc. Law isn't ready for two exact same people to exists simultaneously. It would create lots of problems.

>>7814474
You are aware that cloning someone means that you only grow new organism with the same DNA, right? it doesn't duplicate your memories, skills nor hypothetical soul.

>>7814503
Why would you clone someone if you can just simply grow single organ which is cheaper and easier? It's actually happening with bladders.

>>7814526
>nor hypothetical soul.

Doesn't exist.

>>7814526
>Law isn't ready for two exact same people to exists simultaneously.
Fool, you should understand, age of a clone NOT same as age of an original human, because the clone will grow as an ordinary child.
Just establish database of clones. Cloning is expensive task. Not so many clones will be made for decade.
>it doesn't duplicate your memories, skills
Very interesting question. Because cloning of human still not did, there is not exact answer.
>nor hypothetical soul.
Humans should do no care about that, the heaven and a god already care about that and can do insert a soul into embryo while he growing into a woman womb, in case heaven and a god wish this.

>>7814555
Yes, we know that.
But there are religious people who believe otherwise and they are afraid of human cloning/modifying/resurrecting souls.
If they understood cloning is only about making a new baby with the same DNA as some other person.

>>7814570
>Fool, you should understand, age of a clone NOT same as age of an original human, because the clone will grow as an ordinary child.
I know, it still can create some fuss.
>Very interesting question. Because cloning of human still not did, there is not exact answer.
It doesn't. Your DNA doesn't change during your life, so you can't put any memories/skills/information into your clone.
>Humans should do no care about that, the heaven and a god already care about that and can do insert a soul into embryo while he growing into a woman womb, in case heaven and a god wish this.
There are people who does care about that and (unfortunately) we have to respect that.

>>7814526
>if you can just simply grow single organ which is cheaper and easier?
Japanese Scientists with Chief Takashi Tsuji from Tokyo grew a tooth into 2009 year.
And now into 2016 there still not is offer to grow a tooth, as you can guess, because, trouble with laws about cloning.

>>7814526
No it doesn't, cloning gives you exact copy of cloned person, at the same age and of same memories and abilities

>>7814581
Yea, the laws causes problems in that matter.
But still producing single organ is easier and cheaper than a clone.

>>7814584
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloning?oldformat=true#Artificial_cloning_of_organisms

File: AP_ArmingForWar_245p.jpg (60KB, 557x518px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 557x518px

>>7814440
>unless there is a WW3
>he really thinks that manpower is a deciding factor in modern day wars
WW2: several tens of millions of soldiers
Vietnam: 1,5 million
Iraq: a little over 300k

the age of human wave tactics is over, nobody gives a shit anymore about the sheer number of soldiers

>>7814620
it is in case you have a lot wealth for missiles.

>>7814423
Or if the corporation or enterprising individual wasn't completely retarded, they would instead use machines which are extremely durable, have physical manipulation and computing abilities that far exceed the best human, don't require sleep and nutrition, and can be constructed/maintained in much smaller time frames.

>>7814440

>what are environmental variables acting on gene expression

>>7814321
Dolly the sheep was a clone and lived to be 6 years old (about half of the average life of a sheep) but her death was probably not related to being cloned. Why do you believe it would be much different for humans?

>>7814321
how do we get better at cloning without practicing?

File: Tamerlan.jpg (50KB, 246x400px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 246x400px

>>7814693
How we can make pilaff with out rice?