>>7814457 Wars have always encouraged the advance of science. Nuclear race, moon race, etc. were all motivated by wars. I'm not saying that wars = science advance. However, in wars, people do not care about ethic as much as peace time.
>>7814226 Good news 1: we can resurrect a random saint from relics. Bad news 1: what if he or she, would talk heresy or do not show miracles? Bad news 2: another life from cloning mean not only one way, Jesus way, of resurrect is.
>>7814226 Because humans think they're special snowflakes compared to the rest of the animal kingdom. It would create minor problems in forensics and religious people hate it but other than that cloning would be amazing. Biology theories could be btfo or validated. Nature vs nature, gayness all that crap. Really though besides research there is no commercial application in human cloning. Harvesting organs would be murder and violation of human rights. Labor, we'll they're just people like the rest of us. Now if you could engineer humans that would be a different story. You could create beings that had a modified human template so they'd basically just be a programmable body. They'd have no mind so they're would be no harm done. So cloning + genetic engineering = huge potential
>>7814321 Not a big problem. If it isn't conscious and can't feel pain yet, it can be discarded.
>>7814479 >Harvesting organs would be murder and violation of human rights
Once again, same applies. If it isn't conscious, nor can it feel pain yet (because it isn't developed enough yet), why not harvest its organs so that those who are actually conscious wouldn't suffer/die because organs for transplantation weren't available?
>>7814526 >Law isn't ready for two exact same people to exists simultaneously. Fool, you should understand, age of a clone NOT same as age of an original human, because the clone will grow as an ordinary child. Just establish database of clones. Cloning is expensive task. Not so many clones will be made for decade. >it doesn't duplicate your memories, skills Very interesting question. Because cloning of human still not did, there is not exact answer. >nor hypothetical soul. Humans should do no care about that, the heaven and a god already care about that and can do insert a soul into embryo while he growing into a woman womb, in case heaven and a god wish this.
>>7814555 Yes, we know that. But there are religious people who believe otherwise and they are afraid of human cloning/modifying/resurrecting souls. If they understood cloning is only about making a new baby with the same DNA as some other person.
>>7814570 >Fool, you should understand, age of a clone NOT same as age of an original human, because the clone will grow as an ordinary child. I know, it still can create some fuss. >Very interesting question. Because cloning of human still not did, there is not exact answer. It doesn't. Your DNA doesn't change during your life, so you can't put any memories/skills/information into your clone. >Humans should do no care about that, the heaven and a god already care about that and can do insert a soul into embryo while he growing into a woman womb, in case heaven and a god wish this. There are people who does care about that and (unfortunately) we have to respect that.
>>7814526 >if you can just simply grow single organ which is cheaper and easier? Japanese Scientists with Chief Takashi Tsuji from Tokyo grew a tooth into 2009 year. And now into 2016 there still not is offer to grow a tooth, as you can guess, because, trouble with laws about cloning.
>>7814423 Or if the corporation or enterprising individual wasn't completely retarded, they would instead use machines which are extremely durable, have physical manipulation and computing abilities that far exceed the best human, don't require sleep and nutrition, and can be constructed/maintained in much smaller time frames.
>>7814321 Dolly the sheep was a clone and lived to be 6 years old (about half of the average life of a sheep) but her death was probably not related to being cloned. Why do you believe it would be much different for humans?
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org with the post's information.